Review European(审查欧洲)研究综述
Review European 审查欧洲 - Research shows that citizens prefer a moderate balance of constituency and national policy work (Vivyan and Wagner, 2016), but how much do voters actually expect MPs to engage in the European project? And even more importantly, does this engagement matter when voters seek to make a decision between candidates at the ballot box? MPs already review European Union (EU) legislation when they transpose EU policies into national law (Franchino and Høyland, 2009), deliberate about EU proposals in parliamentary committees (Winzen, 2017), and address the EU in debates and questions (Rauh, 2015). [1] In this study, we review European research on the relationship between nature and integration of immigrants. [2]研究表明，公民更喜欢在选区和国家政策工作之间取得适度平衡（Vivyan 和 Wagner，2016 年），但选民实际上期望国会议员参与欧洲项目的程度如何？ And even more importantly, does this engagement matter when voters seek to make a decision between candidates at the ballot box?国会议员在将欧盟政策转化为国家法律时已经审查了欧盟 (EU) 立法（Franchino 和 Høyland，2009 年），在议会委员会审议欧盟提案（Winzen，2017 年），并在辩论和问题中向欧盟发表讲话（Rauh，2015 年） ）。 [1] 在这项研究中，我们回顾了欧洲关于自然与移民融合之间关系的研究。 [2]