Oropharyngeal Saliva(口咽唾液)研究综述
Oropharyngeal Saliva 口咽唾液 - Physical exam was notable for erythematous and scaly-dry skin in V-neck pattern, gottron papules, facial and periorbital erythema with scaly skin, periungual erythema, oropharyngeal salivary pooling, proximal bilateral upper and lower extremity weakness with intact distal extremity strength, and wasting of the bilateral quadriceps and hamstrings. [1] OBJECTIVES (1) To compare perioperative outcomes and overall survival of patients with oropharyngeal salivary gland malignancies (OPSGMs) treated with transoral robotic surgery (TORS) versus other approaches. [2] We aimed to test the sensitivity of naso-oropharyngeal saliva and self-administered nasal (SN) swab compared to nasopharyngeal (NP) swab for COVID-19 testing in a large cohort of migrant workers in Singapore. [3] Robotic surgery has a different role to play in oropharyngeal salivary origin tumors, where surgery is the primary essential modality. [4]体格检查可见 V 颈型红斑和鳞状干燥皮肤、gottron 丘疹、面部和眶周红斑伴鳞状皮肤、甲周红斑、口咽唾液池、双侧上肢和下肢近端无力但远端肢体力量完整、消瘦双侧股四头肌和腘绳肌。 [1] 目标 (1) 比较经口机器人手术 (TORS) 与其他方法治疗的口咽唾液腺恶性肿瘤 (OPSGMs) 患者的围手术期结局和总生存期。 [2] 我们的目的是在新加坡的一大群移民工人中测试鼻口咽唾液和自我管理的鼻 (SN) 拭子与鼻咽 (NP) 拭子对 COVID-19 检测的敏感性。 [3] 机器人手术在口咽唾液源性肿瘤中发挥着不同的作用，其中手术是主要的基本方式。 [4]
oral saliva deep 口水深
This study aims to critically appraise and compare the clinical performance of RT-PCR tests using oral saliva, deep-throat saliva/ posterior oropharyngeal saliva (DTS/POS), sputum, urine, feces, and tears/conjunctival swab [CS]) against standard specimens (NPS, OPS, or a combination of both). [1] This study aims to critically appraise and compare the clinical performance of RT-PCR tests using oral saliva, deep-throat saliva/posterior oropharyngeal saliva (DTS/POS), sputum, urine, feces, and tears/conjunctival swab (CS) against standard specimens (NPS, OPS, or a combination of both). [2] This study aims to critically appraise and compare the clinical performance of RT-PCR tests using oral saliva, deep-throat saliva/ posterior oropharyngeal saliva (DTS/POS), sputum, urine, feces, and tears/conjunctival swab [CS]) against standard specimens (NPS, OPS, or a combination of both). [3]本研究旨在批判性评价和比较使用口腔唾液、深喉唾液/口咽后唾液 (DTS/POS)、痰液、尿液、粪便和泪液/结膜拭子 [CS]) 对 RT-PCR 检测的临床表现标准样品（NPS、OPS 或两者的组合）。 [1] 本研究旨在严格评估和比较使用口腔唾液、深喉唾液/口咽后部唾液 (DTS/POS)、痰液、尿液、粪便和泪液/结膜拭子 (CS) 进行的 RT-PCR 检测的临床表现。标本（NPS、OPS 或两者的组合）。 [2] nan [3]
Posterior Oropharyngeal Saliva 后口咽唾液
Background: The present study was set up to evaluate the efficacy of virological surveillance using posterior oropharyngeal saliva samples to monitor the COVID-19 pandemic in general practice. [1] A total of 60 pools of nasopharyngeal swab and 60 pools of posterior oropharyngeal saliva specimens, each consisting of 1 SARS-CoV-2 positive and 9 SARS-CoV-2 negative specimens, were included for the comparison. [2] This study aims to critically appraise and compare the clinical performance of RT-PCR tests using oral saliva, deep-throat saliva/ posterior oropharyngeal saliva (DTS/POS), sputum, urine, feces, and tears/conjunctival swab [CS]) against standard specimens (NPS, OPS, or a combination of both). [3] This study aims to critically appraise and compare the clinical performance of RT-PCR tests using oral saliva, deep-throat saliva/posterior oropharyngeal saliva (DTS/POS), sputum, urine, feces, and tears/conjunctival swab (CS) against standard specimens (NPS, OPS, or a combination of both). [4] Posterior oropharyngeal saliva is a sensitive source for SARS-CoV-2 detection. [5] In this study, the use of oral rinses (ORs) and posterior oropharyngeal saliva as an alternative to swab collection methods from symptomatic and asymptomatic health care workers for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA by RT-PCR was evaluated. [6] This study aims to critically appraise and compare the clinical performance of RT-PCR tests using oral saliva, deep-throat saliva/ posterior oropharyngeal saliva (DTS/POS), sputum, urine, feces, and tears/conjunctival swab [CS]) against standard specimens (NPS, OPS, or a combination of both). [7] Research design and methods: In this study, we compared the performance of these two systems on SARS-CoV-2 detection in 9 nasopharyngeal swab (NPS) and 70 posterior oropharyngeal saliva specimens collected from 79 patients suspected of SARS-CoV-2 infection between August 2020 and March 2021. [8] Temporal profiles of viral load in posterior oropharyngeal saliva samples and serum antibody responses during infection by SARS-CoV-2: an observational cohort study. [9]背景：本研究旨在评估在一般实践中使用后口咽唾液样本监测 COVID-19 大流行的病毒学监测效果。 [1] 共有 60 份鼻咽拭子和 60 份口咽后部唾液样本进行比较，每个样本由 1 份 SARS-CoV-2 阳性和 9 份 SARS-CoV-2 阴性样本组成。 [2] 本研究旨在批判性评价和比较使用口腔唾液、深喉唾液/口咽后唾液 (DTS/POS)、痰液、尿液、粪便和泪液/结膜拭子 [CS]) 对 RT-PCR 检测的临床表现标准样品（NPS、OPS 或两者的组合）。 [3] 本研究旨在严格评估和比较使用口腔唾液、深喉唾液/口咽后部唾液 (DTS/POS)、痰液、尿液、粪便和泪液/结膜拭子 (CS) 进行的 RT-PCR 检测的临床表现。标本（NPS、OPS 或两者的组合）。 [4] nan [5] nan [6] nan [7] 研究设2020 年 8 月和 2021 年 3 月。 [8] nan [9]
oropharyngeal saliva sample 口咽唾液样本
If patients were able to cooperate, oropharyngeal saliva samples were obtained. [1] Background: The present study was set up to evaluate the efficacy of virological surveillance using posterior oropharyngeal saliva samples to monitor the COVID-19 pandemic in general practice. [2] Temporal profiles of viral load in posterior oropharyngeal saliva samples and serum antibody responses during infection by SARS-CoV-2: an observational cohort study. [3]如果患者能够合作，则获得口咽唾液样本。 [1] 背景：本研究旨在评估在一般实践中使用后口咽唾液样本监测 COVID-19 大流行的病毒学监测效果。 [2] nan [3]
oropharyngeal saliva specimen 口咽唾液标本
A total of 60 pools of nasopharyngeal swab and 60 pools of posterior oropharyngeal saliva specimens, each consisting of 1 SARS-CoV-2 positive and 9 SARS-CoV-2 negative specimens, were included for the comparison. [1] Research design and methods: In this study, we compared the performance of these two systems on SARS-CoV-2 detection in 9 nasopharyngeal swab (NPS) and 70 posterior oropharyngeal saliva specimens collected from 79 patients suspected of SARS-CoV-2 infection between August 2020 and March 2021. [2]共有 60 份鼻咽拭子和 60 份口咽后部唾液样本进行比较，每个样本由 1 份 SARS-CoV-2 阳性和 9 份 SARS-CoV-2 阴性样本组成。 [1] 研究设2020 年 8 月和 2021 年 3 月。 [2]