Review Searching(评论搜索)研究综述
Review Searching 评论搜索 - MethodsIn January 2018, a review searching the databases PubMed, The Cochrane Library, and Web of Science, using defined search terms for “big data analytics” and “multimorbidity”, supplemented by a search of grey literature with Google Scholar, was conducted. [1]方法 2018 年 1 月，对 PubMed、Cochrane 图书馆和 Web of Science 数据库进行了回顾，使用定义的“大数据分析”和“多发病”搜索词，辅以谷歌学术搜索灰色文献。 [1]
Systematic Review Searching 系统评价检索
Methods and analysis We will use an innovative mixed-methods study design combining systematic review searching techniques with cross-sectional quantitative descriptive analysis and interpretative qualitative metasynthesis to integrate three elements: (1) Scoping review: multiple database searches for empirical studies and first-hand experiences in English (no other restrictions) to establish how patients and informal carers conceptualise safety in palliative medication management. [1] Methods: We performed a systematic review searching Medline, Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Covid-19 register, international trial registers, medRxiv, bioRxiv, and arXiv up to April 10, 2021. [2] We conducted a systematic review searching the Cochrane, PubMed, and Ovid databases. [3] Despite the fact that systematic review searching is a significant task for many librarians and knowledge professionals, the search process can be considered a form of invisible labor because it often goes without recognition. [4] We conducted a systematic review searching the PubMed and MEDES databases from 2009 to 2019 using predefined selection criteria. [5] Methods: Using the PICO (Patient, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome) framework, we conducted a systematic review searching Medline (New PubMed), Embase. [6] METHODS We performed a systematic review searching Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Central from inception to March 29, 2019. [7] METHODS Systematic review searching four databases (MEDLINE/EMBASE/PsycINFO/CINAHL) from January 1998 to October 2020. [8] METHODS We conducted a systematic review searching PubMed, EMBASE, Ovid PsycINFO, and ClinicalTrials. [9] Methods We conducted a qualitative systematic review searching 11 databases and 24 relevant government and non-governmental organisation (NGO) websites. [10] We conducted a systematic review searching the databases PubMed, Embase and Cochrane. [11] A systematic review searching foremost databases was conducted for evidence of trauma-informed school-wide approaches used between 2008 and 2019. [12] We performed a systematic review searching the electronic databases PubMed and Scopus through December 2020 and selected articles that compared sleep of offenders and controls and articles that studied the association between sleep and aggression. [13] Systematic review searching Medline, Embase and PsychINFO from inception to May 2021. [14] This review study aims to (i) explore the pathophysiological background of sarcopenia in PLWH under the different existing ART and (ii) develop a mini-systematic review searching epidemiological studies investigating sarcopenia prevalence in PLWH. [15] METHODS We performed a systematic review searching MEDLINE for articles published from 1972 to 2016. [16] Methods We performed a systematic review searching for prospective clinical trials comparing any treatment versus placebo for the treatment of CRF. [17] Methods To assess scope and consistency of dialysis adequacy by professionals, we performed a systematic review searching the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) up to July 2017. [18] METHODS A systematic review searching for the terms "(bone marrow)" AND "(aspirate OR concentrate)" AND "(cartilage OR chondral OR osteochondral)" was performed in the databases PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Google Scholar regarding the use of BMAC for the treatment of focal chondral lesions of the knee. [19] We performed a systematic review searching MEDLINE via PubMed and Cochrane (CENTRAL) databases for observational studies reporting on the association between aPL and dementia in the general population, in subjects carrying aPL, in patients with cognitive disorder/dementia, and in primary and secondary APS. [20] Methods: We conducted a systematic review searching in several databases (Medline, Embase, CENTRAL, CINAHL, PsycInfo, Science Citation Index, clinicaltrials. [21] A systematic review searching leading databases was conducted for evidence of organisation-wide, trauma-informed, out-of-home care studies, between 2002 and 2017. [22] Methods Systematic review searching nine databases to June 2017 for experimental, qualitative and observational studies. [23] Methods We performed a systematic review searching the PubMed/MEDLINE public database for pregnancy in women with pre-existent IHD analysing the cardiac, obstetric and fetal/neonatal outcome of pregnancy in women with pre-existing IHD. [24] METHODS We performed a systematic review searching the PubMed and Embase databases from inception to December 7, 2017 for randomized and nonrandomized studies that included adults with previous venous thromboembolism requiring VKA interruption to undergo an elective procedure, and that reported venous thromboembolism or bleeding outcomes. [25] A systematic review searching four electronic databases (PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Embase) was conducted. [26] Methods In February 2019, we performed a systematic review searching Medline, Embase, PsychINFO, Global Health and Web of Science without language or date restrictions. [27] Methods: We conducted a systematic review searching four databases: PubMed, Ebsco Medline with full text, PsycINFO, and Web of Science; and including articles that were 1) related to at least one of the research question; 2) intervention studies aiming to evaluate the effectiveness of the familiar social support component in weight loss; 3) the population of the study was adult women between 18 and 65 years. [28]方法和分析 我们将采用创新的混合方法研究设计，将系统评价检索技术与横断面定量描述性分析和解释性定性综合综合结合起来，整合三个要素：（1）范围审查：对实证研究和第一手资料进行多个数据库搜索英语经验（无其他限制），以确定患者和非正式护理人员如何概念化姑息性药物管理中的安全性。 [1] 方法：我们对 Medline、Pubmed、Embase、Cochrane Covid-19 注册库、国际试验注册库、medRxiv、bioRxiv 和 arXiv 进行了系统评价，检索时间截至 2021 年 4 月 10 日。 [2] 我们对 Cochrane、PubMed 和 Ovid 数据库进行了系统评价。 [3] 尽管系统评价检索对于许多图书馆员和知识专业人士来说是一项重要的任务，但检索过程可以被视为一种无形的劳动，因为它经常得不到认可。 [4] 我们使用预定义的选择标准对 2009 年至 2019 年的 PubMed 和 MEDES 数据库进行了系统评价。 [5] 方法：使用 PICO（患者、干预、比较、结果）框架，我们对 Medline（新 PubMed）、Embase 进行了系统评价。 [6] 方法 我们对 Medline、Embase 和 Cochrane Central 从成立到 2019 年 3 月 29 日进行了系统评价。 [7] 方法 从 1998 年 1 月到 2020 年 10 月，系统评价搜索了四个数据库（MEDLINE/EMBASE/PsycINFO/CINAHL）。 [8] 方法 我们对 PubMed、EMBASE、Ovid PsycINFO 和 ClinicalTrials 进行了系统评价。 [9] 方法 我们对 11 个数据库和 24 个相关政府和非政府组织 (NGO) 网站进行了定性系统评价。 [10] 我们对 PubMed、Embase 和 Cochrane 数据库进行了系统评价。 [11] 对 2008 年至 2019 年间在全校范围内使用的创伤知情方法的证据进行了系统审查，搜索了最重要的数据库。 [12] 我们对截至 2020 年 12 月的电子数据库 PubMed 和 Scopus 进行了系统评价，并选择了比较罪犯和对照组睡眠的文章以及研究睡眠与攻击之间关联的文章。 [13] 从成立到 2021 年 5 月对 Medline、Embase 和 PsychINFO 进行系统评价。 [14] 本综述研究旨在 (i) 探索不同现有 ART 下 PLWH 中肌肉减少症的病理生理学背景，以及 (ii) 开展一项小型系统综述，检索调查 PLWH 中肌肉减少症患病率的流行病学研究。 [15] 方法 我们对 1972 年至 2016 年发表的文章进行了系统评价，搜索 MEDLINE。 [16] 方法 我们进行了一项系统评价，寻找比较任何治疗与安慰剂治疗 CRF 的前瞻性临床试验。 [17] 方法 为了评估专业人员对透析充分性的范围和一致性，我们对截至 2017 年 7 月的 Cochrane 中央对照试验注册中心 (CENTRAL) 进行了系统评价。 [18] 方法 在 PubMed、Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials 和 Google Scholar 数据库中对术语“（骨髓）”和“（抽吸或浓缩物）”和“（软骨或软骨或骨软骨）”进行了系统评价，涉及使用 BMAC 治疗膝关节的局灶性软骨损伤。 [19] 我们通过 PubMed 和 Cochrane (CENTRAL) 数据库对 MEDLINE 进行了系统评价，以获取观察性研究，报告一般人群、携带 aPL 的受试者、认知障碍/痴呆患者以及原发性和继发性 APS 中 aPL 与痴呆之间的关系. [20] 方法：我们在多个数据库（Medline、Embase、CENTRAL、CINAHL、PsycInfo、Science Citation Index、clinicaltrials. [21] 在 2002 年至 2017 年期间，对领先数据库进行了系统评价，以寻找组织范围内的创伤知情的户外护理研究的证据。 [22] 方法 系统回顾搜索截至 2017 年 6 月的九个数据库，用于实验、定性和观察研究。 [23] 方法 我们对 PubMed/MEDLINE 公共数据库进行了一项系统评价，以搜索已患有 IHD 的女性怀孕情况，分析了已患有 IHD 女性妊娠的心脏、产科和胎儿/新生儿结局。 [24] 方法 我们对 PubMed 和 Embase 数据库从开始到 2017 年 12 月 7 日进行了系统评价，以查找随机和非随机研究，其中包括既往有静脉血栓栓塞且需要 VKA 中断以进行择期手术的成人，以及报告了静脉血栓栓塞或出血结局的成人。 [25] 对四个电子数据库（PubMed、CINAHL、Web of Science 和 Embase）进行了系统评价。 [26] 方法 2019 年 2 月，我们对 Medline、Embase、PsychINFO、Global Health 和 Web of Science 进行了系统评价，没有语言或日期限制。 [27] 方法：我们对四个数据库进行了系统评价：PubMed、Ebsco Medline with full text、PsycINFO 和 Web of Science；并包括 1) 与至少一个研究问题相关的文章； 2) 旨在评估熟悉的社会支持成分在减肥中的有效性的干预研究； 3) 研究人群为 18 至 65 岁的成年女性。 [28]
Literature Review Searching 文献综述检索
We carry out a literature review searching in four different databases. [1] We performed a structured literature review searching Google Scholar, PubMed, and EMBASE for articles between 2000 and February 2020. [2] We performed a literature review searching medical databases as UpToDate and PubMed for relevant information about diagnosis, impact, treatment, and outcome of medullary thyroid carcinoma during pregnancy. [3] METHODS A systematic literature review searching for the studies that assessed the outcome of CME of colon cancer was conducted. [4] METHODS We conducted a literature review searching multiple databases to evaluate the evidence for the off-label uses of 5-FU. [5] Methods We have planned a scoping literature review searching the following databases from inception onwards: MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase and Embase Classic, Web of Science Core Collection, Education Resources Index, Sociological s, APA PsycINFO, SCOPUS, CINAHL Plus, Emcare and The Cochrane Library. [6] We performed a literature review searching for prospective studies including patients with CCS, excluding patients with HF at baseline, with data on HF admission incidence in follow up and predictive variables. [7] ABSTRACT This study presents design principles for student facilitation in teacher learning groups (TLGs), based on a systematic literature review searching for characteristics, conditions, and outcomes of students working in TLGs. [8] Additionally, we provide a literature review searching on PubMed terms related to "medullary thyroid carcinoma", "primary thyroid paraganglioma", "paraganglioma-like medullary thyroid cancer" in relationship with nodular appearance at neck US, serum CT measurement, cytological and histological findings. [9] We performed a literature review searching for original articles in seven repositories, from 1970 to 2019, and identified 11 main methods currently used in ultrasound computer-aided diagnosis systems. [10] Methods: A literature review searching Medline, Embase, Ovidsp, Cochrane library, pubmed database and google scholar was performed searching keywords including: ‘Robotic hip surgery’, ‘Robotic orthopaedic surgery’, ‘Computer assisted hip surgery’, ‘robotic arthroplasty’, and ‘computer assisted orthopaedic surgery’. [11] How e-health technology can improve cancer nurse practise and empower cancer patients receiving Immunotherapy? 3 phases: first literature review searching for e-health nurses interventions with cancer patients in last years. [12]我们在四个不同的数据库中进行文献综述检索。 [1] 我们对 2000 年至 2020 年 2 月期间的文章进行了结构化文献综述，搜索 Google Scholar、PubMed 和 EMBASE。 [2] 我们进行了文献综述，搜索医学数据库 UpToDate 和 PubMed，以获取有关妊娠期甲状腺髓样癌的诊断、影响、治疗和结果的相关信息。 [3] 方法 对评估结肠癌 CME 结果的研究进行了系统的文献回顾。 [4] 方法 我们对多个数据库进行了文献综述，以评估 5-FU 的标签外使用的证据。 [5] 方法 我们计划从一开始就搜索以下数据库：MEDLINE (Ovid)、Embase 和 Embase Classic、Web of Science 核心合集、教育资源索引、Sociological s、APA PsycINFO、SCOPUS、CINAHL Plus、Emcare 和 The科克伦图书馆。 [6] 我们进行了文献回顾，搜索前瞻性研究，包括 CCS 患者，不包括基线 HF 患者，以及随访和预测变量中 HF 入院发生率的数据。 [7] 摘要 本研究基于对在 TLG 中工作的学生的特征、条件和成果的系统文献回顾，提出了教师学习小组 (TLG) 中学生促进的设计原则。 [8] 此外，我们提供文献综述，检索与“甲状腺髓样癌”、“原发性甲状腺副神经节瘤”、“副神经节瘤样甲状腺髓样癌”相关的 PubMed 术语与颈部 US 结节外观、血清 CT 测量、细胞学和组织学发现的关系. [9] 我们对 1970 年至 2019 年的七个存储库中的原始文章进行了文献综述，并确定了超声计算机辅助诊断系统中当前使用的 11 种主要方法。 [10] 方法：检索 Medline、Embase、Ovidsp、Cochrane 图书馆、pubmed 数据库和 google 学者的文献综述，搜索关键字包括：“机器人髋关节手术”、“机器人骨科手术”、“计算机辅助髋关节手术”、“机器人关节成形术”、和“计算机辅助骨科手术”。 [11] 电子健康技术如何改善癌症护士的实践并赋予癌症患者接受免疫治疗的能力？ 3 个阶段：第一次文献回顾，寻找电子保健护士在过去几年对癌症患者的干预。 [12]
Scoping Review Searching
METHODS A scoping review searching for terms related to physician, information, oral communication, and controlled study. [1] We performed a scoping review searching scientific and grey literature databases with the aim of assessing the extent of published research dealing with SoP and effectiveness of WSs. [2]方法 搜索与医生、信息、口头交流和对照研究相关的术语的范围审查。 [1] 我们对科学和灰色文献数据库进行了范围审查，目的是评估已发表的涉及 SoP 的研究范围和 WSs 的有效性。 [2]
review searching medline 回顾搜索医学
Methods: We performed a systematic review searching Medline, Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Covid-19 register, international trial registers, medRxiv, bioRxiv, and arXiv up to April 10, 2021. [1] Methods: Using the PICO (Patient, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome) framework, we conducted a systematic review searching Medline (New PubMed), Embase. [2] METHODS We performed a systematic review searching Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Central from inception to March 29, 2019. [3] Systematic review searching Medline, Embase and PsychINFO from inception to May 2021. [4] METHODS We performed a systematic review searching MEDLINE for articles published from 1972 to 2016. [5] We performed a systematic review searching MEDLINE via PubMed and Cochrane (CENTRAL) databases for observational studies reporting on the association between aPL and dementia in the general population, in subjects carrying aPL, in patients with cognitive disorder/dementia, and in primary and secondary APS. [6] Methods: A literature review searching Medline, Embase, Ovidsp, Cochrane library, pubmed database and google scholar was performed searching keywords including: ‘Robotic hip surgery’, ‘Robotic orthopaedic surgery’, ‘Computer assisted hip surgery’, ‘robotic arthroplasty’, and ‘computer assisted orthopaedic surgery’. [7] Methods In February 2019, we performed a systematic review searching Medline, Embase, PsychINFO, Global Health and Web of Science without language or date restrictions. [8]方法：我们对 Medline、Pubmed、Embase、Cochrane Covid-19 注册库、国际试验注册库、medRxiv、bioRxiv 和 arXiv 进行了系统评价，检索时间截至 2021 年 4 月 10 日。 [1] 方法：使用 PICO（患者、干预、比较、结果）框架，我们对 Medline（新 PubMed）、Embase 进行了系统评价。 [2] 方法 我们对 Medline、Embase 和 Cochrane Central 从成立到 2019 年 3 月 29 日进行了系统评价。 [3] 从成立到 2021 年 5 月对 Medline、Embase 和 PsychINFO 进行系统评价。 [4] 方法 我们对 1972 年至 2016 年发表的文章进行了系统评价，搜索 MEDLINE。 [5] 我们通过 PubMed 和 Cochrane (CENTRAL) 数据库对 MEDLINE 进行了系统评价，以获取观察性研究，报告一般人群、携带 aPL 的受试者、认知障碍/痴呆患者以及原发性和继发性 APS 中 aPL 与痴呆之间的关系. [6] 方法：检索 Medline、Embase、Ovidsp、Cochrane 图书馆、pubmed 数据库和 google 学者的文献综述，搜索关键字包括：“机器人髋关节手术”、“机器人骨科手术”、“计算机辅助髋关节手术”、“机器人关节成形术”、和“计算机辅助骨科手术”。 [7] 方法 2019 年 2 月，我们对 Medline、Embase、PsychINFO、Global Health 和 Web of Science 进行了系统评价，没有语言或日期限制。 [8]
review searching fmy 查看搜索 Fmy
METHODS Systematic review searching four databases (MEDLINE/EMBASE/PsycINFO/CINAHL) from January 1998 to October 2020. [1] On 4 April 2021, we developed a rapid review searching four electronic databases: PubMed/Medline, Scopus, EMBASE, Google Scholar and medRxiv. [2] A systematic review searching four electronic databases (PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Embase) was conducted. [3] Methods: We conducted a systematic review searching four databases: PubMed, Ebsco Medline with full text, PsycINFO, and Web of Science; and including articles that were 1) related to at least one of the research question; 2) intervention studies aiming to evaluate the effectiveness of the familiar social support component in weight loss; 3) the population of the study was adult women between 18 and 65 years. [4]方法 从 1998 年 1 月到 2020 年 10 月，系统评价搜索了四个数据库（MEDLINE/EMBASE/PsycINFO/CINAHL）。 [1] 2021 年 4 月 4 日，我们对四个电子数据库进行了快速审查：PubMed/Medline、Scopus、EMBASE、Google Scholar 和 medRxiv。 [2] 对四个电子数据库（PubMed、CINAHL、Web of Science 和 Embase）进行了系统评价。 [3] 方法：我们对四个数据库进行了系统评价：PubMed、Ebsco Medline with full text、PsycINFO 和 Web of Science；并包括 1) 与至少一个研究问题相关的文章； 2) 旨在评估熟悉的社会支持成分在减肥中的有效性的干预研究； 3) 研究人群为 18 至 65 岁的成年女性。 [4]