Introduction to Grand Chamber
Sentence Examples
Discover more insights into Grand Chamber
Keywords frequently search together with Grand Chamber
Narrow sentence examples with built-in keyword filters
Grand Chamber sentence examples within grand chamber judgment
Grand Chamber sentence examples within grand chamber decision
These are, for example, Grand Chamber decisions, or cases cited by the Court in its more recent case law.
Full Text
It then applies the relevant Convention jurisprudence (drawing especially on the recent Grand Chamber decision of the European Court of Human Rights in Molla Sali v Greece) to identify two relevant tests of compatibility.
Full Text
Grand Chamber sentence examples within grand chamber decided
After a long legal battle that lasted 16 years, the Grand Chamber decided, in the Vavricka case, that a Czech national law imposing a statutory duty of a set of standard vaccinations for children under the age of 15 does not violate the right to private life as protected under the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR).
Full Text
After a long legal battle that lasted 16 years, the Grand Chamber decided, in the Vavricka case, that a Czech national law imposing a statutory duty of a set of standard vaccinations for children under the age of 15 does not violate the right to private life as protected under the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR).
Full Text
Learn more from Grand Chamber
CESAA 19th ANNUAL EUROPE ESSAY COMPETITION 2011 - Postgraduate winner: Simone Abel (University of New South Wales)In 2007, the European Court of Human Rights’ Grand Chamber handed down its judgment in DH and Others v Czech Republic.
Full Text
The second part of the chapter analyses the Grand Chamber judgment in the case of J.
Full Text
After a long legal battle that lasted 16 years, the Grand Chamber decided, in the Vavricka case, that a Czech national law imposing a statutory duty of a set of standard vaccinations for children under the age of 15 does not violate the right to private life as protected under the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR).
Full Text
In the second report, two cases rendered on the same day by the Grand Chamber of the Court are discussed.
Full Text
On 8 April 2021 the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights handed down its judgement in the Case of Vavřička and others v.
Full Text
P16-2019-001 Section of the Court : Grand Chamber Applicable Convention Rights : Article 7 echr – No punishment without law Primary Legal issue : “The use of the ‘blanket reference’ or ‘legislation by reference’ technique in the definition of an offence and the standards of comparison between the criminal law in force at the time of the commission of the offence and the amended criminal law.
Full Text
It bears various names: the grand chamber, the extended chamber, the expanded composition, the reunion of several chambers, a court sitting en banc, an extended section or a division of a court.
Full Text
The reporting period (September 2020-December 2020) was a particularly intense time in terms of important judgments on social security with no fewer than four judgments from the Grand Chamber of the Court.
Full Text
This case document summarizes the facts and decision in Hirst v United Kingdom [2005] ECHR 681, European Court of Human Rights (Grand Chamber).
Full Text
In Privacy International and Quadrature Du Net, the Grand Chamber of the Court of Justice of the European Union (‘CJEU’) ruled that the e-Privacy Directive and EU Charter on Fundamental Rights generally prevent national law from enabling bulk retention and transmission of traffic and location data.
Full Text
In December 2020, the Grand Chamber of the CJUE has confirmed that Hungary has failed to fulfil its obligations under EU law in the area of procedures for granting international protection and returning illegally staying third-country nationals.
Full Text
The idea that the judicial conflict can only be resolved by third parties, whether in the form of infringement proceedings or by a Mixed Grand Chamber for the delimitation of EU competences, underestimates the delicately balanced functioning of the judicial dialogue and harbors a worrying potential for escalation.
Full Text
Part 5 provides the analysis of the validity of decisions made by the boards of judges at the Supreme Court on the referral of criminal proceedings to its higher judicial divisions – the joint chamber of the Criminal Cassation Court and the Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court.
Full Text
I N T R O D U C T I O N In Vav ri cka and Others v the Czech Republic, the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights (‘the Court’) considered for the first time whether compulsory childhood vaccination can be compatible with the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR).
Full Text
It has been stated that, along with the Grand Chamber, it is expedient to grant this right to the Senate, as they are the main subject of consideration of constitutional complaints.
Full Text
The European Court of Human Rights sitting as a Grand Chamber held unanimously on 10 July 2020 that the Kingdom of Belgium had violated the right to free elections and the right to an effective remedy at the occasion of the 2014 elections for the Walloon Regional Parliament.
Full Text
With the Resolution of the Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court, dated 18.
Full Text
The article analyses the decision of the Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court, which reveals the legal nature of ensuring access to justice in criminal, or administrative offenses.
Full Text
On 9 March 2021, the Grand Chamber of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) added two judgments to a long line of case law interpreting the meaning of “working time” under art.
Full Text
After a long legal battle that lasted 16 years, the Grand Chamber decided, in the Vavricka case, that a Czech national law imposing a statutory duty of a set of standard vaccinations for children under the age of 15 does not violate the right to private life as protected under the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR).
Full Text
Yet, on 9 March 2021 the Grand Chamber of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU), comprising 15 judges, handed its 56-paragraph long judgment in the latest piece of the linking puzzle: This time in relation to thumbnails, framing and effective technological protection measures in Case C-392/19, VG Bild-Kunst.
Full Text
The ECtHR case law was settled in a Grand Chamber case against Turkey in 2011.
Full Text
These facts, first dealt with by a Chamber of the 3rd Section of the European Court of Human Rights,1 and then, on 13 February 2020, by the Grand Chamber,2 far from constituting an isolated case, are a reflection of a systematic, consolidated and generalised practice on the borders of several European states,3 the so-called ‘hot returns’ or ‘pushbacks’ of aliens.
Full Text
The paper is based on the recent Grand Chamber judgment Mihalache v Romania and offers a key to understanding the reason of multiple concurring opinions attached to it.
Full Text
This paper will refer to the issue of a new definition of a qualifying norm of fraud “in large quantities” made by the Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court of Georgia in 2012, after which different positions about the definition of the norm were formed in the legal literature and court practice.
Full Text
Russia (nos 8019/16, 43800/14 and 28525/20) before the European Court of Human Rights, filed on behalf of the Human Rights Law Centre at the University of Nottingham, which was granted permission by the President of the Grand Chamber to act as third party intervenor in the case.
Full Text
After years of controversial national decisions and the Court of Justice of the European Union’s (CJEU’s) dicta, the Grand Chamber’s ruling in the Tom Kabinet case (C-263/18) seems to have excluded once and for all—save for an ad hoc legislative intervention—the admissibility of digital exhaustion under Article 4(2) InfoSoc.
Full Text
The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has recently given a judgment on the inviolability of European Parliament’s members, which might be regarded as a milestone in its scarce case law on the matter: Oriol Junqueras Vies, Judgment of the Grand Chamber of December 19, 2019.
Full Text
Conseil des ministres, Judgment of the Court of Justice (Grand Chamber) of 1 March 2011 Case (C-236/09) sparked international interest and concern as it prohibited the use of gender as a rating variable in the access to and the supply of goods and services.
Full Text
These are, for example, Grand Chamber decisions, or cases cited by the Court in its more recent case law.
Full Text
Subjects met include the Galli (the self-castrating devotees of the goddess the Great Mother), Terence's comedy The Eunuch (the earliest surviving Latin text to use the word 'eunuch'), Sporus and Earinus the eunuch favourites of the emperors Nero and Domitian, the 'Ethiopian eunuch' of the Acts of the Apostles (an early convert to Christianity), Favorinus of Arles (a superstar intersex philosopher), the Grand Chamberlain Eutropius (the only eunuch ever to be consul), and Narses the eunuch general who defeated the Ostrogoths and restored Italy to Roman rule.
Full Text
ABSTRACT: This comment examines a judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) (Grand Chamber) regarding the restrictions for the ritual slaughter of animals, in the light of the EU regulations on this matter.
Full Text
In two recent cases before the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU), the General Court (at first instance), the High Court of Justice of England and Wales and the Grand Chamber of the CJEU found that a trade agreement and a fisheries agreement between Morocco and the European Union cannot be applied to occupied Western Sahara without the consent of its people.
Full Text
In November 2018, the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights delivered its judgment in the case of Beuze v Belgium.
Full Text
The pluralist spirit of the Grand Chamber’s final decision turned Europe away from the path of Americanization.
Full Text
Various examples will be examined, ranging from the renowned judgment of the Grand Chamber of the Court in Case C-617/10 Åklagaren v Hans Åkerberg Fransson to the most recent judgment of the Grand Chamber of the Court in Joined Cases C-569/16 and C-570/16 Stadt Wuppertal v Maria Elisabeth Bauer and Volker Willmeroth v Martin Broßonn.
Full Text
Finally, this case note critiques the Grand Chamber's findings and examines its likely impact on the problem of cross-border surrogacy.
Full Text
The interpretation of the rights and freedoms provided by the ECtHR sitting in Grand Chamber formation will have general application, also with reference to individual complaints brought under Article 34 of the Convention against States which are not Parties to the Protocol No.
Full Text
In December 2018, the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Justice delivered its judgment in the Weiss case.
Full Text
There follows an extensive critique of the judgment of the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights in Molla Sali v.
Full Text
To that end, it discusses in a critical fashion the case law of the European Court of Human Rights, criticizing in particular the test regarding Article 18 that the Grand Chamber established in Merabishvili.
Full Text
The Grand Chamber of the Court of Justice of the European Union determined that the requirement to annul an pre-existing marriage in order to obtain a full Gender Recognition Certificate, subsequently entitling the applicant to access her state pension at the younger age applicable to women, contravened Article 4 Council Directive 79/7/EEC on the basis of sex discrimination.
Full Text
On 25 July 2018 the Grand Chamber of the CJEU delivered the eagerly awaited decision on Art.
Full Text
Spain before the Grand Chamber may determine the future course of the Court in other migration policy related cases.
Full Text
I have had the privilege of working together with President Vincent De Gaetano since the beginning of my mandate at the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), either in the Committee on working methods, or in the Grand Chamber and in the Bureau.
Full Text
The Perinçek case concerned Switzerland’s criminalisation of the denial of the Armenian genocide, and concluded in 2015 after producing two judgments, first by the Second Chamber, and then by the Grand Chamber of the ECHR.
Full Text
Also it deals with the relation between the territorial and the central Lithuanian courts and the problems arising from that relationship: the separation of competence between the Grand Chamber of Lithuanian Senior Tribunal and the Division of the Memel Territory in the Senior Tribunal, jurisdiction of the cases when the crimes were committed by the Lithuanian officers, working in the Memel Territory, the transmission of cases to the central courts of Lithuania, in whose name the judgments of the territorial courts should have been rendered, language of proceedings, preparation of territorial lawyers, enforcement of the judgments of German courts by the territorial courts, oath of territorial judges.
Full Text
Thereunder, among other things, a Grand Chamber of the Court of Justice ruled on certain issues of EU law on State aid.
Full Text
It seemed that Court of Justice of the European Union wanted to make it short and sweet: It took the Grand Chamber in its Achmea judgement less than fifteen pages to conclude that Investor-State dispute settlement in an intra-EU context is incompatible with EU law.
Full Text
It then applies the relevant Convention jurisprudence (drawing especially on the recent Grand Chamber decision of the European Court of Human Rights in Molla Sali v Greece) to identify two relevant tests of compatibility.
Full Text
These judgments have been recently referred to the Grand Chamber, thus giving hope that the approach taken in respect of the launch of mass interception of communications and metadata has a chance to be revisited.
Full Text
Case C‑136/17 GC, AF, BH, ED v Commission nationale de l’informatique et des libertes (CNIL), Judgement of the Court of Justice of the European Union (Grand Chamber) of 24 September 2019 Search engine operators are confirmed to be controllers with regard to the processing necessary to create the search result list and the structured overview present under each result.
Full Text
A stream of recent judgments by the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Justice has shed light on the procedures that govern treaty-making by the European Union.
Full Text
On 19 December 2017 the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) delivered a judgment in the Lopes de Sousa Fernandes v.
Full Text
The article starts with the analysis of the pronouncements of the Grand Chamber of the EU Court of Justice and the recent judgment of the Supreme Court that has returned to deal with the subject.
Full Text
Drawing on the findings of an empirical study of 461 judgments of the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights, the article suggests that the Court’s consensus doctrine must be understood partially as a reaction to the ‘tyranny of choice’.
Full Text
The article comments on a Grand Chamber judgment by the Court of the European Union on animal slaughter according to Islamic prescriptions.
Full Text
Although the notion of consolidated law is not clearly established, it includes at least Grand Chamber and pilot judgments and eventually committee judgments.
Full Text
*2 The Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) found against Austria because the intended prohibition of heterologous embryo transfer following ovum donation and the prohibition of sperm donation under Austrian law would constitute discriminatory treatment*3; this ruling was overturned by the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights in a subsequent judgment.
Full Text
Greece before the Grand Chamber, the Greek Parliament voted for the possibility for the members of this minority to choose either religious or civil law and jurisdiction—a right for them to exit the minority community.
Full Text
The judgment that the Grand Chamber issued in the Paradiso et Campanelli c.
Full Text
Cyprus and Turkey, the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights had, for the first time, the opportunity to address these questions in greater detail.
Full Text
France, have enriched the regulative framework outlined by the fundamental Grand Chamber judgment Bărbulescu in the matter of workplace privacy protection.
Full Text
The European Court of Human Rights (the Grand Chamber) had already in 2003 the opportunity to give an answer to the above mentioned question: it “concurs in the Chamber’s view that Sharia is incompatible with the fundamental principles of democracy, as set forth in the Convention.
Full Text
Russia (I) (Just Satisfaction), the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR or Court) ordered the Russian Federation to pay Georgia EUR 10 million as reparation for Russia's “coordinated policy of arresting, detaining and expelling Georgian nationals” in the autumn of 2006 (paras.
Full Text
He first considers Eutropius, the grand chamberlain of Emperor Arcadios (395–408), by focusing on Claudian’s invectives concerning him.
Full Text