Risk Comparison(风险比较)研究综述
Risk Comparison 风险比较 - This study examines the effects of risk comparisons in mainstream media during the Covid-19 outbreak that either expressed the severity of the outbreak or downplayed it by comparing the mortality rates of the disease to those of other risks. [1] Furthermore, a risk comparison was carried out in the 2 most discussed categories. [2] This risk comparison between traditional and Islamic banks International Online Conference (May 13–14, 2021) ―CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: A SEARCH FOR EMERGING TRENDS IN THE PANDEMIC TIMES‖ 41 will be included in the secondary objectives of the research. [3] There were discrepancies in the perception of ‘facts’, the perception of probability, the interpretation of risk comparison, what were included as risk trade-offs, the view of the disaster, whose behavior would be changed by the communication and whether risk should be considered a science. [4] Risk attenuation argumentative strategies are identified: social comparison, risk comparison and fatalism. [5] Meanwhile, the results of the risk comparison of the two groups of stocks were heterogeneous (not the same) so that the risk of the two stocks cannot be compared. [6] The risk comparison between TCH and TCHP was inconclusive. [7] Decision trees and the logistic regression method are added to obtain the visualization of the role of each important factors in the form of classification tree and the risk comparison of patients for experiencing a certain laterality condition by using odds ratios. [8] This study aims, namely: (1) To determine the risk comparison of fixed income mutual funds and equity mutual funds during COVID-19. [9] When only childhood CL wear is considered, the risk comparison is clearly skewed towards the positive impact of CL wear, especially in daily disposable wear. [10] These methods differ in when, where and why to apply them, qualitative methods are generally easy to apply and fast in identifying the risks, quantitative methods are not as easy but provide a numerical value to the risk that helps in risk comparison in the case of evaluation or decision-making, and semi quantitative methods falls in between. [11] To address such risk comparisons statistically, one needs to study the joint distribution for the time to delivery due to each mode and time to maternal or neonatal morbidity given information provided for each individual. [12] BACKGROUND The two most common approaches to thrombectomy of emergent large vessel occlusion (direct aspiration and primary stent retriever thrombectomy) have been extensively studied; however, the detailed benefit and risk comparison is largely unknown. [13] Risk comparisons between male and female registered nurses working in correctional settings, have been minimally examined. [14] 61% of the violence/risk comparisons and 79% of the symptom comparisons reported improvements in the intervention groups compared with the control groups. [15]本研究通过比较该疾病的死亡率与其他风险的死亡率来检验 Covid-19 爆发期间主流媒体风险比较的影响，这些比较要么表达了疫情的严重性，要么淡化了疫情。 [1] 此外，还对讨论最多的 2 个类别进行了风险比较。 [2] 传统银行与伊斯兰银行之间的风险比较国际在线会议（2021 年 5 月 13 日至 14 日）“公司治理：大流行时期的新兴趋势”41 将包含在研究的次要目标中。 [3] 在对“事实”的认知、对概率的认知、对风险比较的解释、风险权衡的内容、对灾难的看法、谁的行为会因沟通而改变以及是否应该承担风险等方面存在差异。被认为是一门科学。 [4] 确定了风险衰减论证策略：社会比较、风险比较和宿命论。 [5] 同时，两组股票的风险比较结果存在异质性（不相同），无法比较两只股票的风险。 [6] TCH 和 TCHP 之间的风险比较尚无定论。 [7] 加入决策树和逻辑回归方法，以分类树的形式将各个重要因素的作用可视化，并利用优势比对患者经历某种偏侧状况的风险进行比较。 [8] 本研究旨在，即： (1) 确定 COVID-19 期间固定收益共同基金和股票共同基金的风险比较。 [9] 当仅考虑儿童 CL 磨损时，风险比较明显偏向 CL 磨损的积极影响，尤其是在日常一次性磨损中。 [10] 这些方法的不同之处在于何时、何地以及为何应用它们，定性方法通常易于应用且可快速识别风险，定量方法则不那么容易，但为风险提供了一个数值，有助于在以下情况下进行风险比较评估或决策，半定量方法介于两者之间。 [11] 为了在统计上解决这种风险比较，需要研究由于为每个人提供的信息而导致的每种模式和孕产妇或新生儿发病时间的分娩时间的联合分布。 [12] 背景 两种最常见的紧急大血管闭塞取栓方法（直接抽吸和原发性支架取栓取栓）已被广泛研究。然而，详细的收益和风险比较在很大程度上是未知的。 [13] 在惩教场所工作的男性和女性注册护士之间的风险比较已经过最低限度的检查。 [14] 与对照组相比，61% 的暴力/风险比较和 79% 的症状比较报告了干预组的改善。 [15]
risk comparison acros
Lastly, we introduce the implied probability of success: a novel measure allowing for risk comparison across different innovative technologies. [1] These functions can be used for modeling flood damage, for future disaster risk reduction and for risk comparison across countries. [2]最后，我们介绍了隐含的成功概率：一种允许对不同创新技术进行风险比较的新方法。 [1] 这些函数可用于模拟洪水破坏、未来的灾害风险降低以及各国之间的风险比较。 [2]