Prior Coronary(이전 관상동맥)란 무엇입니까?
Prior Coronary 이전 관상동맥 - By multivariate cox regression analysis, including both biomarkers and clinical characteristics (age, diabetes, prior coronary and peripheral artery disease and pretransplant renal replacement therapy), the relation between overall survival and GDF-15 remained significant for the highest tertile (HR 2. [1] Outcome Prevalent CVD was defined as the history of (1) coronary heart disease defined as diagnosed/silent myocardial infarction, or (2) revascularisation procedure defined as prior coronary/peripheral arterial revascularisation, or (3) carotid angioplasty/carotid endarterectomy, or (4) stroke. [2]바이오마커와 임상적 특징(나이, 당뇨병, 이전의 관상동맥 및 말초동맥 질환, 이식 전 신장 대체 요법)을 모두 포함하는 다변량 콕스 회귀 분석에서 전체 생존율과 GDF-15 사이의 관계는 가장 높은 3분위수(HR 2. [1] 결과 널리 퍼진 CVD는 (1) 진단된/무증상 심근경색으로 정의된 관상동맥 심장 질환, 또는 (2) 이전에 관상동맥/말초동맥 혈관재생술로 정의된 혈관재생술, 또는 (3) 경동맥 성형술/경동맥내막절제술의 병력으로 정의되었습니다. 4) 뇌졸중. [2]
artery bypass grafting 동맥 우회술
A 60-year-old man who underwent prior coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) started to experience recurrence of exertional and resting chest pain one year after CABG. [1] Prior coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) has been considered a relative contraindication to lung transplantation due to the atherosclerotic disease burden and technical challenges. [2] RESULTS The MATRIX score (age, height, smoking, renal failure, prior coronary artery bypass grafting, ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, Killip class, radial expertise) showed a c-index for radial crossover of 0. [3] In high-risk patients with prior coronary artery bypass grafting, several authors have reported the noninferiority or superiority of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) compared with surgical aortic valve replacement; however, in Japan, TAVR cannot be performed for patients on hemodialysis. [4] Twenty-nine (59%) patients had a history of hypertension and 14 (29%) a history of ischaemic heart disease; 13 (27%) with priorMI, 11 (22%) had previous PCI and 2 (4%) had prior coronary artery bypass grafting. [5] TAVR CTA scans were categorized as normal/mild CAD, single vessel disease, high risk (multi-vessel or left main disease), or non-diagnostic in patients without prior coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and as low risk or high risk in patients with prior CABG. [6] Exclusion criteria were left ventricular ejection fraction <25% and prior coronary artery bypass grafting. [7] Zero LAAO patients (0%) had prior coronary artery bypass grafting, compared to 35 patients (42%) who did not receive LAAO (p Conclusion A low number of TEs was observed in HM3 recipients. [8] Chronic total occlusions (CTO) are found commonly in patients with prior coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). [9] 68-year-old male with prior coronary artery bypass grafting in 1980s was referred for a coronary angiogram due to Class. [10] Radiation levels were analyzed for normorhythmic patients, patients with prior coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), arrhythmia, and according to patient size and tube voltage. [11] Objectives Chronic total occlusion (CTO) is prevalent in patients with prior coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). [12] OBJECTIVES Patients with patent internal thoracic artery (ITA) grafts after prior coronary artery bypass grafting surgery who require aortic valve replacement (AVR) pose unique technical challenges for safe and optimal myocardial protection. [13] 002), prior coronary artery bypass grafting (HR 2. [14] 040107 2374 A 71-year-old man with prior coronary artery bypass grafting, transcatheter aortic valve replacement, and pericardiotomy for constrictive pericarditis was evaluated for dyspnea. [15] 6% (11 of 95) with prior coronary artery bypass grafting and 29. [16] 4%), and prior coronary artery bypass grafting (23. [17] Prompt identification of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) may be particularly challenging in patients with prior coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). [18] 001) and more frequent prior coronary artery bypass grafting (8. [19] All clinical variables, except prior coronary artery bypass grafting, were independent risk predictors. [20] This article also discusses the difficulties faced during transradial approach in patients with prior coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). [21] 20 years) and had undergone prior coronary artery bypass grafting more frequently (OR, 2. [22] Multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to assess potential predictors of retrograde CTO PCI failure including sex, vascular access site, sheath size, prior PCI, prior coronary artery bypass grafting, history of myocardial infarction, target vessel of CTO, J-CTO score, retrograde wire crossing collaterals, and reverse controlled antegrade and retrograde subintimal tracking (CART) use. [23] SDD patients had lower rates of atrial fibrillation, peripheral arterial disease, and prior coronary artery bypass grafting and were treated at higher-volume centers. [24]이전에 관상동맥우회술(CABG)을 받은 60세 남성이 CABG 후 1년에 운동 및 안정 시 흉통의 재발을 경험하기 시작했습니다. [1] 이전의 관상동맥 우회술(CABG)은 동맥경화성 질환 부담과 기술적 문제로 인해 폐 이식에 대한 상대적인 금기로 간주되었습니다. [2] nan [3] nan [4] nan [5] nan [6] nan [7] nan [8] nan [9] 1980년대에 이전에 관상동맥 우회술을 받은 68세 남성이 Class로 인해 관상동맥 조영술을 위해 의뢰되었습니다. [10] 정상 리듬 환자, 관상동맥 우회술(CABG) 경험이 있는 환자, 부정맥, 환자의 크기와 관전압에 따라 방사선량을 분석하였다. [11] 목적 만성 전체 폐색(CTO)은 이전에 관상동맥 우회로 이식(CABG)을 받은 환자에서 만연합니다. [12] 목표 대동맥 판막 교체(AVR)가 필요한 이전의 관상동맥 우회로 이식 수술 후 특허 내부 흉부 동맥(ITA) 이식을 받은 환자는 안전하고 최적의 심근 보호를 위한 고유한 기술적 문제를 제기합니다. [13] 002), 이전의 관상동맥 우회술(HR 2. [14] 040107 2374 이전에 관상동맥 우회술, 경동맥 대동맥 판막 치환술 및 협착성 심낭염에 대한 심낭절개술을 받은 71세 남성이 호흡곤란에 대해 평가되었습니다. [15] 6%(95개 중 11개)는 이전에 관상동맥 우회로 이식술을 받은 적이 있고 29개입니다. [16] 4%) 및 이전 관상동맥 우회술(23. [17] 급성 심근경색증(AMI)의 신속한 식별은 이전에 관상동맥 우회술(CABG)을 받은 환자에서 특히 어려울 수 있습니다. [18] 001) 이전에 관상동맥우회술을 더 자주 받았다(8. [19] 이전의 관상동맥 우회술을 제외한 모든 임상 변수는 독립적인 위험 예측인자였습니다. [20] 이 기사는 또한 이전에 관상 동맥 우회로 이식(CABG)을 한 환자에서 요골을 통한 접근 중에 직면하는 어려움에 대해 설명합니다. [21] nan [22] nan [23] nan [24]
artery bypass graft 동맥 우회 이식
In the overall sample the following predictors were identified: 1) age; 2) body surface area; 3) cardiopulmonary bypass time; 4) prior coronary artery bypass graft surgery; 5) preoperative hematocrit; and 6) elective versus emergent surgery. [1] sPPM was present in 40 (11%) of the patients [8 (7%) ES XT and 32 (13%) ES3] and was associated with female sex, smaller left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) diameter and aortic valve annular area, absence of prior coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery, shorter height, higher body mass index, and smaller pre-TAVR valve area (all p < 0. [2] 8% had prior coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. [3] Patients with prior coronary artery bypass graft were excluded. [4] Little data are available on access strategy outcomes for cardiac catheterizations in patients with prior coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG). [5] Background Patients with prior coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) are at increased risk for recurrent cardiovascular ischaemic events. [6] • Optical coherence tomography imaging demonstrated that patients with prior coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) to the left coronary circulation have greater amount of calcium in the distal left main coronary artery and proximal segments of the left anterior descending and left circumflex artery compared to those without prior CABG. [7] Patients with prior coronary artery bypass graft were excluded. [8] Patients with prior coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) had higher admission HR (8. [9] ) diclofenac in a patient with prior coronary artery bypass graft surgery is described in this report. [10] Advanced age and prior coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery were associated with increased rates of pericardial complications. [11] Background: We examined the procedural outcomes of chronic total occlusions (CTO) percutaneous coronary interventions in patients with prior coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG). [12] The impact of prior coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery and how it affects left ventricular function recovery is not well defined. [13] 001), less likely to have undergone prior coronary artery bypass graft surgery (18% vs. [14] METHODS/MATERIALS The following procedures were considered higher risk: unprotected left main PCI, chronic total occlusion PCI, PCI requiring atherectomy, multivessel PCI, bifurcation PCI, PCI in prior coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) patients, pre-PCI left ventricular ejection fraction ≤30%, or use of hemodynamic support. [15] Objectives The target of this study was to explore the coronary angiography characteristics for symptomatic patients with prior coronary artery bypass graft (CABG). [16]전체 샘플에서 다음과 같은 예측 변수가 확인되었습니다. 1) 연령; 2) 신체 표면적; 3) 심폐 우회 시간; 4) 이전의 관상동맥 우회로 이식 수술; 5) 수술 전 헤마토크릿; 및 6) 선택 대 응급 수술. [1] sPPM은 환자의 40(11%)에서 존재했으며[8(7%) ES XT 및 32(13%) ES3] 여성 성별, 더 작은 좌심실 유출로(LVOT) 직경 및 대동맥판 환형 면적과 관련이 있었습니다. 이전에 관상동맥우회술(CABG) 수술이 없었고, 키가 더 작았고, 체질량지수가 더 높았고, TAVR 이전 판막 면적이 더 작았습니다(모두 p < 0. [2] nan [3] nan [4] nan [5] nan [6] nan [7] nan [8] nan [9] ) 이전에 관상동맥 우회로 이식 수술을 받은 환자의 디클로페낙이 이 보고서에 설명되어 있습니다. [10] 고령 및 이전의 관상동맥 우회술(CABG) 수술은 심낭 합병증의 증가된 비율과 관련이 있었습니다. [11] 배경: 우리는 이전에 관상동맥우회술(CABG)을 받은 환자에서 만성전폐색(CTO) 경피적 관상동맥 중재술의 시술 결과를 조사했습니다. [12] 이전의 관상동맥 우회 이식술(CABG) 수술의 영향과 좌심실 기능 회복에 미치는 영향은 잘 정의되어 있지 않습니다. [13] 001), 이전에 관상동맥우회술을 받은 가능성이 적습니다(18% vs. [14] 방법/재료 다음 절차가 더 높은 위험으로 간주되었습니다: 보호되지 않은 왼쪽 주 PCI, 만성 완전 폐색 PCI, 죽상절제술이 필요한 PCI, 다중 혈관 PCI, 분기 PCI, 이전 관상동맥 우회 이식 수술(CABG) 환자의 PCI, PCI 전 좌심실 박출률 ≤30 %, 또는 혈역학적 지원의 사용. [15] nan [16]
coronary artery disease 관상동맥 질환
A 73-year-old male with a history of severe coronary artery disease and prior coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) presented with chest pain and elevated troponins. [1] Patients with known coronary artery disease, prior coronary revascularization, and those undergoing hemodialysis were excluded. [2] Material and methods: The study group consisted of patients with a prior coronary angiography for stable coronary artery disease (CAD). [3] The multidisciplinary guideline panel used The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach to assess the certainty of evidence and strength of recommendations regarding eight priority questions for adult patients with recurrent, low‐risk chest pain and have derived the following evidence based recommendations: (1) for those >3 h chest pain duration we suggest a single, high‐sensitivity troponin below a validated threshold to reasonably exclude acute coronary syndrome (ACS) within 30 days; (2) for those with a normal stress test within the previous 12 months, we do not recommend repeat routine stress testing as a means to decrease rates of major adverse cardiac events at 30 days; (3) insufficient evidence to recommend hospitalization (either standard inpatient admission or observation stay) versus discharge as a strategy to mitigate major adverse cardiac events within 30 days; (4) for those with non‐obstructive (<50% stenosis) coronary artery disease (CAD) on prior angiography within 5 years, we suggest referral for expedited outpatient testing as warranted rather than admission for inpatient evaluation; (5) for those with no occlusive CAD (0% stenosis) on prior angiography within 5 years, we recommend referral for expedited outpatient testing as warranted rather than admission for inpatient evaluation; (6) for those with a prior coronary computed tomographic angiography within the past 2 years with no coronary stenosis, we suggest no further diagnostic testing other than a single, normal high‐sensitivity troponin below a validated threshold to exclude ACS within that 2 year time frame; (7) we suggest the use of depression and anxiety screening tools as these might have an effect on healthcare use and return emergency department (ED) visits; and (8) we suggest referral for anxiety or depression management, as this might have an impact on healthcare use and return ED visits. [4] We present the case of a 71-year-old man with history of smoking, pulmonary emphysema, hypertension, multivessel coronary artery disease and prior coronary artery bypass graft surgery who presented with spontaneous right-sided pneumothorax associated with phasic changes of the QRS amplitude on the electrocardiogram. [5] There were 70% with coronary artery disease (30% had prior coronary artery bypass grafting) and 50% had a prior lower-extremity amputation, three having previous minor amputations and two major amputations. [6] Patients in each group had similar risk factor profiles including diabetes mellitus, hypertension, smoking, coronary artery disease, myocardial infarction, prior coronary revascularization, congestive heart failure, cerebrovascular accidents and chronic kidney disease. [7] Patients in the two procedures were matched on age, ethnicity, coronary artery disease, congestive heart failure, prior coronary artery bypass graft or percutaneous coronary intervention, chronic kidney disease, degree of ipsilateral stenosis, American Society of Anesthesiologists class, symptomatic status, restenosis, anatomic and medical risk, and urgency of the procedure. [8]심각한 관상동맥 질환의 병력이 있고 이전에 관상동맥 우회술(CABG)을 했던 73세 남성이 흉통과 상승된 트로포닌을 주소로 내원했습니다. [1] 관상 동맥 질환이 있는 환자, 이전에 관상동맥 재관류술을 받은 환자 및 혈액 투석을 받고 있는 환자는 제외되었습니다. [2] 재료 및 방법: 연구 그룹은 이전에 안정 관상동맥 질환(CAD)에 대한 관상동맥 조영술을 받은 환자로 구성되었습니다. [3] nan [4] nan [5] 70%는 관상동맥 질환이 있었고(30%는 이전에 관상동맥 우회술을 받음) 50%는 이전에 하지 절단을 했으며 3명은 이전에 경미한 절단을, 2개는 주요 절단을 했습니다. [6] 각 그룹의 환자는 당뇨병, 고혈압, 흡연, 관상 동맥 질환, 심근 경색, 이전 관상 동맥 혈관 재건술, 울혈 성 심부전, 뇌혈관 사고 및 만성 신장 질환을 포함한 유사한 위험 요소 프로파일을 보였습니다. [7] 두 절차의 환자는 연령, 민족, 관상동맥 질환, 울혈성 심부전, 이전 관상동맥 우회술 또는 경피적 관상동맥 중재술, 만성 신장 질환, 동측 협착 정도, 미국 마취과학회 등급, 증상 상태, 재협착, 해부학적 및 의학적 위험, 절차의 긴급성. [8]
percutaneous coronary intervention 경피적 관상동맥 중재술
OBJECTIVES To evaluate and compare characteristics and clinical outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) among target vessel types in patients with a prior coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. [1] OBJECTIVE To compare the clinical characteristics and outcomes in patients with stable angina who have undergone chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in native arteries with or without prior coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery in a national cohort. [2] An adjusted model demonstrated that male sex, diabetes, dyslipidemia, prior percutaneous coronary intervention, prior myocardial infarction, prior coronary artery bypass graft, admission to a catheterization-equipped hospital, and smoking were positively correlated with EBM prescription on discharge. [3] Background This study aims to analyze the in-hospital outcome of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and prior coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). [4] METHODS The study population consists of 43 patients with acute STEMI and no history of prior coronary intervention treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention. [5]목표 이전에 관상동맥우회술(CABG) 수술을 받은 환자에서 표적 혈관 유형 중 경피적 관상동맥 중재술(PCI)의 특성 및 임상 결과를 평가하고 비교합니다. [1] 목적 국가 코호트에서 이전에 관상동맥우회술(CABG) 수술을 받았거나 받지 않은 자연 동맥에서 만성 전폐쇄(CTO) 경피적 관상동맥 중재술(PCI)을 받은 안정형 협심증 환자의 임상 특성 및 결과를 비교합니다. [2] nan [3] nan [4] 행동 양식 연구 모집단은 43명의 급성 STEMI 환자로 구성되어 있으며 이전에 1차 경피적 관상동맥 중재술로 치료받은 관상동맥 중재술의 병력이 없습니다. [5]
artery bypass surgery
METHODS AND RESULTS We examined all-cause mortality in 12 594 consecutive patients undergoing Rb82 rest/stress PET MPI from January 2010 to December 2016, after excluding those with cardiomyopathy, prior coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG), and missing MBFR. [1] The patient had a history of 2 prior coronary artery bypass surgeries and 2 aortofemoral artery grafting procedures. [2] An 84‐year‐old patient with prior coronary artery bypass surgery presented with non‐ST segment elevation acute myocardial infarction. [3] Patients with bifurcation, chronic total occlusion, cardiogenic shock, or prior coronary artery bypass surgery were excluded. [4]방법 및 결과 2010년 1월부터 2016년 12월까지 Rb82 휴식/스트레스 PET MPI를 받은 연속 환자 12 594명의 모든 원인 사망률을 조사했습니다. [1] 환자는 이전에 2회의 관상동맥 우회술과 2회의 대퇴동맥 이식술의 병력이 있었습니다. [2] 이전에 관상동맥우회술을 받은 84세 환자가 비-ST 분절 상승 급성 심근경색증으로 내원했습니다. [3] nan [4]
prior myocardial infarction 이전 심근경색
3% had prior myocardial infarction, 53% had prior coronary revascularization) with established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in a 1:1 ratio to take 81 mg or 325 mg of aspirin per day. [1] Final predictive model comprised of age, gender, smoking, diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia, typical angina, prior myocardial infarction, prior percutaneous coronary intervention and prior coronary artery bypass graft surgery, and points were assigned based on regression coefficients on multivariable analysis. [2]3%는 이전에 심근경색이 있었고, 53%는 이전에 관상동맥 재관류술을 받은 적이 있음) 죽상경화성 심혈관 질환이 확립된 경우 1:1 비율로 하루에 81mg 또는 325mg의 아스피린을 복용했습니다. [1] 최종 예측 모델은 연령, 성별, 흡연, 당뇨병, 고혈압, 이상지질혈증, 전형적인 협심증, 심근경색 이전, 경피적 관상동맥 중재술, 관상동맥우회술 이전 수술로 구성되었으며 다변수 분석의 회귀계수를 기반으로 점수를 부여하였다. [2]
body mass index 체질량 지수
Age, sex, race, body mass index (BMI), diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, end stage renal disease, prior coronary artery bypass graft surgery, congestive heart failure, tobacco use, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, previous arterial procedure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, statin use, postoperative ambulatory status, level of amputation, stump revision, and referral for prosthesis were collected. [1] Notable predictors of long-term mortality included lower body mass index, peripheral vascular disease, prior coronary artery bypass graft, ABO non-identical transplant, and increased donor age (all P<0. [2]연령, 성별, 인종, 체질량지수(BMI), 당뇨병, 고혈압, 고지혈증, 말기 신질환, 관상동맥우회술 이전 수술, 울혈성 심부전, 담배 사용, 미국 마취과학회(ASA) 점수, 이전 동맥 시술 , 만성 폐쇄성 폐 질환, 스타틴 사용, 수술 후 보행 상태, 절단 수준, 그루터기 교정 및 보철물 의뢰를 수집했습니다. [1] 장기 사망률의 주목할만한 예측인자는 낮은 체질량 지수, 말초 혈관 질환, 이전의 관상동맥 우회술, ABO 비동일 이식 및 증가된 공여자 연령을 포함하였다(모두 P<0. [2]
chronic kidney disease
The elevated risk of SCD was independently associated with MI, HF, arrhythmias, peripheral artery disease, diabetes, chronic kidney disease, and prior coronary heart disease (hazard ratios ranging from 1. [1]SCD의 위험 증가는 MI, HF, 부정맥, 말초 동맥 질환, 당뇨병, 만성 신장 질환 및 이전의 관상 동맥 심장 질환과 독립적으로 연관되었습니다(위험 비율 범위는 1. [1]
aortic valve replacement
A 79-year-old woman with diabetes, prior coronary bypass, renal insufficiency, morbid obesity, and severe symptomatic aortic stenosis presented electively for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). [1]당뇨병, 이전에 관상동맥 우회로, 신부전, 병적 비만 및 중증의 증상이 있는 대동맥 협착증이 있는 79세 여성이 경동맥 대동맥 판막 치환술(TAVR)을 위해 선택적으로 제시되었습니다. [1]
transcatheter aortic valve 경동맥 대동맥 판막
Conclusion In participants without prior coronary revascularization, the coronary artery calcium score represented an independent predictor of 30-day and 1-year mortality after transcatheter aortic valve replacement. [1]결론 관상동맥 재관류술이 없는 참가자에서 관상동맥 칼슘 점수는 경동맥 대동맥판막 치환술 후 30일 및 1년 사망률의 독립적인 예측인자를 나타냅니다. [1]
left main coronary 왼쪽 주요 관상 동맥
The meta-regression analysis suggested that male gender, diabetes mellitus, smoking habit, prior coronary artery disease, left main coronary artery involvement, lower ejection fraction and low TIMI flow at admission are related with higher overall mortality, whereas SCAD recurrence was higher among patients with fibromuscular dysplasia. [1]메타 회귀 분석에서는 남성, 당뇨병, 흡연 습관, 과거 관상동맥 질환, 좌주관상동맥 침범, 낮은 박출률 및 낮은 TIMI 흐름이 입원 시 더 높은 전체 사망률과 관련이 있는 반면 SCAD 재발은 환자에서 더 높았음을 시사했습니다. 섬유근 형성 이상. [1]
Without Prior Coronary 이전 관상동맥 없이
OBJECTIVE To compare the clinical characteristics and outcomes in patients with stable angina who have undergone chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in native arteries with or without prior coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery in a national cohort. [1] Conclusion In participants without prior coronary revascularization, the coronary artery calcium score represented an independent predictor of 30-day and 1-year mortality after transcatheter aortic valve replacement. [2] Our goal was to determine the association between IL-6, FGF23, and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) on coronary artery calcification (CAC) progression and mortality in incident dialysis patients without prior coronary events. [3] TAVR CTA scans were categorized as normal/mild CAD, single vessel disease, high risk (multi-vessel or left main disease), or non-diagnostic in patients without prior coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and as low risk or high risk in patients with prior CABG. [4] While much of the discussion around prolonged DAPT has been focused on stented patients, patients with prior MI without prior coronary stenting comprise a clinically important subgroup. [5] In this study, a genome-wide association study for coronary artery calcification (CAC) was performed in a Korean population-based sample of 400 subjects without prior coronary artery disease and replicated in another of 1,288 subjects. [6] METHODS From the multicenter CONFIRM registry, we analyzed individuals who underwent coronary CTA with known lipid-lowering therapy status and without prior coronary artery disease at baseline. [7]목적 국가 코호트에서 이전에 관상동맥우회술(CABG) 수술을 받았거나 받지 않은 자연 동맥에서 만성 전폐쇄(CTO) 경피적 관상동맥 중재술(PCI)을 받은 안정형 협심증 환자의 임상 특성 및 결과를 비교합니다. [1] 결론 관상동맥 재관류술이 없는 참가자에서 관상동맥 칼슘 점수는 경동맥 대동맥판막 치환술 후 30일 및 1년 사망률의 독립적인 예측인자를 나타냅니다. [2] 우리의 목표는 IL-6, FGF23 및 고감도 C-반응성 단백질(hsCRP)이 관상동맥 석회화(CAC) 진행과 이전에 관상동맥 사건이 없었던 투석 환자에서 사망률 사이의 연관성을 결정하는 것이었습니다. [3] nan [4] 연장된 DAPT에 대한 많은 논의가 스텐트 삽입 환자에 초점을 맞추었지만, 이전에 관상동맥 스텐트 삽입이 없는 이전 MI가 있는 환자는 임상적으로 중요한 하위 그룹을 구성합니다. [5] 이 연구에서는 관상동맥 석회화(CAC)에 대한 전체 게놈 연관 연구가 관상동맥 질환이 없는 400명의 한국 인구 기반 샘플에서 수행되었고 다른 1,288명의 대상에서 복제되었습니다. [6] 행동 양식 다기관 CONFIRM 레지스트리에서 우리는 기준선에서 이전에 관상 동맥 질환이 없었고 지질 저하 요법 상태가 알려진 관상 동맥 CTA를 받은 개인을 분석했습니다. [7]
Undergone Prior Coronary
ResultsPatients in the abnormal findings group (N = 62) were more likely to have undergone prior coronary angiography and to have decreased ejection fraction than those in the normal findings group (N = 81). [1] 001), less likely to have undergone prior coronary artery bypass graft surgery (18% vs. [2] 20 years) and had undergone prior coronary artery bypass grafting more frequently (OR, 2. [3]결과 비정상 소견군(N = 62)의 환자는 정상 소견군(N = 81)보다 이전에 관상동맥 조영술을 받았고 박출률이 감소할 가능성이 더 높았다. [1] 001), 이전에 관상동맥우회술을 받은 가능성이 적습니다(18% vs. [2] nan [3]