Introduction to Safety Participation

This study investigated whether the relationships of personality with safety compliance and safety participation remains significant when safety-specific transformational leadership is supp.

The results of the study highlighted the need for safety participation, safety knowledge, safety training, and interventions to reduce personal issues in the workplace.

Interventions to increase rates of quality and safety participation should target individual and system-level factors, respectively.

Air technician safety compliance and safety participation behavior are the targeted behavioral outcomes.

OBJECTIVES This study explores the effects of employee perception of the management's safety priority, safety rules, and safety training on safety participation and safety behaviour decided by management, as well as the mediating role of safety training on the other four dimensions.

Results show that: (a) LMX directly impacted SC and PC, and indirectly affected CWSB through SC and PC, demonstrating LMX’s cascading role on CWSB; (b) SC directly impacted PC and CWSB, and mediated the LMX-PC and LMX-CWSB relationships; and (c) PC positively associated with safety participation behavior (SPB), and mediated the LMX-SPB and SC-SPB relationships.

A key question, therefore, is why employees should choose to report that they engage in such activities: what is their motivation given such activities are not compulsory? We used social exchange theory (SET) and organizational support theory (OST) to develop a model linking perceived organizational support to reports of safety participation.

As part of a multiphase study, including a descriptive, exploratory qualitative study (Duhn & Medves, 2018), patients were asked to respond to a brief questionnaire to quantify how they viewed their patient-reported safety participation behaviours while in hospital.

The questionnaires consisted of items about self-efficacy, hope, optimism, and resilience dimension of PsyCap and safety compliance and safety participation dimension of safety behavior.

Using methodological research triangulation, a Coping Behaviors–Stress–Safety model was established for construction workers, which demonstrated that 1) different types of problem-focused coping behaviors have varying effects on construction workers’ stress, with proactive coping reducing but confrontive coping escalating their stress; 2) three out of four emotion-focused behaviors consistently spur emotional and physical stress in construction workers; 3) seeking emotional support behaviors were found to not affect the workers’ stress and safety; 4) higher levels of stress could promote safety incompliance; and 5) the adoption of proactive coping and planful problem-solving could directly improve construction workers’ safety participation, while avoidance behavior triggers safety incompliance.

Previous literature suggested association between strains based work-to-family conflicts, job satisfaction, and safety participation.

The results revealed that job security had a direct and significant correlation with safety compliance, safety participation, and safety behavior (P<0.

In addition, safety compliance and safety participation as mediation paths would be the strengthening addition to safety model.

Based on data from a Chinese company (n = 290), this study used a partial least squares-structural equation model to clarify the relationship among safety participation, job competence, and behavioral compliance.

This study aimed to observe the motives underlying safety behaviors, namely safety silence motive (SSM) (SSM-relation, SSM-climate, SSM-issue, and SSM-job) and to evaluate the effect of SSM and safety communication on safety participation in different industrial sectors and scales.

This research aimed to examine the effects of paternalistic leadership on the safety participation of high-speed railway drivers.

Safety compliance (SC) and safety participation (SP), which are key factors predicting safety outcomes (e.

Reference to safety performance sub-dimensions, proactivity, adaptability, and resilience had a positive significant impact on (a) safety compliance, and proactivity had a positive impact on (b) safety participation.

Findings Both work-to-family conflict and family-to-work conflict have direct and positive effects on HSR drivers’ ego depletion and indirect effects on both safety compliance and safety participation via ego depletion.

The results of the study highlighted the need for safety participation, safety knowledge, safety training, and interventions to reduce personal issues in the workplace.

Results from structural equation modeling indicate that authentic leaders’ morality and selflessness affect the psychological capital of frontline employees, while only the latter affects their citizenship behavior; and both psycap and OCB mediate the effects of authentic leader attributes on frontline safety participation and safety compliance.

Additionally, these factors affected safety participation and compliance via workers’ motivation and knowledge.

001) and safety participation (P < 0.

Finally, evidence of criterion-related validity was collected by testing the incremental validity of the mindful organizing scale in the association with various workplace safety outcomes (safety compliance and safety participation).

The elements of performance which refer to the tangible behaviors exhibited by individuals at work, safety participation and safety compliance, are crucial in maintaining safe workplace for construction industry.

Purposes This study investigates the relationship between psychological empowerment as a non-safety antecedent with safety compliance as well as safety participation.

The affect and professional respect dimensions of LMX had indirect effects on safety participation via communication competence, which illustrate the mediating role of communication competence for construction safety.

The result indicates that safety attitude is not only positively related to safety behavior but also positively related to safety participation and safety compliance.

Employees’ trust in organizational safety is conducive in enhancing employees’ safety participation behavior from a psychological perspective.

The explained variances for safety participation and compliance are 74.

Thus, this study tested the relationship between sub-dimensions of PsyCap (self-efficacy, hope, resilience, optimism) and safety behaviors (safety compliance, safety participation), while the mediating role of communication competence was also explored.

First, we propose that servant leadership can promote the safety compliance and safety participation of high-speed railway drivers.

Using hierarchically nested data from employees within a large company in the petroleum distribution industry ( N = 706 employees within 142 groups), our results suggest that trait mindfulness is related to workplace injuries, safety compliance, and safety participation and that this relationship between trait mindfulness and workplace injuries is mediated by safety compliance.

A questionnaire was developed to assess the following dimensions: safety behaviour (safety compliance and safety participation) and OSH knowledge.

This study resulted that the impact of safety performance on safety participation and safety compliance was significantly positive whereas the impact on the number of self-reported accidents/injuries and near misses was significantly negative.

The grassroots managers should focus on supervising the personal unsafe behaviors of front-line employees, supervising the unsafe physical conditions and increasing the safety participation level of front-line employees.

ABSTRACT Initiating a safety oriented change—or safety initiative—is conceptually distinct from other forms of safety participation and safety citizenship behaviour, yet little attention has been given to its performance outcomes or its motivational antecedents.

The results showed that (1) job insecurity had negative impact on safety compliance and safety participation; (2) higher safety support from the supervisor and coworker were associated with higher safety compliance and safety participation; (3) both supervisory and coworker support for safety moderated the effect of job insecurity on safety compliance and safety participation, respectively.

Such leaders formulate and comply with safety procedures and requirements and enhance safety participation.