Current Comparison(当前比较)研究综述
Current Comparison 当前比较 - Current comparisons of these techniques have relied solely on systematic reviews and biomechanical studies. [1] This paper is focused on the detection of counterfeit documents via the recurrent comparison of the security textured background regions of two images. [2] Such analyses clean up the hindrance on the current comparisons to understand the performance gain of the existing modules. [3] We conclude that more attention should be paid to methodological differences between FOP labels and recommend that the current comparison is expanded to a global level and periodically updated, as the variety of FOP labels in the global marketplace is changing constantly. [4] Despite evidence that CABG surgery using the radial artery (RA) instead of saphenous vein (SV) grafts provide superior patency rate and outcomes, RA has been underutilised in current comparisons between CABG and PCI. [5] We argue that GPIs derive influence from their ability to frame issues, extend the authority of the creator, and — most importantly — to invoke recurrent comparison that stimulates governments' concerns for their own and their country's reputation. [6] Validating the utility of this approach requires concurrent comparisons of anopheline biting rates with antibodies to the gSG6 protein to determine the sensitivity and specificity of the assay for monitoring changes in vector populations. [7] This paper is focused on the detection of counterfeit documents via the recurrent comparison of the security textured background regions of two images. [8] This study is a concurrent comparison of two versions of CHOP protocols, a 19-week CHOP and a comparatively overall dose-intense 12-week CHOP. [9] Patients with refractory GERD were recruited for a nonrandomized concurrent comparison, with 60 patients in the C-BLART with tailored PPI use group and 43 patients in the BID proton pump inhibitor (PPI) group. [10] The discussion of the physical principles governing the phenomena, proceeds through a recurrent comparison between the outcomes obtained with the toy models and the results of real experiments. [11]目前对这些技术的比较仅依赖于系统评价和生物力学研究。 [1] 本文的重点是通过对两幅图像的安全纹理背景区域进行反复比较来检测伪造文件。 [2] 这样的分析清除了当前比较的障碍,以了解现有模块的性能增益。 [3] 我们的结论是,应更多地关注 FOP 标签之间的方法差异,并建议将当前的比较扩大到全球水平并定期更新,因为全球市场上 FOP 标签的种类不断变化。 [4] 尽管有证据表明使用桡动脉 (RA) 而不是大隐静脉 (SV) 移植物的 CABG 手术可提供更高的通畅率和结果,但在目前 CABG 和 PCI 之间的比较中,RA 并未得到充分利用。 [5] 我们认为,GPI 的影响来自于它们对问题进行界定、扩大创造者的权威以及——“最重要的是”——调用反复比较的能力,从而激发政府对其自身和国家声誉的关注。 [6] 验证这种方法的实用性需要同时比较按蚊叮咬率与 gSG6 蛋白抗体,以确定监测载体种群变化的测定的敏感性和特异性。 [7] 本文的重点是通过对两幅图像的安全纹理背景区域进行反复比较来检测伪造文件。 [8] 本研究同时比较了两个版本的 CHOP 方案,即 19 周 CHOP 和相对整体剂量密集的 12 周 CHOP。 [9] 难治性 GERD 患者被招募进行非随机同时比较,其中 60 名患者在 C-BLART 与定制 PPI 使用组和 43 名患者在 BID 质子泵抑制剂 (PPI) 组。 [10] 对支配这些现象的物理原理的讨论,通过玩具模型获得的结果与实际实验结果之间的反复比较来进行。 [11]
current comparison group 当前比较组
SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised controlled trials, non-randomised controlled trials, and controlled before-after studies with concurrent comparison groups comparing the effect of different imaging strategies on survival and other health outcomes in adults with cerebral glioma; and full economic evaluations (cost-effectiveness analyses, cost-utility analyses and cost-benefit analyses) conducted alongside any study design, and any model-based economic evaluations on pre- and post-treatment imaging in adults with cerebral glioma. [1] CONCLUSION Using external databases such as those of professional societies may permit comparative effectiveness assessment by providing concurrent comparison groups, additional outcome measures and longer follow-up. [2] Both historical and concurrent comparison groups were used to identify statistical signals for adverse events. [3] SELECTION CRITERIA We included parallel-group randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and cluster-RCTs, as well as non-randomised observational prospective studies with concurrent comparison groups in which participants with BPH who underwent Aquablation. [4]选择标准 我们纳入了随机对照试验、非随机对照试验和前后对照研究,同时比较了不同成像策略对脑胶质瘤成人患者生存率和其他健康结果的影响;与任何研究设计一起进行的全面经济评估(成本效益分析、成本效用分析和成本效益分析),以及对成人脑胶质瘤治疗前和治疗后成像的任何基于模型的经济评估。 [1] 结论 使用外部数据库,如专业协会的数据库,可以通过提供并行比较组、额外的结果测量和更长的随访时间来进行比较有效性评估。 [2] 历史和同时比较组都被用来识别不良事件的统计信号。 [3] 选择标准 我们纳入了平行组随机对照试验 (RCTs) 和整群随机对照试验,以及非随机观察性前瞻性研究,其中有 BPH 参与者接受 Aquablation 的同时比较组。 [4]
current comparison method 当前比较方法
The partial pressures of these vapor species were obtained by the ion current comparison method. [1] This method has advantages over the current comparison methods. [2] Current comparison methods are based on a closest point distance or require at least one of the point cloud to be meshed. [3]这些蒸气物质的分压是通过离子电流比较法获得的。 [1] 这种方法比当前的比较方法具有优势。 [2] 当前的比较方法基于最近的点距离或需要对至少一个点云进行网格划分。 [3]