Introduction to Heat Response

What is/are Heat Response?

Heat Response - Based on a KEGG enrichment analysis, the two pathways “protein processing in endoplasmic reticulum” and “plant hormone signal transduction” are hypothesized to play vital roles during heat response in D. ^[1] Spectral measurements successfully characterized wheat responses to compatible and incompatible interactions, providing an excellent example of the utility of Spectral phenotyping in quantifying responses of specific plant functional traits associated with insect resistance. ^[2] RESULTS The wheat response to Al3+ in the medium was dependent on both the plant genotype and AM colonization. ^[3] An overview of wheat responses and tolerance to HS at biochemical, physiological, and morpho-anatomical behavior may help in formulating appropriate breeding strategies for wheat crop improvement. ^[4] Inhibitors of transient receptor potential vanilloid 1 (Trpv1), calmodulin, PKC, and Hsf1, and the small interfering RNA‐mediated knockdown of Trpv1 diminished those heat responses. ^[5] AtPUB48-overexpressing lines (OEs) of plants were generated to detect the functions of AtPUB48 in the heat response signaling pathway in Arabidopsis. ^[6] We profile the dynamic change of C-to-U RNA editome under heat stress and propose a potential role of editing sites in the heat response. ^[7] tremuloides Michaux), and further investigated the heat response of photosynthetic activity in hybrid aspen leaves under laboratory conditions. ^[8] Wheat responses were swiftly set up and were evidenced before any visible symptom. ^[9] The changes in fluorescence intensity of different 5′deletion fragments showed that the heat response region was located between −500 bp and −400 bp in pCS. ^[10] Remarkably, annotations of genes in these regions are consistent with molecular roles in heat responses. ^[11] This work provided interesting insights into the post-transcriptional mechanisms of wheat responses to water deficit in relation to mycorrhizal symbiosis. ^[12] Wheat response to lime application was presented as relative yield percentage (grain yield for the no-lime treatment divided by the highest grain yield achieved for lime treatments × 100). ^[13] The sensitivity was determined by measuring the temperature variation according to the applied power; the heat response time was about 5 times faster and the sensitivity was improved about 2 times compared with the bulk silicon substrate. ^[14] The majority of the published works on the proteomics of the wheat response to Fusarium graminearum infection are case specific. ^[15] We studied how codon usage bias and other evolutionary features could impact the translation patterns in the heat response of the plant. ^[16] In this review, we focused on the recent studies of heat responses in wheat from omics perspective and shed light on understanding heat-responsive mechanisms that gene expression, protein synthesis, and epigenetic modification are significantly altered when subjected to heat stress. ^[17] Our results identified some N deficiency-responsive protein species and revealed the role of ABA in wheat responses to N deficiency. ^[18] The heat response of this bacterium is considered to be due to a classical, stress-induced regulatory system that is characterized by extensive transcriptional reprogramming. ^[19] To facilitate the development of new wheat cultivars that can thrive in low N growth conditions, key loci and genes associated with wheat responses to low N must be identified. ^[20] The recently released genome sequences of wheat, as well as emerging single-molecular sequencing technologies, provide an opportunity to thoroughly investigate the molecular mechanisms of the wheat response to HS. ^[21] MethodsTo understand the mechanism of wheat response to ER stress, three wheat cultivars were used in our pre-experiments. ^[22] These insights could facilitate the elucidation of the potential mechanisms of wheat responses to CCN. ^[23] Therefore, in this chapter, a brief attempt has been made to summarize the wheat responses and tolerance to UV-B radiation. ^[24] The use of molecular techniques to study gene-level responses to environmental changes in non-model organisms is increasing and may help to improve the mechanistic understanding of durum wheat response to elevated CO2 and high temperature. ^[25] The heat response of cable groups was discretized into combination of self-heating and mutual heating in multi-loop cables. ^[26] Thus, both SPW components and root microbial colonization influenced wheat responses to CuO NPs. ^[27] Collectively, these results suggest that the ATG8-requiring autophagy process is involved in wheat responses to stresses and that different ATG8s are commonly involved but have unequal significance in wheat response to specific stresses. ^[28] Our data provide a basis for future research to improve our understanding on the molecular mechanism for heat responses in D. ^[29] In the current study, we investigated the effect of temporal adaptation (5-10 min) to different temperature (25-35 °C) and osmolarity (250-350 mOsm) conditions on the heat response (until 40 °C) of human TRPV4 in cultured cells using Ca2+ imaging. ^[30] After short-term extreme high nighttime temperature stress, genes involved in photosynthesis, oxidation, and detoxication by glutathione were upregulated in HSS in comparison to HTS, while that of the heat response-related transcription factor genes were significantly upregulated in HTS in comparison to HSS. ^[31]

result provides new

Taken together, our result provides new insight into the wheat response to Fe starvation at the molecular level and lays the foundation to design new strategies for the improvement of Fe nutrition in crops. ^[1] Taken together, our result provides new insight on wheat response to Fe starvation and lays foundation to design strategies to improve Fe nutrition in crops. ^[2] Taken together, our result provides new insight into the wheat response to Fe starvation at molecular level and lays foundation to design new strategies for the improvement of Fe nutrition in crops. ^[3]

heat response signaling

This work is the first to link a small heat shock protein with collagen function, suggesting a novel role for HspB1 as a hub between canonical heat response signaling and SKN-1 transcription. ^[1] AtPUB48-overexpressing lines (OEs) of plants were generated to detect the functions of AtPUB48 in the heat response signaling pathway in Arabidopsis. ^[2]

heat response gene

Powerful differential gene expression (DE) and differential AS (DAS) identified 17,143 and 2162 heat response genes, respectively, many of which are novel. ^[1] Based on transcriptome and differentially expressed genes analysis, we explored the GO (Gene Ontology) terms and KEGG (Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes) metabolic pathways associated with the EPT treatment and the differentially expressed heat response genes of pineapple fruit after EPT treatment. ^[2]

heat response time

Numerical examples clearly show the controllability of overall heat response time through the thermal eigenvalue, and especially, it is demonstrated that the proposed method is useful in designing an effective cooling structure for an instantaneous heating. ^[1] The sensitivity was determined by measuring the temperature variation according to the applied power; the heat response time was about 5 times faster and the sensitivity was improved about 2 times compared with the bulk silicon substrate. ^[2]

heat response mechanism

This study provides first insights into the diversity of the heat response mechanisms among Clematis species. ^[1] KEY MESSAGE Our results provide insights into heat response mechanisms among Clematis species. ^[2]

heat response factor

Through regulation of some transcription factors including heat response factors (HSFs), POZCP26 and MYB, macrofungi respond to heat stress by different mechanisms. ^[1] The novel allele was named as HSP101–1 , which was confirmed to be a heat response factor by qRT-PCR, and knockout of HSP101–1 significantly decreased the thermotolerance capacity of NTR. ^[2]