Endonasal Skull(비강 해골)란 무엇입니까?
Endonasal Skull 비강 해골 - Objective Though microvascular free tissue transfer is well established for open skull base reconstruction, normative data regarding flap design and inset after endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery (ESBS) is lacking. [1] Introduction Endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery (EESBS) has been associated with a minimally invasive and effective approach for pathology of the anterior skull base and associated with less overall morbidity compared with open approaches. [2] BACKGROUND As endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery (EESBS) for sellar pathology has become routine, there is increasing awareness of quality-of-life (QOL) outcomes related to this approach. [3] This suggests the suitability of this method for utilization during endoscopic endonasal skull base approaches. [4] This study aimed to assess its neural fibers within the pterygopalatine fossa after synapsing at the PPG, and to explore potential clinical implications for endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery. [5] Endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery is thought to be among the highest-risk aerosol-generating procedures for surgeons and operating room personnel. [6] Endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery (ESBS) is thought to be among the highest risk aerosol-generating procedures (AGPs) for surgeons and operating room personnel. [7] However, thoughtful, evidence-based approaches should be considered as a sustainable option toreduce the risk of respiratory viral particle aerosolization in AGPs, such as endonasal skull base surgery. [8] Background One of the major complications in endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery (EESBS) is postoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks. [9] This chapter highlights the recent literature, incidence, management, and outcomes regarding these complications in endonasal skull base surgery, with a particular focus on orbital surgery. [10] Objective Presently, there are no standards for reporting outcomes of endoscopic endonasal skull base reconstruction (ESBR). [11] METHODS Video annotations from cadaveric endoscopic endonasal skull base simulations (n=20 trials of 1-5 min, size = 8GB) were reviewed by 2 researcher-annotators. [12] Conclusion Initial experience with radiofrequency ablation showed that it was a safe technique to use in both endonasal skull-base and transcranial procedures. [13] Objective The study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of obtaining preoperative type and screens (T/S) for common endonasal skull base procedures, and determine patient and hospital factors associated with receiving blood transfusions. [14] The V-Loc™ wound closure device (Covidien) is a safe and effective adjunct to reconstruction after endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery as it provides an option for graft/flap suturing. [15] OBJECTIVE Injury to the internal carotid artery (ICA) is the most critical complication of endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery. [16] The risk of carotid artery injury in aggressive endonasal skull base surgical interventions ranges from 1% to 9%. [17] Endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery has seen a significant amount of development in recent years, pushing techniques to fit a broadened anatomic understanding in the setting of advanced instrumentation. [18] This case report presents a 68 year old man with visual disturbance, which was diagnosed as recurrent pituitary adenoma and cured by transsphenoidal pituitary surgery with endoscopic endonasal skull base repair with nasoseptal flap. [19] Although recent guidelines for obstructive sleep apnea recommend early postoperative use of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) after endonasal skull base surgery, the time of initiation of CPAP is unclear. [20] Study Design Case series with chart review of patients undergoing endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery (2012-2014). [21] Therefore, there appears to be no evidence of impact of endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery on craniofacial development within the growth period studied. [22] Introduction Reconstruction of craniocervical junction (CCJ) defects after endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery (ESBS) remains challenging, despite advancements in vascularized intranasal and regional flaps. [23] With the advent of extended endonasal skull base surgery and advances in endoscopy, instrumentation, and surgical navigation technologies, transclival skull base surgery for chordoma and chondrosarcoma has gained promising new momentum and evidence for efficacy. [24] The utility of endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery (EES) in various pathologic entities in adults has been published in the literature. [25] Introduction Endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery (EESBS) leads to significant alterations in sinonasal anatomy and physiology. [26] From another perspective, concerns about the craniofacial development after endoscopic endonasal skull base procedures in children turned to be unfounded as recent works disclosed no evidence of impact of endoscopic endonasal surgery on craniofacial development in the young patients [6]. [27] OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effects of nasal lavage with and without mupirocin after endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery. [28] The evolution of endoscopic endonasal skull base approaches and the continuous advances in radiotherapy enhanced surgeons’ ability to Bdo no harm^, and there has been a paradigm shift in skull base surgery from aggressive surgical resection at all cost, to maximum functional preservation. [29] Background Endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery (ESBS) has gained significant popularity over the last decade. [30] PDS sheet is flexible and can be contoured into shape, making it ideal for endoscopic endonasal skull-base repair using single-hand instrumentation. [31] The use of adenosine to induce transient hypotension or flow arrest has been previously described during intracranial aneurysm surgery; however, there have been no reports of the technique being used during endonasal skull‐base surgery to achieve hemostasis following major vascular injury. [32] Regenerated oxidized cellulose (ROC) sheets have gained popularity as an adjunct to a vascularized nasoseptal flap for closure of dural defects after endoscopic endonasal skull‐base approaches (EESBS). [33] OBJECTIVE Three-dimensional (3D), high-definition (HD) endoscopy has been recently introduced in neurosurgery, and its value has been discussed extensively in endonasal skull base surgery. [34]목적 개방형 두개골 기저부 재건을 위해 미세혈관 유리 조직 이식이 잘 확립되어 있지만 내시경 두개골 기저부 수술(ESBS) 후 피판 디자인 및 삽입에 관한 규범적 데이터가 부족합니다. [1] 서론 내시경 두개골 기저부 수술(EESBS)은 전방 두개골 기저부의 병리학에 대해 최소 침습적이고 효과적인 접근 방식과 관련이 있으며 개방 접근 방식에 비해 전반적인 이환율이 낮습니다. [2] 배경 판매 병리학에 대한 내시경 내비강 두개골 기저 수술(EESBS)이 일상화됨에 따라 이 접근 방식과 관련된 삶의 질(QOL) 결과에 대한 인식이 증가하고 있습니다. [3] 이것은 내시경 두개골 기저부 접근 동안 활용을 위한 이 방법의 적합성을 시사합니다. [4] 이 연구는 PPG에서 시냅스 후 익상구개와 내의 신경 섬유를 평가하고 내시경 두개골 기저부 수술에 대한 잠재적인 임상적 의미를 탐색하는 것을 목표로 했습니다. [5] 내시경 두개골 기저부 수술은 외과의와 수술실 직원에게 가장 위험한 에어로졸 생성 절차 중 하나로 생각됩니다. [6] 내시경 두개골 기저 수술(ESBS)은 외과의와 수술실 직원에게 가장 위험한 에어로졸 발생 절차(AGP) 중 하나로 생각됩니다. [7] 그러나 사려 깊은 증거 기반 접근법은 비강 두개골 기저부 수술과 같은 AGP에서 호흡기 바이러스 입자 에어로졸화의 위험을 줄이기 위한 지속 가능한 옵션으로 간주되어야 합니다. [8] 배경 내시경 두개골 기저부 수술(EESBS)의 주요 합병증 중 하나는 수술 후 뇌척수액(CSF) 누출입니다. [9] 이 장에서는 특히 안와 수술에 중점을 둔 비내 두개골 기저부 수술에서 이러한 합병증에 관한 최근 문헌, 발병률, 관리 및 결과를 강조합니다. [10] 목적 현재 내시경 두개골 기저부 재건술(ESBR) 결과 보고에 대한 기준은 없다. [11] 행동 양식 사체 내시경 비강 내 두개골 기저부 시뮬레이션(n=1-5분의 20회 시도, 크기 = 8GB)의 비디오 주석은 2명의 연구원-주석자가 검토했습니다. [12] 결론 고주파 절제술의 초기 경험은 비강내 두개골 기저부 및 경두개 시술 모두에서 사용하기에 안전한 기술임을 보여주었습니다. [13] 목적 이 연구는 일반적인 비강내 두개골 기저부 시술에 대한 수술 전 유형 및 선별 검사(T/S) 획득의 비용 효율성을 평가하고 수혈을 받는 것과 관련된 환자 및 병원 요인을 결정하는 것을 목표로 했습니다. [14] nan [15] nan [16] nan [17] nan [18] nan [19] nan [20] nan [21] nan [22] nan [23] nan [24] nan [25] nan [26] nan [27] nan [28] nan [29] nan [30] nan [31] nan [32] nan [33] nan [34]
Endoscopic Endonasal Skull
Objective Though microvascular free tissue transfer is well established for open skull base reconstruction, normative data regarding flap design and inset after endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery (ESBS) is lacking. [1] Introduction Endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery (EESBS) has been associated with a minimally invasive and effective approach for pathology of the anterior skull base and associated with less overall morbidity compared with open approaches. [2] BACKGROUND As endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery (EESBS) for sellar pathology has become routine, there is increasing awareness of quality-of-life (QOL) outcomes related to this approach. [3] This suggests the suitability of this method for utilization during endoscopic endonasal skull base approaches. [4] This study aimed to assess its neural fibers within the pterygopalatine fossa after synapsing at the PPG, and to explore potential clinical implications for endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery. [5] Endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery is thought to be among the highest-risk aerosol-generating procedures for surgeons and operating room personnel. [6] Endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery (ESBS) is thought to be among the highest risk aerosol-generating procedures (AGPs) for surgeons and operating room personnel. [7] Background One of the major complications in endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery (EESBS) is postoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks. [8] Objective Presently, there are no standards for reporting outcomes of endoscopic endonasal skull base reconstruction (ESBR). [9] METHODS Video annotations from cadaveric endoscopic endonasal skull base simulations (n=20 trials of 1-5 min, size = 8GB) were reviewed by 2 researcher-annotators. [10] The V-Loc™ wound closure device (Covidien) is a safe and effective adjunct to reconstruction after endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery as it provides an option for graft/flap suturing. [11] OBJECTIVE Injury to the internal carotid artery (ICA) is the most critical complication of endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery. [12] Endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery has seen a significant amount of development in recent years, pushing techniques to fit a broadened anatomic understanding in the setting of advanced instrumentation. [13] This case report presents a 68 year old man with visual disturbance, which was diagnosed as recurrent pituitary adenoma and cured by transsphenoidal pituitary surgery with endoscopic endonasal skull base repair with nasoseptal flap. [14] Study Design Case series with chart review of patients undergoing endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery (2012-2014). [15] Therefore, there appears to be no evidence of impact of endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery on craniofacial development within the growth period studied. [16] Introduction Reconstruction of craniocervical junction (CCJ) defects after endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery (ESBS) remains challenging, despite advancements in vascularized intranasal and regional flaps. [17] The utility of endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery (EES) in various pathologic entities in adults has been published in the literature. [18] Introduction Endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery (EESBS) leads to significant alterations in sinonasal anatomy and physiology. [19] From another perspective, concerns about the craniofacial development after endoscopic endonasal skull base procedures in children turned to be unfounded as recent works disclosed no evidence of impact of endoscopic endonasal surgery on craniofacial development in the young patients [6]. [20] OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effects of nasal lavage with and without mupirocin after endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery. [21] The evolution of endoscopic endonasal skull base approaches and the continuous advances in radiotherapy enhanced surgeons’ ability to Bdo no harm^, and there has been a paradigm shift in skull base surgery from aggressive surgical resection at all cost, to maximum functional preservation. [22] Background Endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery (ESBS) has gained significant popularity over the last decade. [23] PDS sheet is flexible and can be contoured into shape, making it ideal for endoscopic endonasal skull-base repair using single-hand instrumentation. [24] Regenerated oxidized cellulose (ROC) sheets have gained popularity as an adjunct to a vascularized nasoseptal flap for closure of dural defects after endoscopic endonasal skull‐base approaches (EESBS). [25]목적 개방형 두개골 기저부 재건을 위해 미세혈관 유리 조직 이식이 잘 확립되어 있지만 내시경 두개골 기저부 수술(ESBS) 후 피판 디자인 및 삽입에 관한 규범적 데이터가 부족합니다. [1] 서론 내시경 두개골 기저부 수술(EESBS)은 전방 두개골 기저부의 병리학에 대해 최소 침습적이고 효과적인 접근 방식과 관련이 있으며 개방 접근 방식에 비해 전반적인 이환율이 낮습니다. [2] 배경 판매 병리학에 대한 내시경 내비강 두개골 기저 수술(EESBS)이 일상화됨에 따라 이 접근 방식과 관련된 삶의 질(QOL) 결과에 대한 인식이 증가하고 있습니다. [3] 이것은 내시경 두개골 기저부 접근 동안 활용을 위한 이 방법의 적합성을 시사합니다. [4] 이 연구는 PPG에서 시냅스 후 익상구개와 내의 신경 섬유를 평가하고 내시경 두개골 기저부 수술에 대한 잠재적인 임상적 의미를 탐색하는 것을 목표로 했습니다. [5] 내시경 두개골 기저부 수술은 외과의와 수술실 직원에게 가장 위험한 에어로졸 생성 절차 중 하나로 생각됩니다. [6] 내시경 두개골 기저 수술(ESBS)은 외과의와 수술실 직원에게 가장 위험한 에어로졸 발생 절차(AGP) 중 하나로 생각됩니다. [7] 배경 내시경 두개골 기저부 수술(EESBS)의 주요 합병증 중 하나는 수술 후 뇌척수액(CSF) 누출입니다. [8] 목적 현재 내시경 두개골 기저부 재건술(ESBR) 결과 보고에 대한 기준은 없다. [9] 행동 양식 사체 내시경 비강 내 두개골 기저부 시뮬레이션(n=1-5분의 20회 시도, 크기 = 8GB)의 비디오 주석은 2명의 연구원-주석자가 검토했습니다. [10] nan [11] nan [12] nan [13] nan [14] nan [15] nan [16] nan [17] nan [18] nan [19] nan [20] nan [21] nan [22] nan [23] nan [24] nan [25]
endonasal skull base
Objective Though microvascular free tissue transfer is well established for open skull base reconstruction, normative data regarding flap design and inset after endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery (ESBS) is lacking. [1] Introduction Endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery (EESBS) has been associated with a minimally invasive and effective approach for pathology of the anterior skull base and associated with less overall morbidity compared with open approaches. [2] BACKGROUND As endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery (EESBS) for sellar pathology has become routine, there is increasing awareness of quality-of-life (QOL) outcomes related to this approach. [3] This suggests the suitability of this method for utilization during endoscopic endonasal skull base approaches. [4] This study aimed to assess its neural fibers within the pterygopalatine fossa after synapsing at the PPG, and to explore potential clinical implications for endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery. [5] Endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery is thought to be among the highest-risk aerosol-generating procedures for surgeons and operating room personnel. [6] Endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery (ESBS) is thought to be among the highest risk aerosol-generating procedures (AGPs) for surgeons and operating room personnel. [7] However, thoughtful, evidence-based approaches should be considered as a sustainable option toreduce the risk of respiratory viral particle aerosolization in AGPs, such as endonasal skull base surgery. [8] Background One of the major complications in endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery (EESBS) is postoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks. [9] This chapter highlights the recent literature, incidence, management, and outcomes regarding these complications in endonasal skull base surgery, with a particular focus on orbital surgery. [10] Objective Presently, there are no standards for reporting outcomes of endoscopic endonasal skull base reconstruction (ESBR). [11] METHODS Video annotations from cadaveric endoscopic endonasal skull base simulations (n=20 trials of 1-5 min, size = 8GB) were reviewed by 2 researcher-annotators. [12] Objective The study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of obtaining preoperative type and screens (T/S) for common endonasal skull base procedures, and determine patient and hospital factors associated with receiving blood transfusions. [13] The V-Loc™ wound closure device (Covidien) is a safe and effective adjunct to reconstruction after endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery as it provides an option for graft/flap suturing. [14] OBJECTIVE Injury to the internal carotid artery (ICA) is the most critical complication of endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery. [15] The risk of carotid artery injury in aggressive endonasal skull base surgical interventions ranges from 1% to 9%. [16] Endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery has seen a significant amount of development in recent years, pushing techniques to fit a broadened anatomic understanding in the setting of advanced instrumentation. [17] This case report presents a 68 year old man with visual disturbance, which was diagnosed as recurrent pituitary adenoma and cured by transsphenoidal pituitary surgery with endoscopic endonasal skull base repair with nasoseptal flap. [18] Although recent guidelines for obstructive sleep apnea recommend early postoperative use of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) after endonasal skull base surgery, the time of initiation of CPAP is unclear. [19] Study Design Case series with chart review of patients undergoing endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery (2012-2014). [20] Therefore, there appears to be no evidence of impact of endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery on craniofacial development within the growth period studied. [21] Introduction Reconstruction of craniocervical junction (CCJ) defects after endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery (ESBS) remains challenging, despite advancements in vascularized intranasal and regional flaps. [22] With the advent of extended endonasal skull base surgery and advances in endoscopy, instrumentation, and surgical navigation technologies, transclival skull base surgery for chordoma and chondrosarcoma has gained promising new momentum and evidence for efficacy. [23] The utility of endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery (EES) in various pathologic entities in adults has been published in the literature. [24] Introduction Endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery (EESBS) leads to significant alterations in sinonasal anatomy and physiology. [25] From another perspective, concerns about the craniofacial development after endoscopic endonasal skull base procedures in children turned to be unfounded as recent works disclosed no evidence of impact of endoscopic endonasal surgery on craniofacial development in the young patients [6]. [26] OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effects of nasal lavage with and without mupirocin after endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery. [27] The evolution of endoscopic endonasal skull base approaches and the continuous advances in radiotherapy enhanced surgeons’ ability to Bdo no harm^, and there has been a paradigm shift in skull base surgery from aggressive surgical resection at all cost, to maximum functional preservation. [28] Background Endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery (ESBS) has gained significant popularity over the last decade. [29] OBJECTIVE Three-dimensional (3D), high-definition (HD) endoscopy has been recently introduced in neurosurgery, and its value has been discussed extensively in endonasal skull base surgery. [30]목적 개방형 두개골 기저부 재건을 위해 미세혈관 유리 조직 이식이 잘 확립되어 있지만 내시경 두개골 기저부 수술(ESBS) 후 피판 디자인 및 삽입에 관한 규범적 데이터가 부족합니다. [1] 서론 내시경 두개골 기저부 수술(EESBS)은 전방 두개골 기저부의 병리학에 대해 최소 침습적이고 효과적인 접근 방식과 관련이 있으며 개방 접근 방식에 비해 전반적인 이환율이 낮습니다. [2] 배경 판매 병리학에 대한 내시경 내비강 두개골 기저 수술(EESBS)이 일상화됨에 따라 이 접근 방식과 관련된 삶의 질(QOL) 결과에 대한 인식이 증가하고 있습니다. [3] 이것은 내시경 두개골 기저부 접근 동안 활용을 위한 이 방법의 적합성을 시사합니다. [4] 이 연구는 PPG에서 시냅스 후 익상구개와 내의 신경 섬유를 평가하고 내시경 두개골 기저부 수술에 대한 잠재적인 임상적 의미를 탐색하는 것을 목표로 했습니다. [5] 내시경 두개골 기저부 수술은 외과의와 수술실 직원에게 가장 위험한 에어로졸 생성 절차 중 하나로 생각됩니다. [6] 내시경 두개골 기저 수술(ESBS)은 외과의와 수술실 직원에게 가장 위험한 에어로졸 발생 절차(AGP) 중 하나로 생각됩니다. [7] 그러나 사려 깊은 증거 기반 접근법은 비강 두개골 기저부 수술과 같은 AGP에서 호흡기 바이러스 입자 에어로졸화의 위험을 줄이기 위한 지속 가능한 옵션으로 간주되어야 합니다. [8] 배경 내시경 두개골 기저부 수술(EESBS)의 주요 합병증 중 하나는 수술 후 뇌척수액(CSF) 누출입니다. [9] 이 장에서는 특히 안와 수술에 중점을 둔 비내 두개골 기저부 수술에서 이러한 합병증에 관한 최근 문헌, 발병률, 관리 및 결과를 강조합니다. [10] 목적 현재 내시경 두개골 기저부 재건술(ESBR) 결과 보고에 대한 기준은 없다. [11] 행동 양식 사체 내시경 비강 내 두개골 기저부 시뮬레이션(n=1-5분의 20회 시도, 크기 = 8GB)의 비디오 주석은 2명의 연구원-주석자가 검토했습니다. [12] 목적 이 연구는 일반적인 비강내 두개골 기저부 시술에 대한 수술 전 유형 및 선별 검사(T/S) 획득의 비용 효율성을 평가하고 수혈을 받는 것과 관련된 환자 및 병원 요인을 결정하는 것을 목표로 했습니다. [13] nan [14] nan [15] nan [16] nan [17] nan [18] nan [19] nan [20] nan [21] nan [22] nan [23] nan [24] nan [25] nan [26] nan [27] nan [28] nan [29] nan [30]