## Ratio Comparison(比率比较)研究综述

Ratio Comparison 比率比较 - A 15% change in age-specific stroke mortality showed little difference in the ratio comparison of PYLDs (range 0.^{[1]}We used R statistical software, epitools, to calculate the pregnancy-related mortality ratio (number of pregnancy-related deaths per 100,000 live births) for each urban-rural grouping, obtain 95% confidence intervals, and perform exact tests of ratio comparisons using the Poisson distribution.

^{[2]}The ratio comparison with the industry average indicated the possible gray areas of Yes bank, which was once considered as the most promising bank of India.

^{[3]}The improved performance is evident in spanning regressions, direct Sharpe-ratio comparisons, and real-time trading strategies.

^{[4]}Ventral and subcaudal scales in male and female specimens show high variation in the total scale count, the ratio comparison of tl: SVL measurement, indicated the sexual dimorphism.

^{[5]}Deterministic method is the ratio comparison of the Cyclic Resistant Ratio (CRR) and the Cyclic Stress Ratio (CSR) effected by the earthquakes.

^{[6]}The ratio comparison was performed by Chi-square test or Fisher's exact probability test.

^{[7]}A tracheal detection algorithm using ratio comparisons of reflectance was developed.

^{[8]}The ratio comparison was performed by Chi-square test.

^{[9]}

年龄特异性卒中死亡率变化 15%，PYLD 的比率比较差异很小（范围 0.

^{[1]}我们使用 R 统计软件 epitools 计算了每个城乡分组的妊娠相关死亡率（每 10 万活产中与妊娠相关的死亡人数），获得 95% 置信区间，并使用泊松分布。

^{[2]}与行业平均水平的比率比较表明，Yes银行可能存在灰色地带，该银行曾被认为是印度最有前途的银行。

^{[3]}跨越回归、直接夏普比率比较和实时交易策略的改进表现很明显。

^{[4]}男性和女性标本的腹侧和尾侧鳞片在总鳞片计数中显示出很大的变化，tl：SVL测量的比率比较表明性别二态性。

^{[5]}确定性方法是受地震影响的循环抗力比（CRR）和循环应力比（CSR）的比值比较。

^{[6]}比率比较采用卡方检验或Fisher精确概率检验。

^{[7]}开发了一种使用反射比比较的气管检测算法。

^{[8]}比率比较采用卡方检验。

^{[9]}

## Hazard Ratio Comparison

02) in predicting the primary endpoint (hazard ratio comparison p = 0.^{[1]}Cox regression analysis (adjusted for age, race, gender, sub-site, grade and surgical treatment) was conducted for cancer-specific survival and additionally, pairwise hazard ratio comparisons were performed.

^{[2]}

02）预测主要终点（风险比比较 p = 0。

^{[1]}对癌症特异性生存率进行 Cox 回归分析（针对年龄、种族、性别、亚部位、等级和手术治疗进行了调整），此外，还进行了成对风险比比较。

^{[2]}

## Likelihood Ratio Comparison

Likelihood ratio comparisons from conditional probability trees revealed that dogs were 15× more likely to be present on hardstanding surfaces than other habitats but were also present on natural and amenity grassland.^{[1]}Linear mixed-effects regression modelling of lung function was performed, with co-variate parameters evaluated by likelihood ratio comparison.

^{[2]}

条件概率树的似然比比较显示，狗出现在坚硬表面上的可能性比其他栖息地高 15 倍，但也出现在自然和舒适的草地上。

^{[1]}对肺功能进行线性混合效应回归建模，通过似然比比较评估协变量参数。

^{[2]}