Introduction to Meta Analytic Comparison

What is/are Meta Analytic Comparison?

Meta Analytic Comparison - To investigate the robustness of existing cell-typing methods, we collected 7 scATAC-seq datasets targeting mouse brain for a meta-analytic comparison of neuronal cell-type annotation, including a reference atlas generated by the BRAIN Initiative Cell Census Network (BICCN). ^[1] OBJECTIVES We sought to provide further evidence on the safety and efficacy of aortic valve neocuspidization (AVNeo) using autologous pericardium in adult patients with aortic valve disease by reporting clinical and echocardiographic results from the first UK experience and performing a meta-analytic comparison with other biological valve substitutes. ^[2] The meta-analysis used a grading of recommendations assessment, development, and evaluation (GRADE) approach to assess the quality of each meta-analytic comparison. ^[3] Meta-analytic comparisons were performed when appropriate using data from comparative studies using a random-effects model. ^[4] CONCLUSIONS Insufficient data are available for meta-analytic comparison of all combinations of implant placement and loading protocols. ^[5] BACKGROUND AND AIMS Meta-analytic comparison of endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD) versus percutaneous gallbladder drainage (PT-GBD) for acute cholecystitis (AC) brings the risk of spurious results if too few studies are included. ^[6] These articles are heterogeneous but they allow the meta-analytic comparison of the abovementioned outcomes. ^[7] As such, this study was designed to examine the criterion-related validity of universal and industry-specific safety climate measures by conducting a meta-analytic comparison of their relationships with a variety of safety-related outcomes (i. ^[8] Standardized effects were inverse-variance weighted and pooled across studies for meta-analytic comparison. ^[9] To address this issue, this study provides a direct, meta-analytic comparison of functional neuroimaging studies involving EM and IM tasks. ^[10] To this end, we performed a meta-analytic comparison of brain activation between deception and false memory. ^[11] Meta-analytic comparisons were performed using data from comparative studies using a random-effects model and differences of means analysis for outcomes measured on identical scales. ^[12]