Introduction to Two Constructions

What is/are Two Constructions?

Two Constructions - In this paper we define the security model for cheater identifiable ramp secret sharing schemes and provide two constructions for cheater identifiable ramp secret sharing schemes. ^[1] The basic construction is the ironless railgun (ILR), while the other two constructions are iron-core railgun ICR) and iron-core permanent magnet railgun (ICPMR), respectively. ^[2] There are two constructions of étale operations P , independently due to Epstein [E] and May [M]. ^[3] In contrast with these, the last two constructions can model non-Gaussian spatial data without replicates. ^[4] Despite their differences, the two constructions are often used in ways that can be described as one taking over the other’s expressive functions. ^[5] They usually propose two constructions, one being weaker and the other requiring a random oracle. ^[6] We present two constructions, a simple 1-of-n case and a more advanced k-of-n, where the prover must use at least k private keys. ^[7] The first two constructions are based on subcodes of maximum rank distance codes, and the last one generates new codes from known Ferrers diagram rank metric codes. ^[8] The two constructions are proved secure in the random oracle model. ^[9] From the examples provided by the corpora of the RAE, the functional characteristics of the two constructions will be analyzed, and their origins will be explained. ^[10] The article considers two constructions of modern magnet cores – plate cores made of electrical steel and twisted cores made of amorphous steel. ^[11] Certain striking similarities between eher and METALINGUISTIC COMPARATIVES are discussed, with notable differences in modality type and distribution arguing against the conflation of these two constructions and contributing to a deeper understanding of special comparative constructions across languages. ^[12] Finally, the productivity of rival word-formation constructions in modern Russian is discussed both in terms of diachronic changes and in terms of restrictions that the two constructions are subject to. ^[13] These two contents are to propose two constructions of codebooks. ^[14] The objective of this paper is to present two constructions of 16-QAM complementary sequence sets of size 4. ^[15] For certain K3 surfaces, there are two constructions of mirror symmetry that appear very different. ^[16] In this letter, two constructions of frequency hopping (FH) sequence sets with respect to aperiodic Hamming correlation (AHC) are presented. ^[17] In this paper, two constructions of periodic QCSSs from additive characters and multiplicative characters of finite fields are developed. ^[18] In particular, we will discuss three of these tests, namely parasitic gaps, weak crossover and anaphoric binding and show that the two constructions yield quite different results. ^[19] In the paper I address two issues: first, is it feasible to state that the two constructions express the meaning of third person imperative; second, is it feasible to consider them grammaticalized markers of mood. ^[20] From the examples provided by the corpora of the RAE, the functional characteristics of the two constructions will be analyzed, and their origins will be explained. ^[21] As its applications, two constructions of frequency-hopping sequences (FHSs) and two constructions of FHS sets are presented, where the length of sequences can be any odd integer larger than 3. ^[22] We formalize functionality and security goals for message traceback, and detail two constructions that allow revealing a chain of forwarded messages (path traceback) or the entire forwarding tree (tree traceback). ^[23] The preliminary result shows that two constructions differ in terms of fine-grained aspects, such as the number and completion of transfer events. ^[24] Two constructions of a metal core were proposed. ^[25] This paper also argues that teaching two constructions as a pair with several related metaphorical concepts at a time under CL approach is an effective way for the adult mid-level CELs without English language environment. ^[26] Starting from skew Brownian motion,this work summaries its two constructions: discrete approximation and jointly probability distribution. ^[27] Notes on two constructions of zero-difference balanced (ZDB) functions are made in this letter. ^[28] We propose two constructions that provide tradeoffs regarding the security assumption and efficiency: Our first construction is proven secure assuming the standard LWE and the SIS assumption. ^[29] Two constructions of energy-adaptive codes are summarized: energy-adaptive low-density parity-check (LDPC) codes and energy-adaptive polar codes. ^[30] Specifically, two constructions of locally repairable codes are proposed which not only generalize some known explicit constructions but also give optimal locally repairable codes with flexible new parameters. ^[31] In addition, we offer the notion and two constructions for hybrid CKA. ^[32] Two constructions are regarded – one having sectioned windings arrangements and one having interleaved winding arrangements. ^[33] I demonstrate that these two constructions are diachronically related and that they still have a similar syntax. ^[34] Based on this scheme, we present two constructions of the secure deduplication system that support an efficient key update protocol. ^[35] We propose that the differences between the two constructions follow from the interaction of two constraints: the excluded middle constraint (EMC), which rules out derivations involving spellout of linearly intermediate copies only, and the N-only constraint, which restricts movement to occurring where the trace position would license a nominal. ^[36] We present two constructions in the random oracle model. ^[37] In this letter, for an arbitrary pre-given GI, we present two constructions that produce perfect GI sequences (PGISs) embedding the pre-given GI with different embedment frequencies. ^[38] We show these two constructions give equivalent algebras. ^[39] In this short note, we provide a connection between the two constructions by computing the characteristic (Fedosov) class of the twist constructed by Drinfel’d and proving that it is the trivial class given by $$ \frac{[\omega ]}{\hbar }$$ [ ω ] ħ. ^[40] In this paper, we propose two constructions of generalized Reed–Solomon codes and calculate the dimension of their hulls. ^[41] I then elaborate on the understanding and definition of communication as a symbolic coordination of sense, which, analytically stratified, consists of two selections and two constructions. ^[42] The relation between the two constructions was first noticed by Mladenov and Tsanov for the case of the spheres. ^[43] From this perspective, we identify two constructions that generate cubic Lehman graphs from smaller Lehman graphs. ^[44] We discuss a synthetic use of symmetry in two constructions of relations between functions on curves and their Jacobians. ^[45] We also propose a modular construction from any key-private public-key encryption scheme, and a new primitive—oblivious forwarding protocols, of which we give two constructions. ^[46] It aims to provide clues to understand the patterns of agreement that contradict the predictions of our previous studies in which we made a distinction between two constructions corresponding to the same categorial linear outputs: (a) those associated with the reference of only one entity and (b) those in which nouns are used to refer distinct entities. ^[47] In this paper, we present two constructions to obtain mismatched binary periodic complementary pairs with period 3q, where q is a prime, by using new generalized cyclotomy. ^[48] In fact, LAS patterns with ES in that there are two constructions in each variety, i. ^[49] Through the use of an experimental study in which participants were asked to rate the naturalness of the two constructions in 20 attested natural language contexts and provide paraphrases of the semantic relations in question, we tested when the two constructions alternate and whether either construction expresses semantic relations that block alternation. ^[50]

Present Two Constructions

We present two constructions, a simple 1-of-n case and a more advanced k-of-n, where the prover must use at least k private keys. ^[1] The objective of this paper is to present two constructions of 16-QAM complementary sequence sets of size 4. ^[2] Based on this scheme, we present two constructions of the secure deduplication system that support an efficient key update protocol. ^[3] We present two constructions in the random oracle model. ^[4] In this letter, for an arbitrary pre-given GI, we present two constructions that produce perfect GI sequences (PGISs) embedding the pre-given GI with different embedment frequencies. ^[5] In this paper, we present two constructions to obtain mismatched binary periodic complementary pairs with period 3q, where q is a prime, by using new generalized cyclotomy. ^[6] We present two constructions for masking u < q cells and error correction: one is general and based on a generator matrix of a specific form. ^[7] We present two constructions of SecureBoost: HE+GC and SecSh+GC, using combinations of homomorphic encryption, garbled circuits, and random masking to achieve both security and efficiency. ^[8]

Propose Two Constructions

They usually propose two constructions, one being weaker and the other requiring a random oracle. ^[1] These two contents are to propose two constructions of codebooks. ^[2] We propose two constructions that provide tradeoffs regarding the security assumption and efficiency: Our first construction is proven secure assuming the standard LWE and the SIS assumption. ^[3] In this paper, we propose two constructions of generalized Reed–Solomon codes and calculate the dimension of their hulls. ^[4] We propose two constructions under variants of the root assumption and the CDH assumption, respectively. ^[5]