Frontiers of Hormone Research
最新影響指數 - 實時趨勢預測 & 期刊影響力排名


最新

影響指數

2020-2021

2.189

35.5%

影響指數趨勢分析

Researchain
One-click to visualize your research performance

Researchain
One-click to visualize your research performance

Researchain
One-click to visualize your research performance

Researchain
One-click to visualize your research performance

相關推薦期刊

熱門瀏覽期刊

Frontiers of Hormone Research

Frontiers of Hormone Research 2020-2021 年的影響指數為2.189。

Frontiers of Hormone Research Impact Factor
最高影響指數
3.304
最高影響指數 IF

近十年Frontiers of Hormone Research的最高影響指數為3.304。

最低影響指數
1.237
最低影響指數 IF

近十年Frontiers of Hormone Research的最低影響指數為1.237。

影響指數 累積成長率
27.9%
影響指數 累積成長率

近十年Frontiers of Hormone Research的影響指數累積成長率為27.9%。

影響指數 平均成長率
3.1%
影響指數 平均成長率

近十年Frontiers of Hormone Research的影響指數平均成長率為3.1%。

期刊影響力排名

子領域 四分位數 排名 百分比
Endocrinology Q3 89/118

Endocrinology 25%

Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism Q3 129/217

Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 40%

期刊影響力排名

· 在Endocrinology研究領域,Frontiers of Hormone Research的四分位數為Q3。Frontiers of Hormone Research在Endocrinology研究類別的118種相關期刊中排名第89。在Endocrinology研究領域,Frontiers of Hormone Research的排名百分位約為25%。
· 在Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism研究領域,Frontiers of Hormone Research的四分位數為Q3。Frontiers of Hormone Research在Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism研究類別的217種相關期刊中排名第129。在Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism研究領域,Frontiers of Hormone Research的排名百分位約為40%。

Frontiers of Hormone Research Impact Factor 2022 Prediction

Frontiers of Hormone Research Impact Factor Predition System

Frontiers of Hormone Research Impact Factor Prediction System is now online. You can start share your valuable insights with the community.

Predict Check All Preditions
期刊出版物總量
523
期刊累積被引用數
9387

出版物數量年度趨勢

期刊被引用量年度趨勢

國際合作趨勢

文獻被引用趨勢

影響指數歷年數據分析

影響指數
影響指數
2019-2020 2.189
2018-2019 1.615
2017-2018 1.321
2016-2017 2.279
2015-2016 3.02
2014-2015 3.304
2013-2014 -
2012-2013 1.237
2011-2012 1.712
影響指數歷年數據分析

· Frontiers of Hormone Research 2019-2020年的影響指數為2.189
· Frontiers of Hormone Research 2018-2019年的影響指數為1.615
· Frontiers of Hormone Research 2017-2018年的影響指數為1.321
· Frontiers of Hormone Research 2016-2017年的影響指數為2.279
· Frontiers of Hormone Research 2015-2016年的影響指數為3.02
· Frontiers of Hormone Research 2014-2015年的影響指數為3.304
Frontiers of Hormone Research2013-2014的影響指數仍在等待計算中,敬請關注!
· Frontiers of Hormone Research 2012-2013年的影響指數為1.237
· Frontiers of Hormone Research 2011-2012年的影響指數為1.712

出版物引用數趨勢分析

出版數量 引用數量
出版数量 引用数量
1975 16 8
1976 0 22
1977 30 42
1978 13 64
1979 0 105
1980 2 85
1981 0 90
1982 0 108
1983 0 57
1984 33 72
1985 8 63
1986 0 52
1987 24 83
1988 1 57
1989 0 72
1990 0 44
1991 14 50
1992 0 39
1993 0 46
1994 0 32
1995 0 36
1996 5 38
1997 4 44
1998 0 28
1999 13 43
2000 1 26
2001 27 59
2002 25 101
2003 0 97
2004 25 151
2005 13 161
2006 27 236
2007 0 275
2008 19 297
2009 14 476
2010 39 585
2011 0 525
2012 0 551
2013 21 461
2014 26 594
2015 17 598
2016 37 536
2017 12 521
2018 19 446
2019 38 540
2020 0 724
2021 0 47
出版物引用數趨勢分析

· Frontiers of Hormone Research於1975年發表了16篇报告,並取得8篇文獻引用。
· Frontiers of Hormone Research於1976年發表了0篇报告,並取得22篇文獻引用。
· Frontiers of Hormone Research於1977年發表了30篇报告,並取得42篇文獻引用。
· Frontiers of Hormone Research於1978年發表了13篇报告,並取得64篇文獻引用。
· Frontiers of Hormone Research於1979年發表了0篇报告,並取得105篇文獻引用。
· Frontiers of Hormone Research於1980年發表了2篇报告,並取得85篇文獻引用。
· Frontiers of Hormone Research於1981年發表了0篇报告,並取得90篇文獻引用。
· Frontiers of Hormone Research於1982年發表了0篇报告,並取得108篇文獻引用。
· Frontiers of Hormone Research於1983年發表了0篇报告,並取得57篇文獻引用。
· Frontiers of Hormone Research於1984年發表了33篇报告,並取得72篇文獻引用。
· Frontiers of Hormone Research於1985年發表了8篇报告,並取得63篇文獻引用。
· Frontiers of Hormone Research於1986年發表了0篇报告,並取得52篇文獻引用。
· Frontiers of Hormone Research於1987年發表了24篇报告,並取得83篇文獻引用。
· Frontiers of Hormone Research於1988年發表了1篇报告,並取得57篇文獻引用。
· Frontiers of Hormone Research於1989年發表了0篇报告,並取得72篇文獻引用。
· Frontiers of Hormone Research於1990年發表了0篇报告,並取得44篇文獻引用。
· Frontiers of Hormone Research於1991年發表了14篇报告,並取得50篇文獻引用。
· Frontiers of Hormone Research於1992年發表了0篇报告,並取得39篇文獻引用。
· Frontiers of Hormone Research於1993年發表了0篇报告,並取得46篇文獻引用。
· Frontiers of Hormone Research於1994年發表了0篇报告,並取得32篇文獻引用。
· Frontiers of Hormone Research於1995年發表了0篇报告,並取得36篇文獻引用。
· Frontiers of Hormone Research於1996年發表了5篇报告,並取得38篇文獻引用。
· Frontiers of Hormone Research於1997年發表了4篇报告,並取得44篇文獻引用。
· Frontiers of Hormone Research於1998年發表了0篇报告,並取得28篇文獻引用。
· Frontiers of Hormone Research於1999年發表了13篇报告,並取得43篇文獻引用。
· Frontiers of Hormone Research於2000年發表了1篇报告,並取得26篇文獻引用。
· Frontiers of Hormone Research於2001年發表了27篇报告,並取得59篇文獻引用。
· Frontiers of Hormone Research於2002年發表了25篇报告,並取得101篇文獻引用。
· Frontiers of Hormone Research於2003年發表了0篇报告,並取得97篇文獻引用。
· Frontiers of Hormone Research於2004年發表了25篇报告,並取得151篇文獻引用。
· Frontiers of Hormone Research於2005年發表了13篇报告,並取得161篇文獻引用。
· Frontiers of Hormone Research於2006年發表了27篇报告,並取得236篇文獻引用。
· Frontiers of Hormone Research於2007年發表了0篇报告,並取得275篇文獻引用。
· Frontiers of Hormone Research於2008年發表了19篇报告,並取得297篇文獻引用。
· Frontiers of Hormone Research於2009年發表了14篇报告,並取得476篇文獻引用。
· Frontiers of Hormone Research於2010年發表了39篇报告,並取得585篇文獻引用。
· Frontiers of Hormone Research於2011年發表了0篇报告,並取得525篇文獻引用。
· Frontiers of Hormone Research於2012年發表了0篇报告,並取得551篇文獻引用。
· Frontiers of Hormone Research於2013年發表了21篇报告,並取得461篇文獻引用。
· Frontiers of Hormone Research於2014年發表了26篇报告,並取得594篇文獻引用。
· Frontiers of Hormone Research於2015年發表了17篇报告,並取得598篇文獻引用。
· Frontiers of Hormone Research於2016年發表了37篇报告,並取得536篇文獻引用。
· Frontiers of Hormone Research於2017年發表了12篇报告,並取得521篇文獻引用。
· Frontiers of Hormone Research於2018年發表了19篇报告,並取得446篇文獻引用。
· Frontiers of Hormone Research於2019年發表了38篇报告,並取得540篇文獻引用。
· Frontiers of Hormone Research於2020年發表了0篇报告,並取得724篇文獻引用。
· Frontiers of Hormone Research於2021年發表了0篇报告,並取得47篇文獻引用。
· Frontiers of Hormone Research的總出版物為523。
· Frontiers of Hormone Research的總引用數為9387。

Frontiers of Hormone Research
基本資訊
Frontiers of Hormone Research | Academic Accelerator - About the Journal

介绍

New sophisticated technologies and methodological approaches in diagnostics and therapeutics have led to significant improvements in identifying and characterizing an increasing number of medical conditions, which is particularly true for all aspects of endocrine and metabolic dysfunctions. Novel insights in endocrine physiology and pathophysiology allow for new perspectives in clinical management and thus lead to the development of molecular, personalized treatments. In view of this, the active interplay between basic scientists and clinicians has become fundamental, both to provide patients with the most appropriate care and to advance future research.The individual volumes of this series explore cutting-edge topics in the field of endocrinology and metabolism, providing the most updated, critical opinions of international leading researchers and clinicians. Going from in vitro studies to daily clinical applications, each volume presents a state-of-the-art overview including a discussion of future perspectives. None

ISSN
0301-3073
ISSN

Frontiers of Hormone Research的ISSN是 0301-3073 ISSN是一個8位數的代碼,用於識別各種報紙,期刊,雜誌和期刊以及所有媒體 - 包括印刷版和電子版。

ISSN (Online)
-
ISSN (Online)

Frontiers of Hormone Research的ISSN(Online)是 - . ISSN是一個8位數的代碼,用於識別各種報紙,期刊,雜誌和期刊以及所有媒體 - 包括印刷版和電子版。

出版社
S. Karger AG
出版社

Frontiers of Hormone Research的出版社是 S. Karger AG

出版頻率
-
出版頻率

Frontiers of Hormone Research publishes reports - .

出版年度
1975, 1977, 1984, 1996-1997, 1999-2002, 2004-2010, 2013-2019
出版年度

Frontiers of Hormone Research的出版年度包含 1975, 1977, 1984, 1996-1997, 1999-2002, 2004-2010, 2013-2019 .

開放取用
NO
開放取用

Frontiers of Hormone Research傳統訂閱 (non-OA) 期刊。出版商擁有其期刊中文章的版權。任何想要閱讀文章的人都應該由個人或機構支付費用來訪問這些文章。任何人想以任何方式使用這些文章都必須獲得出版商的許可。

出版费
Review
出版費

There is no publication fee for submiting manuscript to Frontiers of Hormone Research. Frontiers of Hormone Research is Subscription-based (non-OA) Journal. Publishers own the rights to the articles in their journals. Anyone who wants to read the articles should pay by individual or institution to access the articles.

語言
English
語言

The language of Frontiers of Hormone Research is English .

國家/地區
Switzerland
國家/地區

The publisher of Frontiers of Hormone Research is S. Karger AG , which locates in Switzerland .

What is Impact Factor?

The impact factor (IF) or journal impact factor (JIF) of an academic journal is a scientometric index calculated by Clarivate that reflects the yearly average number of citations of articles published in the last two years in a given journal. It is frequently used as a proxy for the relative importance of a journal within its field; journals with higher impact factor values are often deemed to be more important, or carry more intrinsic prestige in their respective fields, than those with lower values.

Frontiers of Hormone Research | Academic Accelerator - About the Impact Factor

Impact factor is commonly used to evaluate the relative importance of a journal within its field and to measure the frequency with which the “average article” in a journal has been cited in a particular time period. Journal which publishes more review articles will get highest IFs. Journals with higher IFs believed to be more important than those with lower ones. According to Eugene Garfield “impact simply reflects the ability of the journals and editors to attract the best paper available.” Journal which publishes more review articles will get maximum IFs. The Impact Factor of an academic journal is a scientometric Metric that reflects the yearly average number of citations that recent articles published in a given journal received. It is frequently used as a Metric for the relative importance of a journal within its field; journals with higher Impact Factor are often deemed to be more important than those with lower ones. The Frontiers of Hormone Research Impact Factor IF measures the average number of citations received in a particular year (2020) by papers published in the Frontiers of Hormone Research during the two preceding years (2018-2019). Note that 2020 Impact Factor are reported in 2021; they cannot be calculated until all of the 2020 publications have been processed by the indexing agency. New journals, which are indexed from their first published issue, will receive an impact factor after two years of indexing; in this case, the citations to the year prior to Volume 1, and the number of articles published in the year prior to Volume 1, are known zero values. Journals that are indexed starting with a volume other than the first volume will not get an impact factor until they have been indexed for three years. Occasionally, Journal Citation Reports assigns an impact factor to new journals with less than two years of indexing, based on partial citation data. The calculation always uses two complete and known years of item counts, but for new titles one of the known counts is zero. Annuals and other irregular publications sometimes publish no items in a particular year, affecting the count. The impact factor relates to a specific time period; it is possible to calculate it for any desired period. In addition to the 2-year Impact Factor, the 3-year Impact Factor, 4-year Impact Factor, 5-year Impact Factor, Real-Time Impact Factor can provide further insights and factors into the impact of Frontiers of Hormone Research.

History

The impact factor was devised by Eugene Garfield, the founder of the Institute for Scientific Information (ISI). Impact factors are calculated yearly starting from 1975 for journals listed in the Journal Citation Reports (JCR). ISI was acquired by Thomson Scientific & Healthcare in 1992, and became known as Thomson ISI. In 2018, Thomson ISI was sold to Onex Corporation and Baring Private Equity Asia. They founded a new corporation, Clarivate, which is now the publisher of the JCR.

Use

The impact factor is used to compare different journals within a certain field. The Web of Science indexes more than 11,500 science and social science journals. Journal impact factors are often used to evaluate the merit of individual articles and individual researchers. This use of impact factors was summarised by Hoeffel:

Impact Factor is not a perfect tool to measure the quality of articles but there is nothing better and it has the advantage of already being in existence and is, therefore, a good technique for scientific evaluation. Experience has shown that in each specialty the best journals are those in which it is most difficult to have an article accepted, and these are the journals that have a high impact factor. Most of these journals existed long before the impact factor was devised. The use of impact factor as a measure of quality is widespread because it fits well with the opinion we have in each field of the best journals in our specialty....In conclusion, prestigious journals publish papers of high level. Therefore, their impact factor is high, and not the contrary.

Eugene Garfield

In brief, Impact factors may be used by:
  • Authors to decide where to submit an article for publication.
  • Libraries to make collection development decisions
  • Academic departments to assess academic productivity
  • Academic departments to make decisions on promotion and tenure.
As impact factors are a journal-level metric, rather than an article- or individual-level metric, this use is controversial. Garfield agrees with Hoeffel,but warns about the "misuse in evaluating individuals" because there is "a wide variation [of citations] from article to article within a single journal". Other things to consider about Impact Factors:
  • Many journals do not have an impact factor.
  • The impact factor cannot assess the quality of individual articles. Even if citations were evenly distributed among articles, the impact factor would only measure the interests of other researchers in an article, not its importance and usefulness.
  • Only research articles, technical notes and reviews are “citable” items. Editorials, letters, news items and meeting abstracts are “non-citable items”.
  • Only a small percentage of articles are highly cited and they are found in a small subset of journals. This small proportion accounts for a large percentage of citations.
  • Controversial papers, such as those based on fraudulent data, may be highly cited, distorting the impact factor of a journal.
  • Citation bias may exist. For example, English language resources may be favoured. Authors may cite their own work.
Moreover, informed and careful use of these impact data is essential, and should be based on a thorough understanding of the methodology used to generate impact factors. There are controversial aspects of using impact factors:
  • It is not clear whether the number of times a paper is cited measures its actual quality.
  • Some databases that calculate impact factors fail to incorporate publications including textbooks, handbooks and reference books.
  • Certain disciplines have low numbers of journals and usage. Therefore, one should only compare journals or researchers within the same discipline.
  • Review articles normally are cited more often and therefore can skew results.
  • Self-citing may also skew results.
  • Some resources used to calculate impact factors have inadequate international coverage.
  • Editorial policies can artificially inflate an impact factor.
Impact factors have often been used in advancement and tenure decision-making. Many recognize that this is a coarse tool for such important decisions, and that a multitude of factors should be taken into account in these deliberations. When considering the use of the impact factor (IF), keep these aspects in mind:
  • IF analysis is limited to citations from the journals indexed by the Web of Science/Web of Knowledge. Currently, the Web of Science indexes only 8621 journals across the full breadth of the sciences, and just 3121 in the social sciences.
  • A high IF/citation rate says nothing about the quality -- or even, validity -- of the references being cited. Notorious or even retracted articles often attract a lot of attention, hence a high number of citations. The notority related to the first publication on "cold fusion" is one such example.
  • Journals that publish more "review articles" are often found near the top of the rankings. While not known for publishing new, creative findings, these individual articles tend to be heavily cited.
  • The IF measures the average number of citations to articles in the journal -- given this, a small number of highly-cited articles will skew the figure.
  • It takes several years for new journals to be added to the list of titles indexed by the Web of Science/Web of Knowledge, so these newer titles will be under-represented.
  • It's alleged that journal editors have learned to "game" the system, encouraging authors to cite their works previously published in the same journal.
Comparing Journals Across Disciplines? Not a good idea! Using Impact Factors within a given discipline should only be done with great care, as described above. Using impact factor data to compare journals across disciplines is even more problematic. Here are some of the reasons:
  • Disciplines where older literature is still referenced, such as Chemistry and Mathematics, offer challenges to the methodolgy since older citations (older than two years) are not used to calculate the impact factor for a given journal. (Five-year impact factor analysis, which can be calculated using the Journal Citation Index database, helps smooth out this problem only to some degree.)
  • Different disciplines have different practices regarding tendency to cite larger numbers of references. Higher overall citation rates will bump upward impact factor measurements.
  • Where it's common for large numbers of authors to collaborate on a single paper, such as in Physics, the tendency of authors to cite themselves (and in this case, more authors) will result in increased citation rates.

Pros and Cons of the Impact Factor

Pros:

  • A vetted, established metric for measuring journal impact within a discipline.
  • Designed to eliminate bias based on journal size and frequency.
Cons:
  • Individual articles makes an uneven contribution to overall Impact Factor.
  • Impact Factor does not account for certain things, things like context (postive or negative citaion) and intentionality (self-citation).
  • The metric is proprietary to and bound by the contents of the Thomson Reuters database.
  • Citations, on which the Impact Factor is based, count for less than 1% of an article's overall use.

Criticism

Numerous critiques have been made regarding the use of impact factors. A 2007 study noted that the most fundamental flaw is that impact factors present the mean of data that are not normally distributed, and suggested that it would be more appropriate to present the median of these data. There is also a more general debate on the validity of the impact factor as a measure of journal importance and the effect of policies that editors may adopt to boost their impact factor (perhaps to the detriment of readers and writers). Other criticism focuses on the effect of the impact factor on behavior of scholars, editors and other stakeholders. Others have made more general criticisms, arguing that emphasis on impact factor results from negative influence of neoliberal policies on academia claiming that what is needed is not just replacement of the impact factor with more sophisticated metrics for science publications but also discussion on the social value of research assessment and the growing precariousness of scientific careers in higher education.
Experts stress that there are limitations in using impact factors to evaluate a scholar's work. There are many reasons cited for not relying on impact factor alone to evaluate the output of a particular individual. Among these are the following:

  • A single factor is not sufficient for evaluating an author's work.
  • Journal values are meaningless unless compared within the same discipline. Impact factors vary among disciplines.
  • The impact factor was originally devised to show the impact of a specific journal, not a specific scholar. The quality and impact of the author's work may extend beyond the impact of a particular journal.
According to Jim Testa, a researcher for ThomsonReuters Scientific, the most widespread misuse of the Impact Factor is to evaluate the work of an individual author (instead of a journal). "To say that because a researcher is publishing in a certain journal, he or she is more influential or deserves more credit is not necessarily true. There are many other variables to consider." (interview 6/26/2008 in Thomson Reuters blog entry)

什麼是影響指數?

影響指數(IF)經常用作表明期刊對其領域重要性的指標。它是由科學信息研究所的創始人Eugene Garfield首次提出的。儘管IF被機構和臨床醫生廣泛使用,但是人們對於IF日記的計算方法,其意義以及如何利用它存在著廣泛的誤解。期刊的影響指數與同行評議過程的質量和期刊的內容質量等因素無關,而是一種反映對期刊,書籍,論文,項目報告,報紙上發表的文章的平均引用次數的度量,會議/研討會論文集,在互聯網上發布的文件,說明以及任何其他批准的文件。

Frontiers of Hormone Research | Academic Accelerator - About the Impact Factor

影響指數通常用於評估期刊在其領域內的相對重要性,以及衡量期刊在特定時間段內引用“平均文章”的頻率。發表更多評論文章的期刊將獲得最高的IF。 IF較高的期刊被認為比IF較低的期刊更重要。根據尤金·加菲爾德(Eugene Garfield)的說法,“影響只是反映期刊和編輯吸引最佳論文的能力。”發表更多評論文章的期刊將獲得最大的IF。

Selected Articles

Full Title Authors
Full Title Authors