Community Adults(社区成人)研究综述
Community Adults 社区成人 - We administered measures of ASAD symptoms, IU, and AS, as well as trait anxiety to a sample of community adults (n = 761) recruited through Amazon Mechanical Turk (MTurk). [1] Participants were community adults (N = 366; M Age = 24. [2] METHODS The primary sample was a cohort of community adults (N = 1431) who completed a one-time in-person assessment. [3] The highest prevalence of each disorder was found among infected/recovered adults (18–56%), followed by healthcare providers (11–28%) and community adults (11–20%). [4] The present study examined willingness to receive COVID-19 vaccine, the associated reasons for willingness/unwillingness, and vaccine safety perceptions in a cross-sectional assessment of community adults in Ontario. [5] Therefore, this study aimed to study the interaction between childhood parental bonding and these effects in community adults. [6] To address this gap, we investigated the direct and unique contributions of cortical thickness (level 1), pathological personality traits (level 2) and trauma exposure (level 3) for explaining lifetime physical aggression in a high-risk sample of community adults (N = 129, 47. [7] METHODS Participants (N = 80) were community adults (mean age = 32. [8] Methods: A population-based random telephone survey was conducted in community adults in May 2020; 658 social media users and 177 Internet gamers were identified. [9] The present study examined willingness to receive a COVID-19 vaccine, the associated reasons for willingness/unwillingness, and vaccine safety perceptions in a cross-sectional assessment of community adults in Ontario. [10] Method: Community adults (n = 856) participated in this eight-year study across four waves of assessment, each spaced about two years apart. [11] PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING The present study included a large sample of community adults (n = 489) who were oversampled for internalizing psychopathology symptoms. [12] Samples were composed of adolescents, undergraduates, and community adults. [13] CONCLUSIONS Community adults with substance use disorders, comorbid substance use and mental health disorders, and increasing multimorbidity are most at risk of crime and justice involvement, highlighting the importance of community-based addiction treatment. [14] In the second sample, (the Study of Household Purchasing Patterns, Eating, and Recreation or SHoPPER), trained dietitians conducted 24DR interviews with 69 community-dwelling adults in their homes; all the community adults then completed a paper-based SS© at the final visit. [15] It is unclear whether similar associations exist in community adults and in other locations. [16] Community adults (N = 173) completed self-report questionnaires assessing two higher-order perfectionism dimensions (self-critical [SC], personal standards [PS]), neuroticism, experiential avoidance, and depressive and anxious symptoms at Time 1, Time 2 one year later, and Time 3 two years later. [17] For this study, ethnobotanical data were collected by means of interviews using semi-structured questions responded to by the elderly, community adults, and youth who had been selected on the basis of referrals. [18] Background The aim of this study is to examine the relationship between personal values in adolescence retrospectively assessed and psychological distress in adults in a representative sample of community adults in Japan. [19] veterans, prisoners, community adults and adolescents). [20] Our results provide preliminary good internal consistency and construct validation of the Chinese-version BQDI as a measure of betel quid dependence in community adults. [21] ABSTRACT The aim of this study was to compare prisoners (n = 772), community adults (n = 1201), university students (n = 2080), and adolescents (n = 472) on four sets of psychopathic traits (affective responsiveness, cognitive responsiveness, interpersonal manipulation, and egocentricity), using a psychopathy measure which does not index criminal/antisocial behavior – the Psychopathic Personality Traits Scale. [22] Therefore, we examined the structure and relations of the HPS in a large sample of community adults (N = 737) receiving psychiatric treatment. [23] Using data from a sample of community adults (N = 210), we employed a construct rating and psychometric refinement approach to develop item-based PID-5 Triarchic scales for measuring psychopathy dimensions of boldness, meanness, and disinhibition. [24] METHOD Online respondents (community adults and university students; total N = 1,715) completed self-report measures of personality and trolling behavior. [25] 1% community adults, 46. [26] The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of an intervention with youth on cardiovascular disease risk factors of community adults. [27] To overcome these limitations, we assessed relationships between multiple dimensions of interoceptive awareness (IA) and multiple facets of body image in community adults. [28] The aim of this exploratory study is to test, in community adults, the relationship between of parental representations and psychological pain. [29] This new Trait Fear scale was then evaluated for convergent and discriminant validity with measures of personality and psychopathology in a separate sample (n = 213) consisting of community adults and undergraduate students. [30] Results supported a bifactor model of the MCQ-30 in a sample of community adults from the United States (N = 785), as well as separately among men (n = 372) and women (n = 413). [31] Methods: Community adults (N 1⁄4 230) were randomly assigned to complete 1 of 3 activities, each week for 4 weeks: to perform 3 kind acts for other people, to perform 3 kind acts for themselves, or to list daily activities. [32]我们对通过 Amazon Mechanical Turk (MTurk) 招募的社区成年人样本 (n = 761) 进行了 ASAD 症状、IU 和 AS 以及特质焦虑的测量。 [1] 参与者是社区成年人（N = 366；M 年龄 = 24。 [2] 方法 主要样本是一组完成了一次性面对面评估的社区成年人 (N = 1431)。 [3] 在受感染/康复的成年人中发现每种疾病的患病率最高（18-56%），其次是医疗保健提供者（11-28%）和社区成年人（11-20%）。 [4] 本研究在安大略省社区成年人的横断面评估中检查了接受 COVID-19 疫苗的意愿、意愿/不意愿的相关原因以及疫苗安全认知。 [5] 因此，本研究旨在研究儿童父母关系与社区成年人的这些影响之间的相互作用。 [6] 为了解决这一差距，我们调查了皮质厚度（1 级）、病理人格特征（2 级）和创伤暴露（3 级）对解释社区成人高风险样本（N = 129, 47. [7] 方法 参与者（N = 80）是社区成年人（平均年龄 = 32。 [8] 方法：2020年5月对社区成年人进行基于人群的随机电话调查；确定了 658 名社交媒体用户和 177 名网络游戏玩家。 [9] 本研究在安大略省社区成年人的横断面评估中检查了接受 COVID-19 疫苗的意愿、意愿/不意愿的相关原因以及疫苗安全认知。 [10] 方法：社区成年人 (n = 856) 参加了这项为期八年的研究，共进行了四轮评估，每轮评估相隔约两年。 [11] 参与者和设置 本研究包括大量社区成年人 (n = 489)，他们因内化精神病理学症状而被过度抽样。 [12] 样本由青少年、本科生和社区成年人组成。 [13] 结论 患有物质使用障碍、共存物质使用和精神健康障碍以及多发病率增加的社区成年人最有可能参与犯罪和司法，这凸显了以社区为基础的成瘾治疗的重要性。 [14] 在第二个样本（家庭购买模式、饮食和娱乐或购物者研究）中，训练有素的营养师对 69 名社区居民在家中进行了 24DR 访谈；然后，所有社区成年人在最后一次访问时完成了纸质 SS©。 [15] 目前尚不清楚社区成年人和其他地方是否存在类似的关联。 [16] 社区成年人 (N=173) 完成了自我报告问卷，评估了两个高阶完美主义维度（自我批评 [SC]、个人标准 [PS]）、神经质、经验回避以及时间 1、时间 2 的抑郁和焦虑症状一年后，时间 3 两年后。 [17] 在这项研究中，民族植物学数据是通过访谈的方式收集的，这些问题是由根据推荐选择的老年人、社区成年人和青年回答的半结构化问题。 [18] 背景 本研究的目的是在日本社区成年人的代表性样本中研究回顾性评估的青春期个人价值观与成年人心理困扰之间的关系。 [19] 退伍军人、囚犯、社区成年人和青少年）。 [20] 我们的结果提供了初步良好的内部一致性，并构建了中文版 BQDI 作为社区成年人槟榔依赖量度的验证。 [21] 摘要 本研究的目的是比较囚犯 (n = 772)、社区成年人 (n = 1201)、大学生 (n = 2080) 和青少年 (n = 472) 的四组精神病特征（情感反应、认知反应能力、人际操纵和自我中心性），使用不索引犯罪/反社会行为的精神病测量——精神病人格特征量表。 [22] 因此，我们在大量接受精神病治疗的社区成年人（N = 737）样本中检查了 HPS 的结构和关系。 [23] 使用来自社区成年人样本 (N = 210) 的数据，我们采用构建评级和心理测量改进方法来开发基于项目的 PID-5 三元量表，用于测量大胆、卑鄙和去抑制的精神病维度。 [24] 方法 在线受访者（社区成年人和大学生；总 N = 1,715）完成了人格和拖钓行为的自我报告测量。 [25] 1% 的社区成年人，46 岁。 [26] 本研究的目的是调查青年干预对社区成年人心血管疾病危险因素的影响。 [27] 为了克服这些限制，我们评估了内感受意识 (IA) 的多个维度与社区成年人身体形象的多个方面之间的关系。 [28] 这项探索性研究的目的是在社区成年人中测试父母陈述与心理痛苦之间的关系。 [29] 然后，在由社区成人和本科生组成的单独样本 (n = 213) 中，通过测量人格和精神病理学来评估这种新的特质恐惧量表的收敛效度和区分效度。 [30] 结果支持美国社区成年人样本（N = 785）以及男性（n = 372）和女性（n = 413）样本中的 MCQ-30 双因子模型。 [31] 方法：社区成年人 (N 1⁄4 230) 被随机分配完成 3 项活动中的一项，每周持续 4 周：为他人执行 3 种行为，为自己执行 3 种行为，或列出日常活动。 [32]
Chinese Community Adults 华人社区成人
This study aimed to estimate the prevalence of PSU among Chinese community adults and adopted a social-cognitive theory and social axiom framework to evaluate the effects of beliefs on PSU. [1] The purpose of this study was to estimate the possible correlation of LAP with CKD prevalence in Chinese community adults. [2] In this research, we compared the prediction of LS with Extraversion and Neuroticism via the pathways of individual depressive state and interdependent happiness between American (n = 155) and Chinese community adults (n = 248). [3]本研究旨在估计中国社区成年人中 PSU 的患病率，并采用社会认知理论和社会公理框架来评估信念对 PSU 的影响。 [1] 本研究的目的是估计 LAP 与中国社区成年人 CKD 患病率的可能相关性。 [2] 在这项研究中，我们通过美国 (n=155) 和中国社区成年人 (n=248) 之间的个体抑郁状态和相互依赖幸福感的途径比较了 LS 与外向性和神经质的预测。 [3]
Stressed Community Adults
Here, we provide data from two 3-arm randomized controlled trials that examined the effect of mindfulness training on inflammation in stressed community adults. [1] 153 stressed community adults were randomly assigned to one of three 14-lesson smartphone-based interventions: (1) training in both monitoring and acceptance (MA), (2) training in monitoring only (MO), or (3) active control training. [2] METHOD This preregistered RCT randomly assigned stressed community adults to 1 of 3 conditions: (a) Monitor and Accept (MA) mindfulness training, a standard 8-week Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction (MBSR) intervention that provided explicit instruction in developing both monitoring and acceptance skills; (b) Monitor Only (MO) mindfulness training, a well-matched 8-week MBSR intervention that taught monitoring skills only; or (c) No Treatment (NT) control. [3]在这里，我们提供了来自两项 3 臂随机对照试验的数据，这些试验检查了正念训练对压力社区成年人炎症的影响。 [1] 153 名有压力的社区成年人被随机分配到三个 14 课的基于智能手机的干预措施之一：(1) 监测和接受培训 (MA)，(2) 仅监测培训 (MO)，或 (3) 主动控制培训. [2] 方法 这项预先注册的随机对照试验将压力大的社区成年人随机分配到 3 种条件中的一种：(a) 监控和接受 (MA) 正念训练，一种标准的 8 周基于正念的减压 (MBSR) 干预措施，为发展监控和接受提供了明确的指导技能； (b) 仅监控 (MO) 正念训练，这是一项相匹配的 8 周 MBSR 干预，仅教授监控技能；或 (c) 无治疗 (NT) 对照。 [3]
Older Community Adults
Twenty cohorts of 8933 participants aged 18–98 were identified, including data from the Sydney Memory and Ageing Study, a cohort of older community adults. [1] Therefore, the supervised 12-week Tai Chi exercise had potential beneficial effects on cerebral hemodynamics, plasma risk factors, and balance ability in older community adults at risk of ischemic stroke. [2] The aim of current study was to assess the effects of Baduanjin exercise on cerebrovascular function, cardiac structure and cardiac function, static pulmonary function, traditional risk factors of CVD and the related psychological outcomes in older community adults at risk for ischaemic stroke. [3]确定了 20 个队列，共 8933 名年龄在 18-98 岁之间的参与者，其中包括来自悉尼记忆和衰老研究的数据，这是一个社区老年人队列。 [1] 因此，有监督的为期 12 周的太极拳练习对有缺血性卒中风险的老年人的脑血流动力学、血浆危险因素和平衡能力具有潜在的有益影响。 [2] 本研究的目的是评估八段锦运动对有缺血性卒中风险的老年人的脑血管功能、心脏结构和心脏功能、静态肺功能、CVD 的传统危险因素以及相关心理结果的影响。 [3]
Among Community Adults
Design A prospective cross-sectional study using a custom-designed questionnaire was conducted among community adults in Saudi Arabia, age ≥ 18. [1] Conclusions Survey results suggested that there exists scant information about risk factors, alarming signs, and early treatment approaches among community adults toward stroke. [2]设计 一项使用定制设计问卷的前瞻性横断面研究在沙特阿拉伯的社区成年人中进行，年龄 ≥ 18。 [1] 结论 调查结果表明，社区成年人中风的危险因素、警报信号和早期治疗方法的信息很少。 [2]
Exposed Community Adults
Participants included 397 trauma-exposed community adults (Mage = 35. [1] Participants were 475 trauma-exposed community adults recruited from Amazon's Mechanical Turk (MTurk) platform (Mage = 35. [2]参与者包括 397 名受过创伤的社区成年人（法师 = 35. [1] 参与者是从亚马逊的 Mechanical Turk (MTurk) 平台招募的 475 名受过创伤的社区成年人 (Mage=35. [2]
Healthy Community Adults
Across three separate studies, daily activities and affect were measured throughout 7–15 days (Mdays = 10) in 361 healthy community adults (72. [1] A total of 145 adults participated in the study (psychiatric patients, N = 28; healthy community adults, N = 117). [2]在三项独立的研究中，对 361 名健康社区成年人 (72. [1] 共有 145 名成年人参与了这项研究（精神病患者，N = 28；健康社区成年人，N = 117）。 [2]
General Community Adults
This study examined changes in cannabis use over the following year in a sample of general community adults. [1] Methods A descriptive questionnaire-based cross-sectional study was conducted for a period of 3 months targeting general community adults who visit community pharmacy settings. [2]这项研究检查了普通社区成年人样本中大麻使用在接下来一年中的变化。 [1] 方法 对访问社区药房的普通社区成年人进行为期 3 个月的基于描述性问卷调查的横断面研究。 [2]
1432 Community Adults 1432 社区成年人
Methods Cross-sectional in-person assessment of 1432 community adults (age 38. [1] PARTICIPANTS A total of 1432 community adults (age = mean ± standard deviation = 38. [2]方法对 1432 名社区成年人（年龄 38. [1] 参与者 共有 1432 名社区成年人（年龄 = 平均值 ± 标准差 = 38。 [2]
Urban Community Adults 城市社区成人
Post-second wave seroprevalence ranged from 18% in the rural community children <5 years of age, to 59% in urban community adults 35-59 years of age. [1] Conclusion: Our findings showed low psychological distress among urban community adults. [2]第二波后血清流行率范围从农村社区 5 岁以下儿童的 18% 到城市社区 35-59 岁成年人的 59%。 [1] 结论：我们的研究结果表明，城市社区成年人的心理压力较低。 [2]
community adults completed
A sample composed of 516 Spanish undergraduate students and community adults completed measures of EI, self-esteem, anxiety, and ED symptomatology. [1] METHOD In an online within-subjects experiment, 219 Australian community adults completed the Credibility/Expectancy Questionnaire following written descriptions of BA and ST (presentation order randomized across participants), and again for BA after receiving information about research supporting BA's efficacy. [2]由 516 名西班牙本科生和社区成年人组成的样本完成了 EI、自尊、焦虑和 ED 症状的测量。 [1] 方法 在一项在线受试者内实验中，219 名澳大利亚社区成年人完成了对 BA 和 ST（参与者随机呈现顺序）的书面描述后的可信度/期望问卷，并在收到有关支持 BA 功效的研究信息后再次完成了 BA。 [2]
community adults recruited
Structural equation modeling was used to examine the direct and interactive effects of AS and IU as related to COVID-19 worries and behaviors in two samples of community adults recruited in April 2020 (N = 642; M age = 38. [1] Participants were 475 trauma-exposed community adults recruited from Amazon's Mechanical Turk (MTurk) platform (Mage = 35. [2]在 2020 年 4 月招募的两个社区成人样本（N = 642；M 年龄 = 38. [1] 参与者是从亚马逊的 Mechanical Turk (MTurk) 平台招募的 475 名受过创伤的社区成年人 (Mage=35. [2]
community adults diagnosed 社区成人确诊
In both studies, community adults diagnosed with SAD and healthy controls received five surveys each day for 2 weeks. [1] Methods Participants were community adults diagnosed with SAD and a psychologically healthycontrol group who completed a 14-day experience-sampling study. [2]在这两项研究中，被诊断患有 SAD 的社区成年人和健康对照者每天接受五次调查，为期 2 周。 [1] 方法 参与者是被诊断患有 SAD 的社区成年人和一个心理健康的对照组，他们完成了为期 14 天的经验抽样研究。 [2]