Comparative Sociology(비교사회학)란 무엇입니까?
Comparative Sociology 비교사회학 - The article examines the features of the discipline of comparative sociology. [1] In order to contribute to a comparative sociology of such social experiments, this article is interested in the case of France and the United States in the 19th century. [2] First is that decolonial sociology is not just global, transnational, or comparative sociology. [3] We suggest that other aspects of social experience, including many that are more ‘everyday’, can be understood through a maximal model of sacrifice and that a rigorous, wider comparative sociology could be developed using this tool. [4] This article provides a foundational link in the research on charismatic authority-bridging the literatures on charisma and cross-national comparative sociology. [5] By using evidence from Delhi in the north and Bengaluru in the south, we also develop a comparative sociology of digital-first environmental movements and show how the significance of Twitter can only be understood in relation to the formations of social capital on the ground. [6] While statistical analysis or historically comparative sociology will provide correlational snapshots and structural transformations, ethnographies necessarily deal with change happening in the everyday. [7] I say worse, because the tendency was to kick capital back out of comparative sociology and political science on the welfare state. [8] The book will appeal to students and scholars in fields such as comparative sociology, political science, social policy and migration research, and European studies. [9] This paper will offer a historical-comparative sociology of state conventions and non-state contentions in defining political cultures of martyrdom during the Turkish civil war of 1970s. [10] Today, with the advancement of globalization, it is essential to clarify how the local communities are changing from a viewpoint of comparative sociology, in order to evaluate the changes in the modern society from a broader point of view. [11] Following the sociological attention paid to empirical particulars, this chapter summarizes the comparative sociology of the Axial Age civilizations of China, India, Israel, and Greece, focusing on the new class of dissident intellectual created (the shi, shramana and sannyasin, prophets, and philosophers, respectively). [12] I signpost how I deployed key notions from Pierre Bourdieu to clarify categories left hazy and to forge new concepts (territorial stigmatization and advanced marginality, punitive containment and liberal paternalism, hyperincarceration and negative sociodicy) as tools for the comparative sociology of the unfinished genesis of the post-industrial precariat, the penal regulation of poverty in the age of diffusing social insecurity and the building of the neo-liberal Leviathan. [13] Having tools for collecting event information from data produced in multiple countries enables comparative sociology and politics studies. [14]이 기사는 비교 사회학 분야의 특징을 조사합니다. [1] 이러한 사회적 실험의 비교사회학에 기여하기 위해 이 글은 19세기 프랑스와 미국의 사례에 관심을 가진다. [2] 첫째, 탈식민적 사회학은 단순히 전지구적, 초국가적, 비교사회학이 아니라는 것이다. [3] 우리는 더 '일상적인' 많은 것을 포함하여 사회적 경험의 다른 측면이 희생의 최대 모델을 통해 이해될 수 있고 이 도구를 사용하여 엄격하고 광범위한 비교 사회학이 개발될 수 있다고 제안합니다. [4] 이 기사는 카리스마와 국가 간 비교 사회학에 관한 문헌을 연결하는 카리스마적 권위에 대한 연구의 기초적인 연결 고리를 제공합니다. [5] 북쪽의 델리와 남쪽의 벵갈루루의 증거를 사용하여 디지털 우선 환경 운동의 비교 사회학을 발전시키고 Twitter의 중요성이 지상의 사회적 자본 형성과 관련하여 어떻게 이해될 수 있는지 보여줍니다. [6] 통계 분석이나 역사적 비교 사회학은 상관 관계의 스냅샷과 구조적 변형을 제공하지만 민족지학은 필연적으로 일상에서 일어나는 변화를 다룬다. [7] nan [8] nan [9] nan [10] nan [11] nan [12] nan [13] nan [14]