Agile Software(애자일 소프트웨어)란 무엇입니까?
Agile Software 애자일 소프트웨어 - Agile Manifesto refers to Leadership and Team characteristics in three out of the twelve principles of Agile software. [1] However, moving to an agile organization and an agile IT department is more complex than adapting an agile software. [2]Agile Manifesto는 Agile 소프트웨어의 12가지 원칙 중 3가지의 리더십 및 팀 특성을 나타냅니다. [1] 그러나 애자일 조직과 애자일 IT 부서로 이동하는 것은 애자일 소프트웨어를 적용하는 것보다 더 복잡합니다. [2]
traditional software development
Performance appraisal for software engineers in an Agile software development environment is complex and different from the traditional software development. [1] The management of traditional software development methodologies and agile software development methodologies over the decades have not worked to its expectation in increasing the success rates of software projects. [2] Agile software development methods provide promising solutions to overcome the efficiency issues and the challenges of traditional software development approaches in the domain. [3]애자일 소프트웨어 개발 환경에서 소프트웨어 엔지니어를 위한 성과 평가는 복잡하고 기존 소프트웨어 개발과 다릅니다. [1] 수십 년에 걸친 전통적인 소프트웨어 개발 방법론과 애자일 소프트웨어 개발 방법론의 관리는 소프트웨어 프로젝트의 성공률을 높이는 데 기대만큼 효과가 없었습니다. [2] nan [3]
increase customer value
Previous empirical studies have demonstrated the relevance of the concept of customer value to the software industry and the state-of-the-art of strategies to increase customer value in Agile Software Development (ASD) has been recently documented in a Systematic Literature Review (SLR). [1] Previous empirical studies have demonstrated the relevance of the concept of customer value to the software industry and the state-of-the-art of strategies to increase customer value in Agile Software Development (ASD) has been recently documented in a Systematic Literature Review (SLR). [2] Agile Software Development (ASD) has been widely accepted in the software industry as a means to increase customer value, despite the few empirical studies related to the subject. [3]이전의 경험적 연구는 소프트웨어 산업에 대한 고객 가치 개념의 관련성을 입증했으며 ASD(Agile Software Development)에서 고객 가치를 높이기 위한 최신 전략은 최근 Systematic Literature Review(SLR)에 문서화되었습니다. ). [1] 이전의 경험적 연구는 소프트웨어 산업에 대한 고객 가치 개념의 관련성을 입증했으며 ASD(Agile Software Development)에서 고객 가치를 높이기 위한 최신 전략은 최근 Systematic Literature Review(SLR)에 문서화되었습니다. ). [2] nan [3]
Scale Agile Software
To identify the most relevant factors and their interactions affecting schedule deviations in large-scale agile software development, we conducted a mixed-methods case study at ING: two rounds of surveys revealed a multitude of organizational, people, process, project and technical factors which were then quantified and statistically modeled using software repository data from 185 teams. [1] Nowadays, most of the projects are driven by market so that the intention of this research is to identify the challenges faced by practitioners in requirements re-usability in distributed large-scale agile projects and to find out how practitioners apply the concept of re-usability to mitigating those challenges in distributed large-scale agile software development from requirement engineering or re-usability perspective. [2] Based on our findings, we suggest that behaviours on their own cannot guarantee a sustained agile culture, and that this is equally important for enterprise agility and for large-scale agile software development transformations. [3] The projects working title “Coordination in large-scale agile software development: An investigation of coordination mechanisms, communication, roles, autonomy and interdependencies” summarizes the main topics of investigation. [4] Based on our findings, we suggest that behaviours on their own cannot guarantee a sustained agile culture, and that this is equally important for enterprise agility and for large-scale agile software development transformations. [5] However, inter-team coordination in large-scale agile software development is still an understudied subject and has become one of the main challenges for researchers and practitioners in the field. [6] The efforts to scale agile software development practices are not wholly able to address issues such as integrity, which is a crucial non-functional aspect of the software development process. [7]대규모 애자일 소프트웨어 개발에서 일정 편차에 영향을 미치는 가장 관련성이 높은 요인과 이들의 상호 작용을 식별하기 위해 ING에서 혼합 방법 사례 연구를 수행했습니다. 그런 다음 185개 팀의 소프트웨어 저장소 데이터를 사용하여 정량화하고 통계적으로 모델링했습니다. [1] 오늘날 대부분의 프로젝트는 시장에 의해 주도되기 때문에 이 연구의 목적은 분산된 대규모 애자일 프로젝트에서 요구사항 재사용성에 대한 실무자가 직면한 문제를 식별하고 실무자가 재사용성 개념을 적용하는 방법을 찾는 것입니다. 요구 사항 엔지니어링 또는 재사용성 관점에서 분산된 대규모 애자일 소프트웨어 개발의 이러한 문제를 완화합니다. [2] 우리의 연구 결과를 바탕으로, 우리는 행동 자체가 지속적인 애자일 문화를 보장할 수 없으며 이것이 엔터프라이즈 민첩성과 대규모 애자일 소프트웨어 개발 혁신에 똑같이 중요하다고 제안합니다. [3] nan [4] nan [5] nan [6] nan [7]
Distributed Agile Software 분산 애자일 소프트웨어
This chapter will focus on the motivation for examining why agile methodology doesn't work efficiently in large enterprises having distributed agile software development model compared to small or medium enterprises. [1] This chapter focuses on examining the impact of distributed agile software development on team performance. [2] The chapter then concludes by drawing core practices to organizations having similar distributed agile software development model. [3] Distributed Agile Software Development blends the principles of agile to geographically separated teams and thereby combines the quality benefits of Agile Software Development with cost benefits of Distributed Software Development. [4] In distributed agile software development, to conquer the problems raised by rapid development of complex products with ever changing technological advances and risks, there is a need of a model with specific tools and technology supported approaches to manage them. [5] There is a growing interest for Distributed Agile Software Development (DASD) in software industry due to multiple benefits such as availability of resources, low development cost, changeability and customer satisfaction. [6]이 장에서는 애자일 방법론이 중소기업에 비해 분산된 애자일 소프트웨어 개발 모델을 보유한 대기업에서 효율적으로 작동하지 않는 이유를 조사하는 동기에 초점을 맞출 것입니다. [1] 이 장에서는 분산된 애자일 소프트웨어 개발이 팀 성과에 미치는 영향을 조사하는 데 중점을 둡니다. [2] nan [3] nan [4] 분산형 애자일 소프트웨어 개발에서 끊임없이 변화하는 기술 발전과 위험과 함께 복잡한 제품의 급속한 개발로 인해 발생하는 문제를 극복하려면 특정 도구와 기술 지원 접근 방식을 관리하는 모델이 필요합니다. [5] 자원의 가용성, 낮은 개발 비용, 변경 가능성 및 고객 만족도와 같은 여러 이점으로 인해 소프트웨어 산업에서 DASD(Distributed Agile Software Development)에 대한 관심이 증가하고 있습니다. [6]
Use Agile Software
In order to adapt to the needs of frequent changes, more and more software development teams use agile software development method. [1] In the design of the governance renewal application classrooms, use agile software development methodology with extreme approach to programming process to explain each activity in each phase of the design. [2] Therefore, it was suggested to use Agile software development and IT projects managing Serum framework as a methodology for implementing information systems. [3]잦은 변경의 요구에 적응하기 위해 점점 더 많은 소프트웨어 개발 팀이 애자일 소프트웨어 개발 방법을 사용합니다. [1] 거버넌스 갱신 응용 프로그램 교실의 설계에서 설계의 각 단계에서 각 활동을 설명하기 위해 프로그래밍 프로세스에 대한 극단적인 접근과 함께 민첩한 소프트웨어 개발 방법론을 사용합니다. [2] nan [3]
Adopt Agile Software
The research identified that the companies that adopt agile software management methodology in Brazil prefer the Scrum method and the development teams may be geographically distributed. [1] Knowledge-intensive companies that adopt Agile Software Development (ASD) relay on efficient implementation of Knowledge Management (KM) strategies to promotes different Knowledge Processes (KPs) to gain competitive advantage. [2] Context: Even regulated domains like the automotive domain increasingly adopt agile software development. [3]nan [1] ASD(Agile Software Development)를 채택한 지식 집약적 기업은 경쟁 우위를 확보하기 위해 다양한 지식 프로세스(KP)를 촉진하기 위해 지식 관리(KM) 전략을 효율적으로 구현합니다. [2] 컨텍스트: 자동차 영역과 같은 규제 대상 영역에서도 점점 더 애자일 소프트웨어 개발을 채택하고 있습니다. [3]
Adopting Agile Software
Background: Organizations adopting Agile Software Development (ASD) use different Knowledge Management (KM) practices to retain and share knowledge. [1] The author is going to do case studies with some organizations that are already using or first adopting agile software development. [2]배경: ASD(Agile Software Development)를 채택한 조직은 지식을 유지하고 공유하기 위해 다양한 KM(지식 관리) 관행을 사용합니다. [1] 저자는 애자일 소프트웨어 개발을 이미 사용 중이거나 처음 채택한 일부 조직을 대상으로 사례 연구를 수행할 것입니다. [2]
Contemporary Agile Software
However, results from previous studies may not be applicable to contemporary agile software development practices. [1] However, results from previous studies may not be applicable to contemporary agile software development practices. [2]그러나 이전 연구의 결과는 현대의 애자일 소프트웨어 개발 관행에 적용되지 않을 수 있습니다. [1] 그러나 이전 연구의 결과는 현대의 애자일 소프트웨어 개발 관행에 적용되지 않을 수 있습니다. [2]
Within Agile Software
Background: Prototyping is an established practice for user interface design and for requirements engineering within agile software development, even so there is a lack of theory on prototyping. [1] To fill this gap, some authors argue in favor of the application of Creative thinking for requirements elicitation within agile software development. [2]배경: 프로토타이핑은 사용자 인터페이스 디자인 및 애자일 소프트웨어 개발 내 요구사항 엔지니어링을 위한 확립된 관행이지만 프로토타이핑에 대한 이론이 부족합니다. [1] nan [2]
Scaling Agile Software 애자일 소프트웨어 확장
To fill the space, the Interpretive Structural Model (ISM) approach is used to reconnoiter the correlations among the De‐Motivators regarding Scaling Agile Software Development Methodologies (ASDM) from the management perspective. [1] Driven by the need to coordinate activities of multiple agile development teams cooperating to produce a large software product, software-intensive organizations are turning to scaling agile software development frameworks. [2]이 공간을 채우기 위해 ISM(Interpretive Structural Model) 접근 방식을 사용하여 관리 관점에서 ASDM(Scaling Agile Software Development Methodologies)과 관련된 De-Motivators 간의 상관 관계를 정찰합니다. [1] 대규모 소프트웨어 제품을 생산하기 위해 협력하는 여러 애자일 개발 팀의 활동을 조정해야 하는 필요성에 따라 소프트웨어 집약적 조직은 애자일 소프트웨어 개발 프레임워크를 확장하는 것으로 눈을 돌리고 있습니다. [2]
Fmy Agile Software Fmy 애자일 소프트웨어
As initial steps towards closing this knowledge gap, we present our experiences from testing five different DT tools from a previously developed toolbox with four Agile software development teams. [1] We conducted an exploratory study of four agile software development teams. [2]이 지식 격차를 좁히기 위한 초기 단계로 4개의 Agile 소프트웨어 개발 팀과 함께 이전에 개발된 도구 상자에서 5개의 서로 다른 DT 도구를 테스트한 경험을 제시합니다. [1] 우리는 4개의 애자일 소프트웨어 개발 팀에 대한 탐색적 연구를 수행했습니다. [2]
Usable Agile Software 사용 가능한 애자일 소프트웨어
The number of publications dealing with Personas and agile development is increasing, which reveals a growing interest in the application of this technique to develop usable agile software. [1] The number of publications is increasing, which reveals a growing interest in the adoption of this technique to develop usable agile software. [2]페르소나 및 애자일 개발을 다루는 출판물이 증가하고 있어 이 기술을 사용 가능한 애자일 소프트웨어 개발에 적용하는 것에 대한 관심이 높아지고 있습니다. [1] 출판물의 수가 증가하고 있으며, 이는 사용 가능한 애자일 소프트웨어를 개발하기 위해 이 기술을 채택하는 것에 대한 관심이 증가하고 있음을 보여줍니다. [2]
agile software development 애자일 소프트웨어 개발
The agile software development process is one of the most emerging lightweight software development methodologies, which uses iterative and prototype development approaches to accommodate changes in software requirements. [1] To fill the space, the Interpretive Structural Model (ISM) approach is used to reconnoiter the correlations among the De‐Motivators regarding Scaling Agile Software Development Methodologies (ASDM) from the management perspective. [2] The author analyzes the ratio of the use of agile software development methodologies, including Scrum and Kanban. [3] Such processes are categorized into two different methodologies which are known as traditional and agile software development methodologies. [4] By querying the challenges of switching to agile software development methodologies in senior capstone projects, this paper makes a case that software development and software development methodology form the thrust of a multi-stakeholder ecosystem that defines today’s digital economy and society. [5] , contextual analysis, Behavior Change Wheel, and user-centered design combined with agile software development); and (2) describe that model’s characteristics and its application in clinical practice. [6] In Agile Software Development processes, it is not a cakewalk to prioritize the relevant requirements because requirements are welcomed even late in development phases in agile methodologies. [7] Agile Software Development (ASD) can be considered the mainstream development method of choice worldwide. [8] Agile software development (ASD) methods have emerged as an innovative and diverse way of developing software as compared to the traditional methodologies that are having high project failure, higher cost and more time to complete the project, customer dissatisfaction, etc. [9] Context: Widespread use of agile software development (ASD) methods can be observed nowadays. [10] However, most of them lack flexibility to be applied in agile software development projects. [11] Despite the increasing number of secondary studies about human factors in Software Engineering (SE) and in Agile Software Development (ASD), there is no study synthesizing which human factors influence software development without a specific perspective from SE or human factor thematic. [12] This work presents information about a Web Scraping tool, developed for the search of Grey Literature in the Agile Software Development context. [13] In agile software development, adoption of security practices poses challenges, often because security activities are not prioritized, or because the practitioners are not able to see the relevance and importance of the activities to the improvement of the security in the project. [14] Kim van Oorschot introduced a dynamic model to simulate Agile Software Development. [15] Background: Prototyping is an established practice for user interface design and for requirements engineering within agile software development, even so there is a lack of theory on prototyping. [16] cross-functionality in terms of their significance for traditional and agile software development workplaces. [17] Software and data analytics solutions support improving development processes and the quality of the software produced in Agile Software Development (ASD). [18] When NoSQL database systems are used in an agile software development setting, data model changes occur frequently and thus, data is routinely stored in different versions. [19] In this article, we are conducting a systematic mapping study on effort estimation in the context of agile software development. [20] When adopting intelligent automation, there is a need to understand the success factors of these new technologies and adapt agile software development (ASD) practices to meet customer expectations. [21] Objective: This study synthesizes research on KM and Agile Software Development (ASD) using the meta-ethnography method considering Scrum and XP frameworks. [22] Context: Test-driven development (TDD) is an agile software development approach that has been widely claimed to improve software quality. [23] Higher education lacks traditional curricula and methods in teaching agile software development. [24] Moreover, the rover's software is being engineered using Agile software development practices and incorporates a significant amount of open-source code, rather than following traditional (spiral, waterfall, etc. [25] As initial steps towards closing this knowledge gap, we present our experiences from testing five different DT tools from a previously developed toolbox with four Agile software development teams. [26] With the mandate of light-weight working practices, iterative development, customer collaboration and incremental delivery of business values, Agile software development methods have become the de-facto standard for commercial software development, worldwide. [27] Effective Retrospective meetings are vital for ensuring productive development processes because they provide the means for Agile software development teams to discuss and decide on future improvements of their collaboration. [28] In building this system, researchers used the agile software development method, namely SCRUM. [29] This chapter presents basic contract law and such law as it more specifically relates to contracts dealing with Agile software development. [30] Currently, Agile software development method has been commonly used in software development projects, and the success rate is higher than waterfall projects. [31] Agile software development has ended up profoundly prevalent over the final two decades. [32] In Agile Software Development (ASD), most of the worry is with overly detailed documentation; nevertheless, proponents of agile methodologies sometimes recommend utilizing “just enough” documentation. [33] Based on this experience and to deal with these problems, in this paper, we propose the ScrumOntoBDD approach to agile software development, which combines Scrum, ontologies and Behaviour-Driven Development (BDD). [34] This article provides a software safety analysis method to help practitioners comply with ISO 26262-6 in Agile software development. [35] In the context of agile software development (ASD), where the main objective is the fast delivery of functionalities, QRs are often ill-defined and not well addressed during the development process. [36] The agile software development model is the methodology used for the development of this research project. [37] Agile software development refers to a group of software development methodologies based on iterative development. [38] The research used participatory workshops incorporating a structured elicitation process, agile software development, and user evaluation to design and test a video game-based DSS in context of two real-world design settings in Detroit, MI, USA. [39] When developing the virtual electronic laboratory, agile software development methodologies, computer modeling methods, and object-oriented programming were used. [40] This chapter will focus on the motivation for examining why agile methodology doesn't work efficiently in large enterprises having distributed agile software development model compared to small or medium enterprises. [41] Project governance (PG) is an important activity in agile software development (ASD) projects. [42] “Technical excellence” is a nebulous term in agile software development. [43] This chapter focuses on examining the impact of distributed agile software development on team performance. [44] In this work, we focus on managing requirement dependencies that in Agile software development (ASD) come in the form of user stories. [45] Results: We identified twelve cultural barriers, six of which were classified as impediments to agile software development practices, and report on the manifestation of these barriers in five DevOps teams. [46] Context: Agile software development (ASD) promotes minimal documentation and often prioritizes functional requirements over quality requirements (QRs). [47] Agile software development has large success rate due to its benefits and promising nature but natively where the size of the project is small. [48] The proposed framework combines elements of both the waterfall and agile software development methods, as well as, aspects of Open Innovation, Customer Involvement and Co-Creation taking a multiple stakeholder approach. [49] Over the last two decades, Agile software development methodology has garnered significant interest in both software industry and research with several studies investigating the level of awareness, perception and use of Agile in software engineering practice. [50]애자일 소프트웨어 개발 프로세스는 소프트웨어 요구 사항의 변경 사항을 수용하기 위해 반복 및 프로토타입 개발 접근 방식을 사용하는 가장 최근에 등장한 경량 소프트웨어 개발 방법론 중 하나입니다. [1] 이 공간을 채우기 위해 ISM(Interpretive Structural Model) 접근 방식을 사용하여 관리 관점에서 ASDM(Scaling Agile Software Development Methodologies)과 관련된 De-Motivators 간의 상관 관계를 정찰합니다. [2] 저자는 Scrum 및 Kanban을 포함한 애자일 소프트웨어 개발 방법론의 사용 비율을 분석합니다. [3] 이러한 프로세스는 전통적인 소프트웨어 개발 방법론과 애자일 소프트웨어 개발 방법론으로 알려진 두 가지 다른 방법론으로 분류됩니다. [4] 시니어 캡스톤 프로젝트에서 애자일 소프트웨어 개발 방법론으로 전환하는 문제에 대해 질문함으로써 이 문서는 소프트웨어 개발 및 소프트웨어 개발 방법론이 오늘날의 디지털 경제와 사회를 정의하는 다중 이해 관계자 생태계의 추력을 형성한다는 사례를 제시합니다. [5] , 상황 분석, 행동 변경 휠 및 애자일 소프트웨어 개발과 결합된 사용자 중심 설계); (2) 해당 모델의 특성과 임상 실습에서의 적용을 설명합니다. [6] 애자일 소프트웨어 개발 프로세스에서는 애자일 방법론의 개발 단계 후반에도 요구 사항을 환영하기 때문에 관련 요구 사항의 우선 순위를 지정하는 것은 간단한 일이 아닙니다. [7] ASD(Agile Software Development)는 전 세계적으로 선택되는 주류 개발 방법으로 간주될 수 있습니다. [8] 애자일 소프트웨어 개발(ASD) 방법은 높은 프로젝트 실패, 높은 비용 및 프로젝트 완료 시간, 고객 불만족 등의 기존 방법론에 비해 혁신적이고 다양한 소프트웨어 개발 방법으로 등장했습니다. [9] 컨텍스트: 오늘날 애자일 소프트웨어 개발(ASD) 방법의 광범위한 사용을 관찰할 수 있습니다. [10] 그러나 대부분은 애자일 소프트웨어 개발 프로젝트에 적용할 수 있는 유연성이 부족합니다. [11] 소프트웨어 엔지니어링(SE) 및 애자일 소프트웨어 개발(ASD)에서 인적 요소에 대한 2차 연구의 증가에도 불구하고 SE 또는 인적 요소 주제의 특정 관점 없이 소프트웨어 개발에 영향을 미치는 인적 요소를 종합하는 연구는 없습니다. [12] 이 작업은 Agile Software Development 컨텍스트에서 Gray 문학 검색을 위해 개발된 웹 스크래핑 도구에 대한 정보를 제공합니다. [13] 애자일 소프트웨어 개발에서