Contemporary American(컨템포러리 아메리칸)란 무엇입니까?
Contemporary American 컨템포러리 아메리칸 - Roosevelt’s famous 1933 inaugural “fear itself” speech is not a rhetorical gesture intended to emphasize the ungroundedness of Depression-era American fear, but a veiled call for generating a displaced object of fear that will enable contemporary Americans to find ways of coping with anxiety. [1] In their article “Just War and Unjust Soldiers: American Public Opinion on the Moral Equality of Combatants,” Scott Sagan and Benjamin Valentino have revealed a wealth of information about the views of contemporary Americans on the ethics of war. [2]Roosevelt의 유명한 1933년 취임 "공포 자체" 연설은 대공황 시대의 미국 공포의 근거가 없음을 강조하기 위한 수사학적 제스처가 아니라 현대 미국인이 불안에 대처하는 방법을 찾도록 할 대체된 공포 대상을 생성하라는 은폐된 외침입니다. [1] Scott Sagan과 Benjamin Valentino는 "정당한 전쟁과 부당한 군인: 전투원의 도덕적 평등에 대한 미국 여론"이라는 기사에서 전쟁 윤리에 대한 현대 미국인의 견해에 대한 풍부한 정보를 공개했습니다. [2]
Three Contemporary American
The aim of this research paper is not to offer a comprehensive study on the representations of women’s handcrafts in American literary tradition but to bring attention to three contemporary American novels, Mama Day by African American feminist author Gloria Naylor, Four Souls by Native American Louise Erdrich, and Flight Behaviour by Barbara Kingsolver. [1] Danielewski, three contemporary American writers and artists, working a hundred years after the first of Joyce’s crucial four “shocks of the new” shook the foundations of fiction. [2] Thematic analysis was conducted of online texts and images related to three contemporary American independent labels in a three-year period (2014 –2017). [3]이 연구 논문의 목적은 미국 문학 전통에서 여성 공예의 표현에 대한 포괄적인 연구를 제공하는 것이 아니라 세 편의 현대 미국 소설, 아프리카계 미국인 페미니스트 작가 Gloria Naylor의 Mama Day, 아메리카 원주민 Louise Erdrich의 Four Souls에 주목하는 것입니다. 및 Barbara Kingsolver의 비행 행동. [1] 조이스(Joyce)의 결정적인 4가지 "새로운 것에 대한 충격"이 픽션의 기초를 흔들었던 첫 번째 사건 이후 100년 동안 작업한 세 명의 현대 미국 작가이자 예술가인 다니엘레프스키(Danielewski)는 [2] 주제별 분석은 3년(2014~2017) 동안 3개의 현대 미국 독립 레이블과 관련된 온라인 텍스트 및 이미지에 대해 수행되었습니다. [3]
contemporary american english 현대 미국 영어
The study consulted the Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA), i. [1] The ultimate goal of this paper is to provide an in-depth analysis of the frequency of you must and you have to in the Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA), the British National Corpus (BNC), and the Corpus of Historical American English (COHA). [2] The article aims to investigate the peculiarities of the precedent name structure actualization on the material of the British National Corpus and the Corpus of Contemporary American English. [3] Thirty sentences were made for each morpheme, divided into three Availability-Reliability Distribution (ARD) groups on the basis of corpus analysis in the Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA; Davies, 2008-): 10 target words high in availability, 10 high in reliability, and 10 low in both reliability and availability. [4] The experimental group studied 16 pre-selected formal academic words and their strong and weak collocations with corpus (COCA, the corpus of contemporary American English), while the comparison group studied the same collocations using advanced learner’s dictionaries. [5] The research employs the traditional research methodology of definitional and contextual analysis and involves the comparative study of vocabulary definitions and the contextual meaning of the lexical units under analysis; excerpts from the National Corpora (British National Corpora and Corpus of Contemporary American English), online forums and the Internet articles (blogs, twits) serve as the empirical basis for the research. [6] Critically, corpus data in the Corpus of Contemporary American English and the British National Corpus (Davies, 2008-) reveal the importance of considering these affixes’ productivity in relation to genre, since -acy is especially frequent in academic texts, principally within certain social sciences. [7] Three linguistic features; nouns, past tense, and conditional clauses, having distinctive generality differences, were selected, and their frequencies were measured in COCA (Corpus of Contemporary American English) and its downsized and less balanced samples in order to extract correlation efficiencies between them. [8] The goal of this paper is to provide an in-depth analysis of the frequency of I was used to, I got used to, and I became used to in the Corpus of Contemporary American English and the British National Corpus. [9] Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA) and Word and Phrase were the main corpora that the participants used to learn various search functions. [10] , day to day, face to face, step by step) qualitatively and quantitatively by examining data from the Corpus of Contemporary American English (Davies, Mark. [11] Using the Vocabulary of American-English Size Test (VAST) based on the Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA), 403 English language learners were tested on a 10% systematic random sample of the first 5,000 most frequent words from that corpus. [12] Using the subcorpus of academic writing in the 450-million-word Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA) as the source data, this study is aimed at examining the syntactic and semantic environments of two frequent near-synonymous verbs, PROPOSE and SUGGEST, from three aspects: (i) frequency patterns, (ii) subject animacy, and (iii) the grammatical features of four verb forms. [13] I analyse the phonological structure of frequent adjectives from the Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA), and show that the data do indeed support the hypothesis. [14] American English is taken from the Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA) and British English is taken from British National Corpus (BNC). [15] 2000–5), The Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA) (Davies 2008–) and finally the most recent one, The London–Lund Corpus 2 (LLC–2) (Põldvere, Johansson & Paradis 2021a). [16] Data were collected from two synchronic corpora, namely the Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA) for English data and Wortschatz Leipzig Corpora Collection for Indonesian data. [17] First, 84 academic vocabularies were selected, based on their frequencies defined by the Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA) (Davies, 2017) and the Academic Core Vocabulary Website (Davies & Gardner, 2019). [18] The study's methodological foundation is a corpus analysis which deals with three different corpora: the primary corpus – selected contemporary animated films (dating from 2017 to 2020) and the secondary – a) the native language corpus (Corpus of Contemporary American English - COCA), and b) Google search engine. [19] For the purpose of this research language material is collected on the basis of the corpora of texts such as the British National Corpus and the Corpus of Contemporary American English. [20] 1-billion-word media database comprising the British National Corpus and Corpus of Contemporary American English—with genres including spoken/television, fiction, magazines, newspapers—to provide a comprehensive view of ageism in the United Kingdom and United States. [21] Applying case studies in the explanation of relevant concepts and methods, this book also provides an introduction to the theory and practice of WE analysis, illustrates the basics of corpus-linguistics methods and expounds on several key corpora forWE research, including the Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA), the Corpus of Historical American English (COHA), the International Corpus of English (ICE), and GloWbE. [22] RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS We combined the Corpus of Historical American English with the Corpus of Contemporary American English to create a 600-million-word-dataset-the largest historical corpus of American English with over 150,000 texts collected from newspapers, magazines, fiction and non-fiction. [23] The analyzed language samples were extracted from The Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA). [24] The data include information on frequencies of occurrence of words and bigrams; this was extracted from the Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA, Davies 2008–). [25] This study uses a general reference corpus, Corpus of Contemporary American English, and compiled the data from the academic subcorpus. [26] The evidence comes from the Corpus of Historical American English and the Corpus of Contemporary American English. [27] This study thus employs the Academic Spoken Word List (ASWL) and the British National Corpus and Corpus of Contemporary American English (BNC/COCA) lists to analyze TED talks’ vocabulary profiles in a corpus consisting of transcripts of 2085 such talks from six main topics. [28] Drawing on data from the Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA) and the Corpus of Historical American English (COHA), we argue that the apparent “confusion” about whether however can serve as a clausal coordinator may be closely related to its increasing preference, over the past century-and-a-half, for clause-initial placement. [29] Most of the illustrative examples come from the British National Corpus and the Corpus of Contemporary American English. [30] Based on Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA), the researcher analyzes how these new words are used in the main five genres: spoken texts, fiction, magazines, newspapers and academic journals. [31] “On Being Inexplicit and Stuff in Contemporary American English”. [32] The frequency of the English terms was further explored from 2008 to 2017 using the Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA). [33] The English language data is taken from the academic language sub-corpus of the Corpus of Contemporary American English, while the Lithuanian language data comes from the Corpus Academicum Lithuanicum, a specialised synchronic corpus of written academic Lithuanian. [34] To collect the data, there are two corpora used in this study, Corpus of Contemporary American English and Global Web-Based English as the representatives of Present-day English. [35] In doing so, the paper draws on data culled from the Corpus of Contemporary American English and, in the absence of publications specifically focused on indefinite English ordinals, relies on broader accounts of the indefinite article. [36] These include freely available online corpora such as the British National Corpus and the Corpus of Contemporary American English. [37] They used two Chinese–English concordance programs and “Corpus of Contemporary American English” to help their revisions. [38] the Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA), composed of more than 520 million words. [39] Utilizing the Corpus of Contemporary American English (Davies, Mark. [40] This corpus-based study explores how linguistic and sociocognitive factors designate when, why, and how speakers say sorry and I’m sorry in two corpora of American spoken English; namely, Michigan Corpus of Academic Spoken English and Corpus of Contemporary American English. [41] The current article aims to report on the development and evaluation of COCA (Corpus of Contemporary American English) Multiword Unit 20 (COCA_MWU20) where the notion of MWU family is adopted. [42] A total of 217 instances from four academic (sections of) written English corpora—the Michigan Corpus of Upper-level Student Papers, the British Academic Written English corpus, the British National Corpus, and the Corpus of Contemporary American English—and 45 English dictionaries and grammar reference materials were analyzed to identify its pragmalinguistic features within discourse. [43] This study, based on Chinese Learner English Corpus (CLEC) and Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA), conducts a contrastive analysis of English near synonyms “motive” and “motivation” in terms of frequency, collocation features and semantic prosody between Chinese English Foreign Language learners and native English speakers. [44] During which, students fulfilled pre-class assignments by using COCA (Corpus of Contemporary American English) to search for collocation on appointed words. [45] This suggests that the Middle-Finger no longer activates thoughts of penises in the minds of contemporary American English speakers. [46] A total of 27 EFL learners were randomly divided into deductive and inductive groups making use of the Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA) to learn eight target words. [47] By using the Corpus of Contemporary American English(COCA), the researcher created three paper-based hand on-concordance. [48] The research is done by collecting some data containing ditransitive verbs in the news of Washington Post and Pittsburg-Gazette and even a single transitive verb in Pittsburg-Gazette, posted by the Corpus of Contemporary American English in 2006, 2014 and 2015. [49] The data were collected from the British National Corpus (BNC), the Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA), the online Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English (LDOCE) and the online Merriam Webster’s Dictionary (MWD). [50]이 연구는 COCA(Corpus of Contemporary American English), i. [1] 이 문서의 궁극적인 목표는 COCA(Corpus of Contemporary American English), BNC(British National Corpus) 및 Corpus of Historical American English에서 해야 하는 빈도와 해야 하는 빈도에 대한 심층 분석을 제공하는 것입니다. (코하). [2] 이 논문은 영국 국립 코퍼스와 현대 미국 영어 코퍼스의 자료에 대한 선례명 구조 구현의 특징을 규명하는 것을 목적으로 한다. [3] 각 형태소에 대해 30개의 문장이 작성되었으며, Corpus of Contemporary American English(COCA; Davies, 2008-)의 코퍼스 분석을 기반으로 3개의 ARD(Availability-Reliability Distribution) 그룹으로 나뉩니다. 신뢰성에서 10, 신뢰성과 가용성 모두에서 10 낮습니다. [4] 실험집단은 사전에 선정된 16개의 공식 학술용어와 코퍼스(COCA, corpus of Contemporary American English)와의 강한 연어와 약한 연어를 연구했고, 비교 그룹은 고급 학습자 사전을 사용하여 동일한 연어를 연구했습니다. [5] 연구는 정의 및 문맥 분석의 전통적인 연구 방법론을 사용하고 어휘 정의와 분석 중인 어휘 단위의 문맥 의미에 대한 비교 연구를 포함합니다. National Corpora(British National Corpora 및 Corpus of Contemporary American English)에서 발췌한 내용, 온라인 포럼 및 인터넷 기사(블로그, 트윗)는 연구의 경험적 근거로 사용됩니다. [6] 비판적으로, Corpus of Contemporary American English와 British National Corpus(Davies, 2008-)의 말뭉치 데이터는 장르와 관련하여 이러한 접미사의 생산성을 고려하는 것의 중요성을 보여줍니다. 과학. [7] 세 가지 언어적 특징; 명사, 과거시제, 조건절은 일반성의 차이가 뚜렷하게 나타나 그 빈도를 COCA(Corpus of Contemporary American English)와 축소 및 균형이 낮은 표본에서 측정하여 이들 간의 상관 효율성을 추출하였다. [8] 이 논문의 목적은 내가 익숙해진 빈도, 익숙해진 빈도, 그리고 익숙해진 빈도에 대한 심층 분석을 제공하는 것입니다. [9] COCA(Corpus of Contemporary American English)와 Word and Phrase는 참가자들이 다양한 검색 기능을 학습하는 데 사용한 주요 말뭉치였습니다. [10] , 매일, 대면, 단계별) 미국 현대 영어 코퍼스(Davies, Mark. [11] COCA(Corpus of Contemporary American English)에 기반한 VAST(Vocabulary of American-English Size Test)를 사용하여 403명의 영어 학습자를 해당 코퍼스에서 가장 자주 사용되는 처음 5,000개 단어의 10% 체계적인 무작위 샘플에서 테스트했습니다. [12] nan [13] nan [14] nan [15] nan [16] nan [17] nan [18] nan [19] nan [20] nan [21] nan [22] nan [23] 분석된 언어 샘플은 COCA(Corpus of Contemporary American English)에서 추출했습니다. [24] 데이터에는 단어 및 바이그램의 발생 빈도에 대한 정보가 포함됩니다. 이것은 Corpus of Contemporary American English(COCA, Davies 2008–)에서 추출되었습니다. [25] 본 연구는 일반 참고 코퍼스인 현대 미국 영어 코퍼스를 사용하여 학술적 하위 코퍼스에서 데이터를 수집하였다. [26] 그 증거는 역사적 미국 영어 코퍼스와 현대 미국 영어 코퍼스에서 나옵니다. [27] 따라서 이 연구는 ASWL(Academic Spoken Word List)과 BNC/COCA(British National Corpus and Corpus of Contemporary American English) 목록을 사용하여 6개의 주요 주제에서 2085년 그러한 대화의 녹취록으로 구성된 코퍼스에서 TED 강연의 어휘 프로필을 분석합니다. . [28] COCA(Corpus of Contemporary American English)와 COHA(Corpus of Historical American English)의 데이터를 바탕으로, 우리는 그러나 클로절 조정자 역할을 할 수 있는지 여부에 대한 명백한 "혼란"이 선호도 증가와 밀접하게 관련될 수 있다고 주장합니다. 지난 세기 반 동안 절의 초기 배치를 위해. [29] 대부분의 예시는 영국 국립 코퍼스(British National Corpus)와 현대 미국 영어 코퍼스(Corpus of Contemporary American English)에서 가져온 것입니다. [30] COCA(Corpus of Contemporary American English)를 기반으로 연구자는 구어체, 소설, 잡지, 신문, 학술지 등 주요 5개 장르에서 이 새로운 단어가 어떻게 사용되는지 분석합니다. [31] "현대 미국 영어의 불분명하고 물건에 관하여". [32] 영어 용어의 빈도는 COCA(Corpus of Contemporary American English)를 사용하여 2008년부터 2017년까지 추가로 조사되었습니다. [33] 영어 데이터는 Corpus of Contemporary American English의 학술 언어 하위 코퍼스에서 가져오는 반면, 리투아니아 언어 데이터는 서면 학술 리투아니아어의 전문적인 동시 코퍼스인 Corpus Academicum Lithuanicum에서 가져옵니다. [34] 데이터를 수집하기 위해 본 연구에서 사용된 코퍼스는 현대 미국 영어의 코퍼스와 현대 영어를 대표하는 글로벌 웹 기반 영어입니다. [35] nan [36] nan [37] nan [38] nan [39] nan [40] nan [41] nan [42] nan [43] nan [44] nan [45] nan [46] nan [47] nan [48] nan [49] nan [50]
contemporary american literature
The work is written by Chuck Palahniuk in 2014 and belongs to the ranks of contemporary American literature. [1] Since 1971, Ploughshares has discovered and cultivated the freshest voices in contemporary American literature, and remains prescient in the digital age by providing readers with thoughtful and entertaining literature in a variety of formats. [2] Since 1971, Ploughshares has discovered and cultivated the freshest voices in contemporary American literature, and remains prescient in the digital age by providing readers with thoughtful and entertaining literature in a variety of formats. [3] Since 1971, Ploughshares has discovered and cultivated the freshest voices in contemporary American literature, and remains prescient in the digital age by providing readers with thoughtful and entertaining literature in a variety of formats. [4] Since 1971, Ploughshares has discovered and cultivated the freshest voices in contemporary American literature, and remains prescient in the digital age by providing readers with thoughtful and entertaining literature in a variety of formats. [5] From Flannery O’Connor and John Steinbeck to Philip Roth and Jonathan Franzen, by way of William Faulkner and Don DeLillo, from slavery and racism to movies and social media, this presentation is a very personal overview of contemporary American literature and culture. [6] Since 1971, Ploughshares has discovered and cultivated the freshest voices in contemporary American literature, and remains prescient in the digital age by providing readers with thoughtful and entertaining literature in a variety of formats. [7] Since 1971, Ploughshares has discovered and cultivated the freshest voices in contemporary American literature, and remains prescient in the digital age by providing readers with thoughtful and entertaining literature in a variety of formats. [8] Since 1971, Ploughshares has discovered and cultivated the freshest voices in contemporary American literature, and remains prescient in the digital age by providing readers with thoughtful and entertaining literature in a variety of formats. [9] Since 1971, Ploughshares has discovered and cultivated the freshest voices in contemporary American literature, and remains prescient in the digital age by providing readers with thoughtful and entertaining literature in a variety of formats. [10] Since 1971, Ploughshares has discovered and cultivated the freshest voices in contemporary American literature, and remains prescient in the digital age by providing readers with thoughtful and entertaining literature in a variety of formats. [11] Since 1971, Ploughshares has discovered and cultivated the freshest voices in contemporary American literature, and remains prescient in the digital age by providing readers with thoughtful and entertaining literature in a variety of formats. [12] The types of abbreviations as well as other graphic peculiarities of the information presentation in the text have been investigated, using examples of English advertising texts, anecdotes, aphorisms, and contemporary American literature. [13] Since 1971, Ploughshares has discovered and cultivated the freshest voices in contemporary American literature, and remains prescient in the digital age by providing readers with thoughtful and entertaining literature in a variety of formats. [14] Since 1971, Ploughshares has discovered and cultivated the freshest voices in contemporary American literature, and remains prescient in the digital age by providing readers with thoughtful and entertaining literature in a variety of formats. [15] Since 1971, Ploughshares has discovered and cultivated the freshest voices in contemporary American literature, and remains prescient in the digital age by providing readers with thoughtful and entertaining literature in a variety of formats. [16] Since 1971, Ploughshares has discovered and cultivated the freshest voices in contemporary American literature, and remains prescient in the digital age by providing readers with thoughtful and entertaining literature in a variety of formats. [17] Since 1971, Ploughshares has discovered and cultivated the freshest voices in contemporary American literature, and remains prescient in the digital age by providing readers with thoughtful and entertaining literature in a variety of formats. [18] Since 1971, Ploughshares has discovered and cultivated the freshest voices in contemporary American literature, and remains prescient in the digital age by providing readers with thoughtful and entertaining literature in a variety of formats. [19] Since 1971, Ploughshares has discovered and cultivated the freshest voices in contemporary American literature, and remains prescient in the digital age by providing readers with thoughtful and entertaining literature in a variety of formats. [20] Since 1971, Ploughshares has discovered and cultivated the freshest voices in contemporary American literature, and remains prescient in the digital age by providing readers with thoughtful and entertaining literature in a variety of formats. [21] Since 1971, Ploughshares has discovered and cultivated the freshest voices in contemporary American literature, and remains prescient in the digital age by providing readers with thoughtful and entertaining literature in a variety of formats. [22] Since 1971, Ploughshares has discovered and cultivated the freshest voices in contemporary American literature, and remains prescient in the digital age by providing readers with thoughtful and entertaining literature in a variety of formats. [23] Since 1971, Ploughshares has discovered and cultivated the freshest voices in contemporary American literature, and remains prescient in the digital age by providing readers with thoughtful and entertaining literature in a variety of formats. [24] Since 1971, Ploughshares has discovered and cultivated the freshest voices in contemporary American literature, and remains prescient in the digital age by providing readers with thoughtful and entertaining literature in a variety of formats. [25] Since 1971, Ploughshares has discovered and cultivated the freshest voices in contemporary American literature, and remains prescient in the digital age by providing readers with thoughtful and entertaining literature in a variety of formats. [26] Since 1971, Ploughshares has discovered and cultivated the freshest voices in contemporary American literature, and remains prescient in the digital age by providing readers with thoughtful and entertaining literature in a variety of formats. [27] Since 1971, Ploughshares has discovered and cultivated the freshest voices in contemporary American literature, and remains prescient in the digital age by providing readers with thoughtful and entertaining literature in a variety of formats. [28] Since 1971, Ploughshares has discovered and cultivated the freshest voices in contemporary American literature, and remains prescient in the digital age by providing readers with thoughtful and entertaining literature in a variety of formats. [29] Since 1971, Ploughshares has discovered and cultivated the freshest voices in contemporary American literature, and remains prescient in the digital age by providing readers with thoughtful and entertaining literature in a variety of formats. [30] Since 1971, Ploughshares has discovered and cultivated the freshest voices in contemporary American literature, and remains prescient in the digital age by providing readers with thoughtful and entertaining literature in a variety of formats. [31] Since 1971, Ploughshares has discovered and cultivated the freshest voices in contemporary American literature, and remains prescient in the digital age by providing readers with thoughtful and entertaining literature in a variety of formats. [32] Since 1971, Ploughshares has discovered and cultivated the freshest voices in contemporary American literature, and remains prescient in the digital age by providing readers with thoughtful and entertaining literature in a variety of formats. [33] Since 1971, Ploughshares has discovered and cultivated the freshest voices in contemporary American literature, and remains prescient in the digital age by providing readers with thoughtful and entertaining literature in a variety of formats. [34] Since 1971, Ploughshares has discovered and cultivated the freshest voices in contemporary American literature, and remains prescient in the digital age by providing readers with thoughtful and entertaining literature in a variety of formats. [35]2014년 척 팔라닉이 쓴 작품으로 미국 현대문학의 대열에 속한다. [1] 1971년부터 Plowshares는 현대 미국 문학에서 가장 신선한 목소리를 발견하고 육성해 왔으며 독자들에게 다양한 형식의 사려 깊고 재미있는 문학을 제공함으로써 디지털 시대에 선견지명을 유지하고 있습니다. [2] 1971년부터 Plowshares는 현대 미국 문학에서 가장 신선한 목소리를 발견하고 육성해 왔으며 독자들에게 다양한 형식의 사려 깊고 재미있는 문학을 제공함으로써 디지털 시대에 선견지명을 유지하고 있습니다. [3] 1971년부터 Plowshares는 현대 미국 문학에서 가장 신선한 목소리를 발견하고 육성해 왔으며 독자들에게 다양한 형식의 사려 깊고 재미있는 문학을 제공함으로써 디지털 시대에 선견지명을 유지하고 있습니다. [4] 1971년부터 Plowshares는 현대 미국 문학에서 가장 신선한 목소리를 발견하고 육성해 왔으며 독자들에게 다양한 형식의 사려 깊고 재미있는 문학을 제공함으로써 디지털 시대에 선견지명을 유지하고 있습니다. [5] 플래너리 오코너(Flannery O'Connor)와 존 스타인벡(John Steinbeck)에서 필립 로스(Philip Roth)와 조나단 프란젠(Jonathan Franzen), 윌리엄 포크너(William Faulkner)와 돈 델릴로(Don DeLillo)를 거쳐 노예제도와 인종차별에서부터 영화와 소셜 미디어에 이르기까지 이 프레젠테이션은 현대 미국 문학과 문화에 대한 매우 개인적인 개요입니다. [6] 1971년부터 Plowshares는 현대 미국 문학에서 가장 신선한 목소리를 발견하고 육성해 왔으며 독자들에게 다양한 형식의 사려 깊고 재미있는 문학을 제공함으로써 디지털 시대에 선견지명을 유지하고 있습니다. [7] 1971년부터 Plowshares는 현대 미국 문학에서 가장 신선한 목소리를 발견하고 육성해 왔으며 독자들에게 다양한 형식의 사려 깊고 재미있는 문학을 제공함으로써 디지털 시대에 선견지명을 유지하고 있습니다. [8] 1971년부터 Plowshares는 현대 미국 문학에서 가장 신선한 목소리를 발견하고 육성해 왔으며 독자들에게 다양한 형식의 사려 깊고 재미있는 문학을 제공함으로써 디지털 시대에 선견지명을 유지하고 있습니다. [9] 1971년부터 Plowshares는 현대 미국 문학에서 가장 신선한 목소리를 발견하고 육성해 왔으며 독자들에게 다양한 형식의 사려 깊고 재미있는 문학을 제공함으로써 디지털 시대에 선견지명을 유지하고 있습니다. [10] 1971년부터 Plowshares는 현대 미국 문학에서 가장 신선한 목소리를 발견하고 육성해 왔으며 독자들에게 다양한 형식의 사려 깊고 재미있는 문학을 제공함으로써 디지털 시대에 선견지명을 유지하고 있습니다. [11] nan [12] nan [13] nan [14] nan [15] nan [16] nan [17] nan [18] nan [19] nan [20] nan [21] nan [22] nan [23] nan [24] nan [25] nan [26] nan [27] nan [28] nan [29] nan [30] nan [31] nan [32] nan [33] nan [34] nan [35]
contemporary american society 현대 미국 사회
Emphasis is made on racial identity in the realities of contemporary American society. [1] Through this work we hope to shine light on the wealth gap in contemporary American society and the academic achievement gap that is an inevitable consequence of this inequitable concentration of monetary means. [2] Despite being an animated sitcom, The Simpsons is a satire of contemporary American society and culture. [3] While this message is strong, uplifting, and ingrained in the societal fabric of contemporary American society, there is a significant disconnect between the cultural narrative and the quality of empirical evidence examining growth following adversity. [4] Updike’s works reflect the characteristics of contemporary American society. [5] It is also relatable to the racist violence the black community is facing in contemporary American society. [6] The present paper seeks to argue that consumption and media wield an unparalleled influence over contemporary American society, in a way that these drives constitute the primary means through which identity is constituted. [7] We then conclude, however, that such interpretive failures might well be a key message of the film, which demonstrates the difficulty of fully grasping the complex and difficult social problems of contemporary American society in a way that can be well described by Fredric Jameson’s now classic vision of the general difficulty of cognitive mapping in the late capitalist world. [8] We used a broad and largely theory-agnostic selection of groups to derive a map of principal dimensions of expressed prejudice in contemporary American society. [9] This article examines the origin of the right and whether it is still relevant in contemporary American society. [10] We conclude with a brief discussion about the role of new media in framing political exigencies and the role of sport in contemporary American society. [11] This study contributes to research on new racism and the prevalence of White racial framings in contemporary American society. [12] Contrary to the general understanding of American Psycho as a sympathetic response to white male crisis in contemporary American society, I will show that the text aims to criticize the crisis theory. [13] The novel’s critique of the myopia of contemporary American society within the context of racial history and a globalized world yields not to pessimism or anti-utopianism, but sustains an embattled desire for something better. [14] The album's lyrics range from a critique of the structural racism in contemporary American society to subjective, embodied experiences of clinical depression, anxiety, and chronic asthma—and their complex entanglement. [15]현대 미국 사회의 현실에서 인종 정체성에 중점을 둡니다. [1] 이 작업을 통해 우리는 현대 미국 사회의 부의 격차와 이러한 불평등한 금전적 수단의 집중으로 인한 불가피한 학업 성취 격차를 조명하고자 합니다. [2] 애니메이션 시트콤임에도 불구하고 심슨 가족은 현대 미국 사회와 문화에 대한 풍자입니다. [3] 이 메시지가 강력하고 고무적이며 현대 미국 사회의 사회 구조에 뿌리를 내리고 있지만, 문화적 내러티브와 역경 이후의 성장을 조사하는 경험적 증거의 품질 사이에는 상당한 단절이 있습니다. [4] 업다이크의 작업은 현대 미국 사회의 특성을 반영합니다. [5] nan [6] nan [7] nan [8] nan [9] 이 기사는 권리의 기원과 그것이 현대 미국 사회에서 여전히 관련이 있는지 여부를 검토합니다. [10] 우리는 정치적 긴급 상황을 구성하는 데 있어 뉴미디어의 역할과 현대 미국 사회에서 스포츠의 역할에 대한 간략한 논의로 결론을 맺습니다. [11] nan [12] nan [13] nan [14] nan [15]
contemporary american politic 현대 미국 정치
Thus, this study provides insights into the state of modern feminism and antifeminism in contemporary American politics. [1] This research reports two Q-studies addressing the possibility that the partisan political divide defining contemporary American politics derives from differences in the way the Right and Left reason causally in addition to the more obvious content-specific contrasts in policy positions and the like. [2] Making sense of such a historically significant social movement will certainly enable a fuller understanding of contemporary American politics and society. [3] Page and Gilens have written a thoughtful, accessible assessment of contemporary American politics. [4] Political Realignment: Economics, Culture, and Electoral Change, 308 Davis, Richard, Beyond Donkeys and Elephants: Minor Political Parties in Contemporary American Politics, 286 Devine, Christopher J. [5] Anger is a common feature in contemporary American politics. [6] Third, application of the social intuitionist model to contemporary American politics can help explain several puzzling dynamics, including the appeal of Donald Trump and the persistence of misinformation. [7] These findings support and extend immigration backlash theory, contribute to research on affective polarization, and document consequential trends in contemporary American politics. [8] Taking its cue from the observation that forms of aggressive humor directed against the political figure Donald Trump are not an ephemeral aspect of contemporary American politics but have been firmly embedded in American cultural discourse for more than two years, this article will explore the ways in which comedians, journalists and other contemporary observers have described and commented on the role and functions of humor and comedy with regard to the Trump phenomenon in the context of the 2016 presidential elections and its aftermath. [9] The election of Donald Trump as president in 2016 arguably represents the most unanticipated election outcome in contemporary American politics. [10] We conclude by discussing the broader implications of these results, including the role of identity in contemporary American politics and the possible realignment of the GOP. [11] We conclude by discussing implications for contemporary American politics, presenting representative survey data showing that racially resentful, white liberals were particularly likely to switch from voting for Barack Obama in 2012 to Donald Trump in 2016. [12]따라서 이 연구는 현대 미국 정치에서 현대 페미니즘과 반페미니즘의 현황에 대한 통찰을 제공한다. [1] 이 연구는 현대 미국 정치를 정의하는 당파적 정치적 분열이 정책적 입장 등의 내용별 대조에 더하여 우파와 좌파가 인과적으로 추론하는 방식의 차이에서 파생될 가능성을 다루는 두 개의 Q-연구를 보고합니다. [2] nan [3] nan [4] nan [5] nan [6] nan [7] nan [8] 도널드 트럼프(Donald Trump) 정치인을 겨냥한 공격적인 유머의 형태가 현대 미국 정치의 일시적인 측면이 아니라 2년 이상 미국 문화 담론에 확고하게 자리 잡고 있다는 관찰에서 힌트를 얻어 이 기사에서는 코미디언, 언론인 및 기타 현대 관찰자들은 2016년 대통령 선거와 그 여파의 맥락에서 트럼프 현상과 관련하여 유머와 코미디의 역할과 기능에 대해 설명하고 논평했습니다. [9] 2016년 도널드 트럼프의 대통령 당선은 현대 미국 정치에서 가장 예상치 못한 선거 결과를 대표하는 것입니다. [10] nan [11] nan [12]
contemporary american writer
In the light of recent research on cultural and literary representations of ageing, this article critically addresses contemporary American writer Erica Jong’s mid-life and later works from feminist and gender perspectives. [1] Danielewski, three contemporary American writers and artists, working a hundred years after the first of Joyce’s crucial four “shocks of the new” shook the foundations of fiction. [2] The influence of rapid industrializations and the First World War not only changed the philosophy of human life, but also changed the writing style of the contemporary American writers. [3] As a prolific contemporary American writer, Joyce Carol Oates has created a large number of works with comprehensive and inclusive topics covering race, ethnicity, violence, historical events and politic. [4] ABSTRACT In recent years, various critics have noted how contemporary American writers are turning to popular genre forms in their work. [5] Does Language Determine Our World’s Borders? The Deaf Beyond the Pale The limits of our language are the limits of our world Ludwig Wittgenstein “If not in words, how did she organize her thoughts?,” asks contemporary American writer Andre Aciman thinking of his deaf mother. [6] The research observes the representation of the alien city chronotope in Jazz (1992) by a contemporary American writer Toni Morrison. [7] This paper offers the longitudinal analysis of female processes of ageing from age-studies and feminist perspectives, as depicted in the works of Erica Jong, a contemporary American writer. [8]노화에 대한 문화적, 문학적 표현에 관한 최근 연구에 비추어 이 글은 현대 미국 작가 에리카 종(Erica Jong)의 중년과 후기 작품을 페미니즘과 젠더 관점에서 비판적으로 다룬다. [1] 조이스(Joyce)의 결정적인 4가지 "새로운 것에 대한 충격"이 픽션의 기초를 흔들었던 첫 번째 사건 이후 100년 동안 작업한 세 명의 현대 미국 작가이자 예술가인 다니엘레프스키(Danielewski)는 [2] 급속한 산업화와 1차 세계대전의 영향은 인간의 삶의 철학을 변화시켰을 뿐만 아니라 현대 미국 작가들의 글쓰기 스타일을 변화시켰습니다. [3] nan [4] nan [5] nan [6] nan [7] nan [8]
contemporary american popular 컨템포러리 아메리칸 인기
What does it mean to be a man in contemporary American popular culture? What does it mean to be a man with other men? What does intimacy between men look like?. [1] A few examples may however be lost to those unfamiliar with contemporary American popular and political culture. [2] The ways in which true crime and podcasting have influenced each other reflect the dynamic relationship between media, genre, technology, and audience behavior, which is ultimately useful in better understanding contemporary American popular culture. [3] The aim of the paper is to assess the continuity of the mythical motifs of “regeneration through violence”, famously described by Richard Slotkin as “the structuring metaphor of the American experience”, in contemporary American popular culture. [4] The aim of the paper is to assess the continuity of the mythical motifs of “regeneration through violence”, famously described by Richard Slotkin as “the structuring metaphor of the American experience”, in contemporary American popular culture. [5] What hyperreality does with this many layered product is to collapse “the distance between sign and referent enmeshing the two and making their independent existence impossible” (Steenberg in Forensic Science in Contemporary American Popular Culture. [6]된다는 것은 무엇을 의미합니까? 현대 미국 대중문화 속의 남자? 다른 남자들과 함께 남자가 된다는 것은 무엇을 의미합니까? 남자들 사이의 친밀감은 어떤 모습일까? [1] 그러나 현대 미국 대중 및 정치 문화에 익숙하지 않은 사람들은 몇 가지 예를 놓칠 수 있습니다. [2] nan [3] 이 논문의 목적은 현대 미국 대중 문화에서 Richard Slotkin이 "미국 경험의 구조적 은유"로 유명하게 묘사한 "폭력을 통한 재생"이라는 신화적 주제의 연속성을 평가하는 것입니다. [4] 이 논문의 목적은 현대 미국 대중 문화에서 Richard Slotkin이 "미국 경험의 구조적 은유"로 유명하게 묘사한 "폭력을 통한 재생"이라는 신화적 주제의 연속성을 평가하는 것입니다. [5] nan [6]
contemporary american political 현대 미국 정치
In so doing, I illustrate how the Bundys translate the Constitution for—and apply the Constitution to the daily lives of—ordinary citizens to shape the boundary conditions of contemporary American political culture. [1] The notion as such was introduced into the scientific circuit by the contemporary American political scientist Herman Finer (1956) and developed by Gabriel A. [2] Leveraging a vast range of unique data sets—spanning the political donations of firms and their leaders; the local, state, and Washington lobbying of Silicon Valley firms; the social media and media commentary of Silicon Valley CEOs and founders; and the role of elites in supporting and founding new political organizations—this book shines a light on the role of this important set of elites in contemporary American political life. [3] Lear treats the famous Civil War battle and Abraham Lincoln’s Gettysburg Address as difficult realities of this special kind—as confounding our “normal forms of explanation” and challenging contemporary American political life, whose coherence depends on a shared grasp of Gettysburg’s meaning (p. [4] In a recent essay, political scientists Daniel Schlozman and Sam Rosenfeld (forthcoming) argue compellingly that contemporary American political parties are ‘‘hollow. [5]그렇게 함으로써 나는 Bundys가 어떻게 현대 미국 정치 문화의 경계 조건을 형성하기 위해 일반 시민들을 위해 헌법을 번역하고 헌법을 적용하는지 설명합니다. [1] 그러한 개념은 현대 미국 정치학자 허먼 파이너(1956)에 의해 과학 회로에 도입되었고 가브리엘 A. [2] nan [3] Lear는 유명한 남북 전쟁 전투와 에이브러햄 링컨의 게티스버그 연설을 이 특별한 종류의 어려운 현실로 취급합니다. 즉, "정상적인 설명 형식"을 혼란스럽게 하고 동시대 미국 정치 생활에 도전하는 것입니다. [4] 최근 에세이에서 정치학자 다니엘 슐로즈만과 샘 로젠펠드(출시 예정)는 현대 미국 정당이 "공허하다"고 강력하게 주장합니다. [5]
contemporary american culture
All of these relations are analyzed in the light of the contemporary American culture which is apparently existent through the lines of this novel. [1] SBS is a significant annual celebratory event in contemporary American culture. [2] In studying how Trumpicons become embroiled in such racial politics of circulation, the authors disclose how new media images contribute to an affective economy of whiteness in contemporary American culture. [3] In "Appalachian Coal Culture and the Residue of Fossil Capital, 1968-Present," I examine literary and visual representations of coal waste in contemporary American culture. [4] Interrogating the ways in which death tourism relies on postmemory as affect and, at times, as racial and ethnic tokenism, the chapter brings death tourism into dialogue with literary texts; these include Shalom Auslander’s Hope: A Tragedy, Alissa Torres’s graphic novel, American Widow, and Amy Waldman’s The Submission, all of which challenge contemporary American culture’s commodification of memory. [5]이 모든 관계는 이 소설의 라인을 통해 분명히 존재하는 현대 미국 문화에 비추어 분석됩니다. [1] SBS는 현대 미국 문화에서 중요한 연례 행사입니다. [2] Trumpicons가 순환의 인종 정치에 어떻게 휘말리게 되었는지 연구하면서 저자는 뉴미디어 이미지가 현대 미국 문화에서 백인의 정서적 경제에 어떻게 기여하는지를 공개합니다. [3] nan [4] nan [5]
contemporary american poet
Many contemporary American poets consider themselves to be Whitman’s successors, and the paper explores how the beatnik Lawrence Ferlinghetti understands this notion. [1] This paper examines the poetry collection entitled Averno (2006) by the contemporary American poet Louise Gluck (1943) from different perspectives. [2] In the poetry of modernist Marianne Moore and contemporary American poet Natasha Trethewey, we find tours of historic places that are associated with the country’s founding history. [3] The contemporary American poet Gary Snyder is influenced deeply by Hanshan’s works and his life style, and Snyder develops his holism on environment protection, which is rightly based on Hanshan’s beings protection thoughts combining Indians’ nature worship tradition. [4] Yet the most telling proof of his legacy is evident in his continuing influence on contemporary American poets. [5]많은 현대 미국 시인들은 스스로를 휘트먼의 후계자로 간주하고 있으며, 이 논문은 비트닉 로렌스 펠링게티가 이 개념을 어떻게 이해하는지 탐구합니다. [1] 이 논문은 현대 미국 시인 Louise Gluck(1943)의 Averno(2006)라는 시집을 다양한 관점에서 살펴보았다. [2] nan [3] nan [4] nan [5]
contemporary american poetry
We suggest that this ap-proach may offer new ways of imagining the multiple dimensions contributing to the so-cial formation of contemporary American poetry. [1] The writer takes a fresh look at an earlier example of Contemporary American poetry using Structuralist discourse as a tool with which to explicate Donald Hall’s poem “The Town of Hill”, first published in 1975. [2] Her research interests include feminism and gender in modern Welsh and Irish literature and syntax in contemporary American poetry, among other diverse topics. [3] The central objects of study will be a range of contemporary American poetry and fiction: James Baldwin’s Giovanni’s Room (1956); Rosmarie Waldrop’s Driven to ion (2010); Joanna Scott’s Arrogance (1990); and C. [4] This essay reads Juliana Spahr’s This Connection of Everyone with Lungs (2005) and Well Then There Now (2011) and Nathaniel Mackey’s Splay Anthem (2006) as exemplars of an impetus in contemporary American poetry to enable exit from the state. [5]우리는 이 접근 방식이 현대 미국 시의 사회적 형성에 기여하는 다양한 차원을 상상하는 새로운 방법을 제공할 수 있다고 제안합니다. [1] 작가는 1975년에 처음 출판된 Donald Hall의 시 "Town of Hill"을 설명하는 도구로 구조주의 담론을 사용하여 현대 미국 시의 초기 예를 새롭게 살펴봅니다. [2] 그녀의 연구 관심 분야는 현대 웨일스어와 아일랜드 문학의 페미니즘과 젠더, 현대 미국 시의 구문 등 다양한 주제입니다. [3] nan [4] nan [5]
contemporary american philosopher
Likewise, Shepard’s contemporary American philosopher, Richard Rorty, believed in the importance of self and the necessity of its redescription to create his ideal society. [1] In this article, in its first part, I present some selected and most important elements of the capabilities approach developed by contemporary American philosopher Martha C. [2] My initial intention was to study classic German philosophers, but I ended up studying contemporary American philosophers like Hilary Putnam, Willard van Orman Quine, and Wilfrid Sellars, and, up to the present day, people like Daniel Dennett and Thomas Nagel. [3] Contemporary American philosopher Alasdair MacIntyre (1981) proposes the issue of morality in a threefold question: Who am I? Who ought I to become? How ought I to get there? The answer to every question refers to the virtues, especially to corporate executive virtues. [4]마찬가지로, 셰퍼드의 동시대 미국 철학자 리처드 로티(Richard Rorty)는 자아의 중요성과 이상적인 사회를 만들기 위해 자아를 다시 기술해야 한다고 믿었습니다. [1] 이 기사의 첫 번째 부분에서 저는 현대 미국 철학자 Martha C. [2] 나의 원래 의도는 고전적인 독일 철학자를 연구하는 것이었으나 힐러리 퍼트넘, 윌라드 반 오만 콰인, 윌프리드 셀라스와 같은 현대 미국 철학자와 오늘날까지 다니엘 데넷, 토마스 네이겔과 같은 사람들을 연구하게 되었습니다. [3] nan [4]
contemporary american fiction
ABSTRACT The rise of the New Sincerity in contemporary American fiction has largely been read on terms provided by a handful of early proponents. [1] In a number of essays published between 1988 and 1993, David Foster Wallace presented a vision of contemporary American fiction that broke in some important regards from then-typical definitions of. [2] He teaches American literature, particularly contemporary American fiction, religion and literature, multicultural American literature, postmodernism, and the Bible as Literature. [3] January-February 2019 DeLillo is undeniably significant in contemporary American fiction. [4]요약 현대 미국 소설에서 새로운 성실의 부상은 소수의 초기 지지자들이 제공한 용어로 주로 읽혀졌습니다. [1] 1988년에서 1993년 사이에 출판된 여러 에세이에서 David Foster Wallace는 당시의 전형적인 정의에서 몇 가지 중요한 측면을 깨뜨린 현대 미국 소설의 비전을 제시했습니다. [2] nan [3] nan [4]
contemporary american artist
” Sherman, one of the most widely discussed contemporary American artists, thus poses a serious challenge to art and cultural critics, because if it is not the artist herself, then who is the woman depicted in her photos? If she does not want to create portraits of herself, then why does Sherman use her own body—distorted by costumes, make-up, and props—as her main model? If it is not a question of self-representation, then what is the relationship between the depiction and the female body being represented? We must consider further, at least. [1] It was only with the following generation of Pop and Minimalist artists that the United States developed a self-sustaining market for the work of contemporary American artists. [2] It was only with the following generation of Pop and Minimalist artists that the United States developed a self-sustaining market for the work of contemporary American artists. [3]가장 널리 논의되는 현대 미국 예술가 중 한 명인 셔먼은 예술과 문화 비평가들에게 심각한 도전을 제기합니다. 왜냐하면 그것이 예술가 자신이 아니라면 그녀의 사진에 묘사된 여성은 누구일까요? 그녀가 자신의 초상화를 만들고 싶지 않다면 왜 셔먼은 의상, 메이크업, 소품으로 인해 왜곡된 자신의 신체를 메인 모델로 사용합니까? 그것이 자기 재현의 문제가 아니라면 묘사와 재현되는 여성의 신체 사이의 관계는 무엇입니까? 우리는 적어도 더 생각해야 합니다. [1] 미국이 현대 미국 예술가들의 작품을 위한 자급자족 시장을 개발한 것은 다음 세대의 팝과 미니멀리스트 예술가들과 함께였습니다. [2] 미국이 현대 미국 예술가들의 작품을 위한 자급자족 시장을 개발한 것은 다음 세대의 팝과 미니멀리스트 예술가들과 함께였습니다. [3]
contemporary american foreign 현대 미국 외국
A combined UCD and STI framework is examined in this paper through a focus on imaginaries of technological innovation in contemporary American foreign policy. [1] A common explanation for the increasing polarization in contemporary American foreign policy is the absence of external threat. [2] In this research, discursive tools used in the period of Cold War and its aftermath for the construction of discourse in American foreign policy will be explored in the context of the related sides of Machiavellian political theory in order to determine whether the contemporary American foreign policy carries Machiavellian tendencies. [3]UCD와 STI가 결합된 프레임워크는 현대 미국 외교 정책에서 기술 혁신의 상상에 초점을 맞춰 이 백서에서 검토됩니다. [1] 현대 미국 외교 정책의 양극화 증가에 대한 일반적인 설명은 외부 위협이 없다는 것입니다. [2] nan [3]
contemporary american novel 현대 미국 소설
This study also investigates the assumption implicit in the conception that contemporary American novel is in solidarity with the state ignoring its imperial ambitions and its saturation with hegemonic practices. [1] The aim of this research paper is not to offer a comprehensive study on the representations of women’s handcrafts in American literary tradition but to bring attention to three contemporary American novels, Mama Day by African American feminist author Gloria Naylor, Four Souls by Native American Louise Erdrich, and Flight Behaviour by Barbara Kingsolver. [2] In The Quiet Contemporary American Novel, Rachel Sykes boldly attempts to define and problematize what she identifies as a neglected area in the study of twenty-first-century American fiction and that she names “quiet novels. [3]이 연구는 또한 현대 미국 소설이 제국주의적 야망과 패권적 실천에 대한 포화를 무시하고 국가와 연대한다는 개념에 내재된 가정을 조사한다. [1] 이 연구 논문의 목적은 미국 문학 전통에서 여성 공예의 표현에 대한 포괄적인 연구를 제공하는 것이 아니라 세 편의 현대 미국 소설, 아프리카계 미국인 페미니스트 작가 Gloria Naylor의 Mama Day, 아메리카 원주민 Louise Erdrich의 Four Souls에 주목하는 것입니다. 및 Barbara Kingsolver의 비행 행동. [2] nan [3]
contemporary american novelist 현대 미국 소설가
” Literary texts by the British poet John Clare (1793–1864), by the American poet Theodore Roethke (1908–1963), and by the contemporary American novelist Dan Brown are analyzed using the perspectives of von Uexkull and Peirce as well as the modeling strategies developed by Timo Maran (Green Lett Stud Ecocrit 18:297–311, 2014a). [1] This incident has once again raised the ideas of nation, transnationalism and Americanness: the main area of concern in the novels of a contemporary American novelist Cormac McCarthy. [2] As a growing number of contemporary American novelists take the world and its socio-cultural and geopolitical complexity as their subject matter, the contemporary novel’s form and sense of worldliness are shifting. [3]영국 시인 John Clare(1793-1864), 미국 시인 Theodore Roethke(1908-1963), 현대 미국 소설가 Dan Brown의 문학 텍스트는 von Uexkull과 Peirce의 관점과 모델링을 사용하여 분석됩니다. Timo Maran이 개발한 전략(Green Lett Stud Ecocrit 18:297–311, 2014a). [1] 이 사건은 현대 미국 소설가 코맥 매카시(Cormac McCarthy)의 소설에서 주요 관심사인 민족, 초국가주의, 미국성에 대한 사상을 다시 한 번 제기했다. [2] nan [3]
contemporary american policing
Contemporary American policing has routinized involuntary police contacts with young people through frequent, sometimes intrusive investigative stops. [1] ABSTRACT Contemporary American policing practices are marked by increasingly top-down, racialized, militarized, and pseudo-scientific features. [2]현대 미국 경찰은 빈번하고 때로는 방해가 되는 수사 중지를 통해 청소년과의 비자발적 경찰 접촉을 일상화했습니다. [1] 요약 현대 미국 치안 관행은 점점 더 하향식, 인종화, 군사화 및 사이비 과학적 특징으로 특징 지워집니다. [2]
contemporary american social
This chapter introduces a basic typology for identifying key narratives of homelessness that permeate contemporary American social culture. [1] This article historicises three screen adaptations of the play, exploring the historical, social, and media-specific contexts of each (re)interpretation: the 1948 theatrical film adaptation directed by Anthony Asquith, targeting a middlebrow, post-war audience; the 1977 BBC television production reflecting an emphasis on public education at a time of second-wave feminism; and David Mamet’s 1999 heritage-style, cinematic remake, in which Edwardian mores and ideals are counterbalanced by contemporary American social standards. [2]이 장에서는 현대 미국 사회 문화에 스며 있는 노숙자에 대한 주요 내러티브를 식별하기 위한 기본 유형을 소개합니다. [1] 이 기사는 연극의 세 가지 스크린 적응을 역사화하여 각 (재)해석의 역사적, 사회적, 미디어별 맥락을 탐구합니다. 2세대 페미니즘 시대에 공교육에 대한 강조를 반영하는 1977년 BBC 텔레비전 제작; David Mamet의 1999년 유산 스타일의 영화 리메이크. 에드워드 시대의 관습과 이상이 현대 미국 사회 표준과 균형을 이루는 영화입니다. [2]
contemporary american television
From Jason Mittel´s (2006) concept of narrative complexity in contemporary American television, who declares self-reflexivity as one of the complex elements in television narrative in the centuries XX and XXI, this article aims to point out a discussion on the metafictional and self-conscious features in the anglo-american television series Penny dreadful. [1] A large corpus containing the key types of contemporary American television programs was collected, annotated with the Biber tagger, and subjected to multi-dimensional analysis, which indicated four factors of statistically correlated linguistic features. [2]XX와 XXI 세기에 텔레비전 내러티브의 복잡한 요소 중 하나로 자기 성찰을 선언한 현대 미국 텔레비전의 내러티브 복잡성에 대한 Jason Mittel(2006)의 개념에서 이 기사는 메타픽션과 영미 텔레비전 시리즈 Penny dreadful의 자의식적 특징. [1] nan [2]
contemporary american population
Our results indicate that an American genetic component is efficiently detected in contemporary American populations using a small set of ancestry informative SNPs, and these co-ancestry estimates are consistent with the known history and demography of the Americas. [1] Estimating ASCVD risk in patients with diabetes could guide intensity of risk factor treatment, but existing risk calculators (2013 ACC/AHA ASCVD pooled cohort equations [PCE] and RECODe risk equations [RECODe]) have not been evaluated in a contemporary American population with diabetes. [2]우리의 결과는 미국의 유전적 구성 요소가 조상 정보 SNP의 작은 세트를 사용하여 현대 미국 인구에서 효율적으로 감지된다는 것을 나타내며, 이러한 공동 조상 추정은 아메리카의 알려진 역사 및 인구 통계와 일치합니다. [1] 당뇨병 환자의 ASCVD 위험 추정은 위험 인자 치료의 강도를 안내할 수 있지만 기존 위험 계산기(2013 ACC/AHA ASCVD 통합 코호트 방정식[PCE] 및 RECODEe 위험 방정식[RECODe])는 현대 미국 당뇨병 인구에서 평가되지 않았습니다. . [2]
contemporary american art
We provided a brief review of the CAPM, and then estimated a general version of it allowing betas to differ between early American and contemporary American art using auction data on paired sales during the period 1987–2013. [1] By using this concept, art historians can advance their insight into both the historical and contemporary American art market. [2]우리는 CAPM에 대한 간략한 검토를 제공한 다음 1987-2013년 기간 동안의 짝 판매에 대한 경매 데이터를 사용하여 초기 미국 미술과 현대 미국 미술 사이에서 베타가 다를 수 있는 일반 버전을 추정했습니다. [1] 이 개념을 사용함으로써 미술사가들은 역사적 및 현대적 미국 미술 시장에 대한 통찰력을 향상시킬 수 있습니다. [2]
contemporary american health
These findings remain relevant today, as a discussion of contemporary American health politics illustrates. [1] The contemporary American Health Care System created a demand for skilled advanced practice registered nurses (APRNs) to meet the health care needs of the U. [2]이러한 발견은 현대 미국 건강 정치에 대한 논의가 설명하는 것처럼 오늘날에도 여전히 적절합니다. [1] nan [2]