Complex Head(복잡한 머리)란 무엇입니까?
Complex Head 복잡한 머리 - Summary: Virtual surgical planning (VSP) with computer-aided design and computer-aided modeling (CAD/CAM) enables the opportunity to provide personalized medicine in complex head and neck reconstruction. [1] An increasing elderly population in the United Kingdom has led to an increasing number of older patients with head and neck cancer, resulting in a greater demand for complex head and neck reconstructive surgery in this potentially high-risk age group. [2] Routes and approaches to these reconstructive options are complicated and require an understanding of complex head and neck anatomy. [3] This article describes the process from initial presentation and diagnosis, to participative decision-making and treatment of patients with complex head and neck tumors in a certified head and neck cancer center on the basis of three exemplary patient cases. [4] To appraise the utility of a novel EMR‐based checklist for complex head and neck microvascular free‐tissue reconstruction. [5] PURPOSE To perform a comprehensive dosimetric and clinical evaluation of the new Pinnacle Personalized automated planning system for complex head-and-neck treatments. [6] Background: Virtual surgical planning and computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) for complex head and neck reconstruction has a number of cited advantages over conventional surgical planning, such as increased operative efficiency, fewer complications, improved osseous flap union, immediate osseointegrated dental implant placement, and superior functional and aesthetic outcomes. [7] , unaffected or mixed) by MVOCs presented as (1) complex headspace blends or (2) single constituents and known mixtures. [8] BACKGROUND Free flaps have become the preferred reconstructive approach to restore form and function for patients presenting with complex head and neck defects. [9] Further field data are required for robust calibration, in particular for large and complex headlands that vary substantially from the idealised model used for development. [10] Reconstruction of complex head and neck defects requiring mucosal lining and skin cover can be achieved with a single stage, bipaddled PMMC flap, a reliable and easily learnt alternative to technically demanding free tissue transfers. [11] The use of free flaps is an essential and reliable method of reconstruction in complex head and neck defects. [12] With the current advancement in prenatal diagnosis and assessment for surgical planning, EXIT has become an accepted, recognized and preferred option for safe delivery in complex head and neck masses. [13] Further translational and clinical research initiatives are needed to help maximize efficiency and lower the cost of health care, especially in the case of complex head and neck reconstruction. [14] The interposition grafts could also bridge different perforasomes in the thigh region in complex head and neck reconstruction. [15] Complex head and neck procedures are potentially aerosol-generating and considered high risk for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) transmission between the patients, surgeons, and other health-care workers (HCWs). [16] Reconstruction of complex head and neck defects is challenging, especially when more than one soft‐tissue subunit is involved. [17] Vascularized bone free flaps are a fundamental tool in complex head and neck reconstruction. [18] We further reported a paradigmatic case with a complex headache disorder and described its management and outcome. [19] The continued provision of complex head and neck cancer surgery was extremely variable, with some UK centres not performing any cancer surgery. [20] The present case report shows a complex head and neck defect coverage by means of a free double‐paddle PTA flap, with a concise literature review of previous PTA flap descriptions in this setting. [21] Here we present the use of REBOA as a bridge to CT scan in complex head and torso trauma. [22] SUMMARY Background Free flap reconstruction is the gold standard in complex head and neck reconstruction. [23] Background Extensive and complex head and neck lymphatic malformations (LMs) are challenging to manage through traditional therapy. [24] Routes and approaches to these reconstructive options are complicated and require an understanding of complex head and neck anatomy. [25] Good and reliable reconstruction methods are needed to provide good cosmesis in early stage cancers and to fulfill large tissue requirement after complex head and neck resections in advanced stage cancers. [26] However, the adequate LOS remains largely understudied for a complex head and neck cancer (HNC) surgery and free flap reconstruction. [27] We propose that the transverse cervical artery (TCA) is a viable option for complex head and neck reconstruction. [28] There were no other notable secondary outcomes, including intraprocedural airway complications in this population with complex head and neck anatomy. [29] Dear Editor, Microsurgical free tissue transfer is the state-of-the-art reconstruction for complex head and neck defects (Hanasono, Barnea, & Skoracki, 2009). [30] Bulk HMTD has a complex headspace, as shown by previous studies. [31] Conclusion: The trapezius flap is a useful flap for complex head and neck reconstruction with minimal donor site morbidity. [32] Conclusion Chimeric flaps represent a viable option for reconstruction of complex head and neck defects and have complication rates similar to those of double free flaps and single free flaps with locoregional flap while only modestly increasing total operative time. [33] CONCLUSIONS Although the use of autogenous graft remains the reference standard, the evolving science behind clinical tissue engineering has resulted in an effective treatment modality for complex head and neck defects with less morbidity and graft material equal to that of autogenous bone. [34] Microvascular free flap reconstruction is a mainstay of reconstruction of complex head and neck defects. [35] Free flaps, such as the radial forearm and anterolateral thigh flap, have been the mainstay of complex head and neck reconstruction. [36]nan [1] nan [2] nan [3] nan [4] nan [5] nan [6] nan [7] nan [8] nan [9] nan [10] nan [11] nan [12] nan [13] nan [14] nan [15] nan [16] nan [17] nan [18] nan [19] nan [20] nan [21] nan [22] nan [23] nan [24] 이러한 재건 옵션에 대한 경로와 접근 방식은 복잡하며 복잡한 두경부 해부학에 대한 이해가 필요합니다. [25] 초기 암에서 좋은 미관을 제공하고 진행성 암에서 복잡한 두경부 절제술 후 큰 조직 요구 사항을 충족시키기 위해서는 훌륭하고 신뢰할 수 있는 재건 방법이 필요합니다. [26] 그러나 복잡한 두경부암(HNC) 수술 및 자유 피판 재건에 대해 적절한 LOS가 많이 연구되지 않은 상태로 남아 있습니다. [27] 우리는 횡경부동맥(TCA)이 복잡한 두경부 재건을 위한 실행 가능한 옵션이라고 제안합니다. [28] 복잡한 머리와 목 해부학을 가진 이 인구집단에서 시술 중 기도 합병증을 포함한 다른 주목할만한 2차 결과는 없었습니다. [29] 편집자님께, 미세수술 무료 조직 이식은 복잡한 두경부 결손에 대한 최첨단 재건입니다(Hanasono, Barnea, & Skoracki, 2009). [30] 벌크 HMTD는 이전 연구에서 볼 수 있듯이 복잡한 헤드스페이스를 가지고 있습니다. [31] 결론: 승모근 피판은 최소한의 기증자 부위 이환율로 복잡한 두경부 재건에 유용한 피판입니다. [32] 결론 키메라 피판은 복잡한 두경부 결손의 재건을 위한 실행 가능한 옵션이며 이중 자유 피판 및 국소 피판이 있는 단일 자유 피판과 유사한 합병증 비율이 있지만 총 수술 시간은 약간만 증가합니다. [33] 결론 자가 이식편의 사용이 참조 표준으로 남아 있지만, 임상 조직 공학의 이면에 있는 진화하는 과학은 자가 뼈와 동일한 이환율 및 이식 재료로 복잡한 두경부 결손에 대한 효과적인 치료 양식을 가져왔습니다. [34] 미세혈관 자유 피판 재건술은 복잡한 두경부 결손 재건술의 핵심입니다. [35] 요골전완 및 전외측 허벅지 피판과 같은 자유 피판은 복잡한 두경부 재건의 중심이 되어 왔습니다. [36]
complex head model
Significance: The significance of this study is that it develops a fast, accurate, and simple numerical method of EEG source analysis, applicable to almost arbitrary complex head models. [1] BACKGROUND The inverse problem solution in the field of ElectroEncephaloGraphy (EEG) analysis has been addressed in the scientific literature for many decades, utilizing either mathematical techniques for measurement fitting or pure ElectroMagnetic (EM) methods involving complex head models for the prediction of the near field. [2]nan [1] 배경 EEG(ElectroEncephaloGraphy) 분석 분야의 역 문제 솔루션은 측정 피팅을 위한 수학적 기술 또는 근거리 예측을 위한 복잡한 머리 모델을 포함하는 순수 전자기(EM) 방법을 사용하여 과학 문헌에서 수십 년 동안 다루어져 왔습니다. [2]