Introduction to Versus 100

Different modulation frequencies (10 Hz versus 1000 Hz) in pulsed mode, different powers (3 W versus 5 W), and distinct wave modes of radiation (pulsed versus continuous) were compared.

5% more medium‐frequency users (109,497 versus 100,014) than the hospital‐specific data.

QDx7) resulted in 60% complete tumor responses, versus 100% complete tumor responses in the osimertinib plus lerociclib (25 mg/kg osi + 100 mg/kg lero, p.

25%; cases where clinical details were mentioned completely, 86% versus 100%; cases where time of discharge was mentioned, 19% versus 89%; and the cases where name of the doctor who was discharging the patient was mentioned, 20% versus 86.

In subgroup survival analysis of the 36 newly diagnosed patients, the 1-, 2-, 3-, 4-, and 5-year cumulative OS rates for patients with and without positive margins were 100% versus 100%, 96.

0% versus 100% for Architect Syphilis TP, and versus 100% for LUMIPULSE Presto TP.

A clear delirium management plan was documented in 0% of charts in 2017 versus 100% in 2018.

7% versus 100 and 100%, respectively, for probe B.

Survival was decreased in PTDM patients (2-year estimate, 55% versus 100%; P =.

RESULTS Total blood loss with intraarticular TXA alone in patients undergoing simultaneous bilateral TKA and those undergoing staged procedures was not different from the total blood loss with the combined IV plus intraarticular TXA regimen (1063 mL ± 303 mL versus 1004 mL ± 287 mL, mean difference 59 mL [95% CI -7 to 125]; p = 0.

3% versus 100%), though no statistically significant difference was found (P = 0.

7% of the hand area versus 100% for the sECoG array, and 18.

A PSA decline in general, >50% and >90% within 6 wk was seen in 50%, 29%, and 7% versus 100%, 92%, and 53% in CSA versus RGS groups, respectively (all p<0.

17, Tmax >6 seconds 98 versus 100 mL; P=0.

0% versus 100% ((P =.

At the time of analysis, the response duration rate at 6 months was 76% on camrelizumab monotherapy versus 100% on decitabine plus camrelizumab.

7 versus 100.

9%, versus 100% for those with surgery within 70 days).

Median initial serum ammonia level was significantly higher in the nonsurvivor group than in the survivor group (219 (range: 158–792) versus 100.

Methods In 148 patients with advanced LC prior to anticancer therapy (87 non-small-cell LC and 61 small-cell LC) versus 100 well-matched controls, we measured HRG levels in association with clot permeability (Ks), clot turbidimetry (lag phase and maximum absorbance), and clot lysis time (CLT).

Mean patient radiation was significantly lower in group A than in group B (54,307 ± 33,823 mGy cm2 [mean ± standard deviation] versus 100,704 ± 43,930 mGy cm2; p = 0.

In this double-blind, randomized controlled study, we compared maternal hemodynamics using a combination of 500-mL colloid preload and 500-mL crystalloid coload versus 1000-mL crystalloid coload.

2% at 1, 6, and 12 months’ respectively’ in the DEB group versus 100, 89.

9 mm Hg versus 100.

99 mg·h/L for IV versus 1005.

1% FS, a temperature shift of 37 ppm versus 10088 ppm, a pressure shift of 45 ppm versus 777 ppm, a temperature hysteresis error of 21 ppm versus 187 ppm, a pressure hysteresis error of 22 ppm versus 265 ppm, a temperature repeatability error of 15 ppm versus 703 ppm, a pressure repeatability error of 21 ppm versus 36 ppm, and a long-term stability of >7 months versus 69 days.

6% versus 100% while mean FEF 25-75 value was 58% versus 86% for Amish and nonAmish people respectively.

Subjects with a high O3I (≥8%) had a lower maintenance dose of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) compared to those with a low O3I (<8%) (1000 μg (400–1000) versus 1000 μg (500–2000) p = 0.

01; IAT post-tPA MSU versus EMS 93 versus 100, P=0.

6% versus 100%; p =.

Age-standardized mortality of ACV overall and of ischemic stroke specifically was 157/100,000/year versus 100/100,000/year and 122/100,000/year versus 75/100,000/year for District 8 and 12.

1° versus 100.

2% versus 100.

5 versus 100%, p =.

8 versus 1009.

2% versus 100% (P < 0.

9% versus 100%, p = 0.

Results The two-dimensional techniques (periapical radiography and panoramic radiography) yielded a sensitivity of 82% versus 100% in the case of CBCT.

Versus 100wD, the kappa (95% CI) were 0.

0% versus 100%; adjusted OR: 0.

The patients who succeeded pleurodesis had a longer survival rate than those who failed in either the simple pleurodesis group (median, 414 versus 100 days; p < 0.

Results 18 patients (90%) of the DC group had mRS 4–6 before surgery versus 100% in the SC group.

The SC50 and the LNSC had the same 350 km swath width, but differed in resolution, 50 m for SC50 versus 100 m for LNSC, and noise floor, -22 dB for SC50 versus -25 dB for LNSC.

The SVR rates were similar between HCV mono- and HCV/HIV coinfected patients (96% versus 100%, P =.

001) and peak ascending aortic wall shear stress (1264 ± 302 versus 1009 ± 240 mPa, p = 0.

We propose an open-label RCT to compare the microbial cure obtained with a single 1 g dose of azithromycin versus 100 mg of doxycycline twice daily for 7 days, for the treatment of anorectal C.

The risk of variceal formation could be stratified based on the number of preserved critical veins, and patent splenic vein reconstruction was associated with a decreased incidence of varices (60% versus 100%, P =.

So, the aim of this study is to decrease the level of irrigation water: 85 and 70% of full irrigation requirements (FI), versus 100% FI in presence of four compost rates (0, 4.

We find that the feedback increases the duration of the maximum interval during which the subject maintains substantial attention (150±40 s with feedback versus 100±20 s without feedback).

During TILT, HR was higher after than before HDBR (116 ± 4 b/min versus 100 ± 4 b/min, respectively), SAP was unmodified in both conditions, and cBRS indexes were lower after HDBR (α index: 3.

Although the deterioration of N and P removal from both wastewaters was observed, the ZnO NPs-induced inhibition to real wastewater treatment was smaller than that to synthetic wastewater treatment (36% versus 100% inhibition to phosphorus removal).

80) but also with a lower proportion of patients retained (63% versus 100%, p = 0.

Objective To compare the amplitude of potentials by acoustic stimulation at 500 Hz versus 1000 Hz in healthy subjects.

Controlled trial comparing the effi cacy of 88% phenol versus 100% trichloracetic acid for chemical matricectomy in the management of ingrown toenail.

5) versus 100.

256), 100% versus 100% (p=0.

When the results are calculated based on a 20‐ versus 100‐year methane global warming potential, LNG appears noncompetitive for climate impact in marine applications.

9–100) in the 47 hips for which the indication for revision was dislocation versus 100% in the remaining 37 hips (log-rank, p = 0.

124 versus 1000 μm dipyridamole, and p = 0.

Difficult‐to‐control and easy‐to‐control asthma were defined as requiring daily therapy with 500 &mgr;g or more of fluticasone propionate (FLU) with or without a long‐acting &bgr;‐agonist versus 100 &mgr;g or less of FLU in at least 4 visits.

4° versus 100.

5, 90, 100, and 98%, respectively versus 100, 94.

The incidence of any-grade treatment-related adverse events was lower with nivolumab versus everolimus in both the global patient population (80% versus 89%) and the Japanese population (81% versus 100%).

Evidence regarding the effect of 100% fruit juice on glycemic control is conflicting, with little research assessing the metabolic effects of SSBs versus 100% fruit juice, particularly in young, healthy individuals.

The estimated blood loss was less in the 3D group than in the 2D group (50 mL [30-100 mL] versus 100 mL [50-100 mL], P <.

3 kg, ewe lamb growth rate 132 versus 100 g/day, male lamb growth rate 253 versus 235 grams/day and ewe hogget scanning percentage 144 versus 130.

702 versus 100.

Methods A total of 159 chronic hepatitis Egyptian patients versus 100 healthy control group were included.

The stroke-free survival rates at 2 and 8 years for CEA were 98 % and 98 % versus 100 % and 100 % for CAS respectively (P =.

85) and antidiarrheals (9% versus 100%; RR = 0.

In a comparison between ultrasonography and gravity radiography, we found a sensitivity of 100% versus 97%, a specificity of 90% versus 100%, a positive predictive value of 97% versus 100%, and a negative predictive value of 100% versus 90%, respectively.

6% versus 100% for the pre-HTMCS and HTMCS groups, respectively (p = 0.

Insulin concentrations remained above upper assay detection limit also at 180 min of OGTT on metformin treatment (> 1000 µIU/ml versus 100.

Validation (36 versus 36) and replication (200 versus 100) were performed in independent cohorts by quantitative polymerase chain reaction.

In the mantle source discrimination diagrams based on olivine 100Mn/Fe versus 100Ni/Mg or 100Ca/Fe, both groups of picrites plot between the suggested fields of peridotite and pyroxenite mantle sources.

The uptake of two lower protein-binding organic anion transporting polypeptide substrates (pravastatin and rosuvastatin) and two higher binding substrates (atorvastatin and pitavastatin) were measured in rat hepatocytes in incubations with protein-free buffer versus 100% plasma.

RESULTS Forty-eight hours' EEG background pattern had a PPV of 92% and a NPV of 81% in HT, versus 100% and 58% in NT.

DISCUSSION A total of 13 studies were found to meet selection criteria reporting both low radiation dose (70 or 80 kVp versus 100 or 120 kVp) and low contrast medium dose CTPA protocols.

005, mean survival 166 months versus 100 months) and independent in multivariate analysis with age, histological tumour type, tumour size tumour grad, nodal status, ki67 index, chemotherapy, radiotherapy and recurrence (p=0.

Estimated blood loss was greater in the late removal group (190 mL versus 100 mL, P = 0.

Thirty-three percent of deaths (1 of 3) before intervention were identified versus 100% (4 of 4) identified after intervention.

12) or cell saver volume, median volume = 114 mL [0, 250 mL] in antifibrinolytic group versus 100 mL [0, 246 mL] in control group, p = 0.

6% of CCT group versus 100% of urobag group.

The detection rate of postpartum anaemia was higher in the screening group compared with the symptoms group (140 (19%) versus 100 (12%), ORadjusted 2.

6 versus 100%, p < 0.

8 μm versus 100.

1° versus 100.

90% versus 100.

The median RBCLS in IDA patients with chronic gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding was shorter than that those without GI bleeding (38 d versus 100 d, p < 0.

2%) versus 100% (84.

Time to transplant was longer in patients allocated to a URD when compared with patients assigned to an MRD (median 142 days versus 100 days; p <.

2 versus 100 ppm).

3 years) versus 100% in patients who underwent THA (p = 0.

2% of patients with TB who were from low-income households spent more than 20% of their household income on inpatient care in 2013, versus 100% in 2015.