グループトライアルとは何ですか？
Group Trials グループトライアル - To detect infrequent gene mutations, investigators need to perform multicenter studies and/or cooperative-group trials with a certain sample size to examine the frequency of the gene mutations in elderly AML patients, enabling sufficient statistical power for meaningful comparisons. [1] We identified 18 studies on PTSD including 13 randomized controlled trials (RCTs; 654 participants) and 5 single-group trials (60 participants). [2] performed two randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel-group trials of Mepolizumab (METREY and METREO). [3] 82%), group trials are in very good qualifications (89. [4] The review included six trials (four parallel-group and two cross-over group trials) consisting of 948 participants. [5] The individual behavioural assays predicted habitat use, but not foraging success or dominance; fish that were aggressive to a mirror were more frequently found in the open habitat during the group trials. [6] The test subjects in the development of learning media consisted of expert validators, practitioner validators, observers, 5 students of class XII as group trials, and 22 students of class XII KPR as field trials. [7] In most randomized controlled and parallel-group trials, probiotics, prebiotics, synbiotics, antibiotics, and FMT therapy for chronic constipation were effective with few side effects. [8] The Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) 2010 Statement was developed to improve the reporting of randomized clinical trials, but the primary focus was on parallel-group trials with 2 groups. [9] Trials comparing rACTH with placebo or single-group trials will not add new knowledge. [10] For this assessment, we calculated post hoc the correlation between pre-dose FEV1 and pre-dose PEF measured under supervision in the clinic and, for both lung function parameters, the correlations between supervised clinic and unsupervised home measurements, using the results from the 8 Phase III parallel-group trials of the global clinical development programme with tiotropium Respimat® in patients with asthma aged 12 to 75 years. [11] Based on the data obtained from the results of the study consisting of expert validation, group trials and effectiveness tests, and discussion of the results of the study, it can be concluded as follows: (1) The model of training footwork for beginner's that the researchers have developed obtained 35 items that are worth using, (2) Based on the results of the footwork badminton test, t = 3,920, db = 58 and sig. [12] BRIGHT and EDITION 3 were both multicenter, open-label, randomized, parallel-group trials with primary endpoint at 6 months. [13]まれな遺伝子変異を検出するには、研究者は特定のサンプルサイズで多施設共同研究および/または共同グループ試験を実施して、高齢のAML患者の遺伝子変異の頻度を調べ、有意義な比較のための十分な統計的検出力を可能にする必要があります。 [1] 13件のランダム化比較試験（RCT; 654人の参加者）と5件の単一グループ試験（60人の参加者）を含む、PTSDに関する18件の研究を特定しました。 [2] メポリズマブ（METREYおよびMETREO）の2つのランダム化プラセボ対照二重盲検並行群間試験を実施しました。 [3] 82％）、グループ試験は非常に良い資格にあります（89。 [4] レビューには、948人の参加者からなる6つの試験（4つの並行グループ試験と2つの交差グループ試験）が含まれていました。 [5] 個々の行動分析は生息地の使用を予測しましたが、採餌の成功や優位性は予測しませんでした。鏡に攻撃的な魚は、グループ試験中にオープンハビタットでより頻繁に発見されました。 [6] 学習メディアの開発におけるテスト対象は、専門家のバリデーター、開業医のバリデーター、オブザーバー、グループトライアルとしてのクラスXIIの5人の学生、およびフィールドトライアルとしてのクラスXIIKPRの22人の学生で構成されました。 [7] ほとんどのランダム化比較試験および並行群間試験では、プロバイオティクス、プレバイオティクス、シンバイオティクス、抗生物質、および慢性便秘に対するFMT療法が効果的であり、副作用はほとんどありませんでした。 [8] 統合報告試験基準（CONSORT）2010声明は、ランダム化臨床試験の報告を改善するために作成されましたが、主な焦点は2つのグループによる並行グループ試験でした。 [9] rACTHをプラセボまたは単一グループの試験と比較する試験は、新しい知識を追加しません。 [10] この評価では、クリニックで監視下で測定された投与前FEV1と投与前PEFの間の相関、および両方の肺機能パラメーターについて、監視されたクリニックと監視されていない自宅測定の間の相関を、8の結果を使用して事後計算しました。 12〜75歳の喘息患者を対象としたチオトロピウムRespimat®を使用したグローバル臨床開発プログラムの第III相並行群間試験。 [11] 専門家による検証、グループトライアル、有効性テストからなる調査結果、および調査結果の議論から得られたデータに基づいて、次のように結論付けることができます。（1）初心者向けのトレーニングフットワークのモデル研究者は、使用する価値のある35のアイテムを開発しました。（2）フットワークバドミントンテストの結果に基づいて、t = 3,920、db=58およびsig。 [12] BRIGHTとEDITION3はどちらも、6か月を主なエンドポイントとする、多施設、非盲検、ランダム化、並行群間試験でした。 [13]
small group trial 小グループトライアル
Media video dribbling on the game of football and tested through 2 stages, namely (1) Expert test that is the review of the content experts / learning materials; learning media experts; and design experts, (2) Field test is individual group testing; small group trial; and large group trials. [1] Then the students' response to the electronic textbook (BAEI) in small group trials and large group trials (field) obtained the criteria of "Very Attractive" with the average score on the small group trial of 3. [2] Validation was carried out by material experts and media experts with individual test subjects, namely 2 mathematics teachers, small group trial subjects consisted of 6 students, and large group trials namely students of XIPA2 class of SMAN 5 Jambi City. [3] Small group trial subjects were 10 students from grade IV Shidiq and large group trials were 28 students from grade IV Amanah. [4] In this research, to reach the target of teaching materials of computer-based business mathematics, the development using Borg and Gall method with some modifications into five steps: needs analysis and curriculum majoring in accounting, initial product development, education expert validation, small group trial , and large group trials. [5]サッカーの試合でドリブルするメディアビデオは、2つの段階でテストされます。つまり、（1）コンテンツの専門家/学習資料のレビューである専門家テスト。メディアの専門家を学ぶ。および設計の専門家。（2）フィールドテストは個別のグループテストです。小グループ裁判;と大規模なグループトライアル。 [1] その後、小グループ試験と大グループ試験（フィールド）での電子教科書（BAEI）に対する学生の反応は、小グループ試験の平均スコアが3である「非常に魅力的」の基準を取得しました。 [2] nan [3] nan [4] nan [5]
comprehensive electronic database 包括的な電子データベース
SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group Trials Register which comprises references identified from comprehensive electronic database searches and handsearches of relevant journals and abstract books of conference proceedings. [1] SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group Trials Register comprising of references identified from comprehensive electronic database searches and handsearches of relevant journals and abstract books of conference proceedings. [2] SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group Trials Register comprising references identified from comprehensive electronic database searches, hand searches of relevant journals and abstract books of conference proceedings. [3] SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group Trials Register, comprising references identified from comprehensive electronic database searches and handsearches of relevant journals and abstract books of conference proceedings. [4] SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group Trials Register which comprises references identified from comprehensive electronic database searches, handsearches of relevant journals, abstract books and conference proceedings. [5]検索方法 Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group Trials Registerを検索しました。これは、包括的な電子データベース検索と、関連するジャーナルおよび会議議事録の抄録集のハンドサーチから特定された参照で構成されています。 [1] 検索方法 コクラン嚢胞性線維症および遺伝性疾患グループ試験登録簿を検索しました。これは、包括的な電子データベース検索と、関連するジャーナルおよび会議議事録の抄録集のハンドサーチから特定された参照で構成されています。 [2] nan [3] nan [4] nan [5]
double blind placebo 二重盲検プラセボ
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trials that assessed adverse events (AEs) with topical NSAIDs in patients with OA were eligible for inclusion. [1] Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trials that assessed adverse events (AEs) with opioids in patients with OA were eligible for inclusion. [2] Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trials that assessed adverse events (AEs) with COX-2 inhibitors in patients with OA were eligible for inclusion. [3] Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trials that assessed adverse events (AEs) with IAHA in patients with OA were eligible for inclusion. [4]OA患者を対象とした局所NSAIDによる有害事象（AE）を評価したランダム化二重盲検プラセボ対照並行群間試験は、対象となる資格がありました。 [1] OA患者におけるオピオイドによる有害事象（AE）を評価したランダム化二重盲検プラセボ対照並行群間試験は、含める資格がありました。 [2] nan [3] nan [4]
trial subjects consisted 試験対象からなる
The trial subjects consisted of two experts on Biology subject matter, two learning design experts, two instructional media experts, three students for individual trials, nine students for small group trials and 69 students for limited field testing. [1] The trial subjects consisted of 3 students with individual trials, 9 students with small group trials, and 32 students with limited field trials. [2]試験科目は、生物学の主題に関する2人の専門家、2人の学習デザインの専門家、2人のインストラクショナルメディアの専門家、3人の個人試験の学生、9人の小グループ試験の学生、69人の限定フィールドテストの学生で構成されました。 [1] 試験科目は、個人試験の3人の学生、小グループ試験の9人の学生、および限定的な野外試験の32人の学生で構成されていました。 [2]
20 % 2 20% 2
This is evidenced by the results of cognitive and psychomotor tests that have been conducted on small group trials with the acquisition of a percentage of 20% (2 people) with very good categories, 50% percentage (5 people) with good categories, 10% percentage (1 person) with enough categories and a percentage of 20% (2 people) with less categories. [1] This is evidenced by the results of cognitive and psychomotor tests that have been conducted on small group trials with the acquisition of a percentage of 20% (2 people) with very good categories, 50% (5 people) with good categories, 10% (1 person) with enough categories and 20% (2 people) with less categories. [2]これは、小グループ試験で実施された認知および精神運動テストの結果によって証明されており、非常に良いカテゴリーで20％（2人）、良いカテゴリーで50％（5人）、10％の割合を獲得しています。カテゴリが十分な割合（1人）とカテゴリが少ない割合（2人）。 [1] これは、小グループ試験で実施された認知および精神運動テストの結果によって証明されており、非常に良いカテゴリーで20％（2人）、良いカテゴリーで50％（5人）、10％（ 1人）十分なカテゴリがあり、20％（2人）が少ないカテゴリです。 [2]
Small Group Trials 小グループ試験
This research method consists of two stages, which in stage I is the product testing phase which consists of: (1) validation of learning design experts, (2) expert material validation, (3) validation of learning media experts, (4) test try individuals, (5) small group trials, and (6) limited field trials. [1] Using an RD (2) the practicality of the module from individual trials was 96% and from the small group trials was 81. [2] Furthermore, for product trials, the percentage of small group trials was 90. [3] 25%) small group trials in very decent qualifications (93. [4] The results of the study show that the product model of this exercise is feasible to use, in the results of small group trials and large groups can explain that the model as a whole can be done well. [5] Then the students' response to the electronic textbook (BAEI) in small group trials and large group trials (field) obtained the criteria of "Very Attractive" with the average score on the small group trial of 3. [6] For small group trials conducted on a limited number of 15 students, consisting of students who have high, medium and low abilities, and field trials were conducted on 32 students. [7] The type of the research used in this study is Research and Development (R & D) by using the stages or procedures that have been adapted, such as: Needs analysis; develop the products; validation and revision; small group trials; medium group trials; large groups trials; final product. [8] Small group trials were conducted on 6th grade students of MTs Al Huda Bandung Baru as many as 6 students and a field trial of 30 students. [9] In the third stage, product testing was carried out in three ways, namely individual trials, small group trials and limited field trials. [10] Then, the mobile learning with schoology applications was tested through two stages: small group trials and field trials in Junior High School. [11] The trial subjects consists of learning material experts, learning design experts, two instructional media design experts, three students for individual trials, six students for small group trials and thirty students for large group trials. [12] Data was collected from 1 media expert with a percentage of 95%, 1 material expert at 90%, and in the individual trials got a percentage of 95%, from small group trials totaling 4 students 90%, and field trials totaling 23 students 90. [13] The product development procedures include product analysis to be created, initial product development, expert validation and revision, small group trials and revision, large group trials and end products. [14] Product trials are carried out in two stages: small group trials and limited field trials. [15] 7% small group trials were feasible and in the field trial 87. [16] As for the implementation of individual trials are achieved 95% achievement, a small group trials reaching 95%, and a field test achieved 96% success. [17] This research method used research and development methods from Borg and Gall 1983 which have been modified by researchers namely: (1) Requirement analysis of 25 students for observation; (2) Manufacture of initial products; (3) Overview of experts 3 persons; (4) Product revision; (5) Small group trials 10 students; (6) Product revision; (7) Large group trials 14 students; and (8) The final product. [18] The development model used is Brog and Gall which are compiled with ten-step modifications, namely: (1) preliminary studies which include literature studies and field observations, (2) development which includes media planning, product drafting, product validation and revisions to product validation, and (3) trials which included small group trials, revisions to small group trials, large group trials, and final product revisions. [19] This research applies the Research and Development (R & D) method with the Borg and Gall model which is limited to small group trials. [20] To determine the feasibility of the media, the media experts and material experts validated the media that had been made and then conducted a media trial to the students, the trial was carried out on three stages, one to one, small group trials, and field test trials. [21] To test the practicality of LKPD, one on one and small group trials were conducted with data collection techniques through questionnaires. [22] (4) to describe the response of students in the form of individual trials, small group trials and field trials on the development of interactive multimedia based on Balinese Culture contextual on graphic design learning in Class X Multimedia in SMK Negeri 1 Sawan. [23] The response of students in small group trials is interesting with an average score of 2. [24] Analysis of 27 items in the small group trials showed test obtained 24 items received and 3 items were rejected. [25] 6%, the small group trials get an average value of 4. [26] Based on the results of expert validation and comments that the developed teaching materials are valid, from the results of one-to-one and small group trials, students comment that teaching-based teaching materials can make it easier to understand the concepts and from questionnaire data analysis results obtained that the teaching materials are already practical. [27] 25%; small group trials were 83. [28] the results of the overal datawere 84% validation of ludo media exprets, 74% initialmaterial expert validation, 79% final material validation, 91% of learners responses during small group trials. [29] 89 in the excellent category, small group trials score 92, 75 with a very good category and limited field trials obtained a score of 94. [30] Step of this study consists of preliminary studies, research planning, design development, experts judgment, revision of expert judgment, a small group trials, revisions of small group trials, large group trials, revisions of large group trials. [31] 6%), small group trials (83%), limited field group trials (79. [32] Small group trials involve 15 athletes and 60 for large group trials. [33] The type of the research used in this study is Research and Development (RD b) developing products; c) Validation and revision; d) Small group trials of 5 students; e) Medium group trials of 15 students, and f) large group trials; g) The final product. [34] This type of research is development research (Reseacrh and Development / RD declared interesting based on research on small group trials by 3 students and also 10 students in a large group trial by purposive sampling; and has effectiveness in the high category based on the results of field tests in 1 class of students who have just taken a mathematics logic course. [35] 74%), (5) small group trials are in very good qualifications (86. [36] This research method was carried out by conducting testing surveys, Focus Group Discussions with stakeholders, one to one trial, small group trials, and expanded group testing stages. [37] This research is a research development that uses the model of dick & carey with several ways of needs analysis, media planning, product development, individual trials, revisions, small group trials, revisions and large group trials, revisions and distribution. [38] 95%), (5) Small group trials are in very good criteria ( 85. [39] We tested the effectiveness of the PBL model in small group trials in learning situations that resembled the actual situation and found PBL effectively increased student mastery of a particular topic. [40] Third, he effectiveness of evaluating thematic learning by using Rubrics in small group trials was 86. [41] The results of the development research are: (1) The results of the validation of the material and the media obtain an average score of 36 with the category "quite valid"; (2) The results of the effectiveness of the media in small group trials have achieved 100% mastery learning in the "very effective" category; (3) The results of the practicality of the media in small group trials obtained an average score of 57 in the "very practical" category; (4) The results of the effectiveness of the media in large group trials gained mastery learning reaching 80% with the category of "effective"; and (5) The practicality of the media in the large group test obtained an average of 54,485 in the "practical" category. [42] This research uses Research and Development design by Borg and Gall which is simplified into 5 stages, namely: 1) Preliminary study and needs analysis, 2) Initial product development, 3) Expert Validation, 4) Small group trials, and 5) Limited group trials. [43] The trial subjects consisted of two experts on Biology subject matter, two learning design experts, two instructional media experts, three students for individual trials, nine students for small group trials and 69 students for limited field testing. [44] Student responses to small group trials gained a percentage of 87% and 83% of field trials. [45] 57%), small group trials were very good qualifications (96. [46] 33% which indicates that the product design for the development of dribbling and shooting training models for students who have developed futsal achievements can be tested on the stage of small group trials and large group trials. [47] The product assessment were conducted by five chemistry teachers and 20 students for small group trials. [48] The results of the research analysis showed that product validation by material experts as well as media experts, small group trials and product use trials showed that the material in the form of automotive electrical learning modules was proper to use. [49] The research method uses a modified Borg & Gall research and development model, namely: 1) preliminary research and information gathering 2) planning 3) initial product design development 4) small group trials 5) main product revisions 6) limited field tests 7) product revisions. [50]この調査方法は2つの段階で構成され、段階Iは、（1）学習設計の専門家の検証、（2）専門家の資料の検証、（3）学習メディアの専門家の検証、（4）テストで構成される製品テスト段階です。個人、（5）小グループ試験、および（6）限定フィールド試験を試してください。 [1] RD（2）を使用すると、個々の試験からのモジュールの実用性は96％であり、小グループ試験からのモジュールの実用性は81でした。 [2] nan [3] nan [4] nan [5] その後、小グループ試験と大グループ試験（フィールド）での電子教科書（BAEI）に対する学生の反応は、小グループ試験の平均スコアが3である「非常に魅力的」の基準を取得しました。 [6] 高・中・低の能力を持った15名の学生を対象にした小グループ試験と、32名の実地試験を実施しました。 [7] nan [8] nan [9] nan [10] nan [11] nan [12] nan [13] nan [14] nan [15] nan [16] 個別試験の実施については、95％の達成、小グループ試験の95％、実地試験の96％の成功を達成しました。 [17] nan [18] nan [19] nan [20] nan [21] nan [22] nan [23] nan [24] nan [25] 6％、小グループの試験の平均値は4です。 [26] nan [27] nan [28] nan [29] nan [30] nan [31] nan [32] nan [33] nan [34] nan [35] nan [36] nan [37] nan [38] nan [39] nan [40] nan [41] nan [42] nan [43] 試験科目は、生物学の主題に関する2人の専門家、2人の学習デザインの専門家、2人のインストラクショナルメディアの専門家、3人の個人試験の学生、9人の小グループ試験の学生、69人の限定フィールドテストの学生で構成されました。 [44] nan [45] nan [46] nan [47] nan [48] nan [49] nan [50]
Health Group Trials 健康グループ試験
SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Oral Health Group Trials Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE and LILACS. [1] METHODS Electronic databases including EMBASE, MEDLINE, Cochrane Oral Health Group Trials Register and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched up to January 2019. [2] The electronic studies include the National Library of Medicine, PubMed/Medline, Web of Science, Cochrane Oral Health Group Trials, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. [3] Main databases [MEDLINE (1952-February 2019), EMBASE (1984-February 2019), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Cochrane Oral Health Group Trials Register (1993- February 2019)] were searched. [4] To determine the weight of evidence for HHVs in patients with peri‐implantitis (PI) and substantiate the significance of HHVs in peri‐implant inflammation, electronic databases including EMBASE, MEDLINE, Cochrane Oral Health Group Trials Register, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched from 1964 up to and including November 2018. [5] METHODS Based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines, a specific PICO question was constructed: "Does the SCL procedure produce stable clinical outcomes for restorative treatment?" Electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Cochrane Oral Health Group Trials Register) were searched up to December 2017. [6] We searched main databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Cochrane Oral Health Group Trials Register) for articles addressing the focused question up to and including May 2018. [7] Material and methodsElectronic and manual literature searches were performed by two independent reviewers in several databases, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Oral Health Group Trials Register, for articles up to January 2018 reporting outcome of implant placement perforating the sinus floor without regenerative procedure (lateral sinus lift or transalveolar technique) and graft material. [8] SEARCH METHODS We conducted an electronic search of the Cochrane Oral Health Group Trials Register, MEDLINE and EMBASE up to April 2004. [9] This review followed the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis) guidelines that addressed the following focused question: What is the overall clinical and radiographic performance of O-PZI? The MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Cochrane Oral Health Group Trials Register databases were searched. [10] SEARCH METHODS We searched the following electronic databases: the Cochrane Oral Health Group Trials Register (to 17 October 2011), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2011, Issue 4), MEDLINE via OVID (1950 to 17 October 2011), EMBASE via OVID (1980 to 17 October 2011), CINAHL via EBSCO (1980 to 17 October 2011), LILACS via BIREME (1982 to 17 October 2011), ZETOC Conference Proceedings (1980 to 17 October 2011), Web of Science Conference Proceedings (1990 to 17 October 2011), Clinicaltrials. [11] MATERIALS AND METHODS A search was made of two electronic databases (MEDLINE via PubMed and the Cochrane Oral Health Group Trials Register [CENTRAL]), complemented by a manual search. [12]検索方法 Cochrane Oral Health Group Trials Register、Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials（CENTRAL）、MEDLINE、EMBASE、およびLILACSを検索しました。 [1] 方法 2019年1月まで、EMBASE、MEDLINE、Cochrane Oral Health Group Trials Register、Cochrane Central Register ofControlledTrialsなどの電子データベースが検索されました。 [2] nan [3] nan [4] nan [5] nan [6] nan [7] nan [8] nan [9] nan [10] nan [11] nan [12]
Stroke Group Trials 脳卒中グループ試験
SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register (June 2018), CENTRAL (Cochrane Library, June 2018), MEDLINE (1948 to June 2018), Embase (1980 to June 2018), CINAHL (1982 to June 2018), AMED (1985 to June 2018), Science Citation Index (1899 to June 2018), and seven additional databases. [1] SEARCH METHODS The Cochrane Stroke Group Information Specialist searched the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register (last searched 7 January 2019), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; 2019, Issue 1) in the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE Ovid (1980 to 14 January 2019), and Embase OVID (1980 to 14 January 2019). [2] SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register (last searched August 2018), CENTRAL (last searched August 2018), MEDLINE (1966 to August 2018), Embase (1980 to August 2018), and BIOSIS (1926 to August 2018). [3] SEARCH METHODS On 7 January 2019, we searched the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register; the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), in the Cochrane Library; MEDLINE; Embase; the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL); PsycINFO; the Allied and Complementary Medicine Database (AMED); Occupational Therapy Systematic Evaluation of Evidence (OTseeker); the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro); ICHUSHI Web; and six ongoing trial registries. [4] SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register (30 July 2019), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; 2019, Issue 7), MEDLINE (1949 to 30 July 2019), Embase (1980 to 30 July 2019), CINAHL (1982 to 30 July 2019), AMED (1985 to 30 July 2019), and 11 Chinese databases (30 July 2019). [5] SEARCH METHODS:We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register, the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Group Trials Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, AMED, PsycINFO, and PDQT Databse, and clinical trials databases, including ClinicalTrials. [6] SEARCH METHODS For this update, we searched the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register (last searched 16 July 2018), the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (CENTRAL, Issue 7 of 12, July 2018), MEDLINE (1946 to July 2018), Embase (1974 to July 2018), CINAHL (1982 July 2018), PsycINFO (1985 to July 2018), AMED (1985 to July 2018), and PsycBITE March 2012 to July 2018). [7] SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, PsycBITE, REHABDATA and ongoing trials registers up to February 2019. [8] SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group trials register (6 August 2018), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; Issue 1, January 2019), MEDLINE Ovid (from 1948 to 6 August 2018), Embase Ovid (from 1980 to 6 August 2018), CINAHL EBSCO (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature; from 1982 to 6 August 2018), Science Citation Index Expanded ‒ Web of Science (SCI-EXPANDED), Conference Proceedings Citation Index-Science - Web of Science (CPCI-S), and BIOSIS Citation Index. [9] We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register (6 February 2018), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; 2018, Issue 2), MEDLINE Ovid (1950 to 6 February 2018), Embase Ovid (1980 to 6 February 2018), and four Chinese databases (6 February 2018): Chinese Biological Medicine Database (CBM-disc), China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Chinese Scientific Periodical Database of VIP information, and Wanfang Data. [10] SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register, the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Group Trials Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, AMED, PsycINFO, and PDQT Databse, and clinical trials databases, including ClinicalTrials. [11]検索方法 Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register（2018年6月）、CENTRAL（Cochrane Library、2018年6月）、MEDLINE（1948年から2018年6月）、Embase（1980年から2018年6月）、CINAHL（1982年から2018年6月）、AMED（1985年から2018年6月）を検索しました2018年6月）、Science Citation Index（1899年から2018年6月）、および7つの追加データベース。 [1] 検索方法 Cochrane Stroke Group Information Specialistは、MEDLINEOvidのCochraneLibraryにあるCochraneStroke Group Trials Register（最終検索日：2019年1月7日）、Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials（CENTRAL; 2019、Issue 1）を検索しました（1980年から2019年1月14日）。 、およびEmbase OVID（1980年から2019年1月14日）。 [2] nan [3] nan [4] nan [5] nan [6] nan [7] nan [8] nan [9] nan [10] nan [11]
Large Group Trials 大規模グループ試験
Then it was tested at Pakel Muhammadiyah Elementary School Yogyakarta Plus Program by using small group and large group trials. [1] Media video dribbling on the game of football and tested through 2 stages, namely (1) Expert test that is the review of the content experts / learning materials; learning media experts; and design experts, (2) Field test is individual group testing; small group trial; and large group trials. [2] 75%, and was very well used as a learning medium in large group trials with a return of 3. [3] 3 for large group trials with the criteria "very interesting" from 30 students. [4] Furthermore, the students tested media covering the trial of small and large group trials. [5] Limited trials and large group trials were conducted in the eighth grade Lubuklinggau Middle School 14 with a total of 29 students. [6] While the results of large group trials obtained a percentage of eligibility of 88. [7] Validation was carried out by material experts and media experts with individual test subjects, namely 2 mathematics teachers, small group trial subjects consisted of 6 students, and large group trials namely students of XIPA2 class of SMAN 5 Jambi City. [8] Small group trial subjects were 10 students from grade IV Shidiq and large group trials were 28 students from grade IV Amanah. [9] In this research, to reach the target of teaching materials of computer-based business mathematics, the development using Borg and Gall method with some modifications into five steps: needs analysis and curriculum majoring in accounting, initial product development, education expert validation, small group trial , and large group trials. [10]その後、パケルムハマディヤ小学校ジョグジャカルタプラスプログラムで、小グループおよび大グループの試験を使用してテストされました。 [1] サッカーの試合でドリブルするメディアビデオは、2つの段階でテストされます。つまり、（1）コンテンツの専門家/学習資料のレビューである専門家テスト。メディアの専門家を学ぶ。および設計の専門家。（2）フィールドテストは個別のグループテストです。小グループ裁判;と大規模なグループトライアル。 [2] nan [3] nan [4] nan [5] nan [6] 大規模なグループ試験の結果は、88の適格性のパーセンテージを取得しました。 [7] nan [8] nan [9] nan [10]
Disorder Group Trials 障害グループ試験
SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group Trials Register which comprises references identified from comprehensive electronic database searches and handsearches of relevant journals and abstract books of conference proceedings. [1] SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group Trials Register comprising of references identified from comprehensive electronic database searches and handsearches of relevant journals and abstract books of conference proceedings. [2] SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group Trials Register comprising references identified from comprehensive electronic database searches, hand searches of relevant journals and abstract books of conference proceedings. [3] SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group Trials Register, comprising references identified from comprehensive electronic database searches and handsearches of relevant journals and abstract books of conference proceedings. [4] SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group Trials Register which comprises references identified from comprehensive electronic database searches, handsearches of relevant journals, abstract books and conference proceedings. [5]検索方法 Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group Trials Registerを検索しました。これは、包括的な電子データベース検索と、関連するジャーナルおよび会議議事録の抄録集のハンドサーチから特定された参照で構成されています。 [1] 検索方法 コクラン嚢胞性線維症および遺伝性疾患グループ試験登録簿を検索しました。これは、包括的な電子データベース検索と、関連するジャーナルおよび会議議事録の抄録集のハンドサーチから特定された参照で構成されています。 [2] nan [3] nan [4] nan [5]
Cooperative Group Trials 共同グループ試験
Landmark investigation two decades ago demonstrated sex-based disparities among participants in cancer cooperative group trials. [1] Methods: We collected individual patient data from 3600 patients with LA‐NSCLC who participated in 16 cooperative group trials of concurrent CRT. [2] METHODS Data on older patients (≥70 years) enrolled on 38 NCI cooperative group trials of advanced NSCLC from 1991 to 2011 were analyzed. [3] Importance Seminal investigation 2 decades ago alerted the oncology community to age disparities in participation in cooperative group trials; less is known about whether these disparities persist in industry-funded research. [4] Contemporary cooperative group trials attempt to increase radiation doses to achieve nodal clearance and/or pCR. [5]20年前の画期的な調査では、がん協同組合のグループ試験の参加者間の性別による格差が示されました。 [1] 方法：同時CRTの16の共同グループ試験に参加したLA-NSCLCの3600人の患者から個々の患者データを収集した。 [2] nan [3] nan [4] nan [5]
Parallel Group Trials 並列グループ試行
0 tool for individually randomized, parallel group trials. [1] Future parallel group trials with longer treatment periods and a greater range of disease severity are required. [2] Methods: TRIMARAN and TRIGGER were two phase III randomized, multicentre, parallel group trials comparing 52-week treatment with medium strength BDP/FF/GB 400/24/50 µg/d to BDP/FF 400/24 µg/d (TRIMARAN) and high strength BDP/FF/GB 800/24/50 µg/d to BDP/FF 800/24 µg/d (TRIGGER). [3] We systematically reviewed the reporting of sample size calculations in the primary reports of randomized, parallel group trials published in six dermatology journals between January 1, 2013 and December 31, 2015. [4] The primary focus of the statement was on parallel group trials with two treatment groups. [5]個別にランダム化された並行グループ試験用の0ツール。 [1] より長い治療期間とより広い範囲の疾患重症度を伴う将来の並行グループ試験が必要です。 [2] nan [3] nan [4] nan [5]
Addiction Group Trials 中毒グループ試験
SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Tobacco Addiction Group trials register, clinicaltrials. [1] SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Tobacco Addiction Group trials register, clinicaltrials. [2] SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Tobacco Addiction Group trials register, and trial registries for papers mentioning NRT in the title, abstract or keywords. [3] SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Tobacco Addiction Group Trials Register, ClinicalTrials. [4]検索方法 Cochrane Tobacco Addiction Groupの試験登録簿、clinicaltrialsを検索しました。 [1] 検索方法 Cochrane Tobacco Addiction Groupの試験登録簿、clinicaltrialsを検索しました。 [2] nan [3] nan [4]
Study Group Trials スタディグループトライアル
An analysis of patients with breast cancer enrolled in the International Breast Cancer Study Group Trials V and VI revealed that time to menopause after receiving cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil is dose-dependent; in women younger than 35 who received one or no cycles of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil, 37% were menopausal in 5 years, significantly less than the 65% of women under 35 who received six or seven cycles [8]. [1] (2014) Interactions between comorbidity and treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia: results of German Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Study Group trials. [2] Peripheral neuropathy in ANCA-associated vasculitis: outcomes from the European Vasculitis Study Group trials. [3]International Breast Cancer Study Group Trials VおよびVIに登録された乳がん患者の分析により、シクロホスファミド、メトトレキサート、および5-フルオロウラシルを投与された後の閉経までの時間は用量依存的であることが明らかになりました。シクロホスファミド、メトトレキサート、5-フルオロウラシルのサイクルを1回またはまったく受けなかった35歳未満の女性では、37％が5年間で閉経し、6回または7回のサイクルを受けた35歳未満の女性の65％よりも有意に少なかった[8]。 [1] （2014）併存疾患と慢性リンパ性白血病の治療との相互作用：ドイツの慢性リンパ性白血病研究グループ試験の結果。 [2] nan [3]
Oncology Group Trials 腫瘍学グループの試験
We evaluated children with osteosarcoma (OS) on two Children’s Oncology Group trials with higher dose doxorubicin (375–600 mg/m2) preceded by dexrazoxane (10:1 dexrazoxane:doxorubicin dosing). [1] We then performed profiling on 14 early relapse and 14 matched prolonged remission specimens from patients treated on the Children’s Oncology Group trials AALL0331 and AALL0232 (second set). [2]デクスラゾキサン（10：1デクスラゾキサン：ドキソルビシン投与）が先行する高用量ドキソルビシン（375–600 mg / m2）を用いた2つのChildren’s Oncology Group試験で、骨肉腫（OS）の小児を評価しました。 [1] 次に、Children’s Oncology Groupの試験AALL0331およびAALL0232（2番目のセット）で治療された患者からの14の早期再発および14の一致した長期寛解検体のプロファイリングを実行しました。 [2]
Childbirth Group Trials 出産グループトライアル
SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group Trials Register, ClinicalTrials. [1] Methods: We searched for studies published between 1 January 2005 and 17 August 2016, using the following databases: MEDLINE via Ovid, PsycINFO, and the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group trials registry. [2]検索方法 Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group Trials Register、ClinicalTrialsを検索しました。 [1] 方法：次のデータベースを使用して、2005年1月1日から2016年8月17日までに公開された研究を検索しました：Ovid、PsycINFO、およびCochrane Pregnancy andChildbirthGroup試験レジストリを介したMEDLINE。 [2]
Limited Group Trials 限定グループトライアル
With the presentation formula and with the categories, the results of expert validation obtained an average presentation of 90% with very feasible categories, and practical test results on chemistry teachers obtained a value of 95% with very feasible categories and the results of limited group trials obtained 85% with very decent category. [1] The research subjects involve (1) lecturer supporting the Unimed FIS Identity Course; (2) students as subjects for limited group trials; and (3) four experts for the validation of teaching materials that have social studies expert criteria, plus Indonesian language experts and instructional material design experts. [2]プレゼンテーション式とカテゴリを使用すると、専門家による検証の結果は、非常に実行可能なカテゴリで平均90％のプレゼンテーションを取得し、化学教師の実践的なテスト結果は、非常に実行可能なカテゴリと限定されたグループ試験の結果で95％の値を取得しました。非常にまともなカテゴリで85％を取得しました。 [1] 研究テーマは次のとおりです。（1）UnimedFISIdentityコースをサポートする講師。 （2）限定グループ試験の対象としての学生。 （3）社会科の専門家基準を持つ教材の検証のための4人の専門家に加えて、インドネシア語の専門家と教材設計の専門家。 [2]
group trials register グループトライアル登録
SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register (June 2018), CENTRAL (Cochrane Library, June 2018), MEDLINE (1948 to June 2018), Embase (1980 to June 2018), CINAHL (1982 to June 2018), AMED (1985 to June 2018), Science Citation Index (1899 to June 2018), and seven additional databases. [1] SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Oral Health Group Trials Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE and LILACS. [2] METHODS Electronic databases including EMBASE, MEDLINE, Cochrane Oral Health Group Trials Register and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched up to January 2019. [3] SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group Trials Register which comprises references identified from comprehensive electronic database searches and handsearches of relevant journals and abstract books of conference proceedings. [4] SEARCH METHODS The Cochrane Stroke Group Information Specialist searched the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register (last searched 7 January 2019), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; 2019, Issue 1) in the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE Ovid (1980 to 14 January 2019), and Embase OVID (1980 to 14 January 2019). [5] SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register (last searched August 2018), CENTRAL (last searched August 2018), MEDLINE (1966 to August 2018), Embase (1980 to August 2018), and BIOSIS (1926 to August 2018). [6] SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group Trials Register, ClinicalTrials. [7] SEARCH METHODS The Cochrane Gynaecology and Fertility (CGF) Group trials register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL and two clinical trial registers were searched in January 2019 together with reference checking and contact with study authors. [8] SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Tobacco Addiction Group trials register, clinicaltrials. [9] SEARCH METHODS The Cochrane Gynaecology and Fertility (CGF) Group trials register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and two trials registers were searched on 1 February 2018, together with reference checking and contact with study authors and experts in the field to identify additional trials. [10] SEARCH METHODS On 7 January 2019, we searched the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register; the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), in the Cochrane Library; MEDLINE; Embase; the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL); PsycINFO; the Allied and Complementary Medicine Database (AMED); Occupational Therapy Systematic Evaluation of Evidence (OTseeker); the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro); ICHUSHI Web; and six ongoing trial registries. [11] Main databases [MEDLINE (1952-February 2019), EMBASE (1984-February 2019), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Cochrane Oral Health Group Trials Register (1993- February 2019)] were searched. [12] SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group Trials Register comprising of references identified from comprehensive electronic database searches and handsearches of relevant journals and abstract books of conference proceedings. [13] SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group Trials Register comprising references identified from comprehensive electronic database searches, hand searches of relevant journals and abstract books of conference proceedings. [14] SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register (30 July 2019), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; 2019, Issue 7), MEDLINE (1949 to 30 July 2019), Embase (1980 to 30 July 2019), CINAHL (1982 to 30 July 2019), AMED (1985 to 30 July 2019), and 11 Chinese databases (30 July 2019). [15] To determine the weight of evidence for HHVs in patients with peri‐implantitis (PI) and substantiate the significance of HHVs in peri‐implant inflammation, electronic databases including EMBASE, MEDLINE, Cochrane Oral Health Group Trials Register, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched from 1964 up to and including November 2018. [16] We searched the Cochrane Gynaecology and Fertility (CGF) Group Trials Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and two trials registers on 7 January 2019 and checked references of appropriate papers. [17] SEARCH METHODS:We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register, the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Group Trials Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, AMED, PsycINFO, and PDQT Databse, and clinical trials databases, including ClinicalTrials. [18] METHODS Based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines, a specific PICO question was constructed: "Does the SCL procedure produce stable clinical outcomes for restorative treatment?" Electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Cochrane Oral Health Group Trials Register) were searched up to December 2017. [19] SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Tobacco Addiction Group trials register, clinicaltrials. [20] We searched main databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Cochrane Oral Health Group Trials Register) for articles addressing the focused question up to and including May 2018. [21] Material and methodsElectronic and manual literature searches were performed by two independent reviewers in several databases, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Oral Health Group Trials Register, for articles up to January 2018 reporting outcome of implant placement perforating the sinus floor without regenerative procedure (lateral sinus lift or transalveolar technique) and graft material. [22] SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Gynaecology and Fertility (CGF) Group trials register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, and trials registers in January 2018. [23] SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Tobacco Addiction Group trials register, and trial registries for papers mentioning NRT in the title, abstract or keywords. [24] SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group Trials Register, comprising references identified from comprehensive electronic database searches and handsearches of relevant journals and abstract books of conference proceedings. [25] SEARCH METHODS We conducted an electronic search of the Cochrane Oral Health Group Trials Register, MEDLINE and EMBASE up to April 2004. [26] SEARCH METHODS For this update, we searched the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register (last searched 16 July 2018), the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (CENTRAL, Issue 7 of 12, July 2018), MEDLINE (1946 to July 2018), Embase (1974 to July 2018), CINAHL (1982 July 2018), PsycINFO (1985 to July 2018), AMED (1985 to July 2018), and PsycBITE March 2012 to July 2018). [27] SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group Trials Register which comprises references identified from comprehensive electronic database searches, handsearches of relevant journals, abstract books and conference proceedings. [28] SEARCH METHODS We searched the Gynecology and Fertility Group trials register, MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, CINAHL and PsycINFO (search dates: Oct 1996, May 2002, June 2004, April 2006, June 2009, July 2017 and September 2018) for all randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of COCP and CVR for the treatment of HMB. [29] SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, PsycBITE, REHABDATA and ongoing trials registers up to February 2019. [30] This review followed the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis) guidelines that addressed the following focused question: What is the overall clinical and radiographic performance of O-PZI? The MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Cochrane Oral Health Group Trials Register databases were searched. [31] SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group trials register (6 August 2018), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; Issue 1, January 2019), MEDLINE Ovid (from 1948 to 6 August 2018), Embase Ovid (from 1980 to 6 August 2018), CINAHL EBSCO (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature; from 1982 to 6 August 2018), Science Citation Index Expanded ‒ Web of Science (SCI-EXPANDED), Conference Proceedings Citation Index-Science - Web of Science (CPCI-S), and BIOSIS Citation Index. [32] We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register (6 February 2018), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; 2018, Issue 2), MEDLINE Ovid (1950 to 6 February 2018), Embase Ovid (1980 to 6 February 2018), and four Chinese databases (6 February 2018): Chinese Biological Medicine Database (CBM-disc), China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Chinese Scientific Periodical Database of VIP information, and Wanfang Data. [33] SEARCH METHODS We searched the following electronic databases: the Cochrane Oral Health Group Trials Register (to 17 October 2011), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2011, Issue 4), MEDLINE via OVID (1950 to 17 October 2011), EMBASE via OVID (1980 to 17 October 2011), CINAHL via EBSCO (1980 to 17 October 2011), LILACS via BIREME (1982 to 17 October 2011), ZETOC Conference Proceedings (1980 to 17 October 2011), Web of Science Conference Proceedings (1990 to 17 October 2011), Clinicaltrials. [34] SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Airways Group Trials Register and bibliographies of relevant studies. [35] SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group Trials Register (latest 15 May 2018) which is based on regular searches of MEDLINE, PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, BIOSS, AMED, PsychINFO, and registries of clinical trials. [36] SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Tobacco Addiction Group Trials Register, ClinicalTrials. [37] MATERIALS AND METHODS A search was made of two electronic databases (MEDLINE via PubMed and the Cochrane Oral Health Group Trials Register [CENTRAL]), complemented by a manual search. [38] SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register, the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Group Trials Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, AMED, PsycINFO, and PDQT Databse, and clinical trials databases, including ClinicalTrials. [39]検索方法 Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register（2018年6月）、CENTRAL（Cochrane Library、2018年6月）、MEDLINE（1948年から2018年6月）、Embase（1980年から2018年6月）、CINAHL（1982年から2018年6月）、AMED（1985年から2018年6月）を検索しました2018年6月）、Science Citation Index（1899年から2018年6月）、および7つの追加データベース。 [1] 検索方法 Cochrane Oral Health Group Trials Register、Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials（CENTRAL）、MEDLINE、EMBASE、およびLILACSを検索しました。 [2] 方法 2019年1月まで、EMBASE、MEDLINE、Cochrane Oral Health Group Trials Register、Cochrane Central Register ofControlledTrialsなどの電子データベースが検索されました。 [3] 検索方法 Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group Trials Registerを検索しました。これは、包括的な電子データベース検索と、関連するジャーナルおよび会議議事録の抄録集のハンドサーチから特定された参照で構成されています。 [4] 検索方法 Cochrane Stroke Group Information Specialistは、MEDLINEOvidのCochraneLibraryにあるCochraneStroke Group Trials Register（最終検索日：2019年1月7日）、Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials（CENTRAL; 2019、Issue 1）を検索しました（1980年から2019年1月14日）。 、およびEmbase OVID（1980年から2019年1月14日）。 [5] nan [6] 検索方法 Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group Trials Register、ClinicalTrialsを検索しました。 [7] 検索方法 Cochrane Gynecology and Fertility（CGF）グループの治験登録簿、CENTRAL、MEDLINE、Embase、PsycINFO、CINAHL、および2つの臨床試験登録簿が、参照チェックと研究著者との連絡とともに2019年1月に検索されました。 [8] 検索方法 Cochrane Tobacco Addiction Groupの試験登録簿、clinicaltrialsを検索しました。 [9] 検索方法 Cochrane Gynecology and Fertility（CGF）グループの試験登録簿、CENTRAL、MEDLINE、Embase、PsycINFO、CINAHL、および2つの試験登録簿が2018年2月1日に検索され、参照チェックとこの分野の研究者および専門家との連絡により、トライアル。 [10] nan [11] nan [12] 検索方法 コクラン嚢胞性線維症および遺伝性疾患グループ試験登録簿を検索しました。これは、包括的な電子データベース検索と、関連するジャーナルおよび会議議事録の抄録集のハンドサーチから特定された参照で構成されています。 [13] nan [14] nan [15] nan [16] 2019年1月7日に、Cochrane Gynecology and Fertility（CGF）グループトライアルレジスター、CENTRAL、MEDLINE、Embase、CINAHL、および2つのトライアルレジスターを検索し、適切な論文の参照を確認しました。 [17] nan [18] nan [19] 検索方法 Cochrane Tobacco Addiction Groupの試験登録簿、clinicaltrialsを検索しました。 [20] nan [21] nan [22] 検索方法 2018年1月に、Cochrane Gynecology and Fertility（CGF）グループの試験登録、CENTRAL、MEDLINE、Embase、PsycINFO、および試験登録を検索しました。 [23] nan [24] nan [25] nan [26] nan [27] nan [28] nan [29] nan [30] nan [31] nan [32] nan [33] nan [34] nan [35] nan [36] nan [37] nan [38] nan [39]
group trials conducted グループトライアル実施
For small group trials conducted on a limited number of 15 students, consisting of students who have high, medium and low abilities, and field trials were conducted on 32 students. [1] For small group trials conducted by distributing questionnaires to 20 students of Lumajang Middle School 5. [2]高・中・低の能力を持った15名の学生を対象にした小グループ試験と、32名の実地試験を実施しました。 [1] ルマジャン中学校の生徒20名にアンケートを配布して実施した小グループ試験の場合5。 [2]
group trials reaching グループトライアル到達
As for the implementation of individual trials are achieved 95% achievement, a small group trials reaching 95%, and a field test achieved 96% success. [1] As for the implementation of individual trials are achieved 95% achievement, a small group trials reaching 95%, and a field test achieved 96% success. [2]個別試験の実施については、95％の達成、小グループ試験の95％、実地試験の96％の成功を達成しました。 [1] 個別試験の実施については、95％の達成、小グループ試験の95％、実地試験の96％の成功を達成しました。 [2]
group trials get グループトライアルゲット
6%, the small group trials get an average value of 4. [1] Assessing students' responses 1) small group trials get an average of 11. [2]6％、小グループの試験の平均値は4です。 [1] 学生の反応を評価する1）小グループの試験は平均11回得られます。 [2]
group trials obtained グループトライアル取得
With the presentation formula and with the categories, the results of expert validation obtained an average presentation of 90% with very feasible categories, and practical test results on chemistry teachers obtained a value of 95% with very feasible categories and the results of limited group trials obtained 85% with very decent category. [1] While the results of large group trials obtained a percentage of eligibility of 88. [2]プレゼンテーション式とカテゴリを使用すると、専門家による検証の結果は、非常に実行可能なカテゴリで平均90％のプレゼンテーションを取得し、化学教師の実践的なテスト結果は、非常に実行可能なカテゴリと限定されたグループ試験の結果で95％の値を取得しました。非常にまともなカテゴリで85％を取得しました。 [1] 大規模なグループ試験の結果は、88の適格性のパーセンテージを取得しました。 [2]