Introduction to Review Searching

What is/are Review Searching?

Review Searching - MethodsIn January 2018, a review searching the databases PubMed, The Cochrane Library, and Web of Science, using defined search terms for “big data analytics” and “multimorbidity”, supplemented by a search of grey literature with Google Scholar, was conducted. ^[1]

Systematic Review Searching

Methods and analysis We will use an innovative mixed-methods study design combining systematic review searching techniques with cross-sectional quantitative descriptive analysis and interpretative qualitative metasynthesis to integrate three elements: (1) Scoping review: multiple database searches for empirical studies and first-hand experiences in English (no other restrictions) to establish how patients and informal carers conceptualise safety in palliative medication management. ^[1] Methods: We performed a systematic review searching Medline, Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Covid-19 register, international trial registers, medRxiv, bioRxiv, and arXiv up to April 10, 2021. ^[2] We conducted a systematic review searching the Cochrane, PubMed, and Ovid databases. ^[3] Despite the fact that systematic review searching is a significant task for many librarians and knowledge professionals, the search process can be considered a form of invisible labor because it often goes without recognition. ^[4] We conducted a systematic review searching the PubMed and MEDES databases from 2009 to 2019 using predefined selection criteria. ^[5] Methods: Using the PICO (Patient, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome) framework, we conducted a systematic review searching Medline (New PubMed), Embase. ^[6] METHODS We performed a systematic review searching Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Central from inception to March 29, 2019. ^[7] METHODS Systematic review searching four databases (MEDLINE/EMBASE/PsycINFO/CINAHL) from January 1998 to October 2020. ^[8] METHODS We conducted a systematic review searching PubMed, EMBASE, Ovid PsycINFO, and ClinicalTrials. ^[9] Methods We conducted a qualitative systematic review searching 11 databases and 24 relevant government and non-governmental organisation (NGO) websites. ^[10] We conducted a systematic review searching the databases PubMed, Embase and Cochrane. ^[11] A systematic review searching foremost databases was conducted for evidence of trauma-informed school-wide approaches used between 2008 and 2019. ^[12] We performed a systematic review searching the electronic databases PubMed and Scopus through December 2020 and selected articles that compared sleep of offenders and controls and articles that studied the association between sleep and aggression. ^[13] Systematic review searching Medline, Embase and PsychINFO from inception to May 2021. ^[14] This review study aims to (i) explore the pathophysiological background of sarcopenia in PLWH under the different existing ART and (ii) develop a mini-systematic review searching epidemiological studies investigating sarcopenia prevalence in PLWH. ^[15] METHODS We performed a systematic review searching MEDLINE for articles published from 1972 to 2016. ^[16] Methods We performed a systematic review searching for prospective clinical trials comparing any treatment versus placebo for the treatment of CRF. ^[17] Methods To assess scope and consistency of dialysis adequacy by professionals, we performed a systematic review searching the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) up to July 2017. ^[18] METHODS A systematic review searching for the terms "(bone marrow)" AND "(aspirate OR concentrate)" AND "(cartilage OR chondral OR osteochondral)" was performed in the databases PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Google Scholar regarding the use of BMAC for the treatment of focal chondral lesions of the knee. ^[19] We performed a systematic review searching MEDLINE via PubMed and Cochrane (CENTRAL) databases for observational studies reporting on the association between aPL and dementia in the general population, in subjects carrying aPL, in patients with cognitive disorder/dementia, and in primary and secondary APS. ^[20] Methods: We conducted a systematic review searching in several databases (Medline, Embase, CENTRAL, CINAHL, PsycInfo, Science Citation Index, clinicaltrials. ^[21] A systematic review searching leading databases was conducted for evidence of organisation-wide, trauma-informed, out-of-home care studies, between 2002 and 2017. ^[22] Methods Systematic review searching nine databases to June 2017 for experimental, qualitative and observational studies. ^[23] Methods We performed a systematic review searching the PubMed/MEDLINE public database for pregnancy in women with pre-existent IHD analysing the cardiac, obstetric and fetal/neonatal outcome of pregnancy in women with pre-existing IHD. ^[24] METHODS We performed a systematic review searching the PubMed and Embase databases from inception to December 7, 2017 for randomized and nonrandomized studies that included adults with previous venous thromboembolism requiring VKA interruption to undergo an elective procedure, and that reported venous thromboembolism or bleeding outcomes. ^[25] A systematic review searching four electronic databases (PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Embase) was conducted. ^[26] Methods In February 2019, we performed a systematic review searching Medline, Embase, PsychINFO, Global Health and Web of Science without language or date restrictions. ^[27] Methods: We conducted a systematic review searching four databases: PubMed, Ebsco Medline with full text, PsycINFO, and Web of Science; and including articles that were 1) related to at least one of the research question; 2) intervention studies aiming to evaluate the effectiveness of the familiar social support component in weight loss; 3) the population of the study was adult women between 18 and 65 years. ^[28]

Literature Review Searching

We carry out a literature review searching in four different databases. ^[1] We performed a structured literature review searching Google Scholar, PubMed, and EMBASE for articles between 2000 and February 2020. ^[2] We performed a literature review searching medical databases as UpToDate and PubMed for relevant information about diagnosis, impact, treatment, and outcome of medullary thyroid carcinoma during pregnancy. ^[3] METHODS A systematic literature review searching for the studies that assessed the outcome of CME of colon cancer was conducted. ^[4] METHODS We conducted a literature review searching multiple databases to evaluate the evidence for the off-label uses of 5-FU. ^[5] Methods We have planned a scoping literature review searching the following databases from inception onwards: MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase and Embase Classic, Web of Science Core Collection, Education Resources Index, Sociological s, APA PsycINFO, SCOPUS, CINAHL Plus, Emcare and The Cochrane Library. ^[6] We performed a literature review searching for prospective studies including patients with CCS, excluding patients with HF at baseline, with data on HF admission incidence in follow up and predictive variables. ^[7] ABSTRACT This study presents design principles for student facilitation in teacher learning groups (TLGs), based on a systematic literature review searching for characteristics, conditions, and outcomes of students working in TLGs. ^[8] Additionally, we provide a literature review searching on PubMed terms related to "medullary thyroid carcinoma", "primary thyroid paraganglioma", "paraganglioma-like medullary thyroid cancer" in relationship with nodular appearance at neck US, serum CT measurement, cytological and histological findings. ^[9] We performed a literature review searching for original articles in seven repositories, from 1970 to 2019, and identified 11 main methods currently used in ultrasound computer-aided diagnosis systems. ^[10] Methods: A literature review searching Medline, Embase, Ovidsp, Cochrane library, pubmed database and google scholar was performed searching keywords including: ‘Robotic hip surgery’, ‘Robotic orthopaedic surgery’, ‘Computer assisted hip surgery’, ‘robotic arthroplasty’, and ‘computer assisted orthopaedic surgery’. ^[11] How e-health technology can improve cancer nurse practise and empower cancer patients receiving Immunotherapy? 3 phases: first literature review searching for e-health nurses interventions with cancer patients in last years. ^[12]

Scoping Review Searching

METHODS A scoping review searching for terms related to physician, information, oral communication, and controlled study. ^[1] We performed a scoping review searching scientific and grey literature databases with the aim of assessing the extent of published research dealing with SoP and effectiveness of WSs. ^[2]

review searching medline

Methods: We performed a systematic review searching Medline, Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Covid-19 register, international trial registers, medRxiv, bioRxiv, and arXiv up to April 10, 2021. ^[1] Methods: Using the PICO (Patient, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome) framework, we conducted a systematic review searching Medline (New PubMed), Embase. ^[2] METHODS We performed a systematic review searching Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Central from inception to March 29, 2019. ^[3] Systematic review searching Medline, Embase and PsychINFO from inception to May 2021. ^[4] METHODS We performed a systematic review searching MEDLINE for articles published from 1972 to 2016. ^[5] We performed a systematic review searching MEDLINE via PubMed and Cochrane (CENTRAL) databases for observational studies reporting on the association between aPL and dementia in the general population, in subjects carrying aPL, in patients with cognitive disorder/dementia, and in primary and secondary APS. ^[6] Methods: A literature review searching Medline, Embase, Ovidsp, Cochrane library, pubmed database and google scholar was performed searching keywords including: ‘Robotic hip surgery’, ‘Robotic orthopaedic surgery’, ‘Computer assisted hip surgery’, ‘robotic arthroplasty’, and ‘computer assisted orthopaedic surgery’. ^[7] Methods In February 2019, we performed a systematic review searching Medline, Embase, PsychINFO, Global Health and Web of Science without language or date restrictions. ^[8]

review searching fmy

METHODS Systematic review searching four databases (MEDLINE/EMBASE/PsycINFO/CINAHL) from January 1998 to October 2020. ^[1] On 4 April 2021, we developed a rapid review searching four electronic databases: PubMed/Medline, Scopus, EMBASE, Google Scholar and medRxiv. ^[2] A systematic review searching four electronic databases (PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Embase) was conducted. ^[3] Methods: We conducted a systematic review searching four databases: PubMed, Ebsco Medline with full text, PsycINFO, and Web of Science; and including articles that were 1) related to at least one of the research question; 2) intervention studies aiming to evaluate the effectiveness of the familiar social support component in weight loss; 3) the population of the study was adult women between 18 and 65 years. ^[4]