Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes
Research Hotspot & Journal Scope - Trials
Integrating Quality of Life and Survival Outcomes Cardiovascular Clinical Trials.
Jacob V Spertus · Laura A Hatfield · David J Cohen · Suzanne V Arnold · Martin Ho · Philip G Jones · Martin Leon · Bram Zuckerman · John A Spertus ·
MedicineIntegrating Data From Randomized Controlled Trials and Observational Studies to Assess Survival in Rare Diseases
Adam Torbicki · Marisa Bacchi · Marion Delcroix · Harrison W Farber · Hossein-Ardeschir Ghofrani · Brian Hennessy · Pavel Jansa · Sanjay Mehta · Loïc Perchenet · Tomas Pulido · Daniel Rosenberg · Lewis J Rubin · B K S Sastry · Gérald Simonneau · Olivier Sitbon · Rogério Souza · Lee-Jen Wei · Richard Channick · Raymond Benza ·
MedicineFragility Index in Cardiovascular Randomized Controlled Trials.
Muhammad Shahzeb Khan · Rohan Kumar Ochani · Asim Shaikh · Muhammad Shariq Usman · Naser Yamani · Safi U Khan · M Hassan Murad · John Mandrola · Rami Doukky · Richard A Krasuski ·
MedicineScientific Writng Examples of Trials Update in a Sentence
Methods: Electronic databases were searched for eligible trials updated on November 2018.
Scientific Writng Examples of Trials Cohort in a Sentence
Methods and Results: Our analysis included 10 785 black women enrolled in the Women’s Health Initiative Observational Study and Clinical Trials cohort.
Scientific Writng Examples of Negative Trials in a Sentence
endoscopes in transsphenoidal surgery reach opposite conclusions in their systematic reviews [2, 12]? Or why awake surgery enthusiasts reach different conclusions in systematic reviews on the impact of awake surgery than others [4, 14]? Or is this why radiotherapy usually reduces recurrence rates in atypical meningioma if studies are done by radiation oncologists [18, 20–22] but not necessarily if the studies are done by neurosurgeons [7, 13, 15, 17]? Is also our interpretation of the evidence different because we belong to different herds or genealogies where perhaps heretics are sanctioned and only accepted facts prevail? Does this make us read the scientific literature like the devil reads the bible? Is this why most vascular neurosurgeons refuse to believe results from the Aruba trial [16] or the Scottish AVM cohort study [1]? Or is this why many spine surgeons still like to fuse degenerative lumbar spines despite the negative trials [5, 6] (under the motto: screw the evidence)? The present study is an important reminder that not only traditional conflicts of interest matter, but our background, herd, or subspecialty might affect scientific results significantly.
Scientific Writng Examples of Trials Included in a Sentence
Panjabi and Iskander suggest that the trials included in the NMA violated the similarity and consistency of assumptions in NMAs, leading to biased treatment effects.
Scientific Writng Examples of Comparison Trials in a Sentence
However, in landmark head-to-head comparison trials, the thiazide-like diuretic chlorthalidone has been shown to be superior to ACE-I and CCB in decreasing left ventricle mass and preventing heart failure in hypertensive patients.