Polyethylene Liners(폴리에틸렌 라이너)란 무엇입니까?
Polyethylene Liners 폴리에틸렌 라이너 - The reasons for an implant-retaining procedure with irrigation and debridement including the exchange of the polyethylene liners are being discussed as well as possible principles of management of bilateral periprosthetic joint infections. [1] Background: Cementation of polyethylene liners into well-fixed cementless metal shells has become an option during revision total hip arthroplasty (THA). [2] Advances in ceramic have shown good midterm results with regard to reduced wear but are associated with a higher financial cost than polyethylene liners. [3] Sonication of polyethylene liners, rather than the whole prosthesis, was sufficient for diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection. [4] To overcome this problem, antioxidants such as vitamin E (alpha-tocopherol) were supplemented by diffusion into the latest generation of polyethylene liners. [5] BACKGROUND To avoid the morbidity of removing well-fixed implants during revision surgery, the off-label practice of mixing femoral heads with dual mobility (DM) polyethylene liners from different manufacturers is commonly performed. [6]폴리에틸렌 라이너의 교체를 포함하여 세척 및 괴사조직 제거를 통한 임플란트 유지 절차의 이유와 양측 인공 관절 주위 감염 관리의 가능한 원칙이 논의되고 있습니다. [1] 배경: 잘 고정된 시멘트가 없는 금속 쉘에 폴리에틸렌 라이너를 합치는 것은 고관절 재치환술(THA) 동안 선택 사항이 되었습니다. [2] 세라믹의 발전은 마모 감소와 관련하여 좋은 중기 결과를 보여주었지만 폴리에틸렌 라이너보다 재정적 비용이 더 많이 듭니다. [3] 전체 보철물보다 폴리에틸렌 라이너의 초음파 처리는 인공 관절 감염의 진단에 충분했습니다. [4] 이 문제를 극복하기 위해 비타민 E(알파-토코페롤)와 같은 항산화제가 최신 세대의 폴리에틸렌 라이너로 확산되어 보충되었습니다. [5] 배경 재치환 수술 중 잘 고정된 임플란트를 제거하는 이환율을 피하기 위해 대퇴골두와 다른 제조업체의 이중 이동성(DM) 폴리에틸렌 라이너를 혼합하는 오프라벨 관행이 일반적으로 수행됩니다. [6]
highly cross linked 고도로 교차 연결
Therefore, third-generation highly cross-linked polyethylene liners can also cause early failure without a clear cause, and this case report highlights the necessity of considering several strategies for reoperation. [1] The purpose of this study was (1) to compare early wear rates in bedding-in periods of two highly cross-linked polyethylene liners frequently used in THA and (2) to evaluate risk factors indicating a possible higher wear rate. [2] All patients underwent noncemented THA with metal or ceramic on highly cross-linked polyethylene liners. [3] Uncemented modular acetabular components and highly cross-linked polyethylene liners are the implants of choice for most arthroplasty surgeons. [4] METHODS Between 2000 and 2017, we retrospectively identified 882 primary THAs with 36 mm femoral heads and acetabular components ≤52 mm with highly cross-linked polyethylene liners. [5] Methods Twenty-six patients (27 hips) received THA with MODULUS femoral stems, ceramic or metal femoral heads, and highly cross-linked polyethylene liners between April 2011 and March 2016. [6] More promising long-term results are expected with the use of highly cross-linked polyethylene liners. [7] The components were 2-mm-thick porous-coated shells and 4-mm highly cross-linked polyethylene liners. [8] However, few long-term data on revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) using highly cross-linked polyethylene liners are available. [9] Introduction: We report 5- to 10-year clinical and radiological outcomes of a series of uncemented Oxinium on Verilast (highly cross-linked polyethylene liners) total hip replacements (THAs) using the Anthology stem and R3/Reflection cup system. [10] Acetabular cup loosening occurred more frequently in patients with conventional polyethylene liners than in those with highly cross-linked polyethylene liners (p = 0. [11]따라서 3세대 고가교 폴리에틸렌 라이너 역시 명확한 원인 없이 조기 고장을 일으킬 수 있으며, 본 증례보고에서는 여러 가지 재수술 전략을 고려할 필요가 있음을 강조하고 있다. [1] 이 연구의 목적은 (1) THA에 자주 사용되는 두 개의 고도로 가교된 폴리에틸렌 라이너의 침상 기간의 조기 마모율을 비교하고 (2) 높은 마모율을 나타내는 위험 요소를 평가하는 것입니다. [2] nan [3] nan [4] nan [5] nan [6] 고도로 가교된 폴리에틸렌 라이너를 사용하면 보다 유망한 장기적 결과가 기대됩니다. [7] 구성 요소는 2mm 두께의 다공성 코팅 쉘과 4mm 고도로 가교된 폴리에틸렌 라이너였습니다. [8] nan [9] nan [10] nan [11]
Linked Polyethylene Liners 연결된 폴리에틸렌 라이너
Therefore, third-generation highly cross-linked polyethylene liners can also cause early failure without a clear cause, and this case report highlights the necessity of considering several strategies for reoperation. [1] The purpose of this study was (1) to compare early wear rates in bedding-in periods of two highly cross-linked polyethylene liners frequently used in THA and (2) to evaluate risk factors indicating a possible higher wear rate. [2] All patients underwent noncemented THA with metal or ceramic on highly cross-linked polyethylene liners. [3] Uncemented modular acetabular components and highly cross-linked polyethylene liners are the implants of choice for most arthroplasty surgeons. [4] METHODS Between 2000 and 2017, we retrospectively identified 882 primary THAs with 36 mm femoral heads and acetabular components ≤52 mm with highly cross-linked polyethylene liners. [5] Methods Twenty-six patients (27 hips) received THA with MODULUS femoral stems, ceramic or metal femoral heads, and highly cross-linked polyethylene liners between April 2011 and March 2016. [6] More promising long-term results are expected with the use of highly cross-linked polyethylene liners. [7] The components were 2-mm-thick porous-coated shells and 4-mm highly cross-linked polyethylene liners. [8] However, few long-term data on revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) using highly cross-linked polyethylene liners are available. [9] Introduction: We report 5- to 10-year clinical and radiological outcomes of a series of uncemented Oxinium on Verilast (highly cross-linked polyethylene liners) total hip replacements (THAs) using the Anthology stem and R3/Reflection cup system. [10]따라서 3세대 고가교 폴리에틸렌 라이너 역시 명확한 원인 없이 조기 고장을 일으킬 수 있으며, 본 증례보고에서는 여러 가지 재수술 전략을 고려할 필요가 있음을 강조하고 있다. [1] 이 연구의 목적은 (1) THA에 자주 사용되는 두 개의 고도로 가교된 폴리에틸렌 라이너의 침상 기간의 조기 마모율을 비교하고 (2) 높은 마모율을 나타내는 위험 요소를 평가하는 것입니다. [2] nan [3] nan [4] nan [5] nan [6] 고도로 가교된 폴리에틸렌 라이너를 사용하면 보다 유망한 장기적 결과가 기대됩니다. [7] 구성 요소는 2mm 두께의 다공성 코팅 쉘과 4mm 고도로 가교된 폴리에틸렌 라이너였습니다. [8] nan [9] nan [10]
Conventional Polyethylene Liners
The wear patterns obtained from this study are also comparable to the wear patterns shown on available conventional polyethylene liners. [1] Acetabular cup loosening occurred more frequently in patients with conventional polyethylene liners than in those with highly cross-linked polyethylene liners (p = 0. [2]이 연구에서 얻은 마모 패턴은 사용 가능한 기존 폴리에틸렌 라이너에 표시된 마모 패턴과도 유사합니다. [1] nan [2]