Randomized Parallel Group(隨機平行組)到底是什麼？
Randomized Parallel Group 隨機平行組 - Methods The study is based on a randomized parallel-group trial with two treatment groups (routine, feedback) at an outpatient unit of a university hospital. [1] This study used a cluster double-blinded randomized parallel-group design with school as the unit of randomization. [2] Methods: This was a randomized parallel-group clinical trial, including patients with severe traumatic brain injury (Glasgow coma scale <11 and admission to the neurointensive care unit). [3] Study Design Pilot randomized parallel-group open-label trial. [4] METHODS Mixed methods pragmatic randomized parallel-group exploratory feasibility trial comparing standard care to standard care plus acupuncture. [5] This randomized parallel-group control trial tested the efficacy of distraction using audiovisual eyeglasses (AVE) during dental procedures [NCT03902158]. [6] Methods A prospective multicenter randomized parallel-group clinical trial was conducted in 10 asthma clinics in Spain. [7] METHODS Four raters independently applied RoB2 on critical and important outcomes of individually randomized parallel-group trials (RCTs) included in the Cochrane Review "Cannabis and cannabinoids for people with multiple sclerosis". [8] METHODS In this randomized parallel-group controlled trial, PR classes were block randomized to EPR or traditional PR, which were delivered over 16 sessions each. [9] We performed a randomized parallel-group pharmacokinetic study nested within a clinical trial of intensified antimicrobial therapy for tuberculous meningitis. [10] METHODS We performed a randomized parallel-group physician-blinded trial of cognitive-behavioral and mindfulness-based stress reduction (COBMINDEX) on quality of life and psychological symptoms in adults with mild-moderate Crohn disease. [11] METHODS A randomized parallel-group study design was employed, with all players completing the same approximately 70-minute training session (27. [12] METHODS A randomized parallel-group sham stimulation-controlled design was used. [13] Of the included studies, seven were randomized parallel-group (n = 7), two were crossover (n = 2) and one was the pilot study (n = 1). [14] Methods We employed a randomized parallel-group design with 2 study arms to compare VORT to the standard operation preparation procedure. [15]方法 該研究基於在大學醫院的門診部進行的一項隨機平行組試驗，其中有兩個治療組（常規組、反饋組）。 [1] 本研究採用以學校為隨機單位的集群雙盲隨機平行組設計。 [2] 方法：這是一項隨機平行組臨床試驗，包括嚴重創傷性腦損傷患者（格拉斯哥昏迷評分 <11 併入住神經重症監護病房）。 [3] 研究設計試點隨機平行組開放標籤試驗。 [4] 方法 混合方法實用隨機平行組探索性可行性試驗，比較標準護理與標準護理加針灸。 [5] 這項隨機平行組對照試驗測試了在牙科手術過程中使用視聽眼鏡 (AVE) 分散注意力的效果 [NCT03902158]。 [6] 方法 在西班牙的 10 家哮喘診所進行了一項前瞻性多中心隨機平行組臨床試驗。 [7] 方法 四名評估者獨立地將 RoB2 應用於 Cochrane 評論“多發性硬化症患者的大麻和大麻素”中包含的單獨隨機平行組試驗 (RCT) 的關鍵和重要結果。 [8] 方法 在這項隨機平行組對照試驗中，PR 課程被隨機分配到 EPR 或傳統 PR，每個課程超過 16 次。 [9] 我們在結核性腦膜炎強化抗菌治療的臨床試驗中進行了一項隨機平行組藥代動力學研究。 [10] 方法 我們對患有輕度中度克羅恩病的成年人的生活質量和心理症狀進行了一項隨機平行組醫師盲試驗，該試驗旨在降低認知行為和正念減壓 (COBMINDEX)。 [11] 方法 採用隨機平行組研究設計，所有球員完成相同的大約 70 分鐘訓練課程（27. [12] 方法 使用隨機平行組假刺激控制設計。 [13] 在納入的研究中，7項為隨機平行組（n = 7），2項為交叉研究（n = 2），1項為試點研究（n = 1）。 [14] 方法 我們採用具有 2 個研究組的隨機平行組設計來比較 VORT 與標準手術準備程序。 [15]
Blind Randomized Parallel Group
Materials and methods: This is a single-blind randomized parallel group trial conducted in the Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation in Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research and Seth Sukhlal Karnani Memorial Hospital, Kolkata, for a period of 18 months, considering a minimum of 28 subjects in each group. [1] Methods The ROPALS trial is a single-center double-blind randomized parallel group-controlled trial of the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of the ropinirole hydrochloride extended-release tablet (Requip CR) at 2- to 16-mg doses in patients with ALS. [2]材料和方法：這是一項單盲隨機平行組試驗，在加爾各答研究生醫學教育與研究研究所物理醫學與康復系和 Seth Sukhlal Karnani 紀念醫院進行，為期 18 個月，考慮至少每組 28 名受試者。 [1] 方. [2]
randomized parallel group trial
Materials and methods: This is a single-blind randomized parallel group trial conducted in the Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation in Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research and Seth Sukhlal Karnani Memorial Hospital, Kolkata, for a period of 18 months, considering a minimum of 28 subjects in each group. [1] MethodsWe will conduct a prospective multi-centre, cluster-randomized parallel group trial including 1500 patients and 150 recruiting general practitioners. [2] We present an evaluation method to quantify the influence of bias on the test decision of the log-rank test in a randomized parallel group trial with a survival outcome. [3]材料和方法：這是一項單盲隨機平行組試驗，在加爾各答研究生醫學教育與研究研究所物理醫學與康復系和 Seth Sukhlal Karnani 紀念醫院進行，為期 18 個月，考慮至少每組 28 名受試者。 [1] 方法我們將進行一項前瞻性多中心、整群隨機平行組試驗，包括 1500 名患者和 150 名招募全科醫生。 [2] 我們提出了一種評估方法來量化偏倚對隨機平行組試驗中對數秩檢驗的測試決策的影響，該試驗具有生存結果。 [3]
randomized parallel group design
From this double‐blind, placebo‐ controlled, multi‐centred, randomized parallel group design, we report that omalizumab is possibly inadequate to control sputum eosinophilia, and therefore may not have a steroid‐sparing effect, especially in those maintained on oral corticosteroids daily. [1] Therefore, it is recommended to recruit some thousands of participants to accurately detect ADR differences in a 2-arm randomized parallel group design study. [2] From this double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-centred, randomized parallel group design, we report that omalizumab is possibly inadequate to control sputum eosinophilia, and therefore may not have a steroid-sparing effect, especially in those maintained on oral corticosteroids daily. [3]從這項雙盲、安慰劑對照、多中心、隨機平行組設計中，我們報告說，奧馬珠單抗可能不足以控制痰嗜酸性粒細胞增多，因此可能不具有節省類固醇的作用，尤其是在那些每天維持口服皮質類固醇的患者中. [1] 因此，建議招募數千名參與者在 2 臂隨機平行組設計研究中準確檢測 ADR 差異。 [2] 從這種雙盲、安慰劑對照、多中心、隨機平行組設計中，我們報告說，奧馬珠單抗可能不足以控制痰嗜酸性粒細胞增多，因此可能沒有節省類固醇的作用，尤其是那些每天服用口服皮質類固醇的人. [3]