## What is/are Accuracy Meta Analysis?

Accuracy Meta Analysis - RESULTS Ten studies were included in the systematic review, with nine of these included in a diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis, including six of which reported data at the patient level.^{[1]}We performed a diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis for each sign, and then performed a critical evaluation according to pretest probability, assessed with Wells’ score for pulmonary embolism.

^{[2]}A diagnostic accuracy meta-analysis was carried out to calculate the pooled sensitivity and specificity [with 95% confidence intervals (CIs)], and positive and negative likelihood ratios of elastography.

^{[3]}A systematic review and diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis were performed.

^{[4]}There are several statistical packages for diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis with diverse accessibility, usability, and methodological soundness [3].

^{[5]}To address this problem, we conducted an individual participant data diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis to evaluate the discriminative ability of the Children's Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (CY-BOCS) in determining response and remission.

^{[6]}The typical summary statistics for studies chosen for a diagnostic accuracy meta-analysis are often two dimensional: sensitivities and specificities.

^{[7]}In this study, we performed the first diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis to compare the diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of EUS and MRI in the staging of rectal cancer.

^{[8]}Diagnostic accuracy meta-analysis was based on multiple cutoffs logistic generalized linear mixed modeling.

^{[9]}This systematic review and diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis aims to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of this novel serological biomarker, IMA to detect PE.

^{[10]}