Morphodynamic Response(形态动力学响应)研究综述
Morphodynamic Response 形态动力学响应 - A numerical study was conducted using a suspended sediment transport model developed in a previous study to quantify the morphodynamic responses of beach berms and scarps to the foreshore region as well as offshore sand motion. [1] It is therefore highlighted that the estuarine system in response to natural and anthropogenic pressures is very dynamic, and the impacts of various engineering projects in the source-to-sink system should be fully taken into consideration when predicting its morphodynamic response in the estuary. [2] The morphodynamic responses to normal faulting range from longitudinal bed profile adjustments to channel pattern changes. [3] Additional research efforts are required to define sound cause-effect relationships between the human pressures and the morphodynamic responses of sediment-starved gravel-bed rivers. [4] These results are consistent with morphodynamic responses to sedimentological and oceanographic processes involving the interaction of paleocurrents with substrate morphology. [5] SU segmentation divides terrain into homogenous domains and approximates the morphodynamic response of the slope to landslides. [6] In this paper, the morphodynamic response of a gravel-dominated meso-tidal estuary inlet to Sea Level Rise (SLR) is discussed based on three future SLR scenarios. [7] This study utilizes repeated geoacoustic mapping to quantify the morphodynamic response of the nearshore to storm-induced changes. [8] The nearshore hydro-morphodynamic responses to coastal structures vary widely, as these responses are complex functions with numerous parameters, including structural design, sediment and wave dynamics, angle of approach, slope of the coast and the materials making up the beach and structures. [9] These findings provide a new framework for improved predictive capabilities for sediment transport and morphodynamic response in regulated rivers to natural or imposed unsteady flows, while their wider application to graded sediments is also considered. [10] The morphodynamic responses of the Narrabeen beach are highly variable and rapid alongshore. [11] The results also reveal that due to the shape of the beach and its orientation to predominant wave approach direction, there will be a strong longshore variability of morphodynamic response to storms. [12]使用先前研究中开发的悬浮沉积物传输模型进行了数值研究，以量化海滩护堤和陡坡对前滨地区以及近海沙子运动的形态动力学响应。 [1] 因此强调河口系统对自然和人为压力的响应是非常动态的，在预测其在河口的形态动力学响应时，应充分考虑源汇系统中各种工程项目的影响。 [2] 对正常断层的形态动力学响应范围从纵向床剖面调整到通道模式变化。 [3] 需要进一步的研究工作来确定人类压力与缺乏沉积物的砾石床河流的形态动力学响应之间的良好因果关系。 [4] 这些结果与涉及古洋流与底物形态相互作用的沉积学和海洋学过程的形态动力学响应一致。 [5] SU 分割将地形划分为同质域，并近似斜坡对滑坡的形态动力学响应。 [6] 在本文中，基于三种未来 SLR 情景讨论了砾石为主的中潮河口入口对海平面上升 (SLR) 的形态动力学响应。 [7] 本研究利用重复的地声测绘来量化近岸对风暴引起的变化的形态动力学响应。 [8] 对海岸结构的近岸水形态动力学响应差异很大，因为这些响应是具有许多参数的复杂函数，包括结构设计、沉积物和波浪动力学、接近角、海岸坡度以及构成海滩和结构的材料。 [9] 这些发现为提高受管制河流对自然或强加不稳定流的沉积物迁移和形态动力学响应的预测能力提供了一个新框架，同时还考虑了它们在分级沉积物中的更广泛应用。 [10] Narrabeen 海滩的形态动力学响应是高度可变的并且沿岸快速。 [11] 结果还表明，由于海滩的形状及其朝向主要波浪接近方向的方向，对风暴的形态动力学响应将存在强烈的沿岸变化。 [12]
Beach Morphodynamic Response
The S1 scenario was implemented to evaluate the beach morphodynamic response in the case of a removal intervention. [1] Measurements of LCDBs’ freeboard height show that sand-filled geosystems’ breakwaters presented a significant loss of sand during the study period, which explains the unexpected beach morphodynamic response on the lee side of the structure. [2]实施 S1 情景以评估在移除干预情况下的海滩形态动力学响应。 [1] LCDB 干舷高度的测量表明，在研究期间，填沙地质系统的防波堤出现了大量的沙子流失，这解释了结构背风侧意外的海滩形态动力学响应。 [2]