Collegiate Softball(大学垒球)研究综述
Collegiate Softball 大学垒球 - Hypothesis/Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare kinematics between the fastball, changeup, curveball, and dropball pitch types in collegiate softball pitchers. [1] Conclusion: The fastball and curveball placed similar stress on the upper extremity in collegiate softball pitchers. [2] CASE A Division I collegiate softball catcher presented with discoloration, coolness, and swelling of her left index finger that worsened with sport participation. [3] Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to compare pelvis and trunk kinematics between youth and collegiate softball pitchers. [4] OBJECTIVE To determine between-limb differences in shoulder ROM and strength in healthy collegiate softball players. [5] Method: Participants were female collegiate softball players (N = 721) from 62 NCAA teams. [6] Conclusion: At foot contact, the kinematic variables of increased trunk rotation toward the pitching arm side, increased stride length, and a posteriorly shifted COM were associated with upper extremity pain in collegiate softball pitchers. [7] Twelve collegiate softball players were recruited for the study. [8] ; Lucas Molitor, Whitney; Athmann, Ashley; Boell, Molly; Kaiser, Angela; Musch, Ashley; and Willhite, Logan (2019) "Efficacy of High-performance Vision Training on Improving the Reaction Time of Collegiate Softball Athletes: A Randomized Trial," Journal of Sports Medicine and Allied Health Sciences: Official Journal of the Ohio Athletic Trainers Association: Vol. [9] These values can be used by coaches and trainers as descriptive DXA data for collegiate softball players. [10] Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate trunk and pitching arm kinematics and their association with performance outcome: earned run average (ERA), in collegiate softball pitchers. [11]假设/目的：本研究的目的是比较大学垒球投手的快球、换球、曲线球和落球投球类型之间的运动学。 [1] 结论：快球和曲球对大学垒球投手的上肢施加的压力相似。 [2] 案子 一名 I 级大学垒球接球手出现左手食指变色、冰凉和肿胀，随着运动的参与而恶化。 [3] 目的/假设：本研究的目的是比较青少年和大学垒球投手之间的骨盆和躯干运动学。 [4] 客观的 确定健康大学垒球运动员肩部 ROM 和力量的肢体间差异。 [5] 方法：参与者是来自 62 支 NCAA 球队的女大学生垒球运动员（N = 721）。 [6] 结论：在足部接触时，躯干向投球臂侧旋转增加、步幅增加和 COM 后移等运动学变量与大学垒球投手的上肢疼痛相关。 [7] 研究招募了 12 名大学垒球运动员。 [8] ;卢卡斯·莫利托，惠特尼；阿斯曼，阿什利；博尔，莫莉；凯撒，安吉拉；穆什，阿什利；和 Willhite, Logan（2019 年）“高性能视觉训练对提高大学垒球运动员反应时间的效果：一项随机试验”，运动医学与联合健康科学杂志：俄亥俄州运动训练师协会官方期刊：卷。 [9] 教练和训练员可以将这些值用作大学垒球运动员的描述性 DXA 数据。 [10] 因此，本研究的目的是研究大学垒球投手的躯干和投球臂运动学及其与表现结果的关联：平均得分 (ERA)。 [11]
collegiate softball pitcher 大学垒球投手
Hypothesis/Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare kinematics between the fastball, changeup, curveball, and dropball pitch types in collegiate softball pitchers. [1] Conclusion: The fastball and curveball placed similar stress on the upper extremity in collegiate softball pitchers. [2] Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to compare pelvis and trunk kinematics between youth and collegiate softball pitchers. [3] Conclusion: At foot contact, the kinematic variables of increased trunk rotation toward the pitching arm side, increased stride length, and a posteriorly shifted COM were associated with upper extremity pain in collegiate softball pitchers. [4] Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate trunk and pitching arm kinematics and their association with performance outcome: earned run average (ERA), in collegiate softball pitchers. [5]假设/目的：本研究的目的是比较大学垒球投手的快球、换球、曲线球和落球投球类型之间的运动学。 [1] 结论：快球和曲球对大学垒球投手的上肢施加的压力相似。 [2] 目的/假设：本研究的目的是比较青少年和大学垒球投手之间的骨盆和躯干运动学。 [3] 结论：在足部接触时，躯干向投球臂侧旋转增加、步幅增加和 COM 后移等运动学变量与大学垒球投手的上肢疼痛相关。 [4] 因此，本研究的目的是研究大学垒球投手的躯干和投球臂运动学及其与表现结果的关联：平均得分 (ERA)。 [5]
collegiate softball player
OBJECTIVE To determine between-limb differences in shoulder ROM and strength in healthy collegiate softball players. [1] Method: Participants were female collegiate softball players (N = 721) from 62 NCAA teams. [2] Twelve collegiate softball players were recruited for the study. [3] These values can be used by coaches and trainers as descriptive DXA data for collegiate softball players. [4]客观的 确定健康大学垒球运动员肩部 ROM 和力量的肢体间差异。 [1] 方法：参与者是来自 62 支 NCAA 球队的女大学生垒球运动员（N = 721）。 [2] 研究招募了 12 名大学垒球运动员。 [3] 教练和训练员可以将这些值用作大学垒球运动员的描述性 DXA 数据。 [4]