Review Public(审查公众)研究综述
Review Public 审查公众 - The purpose of this article is to review publicly available clinical trials to find trends regarding the number of trials, their location, and interventions including the most frequently studied drugs and their combinations. [1] Findings of this study are projected to be disseminated through peer-review publications. [2] Epidemiological articles and review publications that look into this research issue are often compromised by methodological problems. [3] The findings will be disseminated by peer-review publications and conference presentations. [4] IQVIA grants permission to use the statements for the specified purpose (NOACs share in the total anticoagulation market and role of NOACs as the SoC in the near future) of peer-review publication by Dr. [5] STUDY DESIGN Review publications concerning the use of photocatalytic systems in hospital setting, focusing on products based on TiO2. [6] Our results will be submitted for peer-review publication. [7] This means that many review publications, which do not reference a formal methodology, can still be read as rigorous approaches to qualitative synthesis. [8] In our study, we review publications available in the PUMED database concerning acute leukemia, with a particular emphasis on child's leukemias. [9] The aim of this article is to review publications that reported mutated cancer-associated genes in CML patients at various disease phases. [10] ” Inclusion criteria were quantitative measurement of MI and health outcomes, Veteran or Active Duty Military status, and peer-review publication. [11] These publications differ from legitimate open-access journals in that predatory journals subvert the peer-review publication system for the sole purpose of financial gain with little evident concern for ethical behavior. [12] Traditionally, reviewers have been anonymous, but there is currently a significant amount of open peer-review publications, where the comments are visible to readers, generally with the identities of the reviewers disclosed as well [3, 4], (https://publons. [13] Final assessment included logbook and skills' reviews, graduation thesis or peer-review publication, two-papers' written examination, and an exit practical examination. [14] Although there have been many review publications concerning risk factors for vascular aging, most include cross-sectional epidemiological studies, limiting inferences about temporality. [15] The findings of this study will be presented at relevant conferences and submitted for peer-review publication. [16] In this chapter we review publications which included data on the occurrence and specific concentrations of antibiotics in sewage sludge and soils where sludge was spread. [17] The final results of the review and meta-analysis will be submitted for peer-review publication and also disseminated at relevant conference presentations. [18] The peer-review publications from the field of electron dosimetry with ionization chambers present new results which revise the assumptions of the code of practice in relation to fluence disturbance. [19] The authors, Editorial Board, staff at the Academy and I have worked hard to bring to our readers a new type of review publication. [20] In this paper, we review publications on the nutritional functions of DHA/EPA-enriched glycerophospholipids, including the effects on brain function, antitumor activity, lipid metabolism, and glucose metabolism. [21] A comprehensive search was conducted of databases, PubMed and Informit ATSIhealth, to identify peer-review publications, while relevant websites were also searched for grey literature. [22] In this work, we review publications about metal artifact correction strategies in MRI-based attenuation correction in PET/MRI. [23] Dissemination will take place through a 1 day dissemination workshop with key stakeholders in public health and policy, practitioners and scientists in Bangladesh, and through international conference presentations and peer-review publications. [24] This paper thus aims to review publications related to these topics in the previous 5 years. [25] Methods We searched 17 databases including PubMed, Medline/OvidSP, Science Direct, PROSPERO, PRISMA, PubMed Health, Embase, EBSCOhost, SciELO, TRIP, ProQuest, Academic search complete, Ageline, Cochrane, Web-of-Science and BIOSIS using a comprehensive search strategy to review publications from January 1st1980 to 31stMarch 2019 in English. [26] This chapter describes a literature search that was performed to review publications on the effectiveness or outcome of cognitive-behavioral treatment programs for violent and sexually violent offenders. [27] Hundreds of studies, many summarised in review publications like the IARC Handbook 14 and the National Cancer Institute’s Monograph 21 on the Economics of Tobacco Control, provided strong evidence that tobacco tax increases are an important, even primary tool, in the tobacco control toolkit. [28] In this article, we review publications from 2017 to 2018 reporting molecular simulations of binary ionic liquids. [29] 67 clinical studies and 9 guideline/review publications met the inclusion criteria. [30]本文的目的是回顾公开可用的临床试验，以发现有关试验数量、试验地点和干预措施的趋势，包括最常研究的药物及其组合。 [1] 这项研究的结果预计将通过同行评审出版物传播。 [2] 研究这一研究问题的流行病学文章和评论出版物经常受到方法问题的影响。 [3] 研究结果将通过同行评审出版物和会议报告进行传播。 [4] IQVIA 允许将这些声明用于特定目的（NOAC 在整个抗凝市场中的份额以及 NOAC 在不久的将来作为 SoC 的作用）。 [5] 学习规划 审查有关在医院环境中使用光催化系统的出版物，重点关注基于 TiO2 的产品。 [6] 我们的结果将提交给同行评审发表。 [7] 这意味着许多没有参考正式方法的评论出版物仍然可以被视为定性综合的严格方法。 [8] 在我们的研究中，我们回顾了 PUMED 数据库中关于急性白血病的出版物，特别强调了儿童白血病。 [9] 本文的目的是回顾报告在不同疾病阶段的 CML 患者中发生突变的癌症相关基因的出版物。 [10] ” 纳入标准是 MI 和健康结果的定量测量、退伍军人或现役军人身份以及同行评审出版物。 [11] 这些出版物与合法的开放获取期刊的不同之处在于掠夺性期刊颠覆同行评审出版系统的唯一目的是为了获得经济利益，而对道德行为几乎没有明显的关注。 [12] 传统上，审稿人是匿名的，但目前有大量开放的同行评审出版物，其中评论对读者可见，通常也会公开审稿人的身份 [3, 4]，（https://公报。 [13] 最终评估包括日志和技能审查、毕业论文或同行评审出版物、两篇论文的笔试和退出实践考试。 [14] 尽管有许多关于血管老化危险因素的评论出版物，但大多数都包括横断面流行病学研究，从而限制了对时间性的推论。 [15] 这项研究的结果将在相关会议上发表，并提交给同行评审发表。 [16] 在本章中，我们回顾了出版物，其中包括有关污水污泥和污泥传播的土壤中抗生素的发生情况和特定浓度的数据。 [17] 审查和荟萃分析的最终结果将提交同行评审出版，并在相关会议报告中传播。 [18] 来自具有电离室的电子剂量学领域的同行评审出版物提出了新的结果，这些结果修改了与注量干扰有关的操作规范的假设。 [19] 作者、编辑委员会、学院的工作人员和我一直在努力为我们的读者带来一种新型的评论出版物。 [20] 在本文中，我们回顾了有关富含 DHA/EPA 的甘油磷脂的营养功能的出版物，包括对脑功能、抗肿瘤活性、脂质代谢和葡萄糖代谢的影响。 [21] 对数据库 PubMed 和 Informit ATSIhealth 进行了全面搜索，以识别同行评审出版物，同时也在相关网站上搜索灰色文献。 [22] 在这项工作中，我们回顾了有关 PET/MRI 中基于 MRI 的衰减校正中金属伪影校正策略的出版物。 [23] 传播将通过为期 1 天的传播研讨会与孟加拉国公共卫生和政策的主要利益相关者、从业人员和科学家进行，并通过国际会议演讲和同行评审出版物进行。 [24] 因此，本文旨在回顾过去 5 年与这些主题相关的出版物。 [25] 方法 我们检索了 17 个数据库，包括 PubMed、Medline/OvidSP、Science Direct、PROSPERO、PRISMA、PubMed Health、Embase、EBSCOhost、SciELO、TRIP、ProQuest、Academic search complete、Ageline、Cochrane、Web-of-Science 和 BIOSIS。检索 1980 年 1 月 1 日至 2019 年 3 月 31 日期间英文出版物的检索策略。 [26] 本章描述了一项文献检索，该检索旨在审查有关暴力和性暴力犯罪者的认知行为治疗计划的有效性或结果的出版物。 [27] 数百项研究，其中许多总结在 IARC 手册 14 和国家癌症研究所关于烟草控制经济学的专着 21 等评论出版物中，提供了强有力的证据，表明增加烟草税是烟草控制工具包中一个重要的，甚至是主要的工具。 [28] 在本文中，我们回顾了 2017 年至 2018 年报告二元离子液体分子模拟的出版物。 [29] 67 项临床研究和 9 篇指南/评论出版物符合纳入标准。 [30]
We Review Public 我们审查公众
We review publications relating to the rationale behind, and clinical tests for, detecting and treating early atherosclerosis in people with T1D. [1] We review publicly available resources for a do-it-yourself approach to alteration interpretation when it is not provided or when supplemental research is needed, along with resources to identify genomically matched treatment options that are approved and/or investigational. [2] We review public-use sources from the last 30 years that include information on immigration, SRH, health service utilization, and race/ethnicity. [3]我们回顾了与 T1D 患者早期动脉粥样硬化的基本原理、临床试验、检测和治疗相关的出版物。 [1] 当未提供或需要补充研究时，我们会审查公开可用的资源，以自行更改解释方法，以及确定已批准和/或研究的基因组匹配治疗方案的资源。 [2] 我们回顾了过去 30 年的公共使用资源，包括关于移民、性与生殖健康、卫生服务利用和种族/民族的信息。 [3]
Critically Review Public 批判性地审查公众
Given that there are ongoing discussions about policy initiatives to improve these data, this article sets out to critically review publicly available data, identify important limitations of these data, and profile studies that have used these data successfully. [1] AIMS AND OBJECTIVES To critically review publications addressing the principles governing dog health education in remote Aboriginal communities. [2] Provided that conversations about the problems and prospects of mapping and measuring the Internet feed into continuing discussions of policy initiatives to improve these data, this article sets out to critically review publicly available data, identify important limitations of these data, and profile research that have used these data successfully. [3]鉴于有关改进这些数据的政策举措的持续讨论，本文着手批判性地审查公开可用的数据，确定这些数据的重要局限性，并介绍成功使用这些数据的研究。 [1] 目的和目标 批判性地审查解决偏远土著社区狗健康教育原则的出版物。 [2] 如果有关映射和测量 Internet 的问题和前景的对话能够持续讨论改善这些数据的政策举措，那么本文将批判性地审查公开可用的数据，确定这些数据的重要局限性，并分析使用过的研究这些数据成功。 [3]
Peer Review Public 同行评审公开
In addition, early findings will be shared with Public Health England and Health Scotland, and results communicated via conference presentations, peer review publication and our institutions’ social media platforms. [1] Study results will be submitted for peer review publication. [2] 3% developed skills in preparing peer review publications and literature reviews. [3]此外，早期发现将与英格兰公共卫生和苏格兰卫生共享，结果将通过会议报告、同行评审出版物和我们机构的社交媒体平台进行交流。 [1] 研究结果将提交同行评审发表。 [2] 3% 的人培养了准备同行评审出版物和文献评论的技能。 [3]
Systematically Review Public 系统地审查公众
OBJECTIVE: Systematically review publications in the literature regarding the effects of resistance training on the functional capacity of patients with COPD, considering the feasibility, safety and characteristics of exercise prescription during the rehabilitation process. [1] In the present article, we systematically review publications describing the results of monofocal distraction of stiff nonunions. [2]目的：系统回顾文献中关于阻力训练对COPD患者功能能力影响的文献，考虑康复过程中运动处方的可行性、安全性和特点。 [1] 在本文中，我们系统地回顾了描述僵硬骨不连的单焦点分散结果的出版物。 [2]