Introduction to Laparoscopic Splenectomy

They were categorized into two groups: open splenectomy group (35 patients) and laparoscopic splenectomy group (35 patients).

Our work consists in a systematic review and metaanalysis which evaluates the benefits of laparoscopic splenectomy (LS), hand-assisted laparoscopic splenectomy (HALS), and robotic splenectomy as approaches for the treatment of splenomegaly as compared to open splenectomy (OS) [1].

To evaluate the clinical impact and technical feasibility of augmented reality laparoscopic navigation (ARLN) system in laparoscopic splenectomy for massive splenomegaly.

Presuming a lymphoma, a laparoscopic splenectomy was performed.

Since its introduction in 1991, laparoscopic splenectomy (LS) has become the gold standard in elective spleen surgery in many centres.

Laparoscopic splenectomy has been suggested to cause an increased rate of portal vein thrombosis.

Purpose laparoscopic splenectomy (LS) gained popularity during the last years among pediatric surgeons.

Background: The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic splenectomy (LS) and open splenectomy (OS) in the treatment of Idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura.

Laparoscopic splenectomy is nowadays widely performed for the treatment of benign and malignant diseases of the spleen.

Laparoscopic splenectomy was performed and the patients' symptoms quickly disappeared with platelet recovery.

We planned laparoscopic splenectomy because there was a possibility of a malignant splenic tumor.

On day 35 of hospitalization, he underwent laparoscopic splenectomy.

The aim was to determine the incidence and risk factors for PVT after laparoscopic splenectomy.

Case Report We could successfully manage the patient with HS posted for laparoscopic splenectomy and cholecystectomy.

Although Laparoscopic splenectomy (LS) have been proven to the standard operation for removal of spleen, the rate of conversion to open surgery is still higher than those of other laparoscopic surgeries, especially for huge spleen.

A retrospective review of all patients (< 18 years) who underwent laparoscopic splenectomy or thoracoscopic pulmonary resection between February 2018 and August 2020 (30 months) was undertaken.

Laparoscopic splenectomy and proximal splenorenal shunt with distal pancreatectomy due to aneurysmal dilatations of the splenic artery were successfully performed to avoid mayor progression of portal hypertension.

The thrombosis of the main and intrahepatic branches of the portal vein (TMIP) is potentially lethal and deemed a common complication following laparoscopic splenectomy and azygoportal disconnection (LSD) in patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension (PH).

Laparoscopic splenectomy was performed and postoperative pathology revealed the presence of SH.

METHODS ten Wistars rats weighting more then 300 g were operated for standardizing the laparoscopic pancreatosplenectomy technique, aided by previous descriptions of laparoscopic splenectomy and open pancreatectomy in rats.

Background Laparoscopic splenectomy (LS) being used after Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) has not been reported.

Laparoscopic splenectomy (LS) is popular but has limitations.

Additionally, due to the involvement of the splenic hilum with the inflammatory process, the patient was consented and counseled on a potential laparoscopic splenectomy and given the vaccination regimen for asplenic patients in the preoperative setting.

111 patients (31 males, 80 females) with primary immune thrombocytopenia who were hospitalized to perform laparoscopic splenectomy were included in a prospective study conducted at the National Research Center for Hematology from 2015 to 2019.

Patients who underwent elective laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair (LHHR), laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG), laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB), laparoscopic splenectomy (LS), laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), or laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (LVHR) with assistance of a general surgery chief resident or fellow were identified from the American College of Surgeon’s National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database (2007–2012).

In the splenectomy group, all the patients received open or laparoscopic splenectomy with or without pericardial devascularization.

We aimed to evaluate comparative outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic splenectomy in patients with non-traumatic splenic pathologies.

Technique, indications and outcomes of laparoscopic splenectomy in stable trauma patients have not been well described yet.

Purpose of our study was to measure such angles in our patients during laparoscopic splenectomy (LS) and to verify the concept of baseball position of ports in the procedure.

Because of treatment failure with anti-TB, he had multiple splenic lesions with multiple abscesses hence he underwent laparoscopic splenectomy.

Laparoscopic splenectomy was associated with higher risk of VTE than open splenectomy.

This study investigated the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic splenectomy conducted in the contexts of both laparoscopic secondary surgery for isolated recurrence in the spleen and primary laparoscopic cytoreductive surgery for advanced ovarian cancer.

The laparoscopic splenectomy in pediatric patients is performed worldwide but often the disproportion between size of patients and size of organs requires an extra laparotomic access for spleen removal.

Laparoscopic splenectomy was administrated within six days of admission due to the clear surgical indications.

The patient underwent laparoscopic splenectomy.

The present report describes a case of isolated splenic sarcoidosis that was diagnosed histologically following laparoscopic splenectomy.

After stabilisation, she underwent a laparoscopic splenectomy and remained in complete response.

In view of symptoms, physical examination, and uncertain diagnosis on imaging finding, laparoscopic splenectomy was performed using a 12-mmHassan port, another 5-mm port on the left, and 7-cm upper midline hand-port.

1055/s-0041-1726656 ISSN 2581-9933 A 24-year-old male patient with a history of laparoscopic splenectomy presented to the outpatient clinic with pain and fullness in the left upper quadrant of the abdomen.

As her symptoms persisted, she was worked up for elective laparoscopic splenectomy during which she was found to have multiple peritoneal deposits.

Combined laparoscopic splenectomy and cholecystectomy (CLSC) seems to be the appropriate solution in children that require splenectomy for various pathologies and also have cholelithiasis.

Later, on 25 December 2019, the patient underwent laparoscopic splenectomy, and the pathological diagnosis of primary splenic FDCS was made.

A laparoscopic splenectomy was performed for the patient.

Traditionally, splenectomy has been an open procedure; however, since the first laparoscopic splenectomy was reported in 1991, the minimally invasive laparoscopic approach has become increasingly popular.

BACKGROUND Laparoscopic Splenectomy (LS) is considered the treatment of choice for benign hematologic diseases of the spleen.

Objective To compare and analyze the application advantages of primary splenic pedicle detachment and secondary splenic pedicle detachment during laparoscopic splenectomy.

• Laparoscopic splenectomy has become the gold standard in patients presenting with solid splenic lesions.

Purpose This study was conducted to introduce a novel modified surgical technique for laparoscopic splenectomy and esophagogastric devascularization (LSED) and its safety and efficiency.

Results Laparoscopic splenectomy was performed.

Background and Objectives: Laparoscopic splenectomy (LS) has become the gold standard for patients with immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP).

Three patient-positions (anterior, semilateral, full lateral) have been described for the performance of laparoscopic splenectomy.

The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of warfarin in preventing PVST after laparoscopic splenectomy and azygoportal disconnection (LSD).

Here, we present a case of a female patient with LCA undergoing laparoscopic splenectomy in order to provide clinical experience in LCA treatment.

,1 entitled “Splenic bed laparoscopic splenectomy (LS) approach for massive splenomegaly secondary to portal hypertension and liver cirrhosis” recently published in The American Surgeon.

Objective To observe the effect of total laparoscopic splenectomy (LSC) combined with pericardial devascularization (LPD) on immune function in patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension with hypersplenism (CPHWH).

The patients were divided into the open splenectomy group (n=55) and laparoscopic splenectomy group (n=30) according to different surgical procedure.

Laparoscopic splenectomy was performed safely owing to preoperative splenic artery embolization.

Highlights • Two cases of laparoscopic splenectomy for solitary metastasis – patients after open surgery.

We present a 46-year-old woman who presented with acute abdominal pain and was diagnosed with a spontaneous ruptured splenic cyst that was successfully treated by laparoscopic splenectomy.

BACKGROUND Hand-assisted laparoscopic splenectomy (HALS) can help overcome the drawbacks of laparoscopic splenectomy (LS) while maintaining its advantages.

Introduction: Laparoscopic splenectomy (LS) became the standard choice for splenectomy in children with benign hematological disease.

The patient subsequently underwent an uneventful laparoscopic splenectomy.

Laparoscopic splenectomy (LS) is considered as the gold standard in the surgical management of non-traumatic diseases of spleen (NDOS), and robotic splenectomy (RS) is a promising alternative treatment.

Laparoscopic splenectomy was performed, and regular albendazole therapy was given after the operation.

Presentation of a case We report two consecutive cases of solitary splenic metastases from ovarian and rectal cancer which were completely removed by laparoscopic splenectomy in patients with previous open surgery.

Objectives Various techniques are used in the management of splenic hilum during laparoscopic splenectomy.

We herein report a case of asymptomatic SANT of the spleen in a middle-aged woman with early breast carcinoma and an undiagnosed splenic mass, which was successfully treated by laparoscopic splenectomy and diagnosed postoperatively.

The objective of this study was to derive some useful parameters to define the feasibility of laparoscopic splenectomy (LS) in massive [spleen longitudinal diameter (SLD)>20 cm] and giant spleens (SLD>25 cm).

A laparoscopic splenectomy was performed for diagnostic purposes.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES Laparoscopic splenectomy (LS) is a supportive intervention for cirrhotic patients.

Background: We aimed to evaluate the outcomes of laparoscopic splenectomy (LS) in patients with immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) compared with operated for other indications.

Highlights • The authors present a case of splenic marginal zone lymphoma (SMZL), which was successfully treated with laparoscopic splenectomy.

In this study, we investigated the application of laparoscopic splenectomy in the treatment of haematological disorders of the spleen, intraoperative and postoperative characteristics, the presentation ofoperational technique and the evaluation of the success of this procedure.

This study aimed to evaluate the adverse factors responsible for platelet (PLT) counts below the normal lower limit following laparoscopic splenectomy and azygoportal disconnection (LSD).

Background: Laparoscopic splenectomy (LS) is generally applied for splenectomy, However, it also brings some technical challenges, especially for splenomegaly.

Introduction Laparoscopic splenectomy was reserved for selected cases, however and because of the improvement in surgical technique and laparoscopic instruments, nowadays, there are few contraindications.

Ultrasonography and a computed tomography scan of the abdomen were performed, which revealed a large splenomegaly, and a partial minilaparoscopic splenectomy was indicated.

Portal vein system thrombosis (PVST) is a common complication in patients after open or laparoscopic splenectomy or combined with devascularization.

Laparoscopic splenectomy for definitive management of the aneurysm and removal of the severely injured spleen was planned and prevent risks of delayed rupture.

Laparoscopic splenectomy has become the gold standard for the surgical treatment of most splenic conditions.

Laparoscopic splenectomy has become the standard approach for most elective cases.

Laparoscopic splenectomy (LS) is still the gold standard for most elective cases with normal or slightly enlarged spleen.

ConclusionLaparoscopic splenectomy is minimally invasive and has cosmetic advantages.

The clinical data of 149 patients who underwent successful laparoscopic splenectomy (LS) between January 2014 and September 2017 were analyzed in the present study.

To definitely decide about the appropriate treatment, a laparoscopic splenectomy was performed.

Objective To study the impact of surgical teamwork in totally laparoscopic splenectomy and pericardial devascularization (LSPD) in the treatment of portal hypertension, and advice on technical hints.

Objective: To investigate the application of proximal splenic vein (SV) ligation in laparoscopic splenectomy plus pericardial devascularization (LSPD) surgery.

Laparoscopic splenectomy is safer than open splenectomy.

Objective To evaluate the clinical efficacy of tunnel-building laparoscopic splenectomy (TLS) in the treatment of giant spleen.

Laparoscopic splenectomy was planned but was advanced to an open laparotomy intraoperatively due to the rapid growth of the neoplasm.

Background: As the experience grew with laparoscopic splenectomy (LS) more surgeons appreciate the advantages of lateral approach compared with conventional anterior approach.

Laparoscopic splenectomy is gaining popularity due to less morbidity and minimal operative complications.