Salvage Microdissection(抢救显微切割)研究综述
Salvage Microdissection 抢救显微切割 - Is there any intra-surgical parameter able to predict the outcome of salvage microdissection testicular sperm extraction (mTESE) in patients with previous failed TESE? Among all the variables under consideration, only the seminiferous tubules (ST) caliber pattern found at high magnification was able to significantly predict the mTESE outcome. [1] We assessed the outcome and predictors of successful salvage microdissection testicular sperm extraction (mTESE) in non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) men previously submitted to unfruitful classic (cTESE). [2] BACKGROUND Patients with non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) with a previous failed conventional TESE (cTESE) may undergo a salvage microdissection testicular sperm extraction (mTESE) with the probability of successful sperm retrieval (SSR) being almost dependent upon the number of previous surgical attempts and to different histopathologic categories OBJECTIVES: To determine whether the seminiferous tubules (STs) pattern and the histological categories could affect the sperm retrieval rate (SRR) in patients with NOA undergoing salvage mTESE after failed cTESE MATERIALS AND METHODS: 79 patients undergoing unilateral of bilateral salvage mTESE were evaluated. [3]是否有任何术中参数能够预测先前 TESE 失败患者的挽救性显微切除睾丸精子提取 (mTESE) 的结果？ 在考虑的所有变量中，只有在高放大倍率下发现的曲细精管 (ST) 口径模式能够显着预测 mTESE 结果。 [1] 我们评估了先前提交给非梗阻性无精子症 (NOA) 男性的成功挽救显微解剖睾丸精子提取 (mTESE) 的结果和预测因素 (cTESE)。 [2] 背景 非梗阻性无精子症 (NOA) 患者之前常规 TESE (cTESE) 失败，可进行挽救性显微切除睾丸精子提取 (mTESE)，成功取精 (SSR) 的概率几乎取决于之前的手术尝试次数和目的：确定曲细精管 (STs) 模式和组织学类别是否会影响在 cTESE 失败后接受 mTESE 挽救的 NOA 患者的精子回收率 (SRR) 材料和方法：79 名接受单侧双侧挽救的患者评估了 mTESE。 [3]
testicular sperm extraction
Is there any intra-surgical parameter able to predict the outcome of salvage microdissection testicular sperm extraction (mTESE) in patients with previous failed TESE? Among all the variables under consideration, only the seminiferous tubules (ST) caliber pattern found at high magnification was able to significantly predict the mTESE outcome. [1] We assessed the outcome and predictors of successful salvage microdissection testicular sperm extraction (mTESE) in non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) men previously submitted to unfruitful classic (cTESE). [2] BACKGROUND Patients with non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) with a previous failed conventional TESE (cTESE) may undergo a salvage microdissection testicular sperm extraction (mTESE) with the probability of successful sperm retrieval (SSR) being almost dependent upon the number of previous surgical attempts and to different histopathologic categories OBJECTIVES: To determine whether the seminiferous tubules (STs) pattern and the histological categories could affect the sperm retrieval rate (SRR) in patients with NOA undergoing salvage mTESE after failed cTESE MATERIALS AND METHODS: 79 patients undergoing unilateral of bilateral salvage mTESE were evaluated. [3]是否有任何术中参数能够预测先前 TESE 失败患者的挽救性显微切除睾丸精子提取 (mTESE) 的结果？ 在考虑的所有变量中，只有在高放大倍率下发现的曲细精管 (ST) 口径模式能够显着预测 mTESE 结果。 [1] 我们评估了先前提交给非梗阻性无精子症 (NOA) 男性的成功挽救显微解剖睾丸精子提取 (mTESE) 的结果和预测因素 (cTESE)。 [2] 背景 非梗阻性无精子症 (NOA) 患者之前常规 TESE (cTESE) 失败，可进行挽救性显微切除睾丸精子提取 (mTESE)，成功取精 (SSR) 的概率几乎取决于之前的手术尝试次数和目的：确定曲细精管 (STs) 模式和组织学类别是否会影响在 cTESE 失败后接受 mTESE 挽救的 NOA 患者的精子回收率 (SRR) 材料和方法：79 名接受单侧双侧挽救的患者评估了 mTESE。 [3]
salvage microdissection testicular
Is there any intra-surgical parameter able to predict the outcome of salvage microdissection testicular sperm extraction (mTESE) in patients with previous failed TESE? Among all the variables under consideration, only the seminiferous tubules (ST) caliber pattern found at high magnification was able to significantly predict the mTESE outcome. [1] We assessed the outcome and predictors of successful salvage microdissection testicular sperm extraction (mTESE) in non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) men previously submitted to unfruitful classic (cTESE). [2] BACKGROUND Patients with non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) with a previous failed conventional TESE (cTESE) may undergo a salvage microdissection testicular sperm extraction (mTESE) with the probability of successful sperm retrieval (SSR) being almost dependent upon the number of previous surgical attempts and to different histopathologic categories OBJECTIVES: To determine whether the seminiferous tubules (STs) pattern and the histological categories could affect the sperm retrieval rate (SRR) in patients with NOA undergoing salvage mTESE after failed cTESE MATERIALS AND METHODS: 79 patients undergoing unilateral of bilateral salvage mTESE were evaluated. [3]是否有任何术中参数能够预测先前 TESE 失败患者的挽救性显微切除睾丸精子提取 (mTESE) 的结果？ 在考虑的所有变量中，只有在高放大倍率下发现的曲细精管 (ST) 口径模式能够显着预测 mTESE 结果。 [1] 我们评估了先前提交给非梗阻性无精子症 (NOA) 男性的成功挽救显微解剖睾丸精子提取 (mTESE) 的结果和预测因素 (cTESE)。 [2] 背景 非梗阻性无精子症 (NOA) 患者之前常规 TESE (cTESE) 失败，可进行挽救性显微切除睾丸精子提取 (mTESE)，成功取精 (SSR) 的概率几乎取决于之前的手术尝试次数和目的：确定曲细精管 (STs) 模式和组织学类别是否会影响在 cTESE 失败后接受 mTESE 挽救的 NOA 患者的精子回收率 (SRR) 材料和方法：79 名接受单侧双侧挽救的患者评估了 mTESE。 [3]