Versus Autologous(与自体)研究综述
Versus Autologous 与自体 - OBJECTIVE For people with hematological malignancies treated with bone marrow transplantation (BMT), this systematic review aimed to identify, evaluate, and synthesize the evidence examining the effect of exercise training on the outcomes of exercise capacity, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and hospital length of stay and to identify any difference in the effect on people treated with allogeneic versus autologous transplantation. [1] A priori subgroup metanalysis compared adult versus pediatric, oncology versus HSCT, hematological malignancy versus solid tumor, allogeneic versus autologous HSCT, and veno-arterial versus veno-venous ECMO populations. [2] Pre-transplant central nervous system–directed treatment, allogeneic versus autologous donor, stem cell source, donor type, busulfan use, and cyclosporin use were not significantly associated with neurological complications. [3] Does embryo vitrification or donor oocytes (DO) alter the histopathology of the placenta in ICSI singleton pregnancies with similar endometrial preparation? Placentas from programmed cycles had significantly more immune/idiopathic-inflammation with vitrified-thawed embryos versus fresh transfer and significantly more maternal vascular-malperfusion(MVM) in DO versus autologous oocyte(AO) pregnancies. [4] Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of platelet rich plasma versus autologous emulsified fat in the treatment of infraorbital dark circle. [5] We addressed six Key Questions (KQs): (1) implant-based reconstruction (IBR) versus autologous reconstruction (AR), (2) timing of IBR and AR in relation to chemotherapy and radiation therapy, (3) comparisons of implant materials, (4) comparisons of anatomic planes for IBR, (5) use versus nonuse of human acellular dermal matrices (ADMs) during IBR, and (6) comparisons of AR flap types. [6] Does endometriosis affect live birth following donor oocyte recipient versus autologous in vitro fertilisation (IVF) cycle. [7] Breast reconstruction has evolved to include various techniques that can be categorized according to the type of reconstruction (implant-based versus autologous reconstruction), and the timing of reconstruction (one versus two-step techniques). [8] 07), as was the minimum number of steps recorded over the transplant admission (allogeneic HCT = 395 versus autologous HCT = 848, P =. [9] We compared the outcome of using bioactive glass (BAG) versus autologous bone graft (AB) in patients with infected non-union. [10] Objective: To compare the operative time and post-operative pain with PEEK cage method versus autologous iliac crest bone graft in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion in the cervical spine. [11] Simple excision was performed followed by closure of the bare sclera by conjunctival autograft by the known method of fibrin glue in 30 eyes (Group A) versus autologous serum (Group B). [12] Multivariate analysis stratifying for allogeneic versus autologous transplantation and controlling for age, sex, and disease confirmed an independent association between the SIPAT score and nonadherence. [13] Data were then compared between patients who underwent implant-based versus autologous deep inferior epigastric perforator flap reconstruction. [14] Induction therapy with bortezomib and dexamethasone followed by autologous stem cell transplantation versus autologous stem cell transplantation alone in the treatment of renal AL amyloidosis: a randomized controlled trial. [15] We sought to compare success rates in a large series of patients undergoing tympanoplasty using collagen allografts versus autologous tissues. [16] Costello and colleagues published a wonderfully executed, double blind placebo-controlled trial on fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) versus autologous stool as placebo in mild to moderately active adult ulcerative colitis [UC: one type of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)] patients. [17] In comparison between implant-based versus autologous breast reconstruction, there was no significant difference between implant-based and autologous breast reconstruction (P = 0. [18] BACKGROUND There are conflicting reports regarding the therapeutic effect of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) versus autologous whole-blood (platelet poor plasma, PPP) injections for plantar fasciitis. [19] WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Previous studies demonstrated elevated risk of poor perinatal outcomes with donor versus autologous oocytes during ART, primarily among older women. [20] The use of MSCs to treat degenerative osteo-articular diseases has proven to be effective but further studies are needed to establish the safest and most effective protocol with regard to source, allogenic versus autologous cells and dose. [21] The risk of post-transplant kidney injury varies depending on patient characteristics, type of transplant (allogeneic versus autologous), and choice of chemotherapeutic conditioning regimen (myeloablative versus nonmyeloablative). [22] The present study will investigate the safety and long-term effects of inorganic osteogenesis-inducing scaffold materials versus autologous ilium in lumbar interbody fusion. [23] However, even in cases of severe facial disfigurement, the decision to proceed with transplantation versus autologous reconstruction remains a source of debate, with no current consensus regarding precise indications and inclusion/exclusion criteria. [24] The aim of our study was to evaluate acrylic versus autologous cranioplasty with regard to specific complication rates. [25] Aim: The aim of this study was to examine the clinical and histological differences of using a combination of alloplastic beta triphasic calcium phosphate (β-TCP) and a cross-linked collagen membrane versus autologous platelet-rich fibrin (PRF-L) in ridge preservation after dental extraction. [26] Therefore, it is important to determine the relative effectiveness of allogeneic versus autologous BMDMSCs. [27]客观的 对于接受骨髓移植 (BMT) 治疗的血液系统恶性肿瘤患者,本系统评价旨在识别、评估和综合检查运动训练对运动能力、健康相关生活质量 (HRQoL)、和住院时间,并确定异基因移植与自体移植治疗对患者的影响有何差异。 [1] 先验亚组荟萃分析比较了成人与儿童、肿瘤与 HSCT、血液恶性肿瘤与实体瘤、同种异体与自体 HSCT 以及静脉-动脉与静脉-静脉 ECMO 人群。 [2] 移植前中枢神经系统定向治疗、同种异体供体与自体供体、干细胞来源、供体类型、白消安使用和环孢菌素使用与神经系统并发症无显着相关性。 [3] 胚胎玻璃化或供体卵母细胞 (DO) 是否会改变具有类似子宫内膜准备的 ICSI 单胎妊娠中胎盘的组织病理学? 与新鲜移植相比,来自程序周期的胎盘具有明显更多的免疫/特发性炎症,玻璃化解冻胚胎与新鲜移植相比,DO 中的母体血管灌注不良 (MVM) 与自体卵母细胞 (AO) 妊娠相比显着更多。 [4] 目的:评价富血小板血浆与自体乳化脂肪治疗眶下黑眼圈的疗效。 [5] 我们解决了六个关键问题 (KQ):(1) 基于种植体的重建 (IBR) 与自体重建 (AR),(2) IBR 和 AR 与化疗和放射治疗相关的时机,(3) 种植体材料的比较, (4) IBR 解剖平面的比较,(5) IBR 期间使用与不使用人类脱细胞真皮基质 (ADM),以及 (6) AR 皮瓣类型的比较。 [6] 子宫内膜异位症是否会影响供卵受者与自体体外受精 (IVF) 周期后的活产。 [7] 乳房重建已经发展到包括可以根据重建类型(基于植入物与自体重建)和重建时间(一步与两步技术)分类的各种技术。 [8] 07),以及移植入院时记录的最小步骤数(异基因 HCT = 395 与自体 HCT = 848,P =. [9] 我们比较了在感染性骨不连患者中使用生物活性玻璃 (BAG) 与自体骨移植 (AB) 的结果。 [10] 目的:比较PEEK笼法与自体髂嵴骨移植在颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术中的手术时间和术后疼痛。 [11] 进行简单切除,然后通过自体结膜移植物闭合裸露的巩膜,通过已知方法在 30 只眼睛中使用纤维蛋白胶(A 组)与自体血清(B 组)。 [12] 对同种异体移植与自体移植进行分层并控制年龄、性别和疾病的多变量分析证实了 SIPAT 评分与不依从性之间的独立关联。 [13] 然后比较接受植入物与自体深部腹壁下穿支皮瓣重建的患者的数据。 [14] 硼替佐米和地塞米松诱导治疗后自体干细胞移植与单独自体干细胞移植治疗肾性 AL 淀粉样变性:一项随机对照试验。 [15] 我们试图比较使用胶原同种异体移植物与自体组织进行鼓室成形术的大量患者的成功率。 [16] Costello 及其同事发表了一项关于粪便微生物群移植 (FMT) 与自体粪便作为安慰剂治疗轻度至中度活动性成人溃疡性结肠炎 [UC:一种炎症性肠病 (IBD)] 患者的出色执行的双盲安慰剂对照试验。 [17] 在基于植入物与自体乳房再造的比较中,基于植入物和自体乳房再造之间没有显着差异(P = 0. [18] 背景 关于富血小板血浆(PRP)与自体全血(贫血小板血浆,PPP)注射治疗足底筋膜炎的疗效存在矛盾的报道。 [19] 什么是已知的 先前的研究表明,在 ART 期间,供体与自体卵母细胞相比,围产期不良结局的风险升高,主要是在老年妇女中。 [20] 使用 MSCs 治疗退行性骨关节疾病已被证明是有效的,但需要进一步的研究来建立关于来源、同种异体与自体细胞和剂量的最安全和最有效的方案。 [21] 移植后肾损伤的风险因患者特征、移植类型(异基因与自体)和化疗预处理方案的选择(清髓与非清髓)而异。 [22] 本研究将研究无机成骨诱导支架材料与自体髂骨在腰椎椎间融合中的安全性和长期影响。 [23] 然而,即使在严重面部毁容的情况下,进行移植还是自体重建的决定仍然存在争议,目前在精确适应症和纳入/排除标准方面尚无共识。 [24] 我们研究的目的是评估丙烯酸与自体颅骨成形术在特定并发症发生率方面的差异。 [25] 目的:本研究的目的是检查在脊中使用异体β三相磷酸钙 (β-TCP) 和交联胶原膜与自体富血小板纤维蛋白 (PRF-L) 组合的临床和组织学差异拔牙后的保存。 [26] 因此,确定同种异体与自体 BMDMSC 的相对有效性非常重要。 [27]
Allogeneic Versus Autologous 同种异体与自体
OBJECTIVE For people with hematological malignancies treated with bone marrow transplantation (BMT), this systematic review aimed to identify, evaluate, and synthesize the evidence examining the effect of exercise training on the outcomes of exercise capacity, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and hospital length of stay and to identify any difference in the effect on people treated with allogeneic versus autologous transplantation. [1] A priori subgroup metanalysis compared adult versus pediatric, oncology versus HSCT, hematological malignancy versus solid tumor, allogeneic versus autologous HSCT, and veno-arterial versus veno-venous ECMO populations. [2] Pre-transplant central nervous system–directed treatment, allogeneic versus autologous donor, stem cell source, donor type, busulfan use, and cyclosporin use were not significantly associated with neurological complications. [3] Multivariate analysis stratifying for allogeneic versus autologous transplantation and controlling for age, sex, and disease confirmed an independent association between the SIPAT score and nonadherence. [4] The risk of post-transplant kidney injury varies depending on patient characteristics, type of transplant (allogeneic versus autologous), and choice of chemotherapeutic conditioning regimen (myeloablative versus nonmyeloablative). [5] Therefore, it is important to determine the relative effectiveness of allogeneic versus autologous BMDMSCs. [6]客观的 对于接受骨髓移植 (BMT) 治疗的血液系统恶性肿瘤患者,本系统评价旨在识别、评估和综合检查运动训练对运动能力、健康相关生活质量 (HRQoL)、和住院时间,并确定异基因移植与自体移植治疗对患者的影响有何差异。 [1] 先验亚组荟萃分析比较了成人与儿童、肿瘤与 HSCT、血液恶性肿瘤与实体瘤、同种异体与自体 HSCT 以及静脉-动脉与静脉-静脉 ECMO 人群。 [2] 移植前中枢神经系统定向治疗、同种异体供体与自体供体、干细胞来源、供体类型、白消安使用和环孢菌素使用与神经系统并发症无显着相关性。 [3] 对同种异体移植与自体移植进行分层并控制年龄、性别和疾病的多变量分析证实了 SIPAT 评分与不依从性之间的独立关联。 [4] 移植后肾损伤的风险因患者特征、移植类型(异基因与自体)和化疗预处理方案的选择(清髓与非清髓)而异。 [5] 因此,确定同种异体与自体 BMDMSC 的相对有效性非常重要。 [6]
Transplantation Versus Autologous
Induction therapy with bortezomib and dexamethasone followed by autologous stem cell transplantation versus autologous stem cell transplantation alone in the treatment of renal AL amyloidosis: a randomized controlled trial. [1] However, even in cases of severe facial disfigurement, the decision to proceed with transplantation versus autologous reconstruction remains a source of debate, with no current consensus regarding precise indications and inclusion/exclusion criteria. [2]硼替佐米和地塞米松诱导治疗后自体干细胞移植与单独自体干细胞移植治疗肾性 AL 淀粉样变性:一项随机对照试验。 [1] 然而,即使在严重面部毁容的情况下,进行移植还是自体重建的决定仍然存在争议,目前在精确适应症和纳入/排除标准方面尚无共识。 [2]
versus autologous reconstruction 与自体重建
We addressed six Key Questions (KQs): (1) implant-based reconstruction (IBR) versus autologous reconstruction (AR), (2) timing of IBR and AR in relation to chemotherapy and radiation therapy, (3) comparisons of implant materials, (4) comparisons of anatomic planes for IBR, (5) use versus nonuse of human acellular dermal matrices (ADMs) during IBR, and (6) comparisons of AR flap types. [1] Breast reconstruction has evolved to include various techniques that can be categorized according to the type of reconstruction (implant-based versus autologous reconstruction), and the timing of reconstruction (one versus two-step techniques). [2] However, even in cases of severe facial disfigurement, the decision to proceed with transplantation versus autologous reconstruction remains a source of debate, with no current consensus regarding precise indications and inclusion/exclusion criteria. [3]我们解决了六个关键问题 (KQ):(1) 基于种植体的重建 (IBR) 与自体重建 (AR),(2) IBR 和 AR 与化疗和放射治疗相关的时机,(3) 种植体材料的比较, (4) IBR 解剖平面的比较,(5) IBR 期间使用与不使用人类脱细胞真皮基质 (ADM),以及 (6) AR 皮瓣类型的比较。 [1] 乳房重建已经发展到包括可以根据重建类型(基于植入物与自体重建)和重建时间(一步与两步技术)分类的各种技术。 [2] 然而,即使在严重面部毁容的情况下,进行移植还是自体重建的决定仍然存在争议,目前在精确适应症和纳入/排除标准方面尚无共识。 [3]
versus autologous transplantation
OBJECTIVE For people with hematological malignancies treated with bone marrow transplantation (BMT), this systematic review aimed to identify, evaluate, and synthesize the evidence examining the effect of exercise training on the outcomes of exercise capacity, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and hospital length of stay and to identify any difference in the effect on people treated with allogeneic versus autologous transplantation. [1] Multivariate analysis stratifying for allogeneic versus autologous transplantation and controlling for age, sex, and disease confirmed an independent association between the SIPAT score and nonadherence. [2]客观的 对于接受骨髓移植 (BMT) 治疗的血液系统恶性肿瘤患者,本系统评价旨在识别、评估和综合检查运动训练对运动能力、健康相关生活质量 (HRQoL)、和住院时间,并确定异基因移植与自体移植治疗对患者的影响有何差异。 [1] 对同种异体移植与自体移植进行分层并控制年龄、性别和疾病的多变量分析证实了 SIPAT 评分与不依从性之间的独立关联。 [2]
versus autologous oocyte
Does embryo vitrification or donor oocytes (DO) alter the histopathology of the placenta in ICSI singleton pregnancies with similar endometrial preparation? Placentas from programmed cycles had significantly more immune/idiopathic-inflammation with vitrified-thawed embryos versus fresh transfer and significantly more maternal vascular-malperfusion(MVM) in DO versus autologous oocyte(AO) pregnancies. [1] WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Previous studies demonstrated elevated risk of poor perinatal outcomes with donor versus autologous oocytes during ART, primarily among older women. [2]胚胎玻璃化或供体卵母细胞 (DO) 是否会改变具有类似子宫内膜准备的 ICSI 单胎妊娠中胎盘的组织病理学? 与新鲜移植相比,来自程序周期的胎盘具有明显更多的免疫/特发性炎症,玻璃化解冻胚胎与新鲜移植相比,DO 中的母体血管灌注不良 (MVM) 与自体卵母细胞 (AO) 妊娠相比显着更多。 [1] 什么是已知的 先前的研究表明,在 ART 期间,供体与自体卵母细胞相比,围产期不良结局的风险升高,主要是在老年妇女中。 [2]