Last updated on

Marine Technology Society Journal
Latest Impact Factor IF - Analysis · Trend · Prediction · Ranking


User Feedback

Journal Impact IF

2020-2021

0.708

14.4%

Journal Impact IF Trend

Researchain
One-click to visualize your research performance

Researchain
One-click to visualize your research performance

Researchain
One-click to visualize your research performance

Researchain
One-click to visualize your research performance

Popular Journals

Highly Cited Articles

Marine Technology Society Journal

High Impact Research Articles
Publication Title Author Listing
Publication Title Author Listing

Journal Research Scope

Marine Technology Society Journal

Research Scope
Marine Technology Society Journal | Academic Accelerator - About the Journal

Research Scope

Marine Technology Society Journal

Research Scope

Journal Impact IF Ranking

Marine Technology Society Journal

Journal Impact IF Ranking
Subcategory Quartile Rank Percentile
Ocean Engineering Q3 60/96

Ocean Engineering 38%

Oceanography Q3 96/128

Oceanography 25%

Journal Impact IF Ranking

· In the Ocean Engineering research field, the Quartile of Marine Technology Society Journal is Q3. Marine Technology Society Journal has been ranked #60 over 96 related journals in the Ocean Engineering research category. The ranking percentile of Marine Technology Society Journal is around 38% in the field of Ocean Engineering.
· In the Oceanography research field, the Quartile of Marine Technology Society Journal is Q3. Marine Technology Society Journal has been ranked #96 over 128 related journals in the Oceanography research category. The ranking percentile of Marine Technology Society Journal is around 25% in the field of Oceanography.

Related Journals

Marine Technology Society Journal

Similar Journals

Marine Technology Society Journal

The 2020-2021 Journal Impact IF of Marine Technology Society Journal is 0.708, which is just updated in 2021.

Marine Technology Society Journal Impact Factor
Highest IF
1.07
Highest Journal Impact IF

The highest Journal Impact IF of Marine Technology Society Journal is 1.07.

Lowest IF
0.434
Lowest Journal Impact IF

The lowest Journal Impact IF of Marine Technology Society Journal is 0.434.

Total Growth Rate
34.1%
IF Total Growth Rate

The total growth rate of Marine Technology Society Journal IF is 34.1%.

Annual Growth Rate
3.4%
IF Annual Growth Rate

The annual growth rate of Marine Technology Society Journal IF is 3.4%.

Journal Impact IF History

Marine Technology Society Journal

Journal Impact IF Trend

Year Journal Impact IF
Year Journal Impact IF
2021-2022 Check our Real-Time Impact Factor and Impact Factor Prediction Results
2020-2021 0.619
2019-2020 1.07
2018-2019 0.708
2017-2018 0.727
2016-2017 0.59
2015-2016 0.434
2014-2015 0.757
2013-2014 0.678
2012-2013 0.528
Journal Impact IF History

· The 2020-2021 Journal Impact IF of Marine Technology Society Journal is 0.619
· The 2019-2020 Journal Impact IF of Marine Technology Society Journal is 1.07
· The 2018-2019 Journal Impact IF of Marine Technology Society Journal is 0.708
· The 2017-2018 Journal Impact IF of Marine Technology Society Journal is 0.727
· The 2016-2017 Journal Impact IF of Marine Technology Society Journal is 0.59
· The 2015-2016 Journal Impact IF of Marine Technology Society Journal is 0.434
· The 2014-2015 Journal Impact IF of Marine Technology Society Journal is 0.757
· The 2013-2014 Journal Impact IF of Marine Technology Society Journal is 0.678
· The 2012-2013 Journal Impact IF of Marine Technology Society Journal is 0.528

Marine Technology Society Journal

Journal Key Metrics
Journal Title Marine Technology Society Journal
ISSN 0025-3324
ISSN (Online) -
Publisher
Marine Technology Society Inc.
Publication Frequency
Bimonthly
Coverage
1969-1987, 1993-2020
Open Access
NO
Language
English
Highest Impact Factor (2011 - 2021) 1.07
Lowest Impact Factor (2011 - 2021) 0.434
Total Impact Factor IF Growth Rate (2011 - 2021) 34.1%
Avarage Impact Factor IF Growth Rate (2011 - 2021) 3.4%
Annual Impact Factor IF Growth Rate (2020 - 2021) 14.4 %
Publication Fee
Homepage
Submit Manuscript

Marine Technology Society Journal

Impact Factor 2021-2022 Prediction
Marine Technology Society Journal Impact Factor Predition System

Marine Technology Society Journal Impact Factor Prediction System is now online. You can start share your valuable insights with the community.

Predict Check All Preditions

What is Impact Factor?

The impact factor (IF) or journal impact factor (JIF) of an academic journal is a scientometric index calculated by Clarivate that reflects the yearly average number of citations of articles published in the last two years in a given journal. It is frequently used as a proxy for the relative importance of a journal within its field; journals with higher impact factor values are often deemed to be more important, or carry more intrinsic prestige in their respective fields, than those with lower values.

Marine Technology Society Journal | Academic Accelerator - About the Impact Factor

Impact factor is commonly used to evaluate the relative importance of a journal within its field and to measure the frequency with which the “average article” in a journal has been cited in a particular time period. Journal which publishes more review articles will get highest IFs. Journals with higher IFs believed to be more important than those with lower ones. According to Eugene Garfield “impact simply reflects the ability of the journals and editors to attract the best paper available.” Journal which publishes more review articles will get maximum IFs. The Impact Factor of an academic journal is a scientometric Metric that reflects the yearly average number of citations that recent articles published in a given journal received. It is frequently used as a Metric for the relative importance of a journal within its field; journals with higher Impact Factor are often deemed to be more important than those with lower ones. The Marine Technology Society Journal Impact Factor IF measures the average number of citations received in a particular year (2020) by papers published in the Marine Technology Society Journal during the two preceding years (2018-2019). Note that 2020 Impact Factor are reported in 2021; they cannot be calculated until all of the 2020 publications have been processed by the indexing agency. New journals, which are indexed from their first published issue, will receive an impact factor after two years of indexing; in this case, the citations to the year prior to Volume 1, and the number of articles published in the year prior to Volume 1, are known zero values. Journals that are indexed starting with a volume other than the first volume will not get an impact factor until they have been indexed for three years. Occasionally, Journal Citation Reports assigns an impact factor to new journals with less than two years of indexing, based on partial citation data. The calculation always uses two complete and known years of item counts, but for new titles one of the known counts is zero. Annuals and other irregular publications sometimes publish no items in a particular year, affecting the count. The impact factor relates to a specific time period; it is possible to calculate it for any desired period. In addition to the 2-year Impact Factor, the 3-year Impact Factor, 4-year Impact Factor, 5-year Impact Factor, Real-Time Impact Factor can provide further insights and factors into the impact of Marine Technology Society Journal.

History

The impact factor was devised by Eugene Garfield, the founder of the Institute for Scientific Information (ISI). Impact factors are calculated yearly starting from 1975 for journals listed in the Journal Citation Reports (JCR). ISI was acquired by Thomson Scientific & Healthcare in 1992, and became known as Thomson ISI. In 2018, Thomson ISI was sold to Onex Corporation and Baring Private Equity Asia. They founded a new corporation, Clarivate, which is now the publisher of the JCR.

Use

The impact factor is used to compare different journals within a certain field. The Web of Science indexes more than 11,500 science and social science journals. Journal impact factors are often used to evaluate the merit of individual articles and individual researchers. This use of impact factors was summarised by Hoeffel:

Impact Factor is not a perfect tool to measure the quality of articles but there is nothing better and it has the advantage of already being in existence and is, therefore, a good technique for scientific evaluation. Experience has shown that in each specialty the best journals are those in which it is most difficult to have an article accepted, and these are the journals that have a high impact factor. Most of these journals existed long before the impact factor was devised. The use of impact factor as a measure of quality is widespread because it fits well with the opinion we have in each field of the best journals in our specialty....In conclusion, prestigious journals publish papers of high level. Therefore, their impact factor is high, and not the contrary.

Eugene Garfield

In brief, Impact factors may be used by:
  • Authors to decide where to submit an article for publication.
  • Libraries to make collection development decisions
  • Academic departments to assess academic productivity
  • Academic departments to make decisions on promotion and tenure.
As impact factors are a journal-level metric, rather than an article- or individual-level metric, this use is controversial. Garfield agrees with Hoeffel,but warns about the "misuse in evaluating individuals" because there is "a wide variation [of citations] from article to article within a single journal". Other things to consider about Impact Factors:
  • Many journals do not have an impact factor.
  • The impact factor cannot assess the quality of individual articles. Even if citations were evenly distributed among articles, the impact factor would only measure the interests of other researchers in an article, not its importance and usefulness.
  • Only research articles, technical notes and reviews are “citable” items. Editorials, letters, news items and meeting abstracts are “non-citable items”.
  • Only a small percentage of articles are highly cited and they are found in a small subset of journals. This small proportion accounts for a large percentage of citations.
  • Controversial papers, such as those based on fraudulent data, may be highly cited, distorting the impact factor of a journal.
  • Citation bias may exist. For example, English language resources may be favoured. Authors may cite their own work.
Moreover, informed and careful use of these impact data is essential, and should be based on a thorough understanding of the methodology used to generate impact factors. There are controversial aspects of using impact factors:
  • It is not clear whether the number of times a paper is cited measures its actual quality.
  • Some databases that calculate impact factors fail to incorporate publications including textbooks, handbooks and reference books.
  • Certain disciplines have low numbers of journals and usage. Therefore, one should only compare journals or researchers within the same discipline.
  • Review articles normally are cited more often and therefore can skew results.
  • Self-citing may also skew results.
  • Some resources used to calculate impact factors have inadequate international coverage.
  • Editorial policies can artificially inflate an impact factor.
Impact factors have often been used in advancement and tenure decision-making. Many recognize that this is a coarse tool for such important decisions, and that a multitude of factors should be taken into account in these deliberations. When considering the use of the impact factor (IF), keep these aspects in mind:
  • IF analysis is limited to citations from the journals indexed by the Web of Science/Web of Knowledge. Currently, the Web of Science indexes only 8621 journals across the full breadth of the sciences, and just 3121 in the social sciences.
  • A high IF/citation rate says nothing about the quality -- or even, validity -- of the references being cited. Notorious or even retracted articles often attract a lot of attention, hence a high number of citations. The notority related to the first publication on "cold fusion" is one such example.
  • Journals that publish more "review articles" are often found near the top of the rankings. While not known for publishing new, creative findings, these individual articles tend to be heavily cited.
  • The IF measures the average number of citations to articles in the journal -- given this, a small number of highly-cited articles will skew the figure.
  • It takes several years for new journals to be added to the list of titles indexed by the Web of Science/Web of Knowledge, so these newer titles will be under-represented.
  • It's alleged that journal editors have learned to "game" the system, encouraging authors to cite their works previously published in the same journal.
Comparing Journals Across Disciplines? Not a good idea! Using Impact Factors within a given discipline should only be done with great care, as described above. Using impact factor data to compare journals across disciplines is even more problematic. Here are some of the reasons:
  • Disciplines where older literature is still referenced, such as Chemistry and Mathematics, offer challenges to the methodolgy since older citations (older than two years) are not used to calculate the impact factor for a given journal. (Five-year impact factor analysis, which can be calculated using the Journal Citation Index database, helps smooth out this problem only to some degree.)
  • Different disciplines have different practices regarding tendency to cite larger numbers of references. Higher overall citation rates will bump upward impact factor measurements.
  • Where it's common for large numbers of authors to collaborate on a single paper, such as in Physics, the tendency of authors to cite themselves (and in this case, more authors) will result in increased citation rates.

Pros and Cons of the Impact Factor

Pros:

  • A vetted, established metric for measuring journal impact within a discipline.
  • Designed to eliminate bias based on journal size and frequency.
Cons:
  • Individual articles makes an uneven contribution to overall Impact Factor.
  • Impact Factor does not account for certain things, things like context (postive or negative citaion) and intentionality (self-citation).
  • The metric is proprietary to and bound by the contents of the Thomson Reuters database.
  • Citations, on which the Impact Factor is based, count for less than 1% of an article's overall use.

Criticism

Numerous critiques have been made regarding the use of impact factors. A 2007 study noted that the most fundamental flaw is that impact factors present the mean of data that are not normally distributed, and suggested that it would be more appropriate to present the median of these data. There is also a more general debate on the validity of the impact factor as a measure of journal importance and the effect of policies that editors may adopt to boost their impact factor (perhaps to the detriment of readers and writers). Other criticism focuses on the effect of the impact factor on behavior of scholars, editors and other stakeholders. Others have made more general criticisms, arguing that emphasis on impact factor results from negative influence of neoliberal policies on academia claiming that what is needed is not just replacement of the impact factor with more sophisticated metrics for science publications but also discussion on the social value of research assessment and the growing precariousness of scientific careers in higher education.
Experts stress that there are limitations in using impact factors to evaluate a scholar's work. There are many reasons cited for not relying on impact factor alone to evaluate the output of a particular individual. Among these are the following:

  • A single factor is not sufficient for evaluating an author's work.
  • Journal values are meaningless unless compared within the same discipline. Impact factors vary among disciplines.
  • The impact factor was originally devised to show the impact of a specific journal, not a specific scholar. The quality and impact of the author's work may extend beyond the impact of a particular journal.
According to Jim Testa, a researcher for ThomsonReuters Scientific, the most widespread misuse of the Impact Factor is to evaluate the work of an individual author (instead of a journal). "To say that because a researcher is publishing in a certain journal, he or she is more influential or deserves more credit is not necessarily true. There are many other variables to consider." (interview 6/26/2008 in Thomson Reuters blog entry)

Marine Technology Society Journal
Journal Profile

About

The Marine Technology Society Journal is the flagship publication of the Marine Technology Society. It publishes the highest caliber, peer-reviewed papers, six times a year, on subjects of interest to the society: marine technology, ocean science, marine policy, and education. None

ISSN
0025-3324
ISSN

The ISSN of Marine Technology Society Journal is 0025-3324 . An ISSN is an 8-digit code used to identify newspapers, journals, magazines and periodicals of all kinds and on all media–print and electronic.

ISSN (Online)
-
ISSN (Online)

The ISSN (Online) of Marine Technology Society Journal is - . An ISSN is an 8-digit code used to identify newspapers, journals, magazines and periodicals of all kinds and on all media–print and electronic.

Publisher
Marine Technology Society Inc.
Publisher

Marine Technology Society Journal is published by Marine Technology Society Inc. .

Publication Frequency
Bimonthly
Publication Frequency

Marine Technology Society Journal publishes reports Bimonthly .

Coverage
1969-1987, 1993-2020
Coverage

The Publication History of Marine Technology Society Journal covers 1969-1987, 1993-2020 .

Open Access
NO
Open Access

Publication Fee
Publication Fee

Language
English
Language

The language of Marine Technology Society Journal is English .

Country/Region
United States
Country/Region

The publisher of Marine Technology Society Journal is Marine Technology Society Inc. , which locates in United States .

International Collaboration Trend

Marine Technology Society Journal

Cited Documents Trend

Marine Technology Society Journal

Total Publications
2046
Total Citations
16346

Annual Publication Volume

Marine Technology Society Journal

Annual Citation Record

Marine Technology Society Journal

Publications Cites Dataset

Marine Technology Society Journal

Year Publications Citations
Year Publications Citations
1970 17 2
1971 24 8
1972 13 7
1973 15 6
1974 12 9
1975 15 8
1976 12 4
1977 21 6
1978 15 7
1979 20 12
1980 11 21
1981 3 10
1982 0 11
1983 5 15
1984 2 7
1985 22 9
1986 32 9
1987 36 16
1988 16 31
1989 39 29
1990 46 32
1991 30 62
1992 29 49
1993 27 38
1994 29 59
1995 45 48
1996 46 83
1997 38 70
1998 53 95
1999 65 90
2000 39 148
2001 44 204
2002 53 213
2003 44 272
2004 51 298
2005 60 333
2006 63 464
2007 47 461
2008 53 581
2009 75 655
2010 64 645
2011 85 749
2012 51 959
2013 77 1125
2014 78 1104
2015 89 1272
2016 65 1292
2017 54 1103
2018 86 1091
2019 66 1170
2020 60 1273
2021 0 81
Publications Cites Dataset

· The Marine Technology Society Journal has published 17 reports and received 2 citations in 1970.
· The Marine Technology Society Journal has published 24 reports and received 8 citations in 1971.
· The Marine Technology Society Journal has published 13 reports and received 7 citations in 1972.
· The Marine Technology Society Journal has published 15 reports and received 6 citations in 1973.
· The Marine Technology Society Journal has published 12 reports and received 9 citations in 1974.
· The Marine Technology Society Journal has published 15 reports and received 8 citations in 1975.
· The Marine Technology Society Journal has published 12 reports and received 4 citations in 1976.
· The Marine Technology Society Journal has published 21 reports and received 6 citations in 1977.
· The Marine Technology Society Journal has published 15 reports and received 7 citations in 1978.
· The Marine Technology Society Journal has published 20 reports and received 12 citations in 1979.
· The Marine Technology Society Journal has published 11 reports and received 21 citations in 1980.
· The Marine Technology Society Journal has published 3 reports and received 10 citations in 1981.
· The Marine Technology Society Journal has published 0 reports and received 11 citations in 1982.
· The Marine Technology Society Journal has published 5 reports and received 15 citations in 1983.
· The Marine Technology Society Journal has published 2 reports and received 7 citations in 1984.
· The Marine Technology Society Journal has published 22 reports and received 9 citations in 1985.
· The Marine Technology Society Journal has published 32 reports and received 9 citations in 1986.
· The Marine Technology Society Journal has published 36 reports and received 16 citations in 1987.
· The Marine Technology Society Journal has published 16 reports and received 31 citations in 1988.
· The Marine Technology Society Journal has published 39 reports and received 29 citations in 1989.
· The Marine Technology Society Journal has published 46 reports and received 32 citations in 1990.
· The Marine Technology Society Journal has published 30 reports and received 62 citations in 1991.
· The Marine Technology Society Journal has published 29 reports and received 49 citations in 1992.
· The Marine Technology Society Journal has published 27 reports and received 38 citations in 1993.
· The Marine Technology Society Journal has published 29 reports and received 59 citations in 1994.
· The Marine Technology Society Journal has published 45 reports and received 48 citations in 1995.
· The Marine Technology Society Journal has published 46 reports and received 83 citations in 1996.
· The Marine Technology Society Journal has published 38 reports and received 70 citations in 1997.
· The Marine Technology Society Journal has published 53 reports and received 95 citations in 1998.
· The Marine Technology Society Journal has published 65 reports and received 90 citations in 1999.
· The Marine Technology Society Journal has published 39 reports and received 148 citations in 2000.
· The Marine Technology Society Journal has published 44 reports and received 204 citations in 2001.
· The Marine Technology Society Journal has published 53 reports and received 213 citations in 2002.
· The Marine Technology Society Journal has published 44 reports and received 272 citations in 2003.
· The Marine Technology Society Journal has published 51 reports and received 298 citations in 2004.
· The Marine Technology Society Journal has published 60 reports and received 333 citations in 2005.
· The Marine Technology Society Journal has published 63 reports and received 464 citations in 2006.
· The Marine Technology Society Journal has published 47 reports and received 461 citations in 2007.
· The Marine Technology Society Journal has published 53 reports and received 581 citations in 2008.
· The Marine Technology Society Journal has published 75 reports and received 655 citations in 2009.
· The Marine Technology Society Journal has published 64 reports and received 645 citations in 2010.
· The Marine Technology Society Journal has published 85 reports and received 749 citations in 2011.
· The Marine Technology Society Journal has published 51 reports and received 959 citations in 2012.
· The Marine Technology Society Journal has published 77 reports and received 1125 citations in 2013.
· The Marine Technology Society Journal has published 78 reports and received 1104 citations in 2014.
· The Marine Technology Society Journal has published 89 reports and received 1272 citations in 2015.
· The Marine Technology Society Journal has published 65 reports and received 1292 citations in 2016.
· The Marine Technology Society Journal has published 54 reports and received 1103 citations in 2017.
· The Marine Technology Society Journal has published 86 reports and received 1091 citations in 2018.
· The Marine Technology Society Journal has published 66 reports and received 1170 citations in 2019.
· The Marine Technology Society Journal has published 60 reports and received 1273 citations in 2020.
· The Marine Technology Society Journal has published 0 reports and received 81 citations in 2021.
· The total publications of Marine Technology Society Journal is 2046.
· The total citations of Marine Technology Society Journal is 16346.

Share Your Impact Factor Information with Community

Do you know the Latest Impact Factor of Marine Technology Society Journal? Share with the community!

Impact Factor

What is the Latest Impact Factor?

Data Source

Where do you get the information?



Impact Factor Data Source
Impact Factor Data Source

Thanks for sharing your information with us!