Analytic Comparison(分析比较)研究综述
Analytic Comparison 分析比较 - To investigate the robustness of existing cell-typing methods, we collected 7 scATAC-seq datasets targeting mouse brain for a meta-analytic comparison of neuronal cell-type annotation, including a reference atlas generated by the BRAIN Initiative Cell Census Network (BICCN). [1] This paper presents an analytic comparison between the involute surfaces obtained using theoretical equations, kinematic simulation of the cutting and the surface charged with errors. [2] 0) was used to data fitting and analytic comparison of larch plantation data. [3] OBJECTIVES We sought to provide further evidence on the safety and efficacy of aortic valve neocuspidization (AVNeo) using autologous pericardium in adult patients with aortic valve disease by reporting clinical and echocardiographic results from the first UK experience and performing a meta-analytic comparison with other biological valve substitutes. [4] The meta-analysis used a grading of recommendations assessment, development, and evaluation (GRADE) approach to assess the quality of each meta-analytic comparison. [5] Meta-analytic comparisons were performed when appropriate using data from comparative studies using a random-effects model. [6] Towards the end, there is an analytic comparison between some of the most famous halal food applications available for download and what new feature can be added into them to make them more efficient and useful for consumers. [7] CONCLUSIONS Insufficient data are available for meta-analytic comparison of all combinations of implant placement and loading protocols. [8] The analytic comparison between the behaviour of building types with interventions and that of the vulnerability classes of the European Macroseismic Scale (EMS-98) obtained a vulnerability model for empirical data. [9] We study this edge performance inversion problem through an analytic comparison of edge and cloud latencies and analyze conditions under which the edge can yield worse performance than the cloud. [10] BACKGROUND AND AIMS Meta-analytic comparison of endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD) versus percutaneous gallbladder drainage (PT-GBD) for acute cholecystitis (AC) brings the risk of spurious results if too few studies are included. [11] This article provides an analytic comparison of such LFOs and typical individual mobile objects (IMOs), namely animals, humans, vehicles, etc. [12] These articles are heterogeneous but they allow the meta-analytic comparison of the abovementioned outcomes. [13] Analytic comparisons revealed no significantly different outcomes in terms of mood, pain level, functional ability, or discharge status for patients visited by a chaplain. [14] As such, this study was designed to examine the criterion-related validity of universal and industry-specific safety climate measures by conducting a meta-analytic comparison of their relationships with a variety of safety-related outcomes (i. [15] Standardized effects were inverse-variance weighted and pooled across studies for meta-analytic comparison. [16] To address this issue, this study provides a direct, meta-analytic comparison of functional neuroimaging studies involving EM and IM tasks. [17] To this end, we performed a meta-analytic comparison of brain activation between deception and false memory. [18] The paper offers an analytic comparison of the notions “region”, “regional subsystem”, “regional complex”. [19] When medical practitioners apply CPG recommendations, they need to understand how well their patient population matches the characteristics of those in the study cohort, and thus are confronted with the challenges of locating the study cohort information and making an analytic comparison. [20] It is demonstrated that the approach allows for tractable, analytic comparison between the given test and the benchmark, and for reliable quantitative evaluation of weighted statistics. [21] In this paper we perform an analytic comparison of a number of techniques used to detect fake and deceptive online reviews. [22] Meta-analytic comparisons were performed using data from comparative studies using a random-effects model and differences of means analysis for outcomes measured on identical scales. [23]为了研究现有细胞分型方法的稳健性，我们收集了 7 个针对小鼠大脑的 scATAC-seq 数据集，用于对神经元细胞类型注释进行元分析比较，包括由 BRAIN Initiative 细胞普查网络 (BICN) 生成的参考图谱。 [1] 本文介绍了使用理论方程、切削运动学模拟和带误差的表面获得的渐开线表面之间的分析比较。 [2] 0）用于落叶松人工林数据的数据拟合和分析比较。 [3] 目标 我们试图通过报告来自英国首次经验的临床和超声心动图结果并与其他生物瓣膜进行荟萃分析比较，为成人主动脉瓣疾病患者使用自体心包进行主动脉瓣新瓣化 (AVNeo) 的安全性和有效性提供进一步的证据替代品。 [4] 荟萃分析使用推荐评估、开发和评估分级 (GRADE) 方法来评估每个荟萃分析比较的质量。 [5] 使用随机效应模型的比较研究数据在适当时进行荟萃分析比较。 [6] 最后，对一些可供下载的最著名的清真食品应用程序进行分析比较，以及可以添加哪些新功能以使它们对消费者更有效和有用。 [7] 结论 没有足够的数据可用于对种植体放置和加载协议的所有组合进行荟萃分析比较。 [8] 通过干预措施的建筑类型与欧洲大地震等级 (EMS-98) 的脆弱性等级之间的分析比较，获得了经验数据的脆弱性模型。 [9] 我们通过对边缘和云延迟的分析比较来研究这种边缘性能反转问题，并分析边缘可以产生比云更差的性能的条件。 [10] 背景和目的 如果纳入的研究太少，则内镜超声引导下胆囊引流术（EUS-GBD）与经皮胆囊引流术（PT-GBD）对急性胆囊炎（AC）的荟萃分析比较会带来虚假结果的风险。 [11] 本文提供了此类 LFO 与典型个体移动对象 (IMO) 的分析比较，即动物、人类、车辆等。 [12] 这些文章是异质的，但它们允许对上述结果进行元分析比较。 [13] 分析比较显示，牧师访问的患者在情绪、疼痛程度、功能能力或出院状态方面没有显着不同的结果。 [14] 因此，本研究旨在通过对它们与各种安全相关结果（即 [15] 标准化效应是逆方差加权的，并在研究中汇总以进行荟萃分析比较。 [16] 为了解决这个问题，本研究对涉及 EM 和 IM 任务的功能性神经影像学研究进行了直接的元分析比较。 [17] 为此，我们对欺骗和错误记忆之间的大脑激活进行了元分析比较。 [18] 本文对“区域”、“区域子系统”、“区域综合体”等概念进行了分析比较。 [19] 当医生应用 CPG 建议时，他们需要了解他们的患者群体与研究队列中的特征的匹配程度，因此面临查找研究队列信息和进行分析比较的挑战。 [20] 结果表明，该方法允许在给定测试和基准之间进行易于分析的比较，以及对加权统计数据进行可靠的定量评估。 [21] 在本文中，我们对用于检测虚假和欺骗性在线评论的多种技术进行了分析比较。 [22] 使用随机效应模型的比较研究数据和在相同尺度上测量的结果的均值分析差异进行荟萃分析比较。 [23]