Conventional Learning(기존 학습)란 무엇입니까?
Conventional Learning 기존 학습 - The purpose of the study was to analyze the ability of mathematical connections between students learning scientific based on prezi, lectora-inspire and conventional learning. [1] The purpose of this study is to see the achievement and improvement of students' mathematical communication skills using YouTube videos and those using conventional learning. [2] The objectives of this study are: 1) To determine the differences in learning outcomes shown by students who learn using the NHT-type cooperative model and conventional learning on the learning outcomes of vocational school students in Sampang on the subject of financial mathematics (annuity). [3] So, it can be concluded that the mathematics learning outcomes of students using the Discovery Learning Model are better than the mathematics learning outcomes of students taught using conventional learning in class VII students of MTsS Darussalam Amping Parak for the 2020/2021 academic year. [4] As the student is familiar with conventional learning, to minimize the gap, the need analysis is taken to explore that the existing teaching and learning activities based on the student perspective. [5] The results showed that there was a significant influence on the application of The 5E Learning Cycle learning model rather than conventional learning on the mastery of concepts and problem solving in the fifth grade students of SDN Tunjungsekar 01 Malang. [6] Thus, there are differences in student learning outcomes given the learning method using guided inquiry with students using conventional learning. [7] In this work, we construct a test-time training for deep deformable image registration to improve the generalization ability of conventional learning-based registration model. [8] Through the exemplified industry-focused case study on autoclave composite processing, the model yielded a drastic (88%) improvement in the generalization accuracy compared to the conventional learning, while reducing the computational and temporal cost by 56%. [9] Finally, distance learning becomes an option so that the implementation of higher education can still be carried out like conventional learning. [10] Online learning, should be allowed in undergraduate medical education, by combining it with conventional learning, and students should be prepared to it. [11] The findings of the experiment show that the application is considerably more successful than conventional learning in developing students’ online knowledge assessment abilities, with an impact size of 1. [12] The results of the analysis show that: 1) The mathematics learning outcomes of students with discovery learning model are better than those taught by conventional learning, 2) Mathematics learning outcomes of students with high initial abilities and students with low initial abilities with discovery learning learning models of learning are better than students with high initial abilities. [13] This study aims to determine the difference in the achievement of students' average scores between the implementation of the problem based instruction (PBI) model and conventional learning on student activities, mastery of Newton's Law material, and students' critical thinking skills. [14] As technology develops, mobile or smartphone versions of e-Learning can be compatible with the features available in conventional learning so that the quality of content in the form of subject matter can be accessed properly. [15] The results of data analysis show that the mathematical communication skills of students who learn using the 5E learning cycle model are better than students with conventional learning. [16] The results of students studying accounting using the Blended Learning assisted by Edmodo Social Media show better results compared to the learning outcomes of students learning with conventional learning. [17]이 연구의 목적은 프레지, 렉토라 영감 및 관습적 학습을 기반으로 과학을 배우는 학생들 사이의 수학적 연결 능력을 분석하는 것이었습니다. [1] 본 연구의 목적은 유튜브 영상을 활용한 학생들과 기존 학습을 활용한 학생들의 수학적 의사소통 능력 향상과 성취도를 확인하는 것이다. [2] 본 연구의 목적은 다음과 같다. 1) 금융수학(연금)을 주제로 삼팡의 직업학교 학생의 학습성과에 대해 NHT형 협동모형과 전통적 학습을 활용하여 학습한 학생들의 학습성과 차이를 알아보고자 하였다. . [3] 따라서 2020/2021 학년도 MTsS Darussalam Amping Parak의 class VII 학생들에서 Discovery Learning Model을 사용하는 학생들의 수학 학습 결과가 기존 학습을 사용하여 가르친 학생들의 수학 학습 결과보다 우수하다는 결론을 내릴 수 있습니다. [4] 학생이 기존의 학습에 익숙하기 때문에 격차를 최소화하기 위해 필요성 분석을 수행하여 학생의 관점에서 기존의 교수 및 학습 활동을 탐색합니다. [5] 그 결과 SDN Tunjungsekar 01 Malang의 5학년 학생들의 개념 숙달 및 문제 해결에 기존 학습보다 5E 학습 주기 학습 모델의 적용에 유의한 영향이 있는 것으로 나타났습니다. [6] 따라서 기존 학습을 사용하는 학생과 안내 탐구를 사용한 학습 방법에 따라 학생의 학습 결과에 차이가 있습니다. [7] 본 연구에서는 기존 학습 기반 정합 모델의 일반화 능력을 향상시키기 위해 심 변형 영상 정합을 위한 테스트 시간 훈련을 구성하였다. [8] 오토클레이브 복합 처리에 대한 예시적인 산업 중심 사례 연구를 통해 모델은 기존 학습에 비해 일반화 정확도에서 88%가 크게 향상되었으며 계산 및 시간 비용은 56% 감소했습니다. [9] 마지막으로, 원격 교육은 고등 교육의 구현이 여전히 기존 학습처럼 수행될 수 있도록 옵션이 됩니다. [10] 온라인 학습은 학부 의학 교육에서 기존 학습과 결합하여 허용되어야 하며 학생들은 이에 대비해야 합니다. [11] 실험 결과는 응용 프로그램이 영향 크기 1로 학생들의 온라인 지식 평가 능력 개발에 있어 기존 학습보다 훨씬 더 성공적임을 보여줍니다. [12] 분석 결과, 1) 탐색 학습 모델을 사용하는 학생의 수학 학습 결과가 기존 학습보다 우수하고, 2) 탐색 학습 학습을 통해 초기 능력이 높은 학생과 초기 능력이 낮은 학생의 수학 학습 결과가 나타납니다. 학습 모델은 초기 능력이 높은 학생보다 우수합니다. [13] 이 연구는 문제 기반 교수법(PBI) 모델의 구현과 학생 활동에 대한 기존의 학습 간의 학생 평균 점수 성취도, Newton의 법칙 자료 숙달 및 학생의 비판적 사고 능력의 차이를 결정하는 것을 목표로 합니다. [14] 기술이 발전함에 따라 모바일 또는 스마트폰 버전의 e-Learning은 기존 학습에서 사용할 수 있는 기능과 호환되어 주제 형식의 콘텐츠 품질을 적절하게 액세스할 수 있습니다. [15] 데이터 분석 결과 5E 학습 주기 모델을 사용하여 학습하는 학생들의 수학적 의사소통 능력이 기존 학습을 하는 학생들보다 더 우수한 것으로 나타났습니다. [16] Edmodo 소셜 미디어의 지원을 받는 혼합 학습을 사용하여 회계를 공부하는 학생들의 결과는 기존 학습으로 학습하는 학생들의 학습 결과에 비해 더 나은 결과를 보여줍니다. [17]
cooperative learning model 협동 학습 모델
This study aimed to determine: 1) the differences in student learning outcomes taught used the STAD cooperative learning model used conventional learning models on atomic material and the constituent particles, 2) the magnitude of the influence of the STAD cooperative learning model on student learning outcomes on atomic and particle material constituent. [1] So it can be concluded that there are differences in student learning outcomes between the experimental class that uses the Take and Give Type of Cooperative Learning Model and the control class that uses the conventional learning model in monetary economics courses. [2] This study aims to analyze: (1) the influence of the cooperative learning model is higher than the conventional learning model; (2) the learning outcomes of students who have high learning interest are higher than students who have low learning interest (3) the interaction between cooperative learning models and student learning interest influences student learning outcomes. [3] This study aims to analyze: (1) the influence of the cooperative learning model is higher than the conventional learning model; (2) the learning outcomes of students who have high learning motivation are higher than students who have low learning motivation (3) the interaction between cooperative learning models and student learning motivation influences student learning outcomes. [4] Based on the results of the treatment research analysis using the Make A Match cooperative learning model assisted by video learning in the experimental class is better than the conventional learning model in the control class. [5] This study aims to determine (1) Student learning outcomes in the Political Economy course taught using cooperative learning model type Kancing Gemerincing are higher than students taught using conventional learning models in the Economic Education Study Program, (2) Student learning outcomes in the Political Economy course who has high learning motivation which is taught by using the cooperative learning model type Kancing Gemerincing is higher than students who have high learning motivation who are taught using conventional learning models in the Economic Education Study Program, (3) Student learning outcomes in the Political Economy courses who have low learning motivation who are taught using the cooperative learning model type Kancing Gemerincing are higher than students who have low learning motivation who are taught using conventional learning models in the Education Study Program Economics, and (4) the interaction between cooperative learning model type Kancing Gemerincing and learning motivation towards student learning outcomes in the Political Economy course in the Economic Education Study Program. [6] From the results of the research carried out the implementation of learning using the conventional learning model obtained an average value of 59,50 and the implementation of learning using the TTW cooperative learning model (Think, Talk, Write) obtained an average value of 78,68. [7] The research sample was taken 2 classes determined by random sampling technique, namely Class XI MIA 1 as an experimental class using the STAD type cooperative learning model and class XI MIA 2 as a control class using a conventional learning model. [8]이 연구는 1) 원자 물질 및 구성 입자에 대한 기존 학습 모델을 사용하는 STAD 협력 학습 모델을 사용하여 가르친 학생 학습 결과의 차이, 2) 학생 학습 결과에 대한 STAD 협력 학습 모델의 영향의 크기를 결정하는 것을 목표로 했습니다. 원자 및 입자 재료 구성 요소. [1] 따라서 화폐경제학 과목에서 Take and Give Type의 협동학습모형을 사용하는 실험반과 기존의 학습모형을 사용한 통제반 사이에 학생의 학습성과에 차이가 있다고 결론지을 수 있다. [2] nan [3] nan [4] nan [5] nan [6] nan [7] nan [8]
problem solving ability 문제 해결 능력
The results showed that: 1) creative problemsolving learning models more effectively influence problem-solving abilities than conventional learning models, 2) high learning motivation is more effective in influencing mathematical problem-solving abilities than moderate learning motivation and low learning motivation, 3) high self-efficacy more effective in influencing mathematical problem-solving abilities than moderate selfefficacy and low self-efficacy, 4) there is no effect of differences in learning models with learning motivation on mathematical problem-solving abilities, 5) there is no difference between learning models and self-efficacy on solving abilities problem, 6) high learning motivation with moderate self-efficacy most effectively affects mathematical problem-solving abilities, 7). [1] This study aimed to determine the differences in Problem Solving Abilities (KPM) using Discovery Learning models and Conventional learning models. [2] Based on the results of data analysis, it is obtained: 1) There are differences in problem-solving abilities between students who follow the LAPS-Heuristic learning model and students who follow conventional learning models. [3] This study aims to analyze the comparison of increasing the problem solving ability between groups of students who get problem-based learning with cmaptools media, and groups of students who get conventional learning. [4] It can concluded that realistic learning was more effective in terms of students’ mathematical reasoning and communication than conventional learning; learning with the application of STEM can improve students’ problem solving abilities compared to conventional learning; and the use of google classrooms that can improve communication skills. [5] The objective of this research was to analyze the average of students’ mathematics problem solving abilities by using GeoGebra media and by using conventional learning. [6]결과는 1) 창의적 문제 해결 학습 모델이 기존 학습 모델보다 문제 해결 능력에 더 효과적으로 영향을 미치고, 2) 높은 학습 동기가 수학적 문제 해결 능력에 더 효과적인 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났습니다. 중간 학습 동기와 낮은 학습 동기보다, 3) 높음 자기효능감은 중간 정도의 자기효능감과 낮은 자기효능감보다 수학적 문제 해결 능력에 더 효과적이며, 4) 학습 동기가 있는 학습 모델의 차이가 수학적 문제 해결 능력에 미치는 영향이 없으며, 5) 학습 간에 차이가 없음 6) 중등도의 자기효능감과 높은 학습동기가 수학적 문제해결능력에 가장 효과적인 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 7). [1] 이 연구는 발견 학습 모델과 기존 학습 모델을 사용하여 문제 해결 능력(KPM)의 차이점을 확인하는 것을 목표로 하고 있습니다. [2] nan [3] nan [4] nan [5] nan [6]
blended learning model 혼합 학습 모델
The results showed that (1) there were differences in learning outcomes between those taught with the blended learning model and those taught with the conventional learning model. [1] The treatment given to the experimental class is in the form of a blended learning model face to face driver model, while the control class is done with conventional learning. [2] The results showed no significant differences in HOTS between teacher candidates that learned by blended learning model and teacher candidates that learned by conventional learning model. [3] The treatment given to the experimental class is in the form of a blended learning model, while the control class is with conventional learning. [4] The purpose of this study is to determine (1) the autonomous of learning mathematics taught by the blended learning model of the flipped classroom type in as the senior class in a junior high school in Sokaraja in academi year of 2019/2020, (2) the autonomous of learning mathematics taught by conventional learning models in as the senior class in a junior high school in Sokaraja in academi year of 2019/2020, and (3) whether the learning independence is maintained. [5] Therefore, it can be compared students’ learning outcomes using the Blended Learning model with student learning outcomes with the conventional learning model. [6]결과는 (1) 혼합 학습 모델로 가르친 것과 기존 학습 모델로 가르친 것 사이에 학습 결과에 차이가 있음을 보여주었습니다. [1] 실험 수업에 제공되는 처리는 혼합 학습 모델 대면 드라이버 모델의 형태로 제공되는 반면 제어 수업은 기존 학습으로 수행됩니다. [2] nan [3] nan [4] nan [5] nan [6]
inquiry learning model 탐구 학습 모델
This study aims to find out the use of inquiry learning models and conventional learning models in student IPS learning outcomes, to know the differences in IPS learning outcomes of students who have high learning independence with students who have low learning independence, and to know the interaction between the learning model and the independence of learning to the student's IPS learning outcomes. [1] The results of this study indicate that there are significant differences in learning outcomes between the use of video-assisted inquiry learning models and conventional learning. [2] The sample of this research was 70 students and divided into two groups, the experimental group was given an inquiry learning model and the control group with conventional learning. [3] The result of this research is that students 4Css skills using collaborative inquiry learning model are better than students4Cs skills using conventional learning at SMA Negeri 14 Medan. [4] The results of the hypothesis were tested using t-tests to determine the social skills and character of the experimental class students with inquiry learning models and control classes with conventional learning. [5]본 연구는 학생 IPS 학습 결과에서 탐구 학습 모델과 기존 학습 모델의 활용을 알아보고, 학습 독립성이 높은 학생과 학습 독립성이 낮은 학생의 IPS 학습 결과의 차이를 파악하고, 상호작용을 파악하는 것을 목적으로 합니다. 학습 모델과 학생의 IPS 학습 결과에 대한 학습의 독립성 사이. [1] 이 연구의 결과는 비디오 지원 탐구 학습 모델의 사용과 기존 학습 간의 학습 결과에 상당한 차이가 있음을 나타냅니다. [2] nan [3] nan [4] nan [5]