Introduction to Versus 2

Versus 2 - The objective response and disease control rates were higher in the mFOLFIRINOX than in the S-1 group (15% versus 2%; p =. ^[1] 5% versus 2%; SHR, 0. ^[2] Probands with concordant RFDRs had more pronounced changes: high activity (56% versus 32%), X-ray erosive stages (67% versus 60%) and stages III and IV (32% versus 6%); FC3 and FC4 (23% versus 12%) and a tendency towards more frequent development of the late clinical stage (11% versus 2%). ^[3] As shown in Figure 1, the distribution of pulmonary ventilation was lower on the side of the diaphragmatic defect than on the side with the normal lung (98% versus 2%). ^[4] Children with BSIs had longer median length of hospitalization (5 days versus 4 days), and a higher case-fatality ratio (13% versus 2%) than children without BSI (all P < 0. ^[5] Results: More patients received instructions for RTP (87% versus 59%) and RTL (60% versus 3%), and a complete discharge was more frequent (45% versus 2%), following the conclusion of the intervention. ^[6] 001) and Hispanics (12% versus 2%; P < 0. ^[7] 029), a larger relative lipid-rich necrotic core volume (23% [IQR, 13–31%] versus 2% [IQR, 0–14%]; P =. ^[8] Hyperperfusion was observed more frequently in the seizure group (36% versus 2% for acute ischemic stroke) with high specificity (98%) but low sensitivity (35%) for the diagnosis of epileptic seizure. ^[9] Acute graft versus host disease was more frequent among the reference age group (14% versus 2%, p=0. ^[10] 07), and TLR rate was 3% versus 2% (P = 0. ^[11] Furthermore, the percentage of children with kidney diseases who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2-IgG in our sample was not statistically different from the corresponding Italian healthy population aged 0–17 years (2% versus 2%; P50. ^[12] Results 222 participants were included in the analysis; 83% were comfortable sharing PHI with researchers at their own hospital, although younger patients (≤ 49 years) were more uncomfortable than older patients (50 + years; 13% versus 2% uncomfortable, p < 0. ^[13] Thirty-four percent of dual-port expanders had at least one aspiration in clinic performed by plastic surgery, versus 2% of single port that required ultrasound-guided aspiration (P < 0. ^[14] Severe toxicity include grade 3-4 leukopenia (4% versus 2%), neutropenia (20% versus 22%) , anemia (38% versus 34%), thrombocytopenia (18% versus 24%), neurotoxicity (2% versus 6%) with DD and DP, respectively. ^[15] For MBL-positive strains, QPX-PIP restored the MIC to susceptibility values for ∼70% of strains versus 2% to 40% for other combinations. ^[16] The nonunion rate for RSL was 15% versus 2% for RL, whereas the rate of progression to total wrist arthrodesis for RSL and RL was 4% and 0%, respectively. ^[17] Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) was diagnosed in 9% and 11% of H and NHW, respectively, versus 2% in NHB. ^[18] 4% versus 2%; P<0. ^[19] 004, and 20% versus 2% in day-care hospital, p = 0. ^[20] Thirty-five percent of GI-colonizers developed MDR-E infection versus 2% of non-colonizers (p<0. ^[21] 4% versus 2%; p<0. ^[22] No pregnant patient versus 2% in each control group developed VTE. ^[23] After 1 year, 4% of patients with anxiety symptoms had died versus 2% of patients without; after 3 years, the proportions were 9% versus 8%, respectively. ^[24] 00] [12% versus 2%, OR = 6. ^[25] Thirty-nine of the remaining 40 HRU predictors were higher in EGS including preoperative SIRS/Sepsis (50 versus 2%), ASA classification IV-V (31 versus 5%), albumin <3. ^[26] There was no significant difference in 90-day mortality between patients with and without myocardial injury, 5% [2/42] versus 2% [11/544], P=0. ^[27] 3); for 2015, corresponding figures were 16% versus 2%, RR 6. ^[28] Adjusted for age and race, women had more noncardiac causes of presumed SCD, including pulmonary emboli (8% versus 2%) and neurological causes (10% versus 3%, both P<0. ^[29] RESULTS Significantly more nurses discussed serum glucose and medications with patients, planned follow-up and scheduled practice nurse appointments in 2016 compared with 2006-8, and fewer specialist diabetologist appointments were made (12% versus 2%). ^[30] Pre-operative and post-operative retinal detachment were more common in Huskies than non-Huskies (13% versus 2% and 10% versus 1%, respectively) but the difference was not significant. ^[31] Pooled complication rates were 26% for AVBT versus 2% for PSF, and reoperation rates were 14. ^[32] 4% among diabetic patients versus 2% nondiabetic, P=0. ^[33] FND, at ~ 12 months follow-up, was significantly higher in MS group (8 studies; 1101 patients) versus SRS group (17 studies; 2285 patients) (10% versus 2%, p < 0. ^[34] Among seropositive and seronegative 6- to 16-year-old children and adolescents, 9% versus 10% reported at least one symptom beyond 4 weeks, and 4% versus 2% at least one symptom beyond 12 weeks. ^[35] In phase II, in everolimus-sensitive versus everolimus-resistant cohorts, CBR-16 was 45% versus 23%, and overall response rate was 8% versus 2%, respectively. ^[36] Landless farmers were about 10 times more likely to skip a meal as compared to large farmers (18% versus 2%), but a majority reported receiving extra food rations from the government. ^[37] Background: SARS-CoV-2 infection was associated with a higher thrombotic risk, partially explained by intense systemic inflammatory reaction, longer hospitalizations and intubations as well as central catheters and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation devices Intrinsic thrombotic potential is questioned as certain patients had plasma lupus anticoagulant (LAC) Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the frequency of venous thromboembolism (VTE) among adult patients hospitalized for COVID-19 Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of consecutively hospitalized adult patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection (positive rtPCR) admitted to the University Hospital of Strasbourg from the 25th Feb, 2020 to the 1st Apr, 2020 Patients hospitalized for less than 24 h were excluded and the observation period ended at hospital discharge Results: During the study period, 943 COVID-19 patients were hospitalized in our institution, of whom 772 were included in this analysis The median age was 68 (56–79) years old and 58 patients had previously known VTE Overall, VTE occurred in 60 patients (7 8%): 43 pulmonary embolisms (PE), 15 isolated deep vein thrombosis and 2 superficial vein thrombosis Of note, 81% of patients had been prescribed an anticoagulant treatment on admission VTE incidence was higher in patients with more severe forms of pneumonia defined as either leading to death, and/or requiring intubation/high flow nasal oxygen/non-invasive ventilation (21% versus 2%, P < 0 001) Overall mortality was 21% and death rate was higher in patients that presented a VTE event (35% versus 20%, P = 0 012) Among VTE patients, a search for LAC was performed in 72% of them and came back positive in 88% of cases Overall, 33 major bleeding complications (4 3%) were observed of which 42% were intracranial Conclusion: Our study showed that in-hospital VTE occurred more frequently in case of severe COVID-19 pneumonia and was associated with higher death rates. ^[38] 2% versus 2% DIE and 1. ^[39] 7% versus 28. ^[40] 6711, respectively) versus 2. ^[41] 76 in the experimental versus 22. ^[42] 3 versus 2. ^[43] 95 μg/L versus 262. ^[44] The superiority of the 3D measurements versus 2D measurements allows for greater precision and accuracy and may guide better intraoperative surgical decision-making. ^[45] Using a combination of glycogen depleting cycling-based exercise followed by 36 h of an isonenergetic high CHO or low CHO diet, resting muscle glycogen of the VL muscle (from 16 recreationally active males) was approximately 500 versus 250 mmol·kg-1 dw in the high and low CHO trials, respectively. ^[46] Out-of-pocket payments by patients who did not receive the low-income subsidy decreased by more than those who did receive the low-income subsidy (63%-79% versus 24%-44%). ^[47] 0001) when comparing overall testicular salvage rates in patients presenting with <24 h versus >24 h total DoS (84% versus 25%). ^[48] 6% versus 23. ^[49] Les caracteristiques des patients ont ete comparees selon la presence (IMC ≥ 25 kg/m2) ou l’absence d’un surpoids (IMC Resultats Les patients en surpoids etaient plus sujets au bronchospasme lors d’une reaction per-anesthesique que les patients de poids normal (55,4 % versus 24,0 % p = 0,0014) et ils recevaient plus de bronchodilatateurs (22,6 % versus 7,5 % p = 0,04) pendant la reaction alors que la proportion de patients ayant recu de l’adrenaline etait similaire (51,6 % versus 43,4 % p = 0,6, respectivement). ^[50]

Patient Versus 2

No pregnant patient versus 2% in each control group developed VTE. ^[1] 4% among diabetic patients versus 2% nondiabetic, P=0. ^[2]

Discover more insights into Versus 2

Keywords frequently search together with Versus 2

Narrow sentence examples with built-in keyword filters

Versus 2 sentence examples within Patient Versus 2

No pregnant patient versus 2% in each control group developed VTE.

4% among diabetic patients versus 2% nondiabetic, P=0.

The objective response and disease control rates were higher in the mFOLFIRINOX than in the S-1 group (15% versus 2%; p =.

5% versus 2%; SHR, 0.

Probands with concordant RFDRs had more pronounced changes: high activity (56% versus 32%), X-ray erosive stages (67% versus 60%) and stages III and IV (32% versus 6%); FC3 and FC4 (23% versus 12%) and a tendency towards more frequent development of the late clinical stage (11% versus 2%).

As shown in Figure 1, the distribution of pulmonary ventilation was lower on the side of the diaphragmatic defect than on the side with the normal lung (98% versus 2%).

Children with BSIs had longer median length of hospitalization (5 days versus 4 days), and a higher case-fatality ratio (13% versus 2%) than children without BSI (all P < 0.

Results: More patients received instructions for RTP (87% versus 59%) and RTL (60% versus 3%), and a complete discharge was more frequent (45% versus 2%), following the conclusion of the intervention.

001) and Hispanics (12% versus 2%; P < 0.

029), a larger relative lipid-rich necrotic core volume (23% [IQR, 13–31%] versus 2% [IQR, 0–14%]; P =.

Hyperperfusion was observed more frequently in the seizure group (36% versus 2% for acute ischemic stroke) with high specificity (98%) but low sensitivity (35%) for the diagnosis of epileptic seizure.

Acute graft versus host disease was more frequent among the reference age group (14% versus 2%, p=0.

07), and TLR rate was 3% versus 2% (P = 0.

Furthermore, the percentage of children with kidney diseases who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2-IgG in our sample was not statistically different from the corresponding Italian healthy population aged 0–17 years (2% versus 2%; P50.

Results 222 participants were included in the analysis; 83% were comfortable sharing PHI with researchers at their own hospital, although younger patients (≤ 49 years) were more uncomfortable than older patients (50 + years; 13% versus 2% uncomfortable, p < 0.

Thirty-four percent of dual-port expanders had at least one aspiration in clinic performed by plastic surgery, versus 2% of single port that required ultrasound-guided aspiration (P < 0.

Severe toxicity include grade 3-4 leukopenia (4% versus 2%), neutropenia (20% versus 22%) , anemia (38% versus 34%), thrombocytopenia (18% versus 24%), neurotoxicity (2% versus 6%) with DD and DP, respectively.

For MBL-positive strains, QPX-PIP restored the MIC to susceptibility values for ∼70% of strains versus 2% to 40% for other combinations.

The nonunion rate for RSL was 15% versus 2% for RL, whereas the rate of progression to total wrist arthrodesis for RSL and RL was 4% and 0%, respectively.

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) was diagnosed in 9% and 11% of H and NHW, respectively, versus 2% in NHB.

4% versus 2%; P<0.

004, and 20% versus 2% in day-care hospital, p = 0.

Thirty-five percent of GI-colonizers developed MDR-E infection versus 2% of non-colonizers (p<0.

4% versus 2%; p<0.

No pregnant patient versus 2% in each control group developed VTE.

After 1 year, 4% of patients with anxiety symptoms had died versus 2% of patients without; after 3 years, the proportions were 9% versus 8%, respectively.

00] [12% versus 2%, OR = 6.

Thirty-nine of the remaining 40 HRU predictors were higher in EGS including preoperative SIRS/Sepsis (50 versus 2%), ASA classification IV-V (31 versus 5%), albumin <3.

There was no significant difference in 90-day mortality between patients with and without myocardial injury, 5% [2/42] versus 2% [11/544], P=0.

3); for 2015, corresponding figures were 16% versus 2%, RR 6.

Adjusted for age and race, women had more noncardiac causes of presumed SCD, including pulmonary emboli (8% versus 2%) and neurological causes (10% versus 3%, both P<0.

RESULTS Significantly more nurses discussed serum glucose and medications with patients, planned follow-up and scheduled practice nurse appointments in 2016 compared with 2006-8, and fewer specialist diabetologist appointments were made (12% versus 2%).

Pre-operative and post-operative retinal detachment were more common in Huskies than non-Huskies (13% versus 2% and 10% versus 1%, respectively) but the difference was not significant.

Pooled complication rates were 26% for AVBT versus 2% for PSF, and reoperation rates were 14.

4% among diabetic patients versus 2% nondiabetic, P=0.

FND, at ~ 12 months follow-up, was significantly higher in MS group (8 studies; 1101 patients) versus SRS group (17 studies; 2285 patients) (10% versus 2%, p < 0.

Among seropositive and seronegative 6- to 16-year-old children and adolescents, 9% versus 10% reported at least one symptom beyond 4 weeks, and 4% versus 2% at least one symptom beyond 12 weeks.

In phase II, in everolimus-sensitive versus everolimus-resistant cohorts, CBR-16 was 45% versus 23%, and overall response rate was 8% versus 2%, respectively.

Landless farmers were about 10 times more likely to skip a meal as compared to large farmers (18% versus 2%), but a majority reported receiving extra food rations from the government.

2% versus 2% DIE and 1.

7% versus 28.

6711, respectively) versus 2.

76 in the experimental versus 22.

3 versus 2.

95 μg/L versus 262.

The superiority of the 3D measurements versus 2D measurements allows for greater precision and accuracy and may guide better intraoperative surgical decision-making.

Using a combination of glycogen depleting cycling-based exercise followed by 36 h of an isonenergetic high CHO or low CHO diet, resting muscle glycogen of the VL muscle (from 16 recreationally active males) was approximately 500 versus 250 mmol·kg-1 dw in the high and low CHO trials, respectively.

Out-of-pocket payments by patients who did not receive the low-income subsidy decreased by more than those who did receive the low-income subsidy (63%-79% versus 24%-44%).

0001) when comparing overall testicular salvage rates in patients presenting with <24 h versus >24 h total DoS (84% versus 25%).

6% versus 23.

6% versus 28.

1 versus 21.

0% versus 25.

9% versus 22.

2 min versus 26.

1) versus 226 months (95%CI 218.

0% versus 25.

Mucosal thickness tended to be lower in the critically ill patients than in the controls (147 ± 47 versus 231 ± 127 μm; P = 0.

4 versus 2.

There was no difference in postoperative morbidity between the 2 groups (5 patients with Clavien-Dindo III/IV complications in the success group versus 2 patients in the failure group; 10.

Percent change was noted for 2017 versus 2016.

6%) with a BN inferior to 5% versus 24 patients (13.

57% of paramedics versus 29.

Prevalence of patients with resistant hypertension and uncontrolled BP when we considered day-time and night-time values were respectively 23% and 48% versus 20% and 41% when we take into consideration only the 24 h average ABPM.

Learn more from Versus 2

Keywords related to Versus

Keywords related to 2

What is/are Versus 2?

Patient Versus 2

Mucosal thickness tended to be lower in the critically ill patients than in the controls (147 ± 47 versus 231 ± 127 μm; P = 0.