Introduction to Higher Audit Fee
Sentence Examples
Higher Audit Fee sentence examples
Additional tests reveal that clients who engage in opinion shopping during high sentiment periods have a higher risk of material restatements and higher audit fees.
With a difference-in-differences approach, we find that world-wide reforms result in higher audit fees for reform firms.
This paper investigates whether auditors engaging in practitioner research by writing professional articles and books subsequently provide higher audit quality and generate higher audit fees.
Discover more insights into Higher Audit Fee
Keywords frequently search together with Higher Audit Fee
Narrow sentence examples with built-in keyword filters
In addition, we also find that politicians' career prospects are significantly adversely influenced by MAOs being issued in their jurisdictions, while auditors' political connections enable them to charge higher audit fees, acquire larger market share, and reduce the likelihood of encountering regulatory sanctions.
Our results suggest that, LGBT-supportive firms demand high audit quality and pay higher audit fee than firms that do not adopt LGBT-supportive policies.
Using various readability measures, we predict and find that firms with less readable footnotes have longer audit report lag, incur higher audit fees, and are more likely to receive a first time modified going concern opinion.
This will result in higher audit fees paid to the external auditor.
The negative relationship is highly pronounced when a firm incurs higher audit fees.
Despite the intuitive appeal, prior research finds mixed evidence on whether higher audit fees translate to superior audit quality.
We also find that the higher audit fees by expert auditors are due to more hours and not higher rates.
We find that auditors are more likely to issue modified audit opinions (MAOs) and charge higher audit fees from their clients with higher absolute articulation errors, especially for big auditors and in high litigation risk regime.
We find that US firms headquartered in more corrupt regions pay higher audit fees, have longer audit report lags, and are more likely to receive a going concern audit opinion.
Additionally, the auditor charges higher audit fees to firms with more binding covenants even outside the violation state, and audit fees increase with constraints relative to both performance and capital covenants, reflecting greater financial reporting risk and bankruptcy risk, respectively.
Consistent with practitioners reacting to the factors that they argue create risk, we also find that auditors charge higher audit fee premiums to firms with greater tax risk.
By using Australian Stock Exchange (ASX) listed companies, this study documents that auditors who are industry specialists at both city-and national-level charge significantly higher audit fees compare to those auditors who are specialists either only at city-level or only at national-level industry specialist.
We further find that companies with the same provider attesting to both financial statements and EER benefit from having higher financial statement audit quality without paying significantly higher audit fees.
First, increases in trade credit usage following reductions in analyst coverage are smaller for firms with closer established lending relationships with banks and those incurring higher audit fees.
This study shows that auditors are more likely to charge higher audit fees, issue false-positive going concern opinions (i.
The purpose of this paper is to investigate whether PCON, INST&MGR and FAMILY firms are associated with higher audit fees.
Consistent with lower internal control quality, we find that firms misclassifying audit-related fees are more likely to report a material weakness, are less timely filers (longer report lag) and pay higher audit fees.
, higher likelihood of misstatement), less timely reporting, and higher audit fees, which collectively suggest that component auditor engagements are associated with adverse outcomes.
Additionally, we document an increase in the value relevance of earnings, more accurate analysts’ earnings forecasts, and higher audit fees and hours.
We find that Lead auditors accepting responsibility charge higher audit fees but provide audits of no higher quality, and possibly of even lower quality.
Using a sample of 496 firm-year observations related to listed German companies, our results suggest that Big4 auditors facing a tender for the upcoming period charge higher audit fees than Big4 auditors not facing a tender, while a similar fee effect is not observable for non-Big4 auditors.
We find that (1) firms being audited by Big 4 accounting firms receive IPO premium while others being audited by local accounting firms do not; (2) Big 4 auditors receive higher audit fees than China’s Top 10 or small local auditors.
High audit cost indicates a good quality audit, due to the fact that extended audit hours and expert audit staff conduct more comprehensive investigation, which cost higher audit fees.