Scientific Data

Profile - Forum · Metrics · Reviews

Far more expensive than Data in Brief

The request for uploading a lot of data was delayed for a long time, but in the end it was rejected without an external review. It is impossible to withdraw the uploaded data. The key is that there is no other magazine that can be submitted for this kind of manuscript, so time is wasted.

Reviewing the manuscript in 3 months and giving the results on time after 3 months of overhauling and giving the results on time The level of reviewers varies, some are very strict and some are relatively good. In addition, the editor is very responsible, the format and some minor issues are actively responded to and resolved I recommend big guys who have good data to try, after all if the rise is quite fast

Journal introduction: Founded in 2014, if rapidly rose to 6.4, as the only data journal under nature, it is expected to continue to rise sharply Annual publication volume: about 400 articles per year, 1 article per day on average Review speed: fast review speed, rapid feedback, 3 months to give results Contribution results: from submission to acceptance, a major overhaul in the middle, accepted Experience sharing: The magazine attaches great importance to the rigor of data, and data validation is very important. Contribution experience: Assistant editor-->Editor-->Reviewer (2)-->Retreat-->Re-review (I feel that the reviewer has been changed)-->Editorial Committee-->Editor-in-chief, etc., which lasted One year, plus calculations, data set creation, and writing will take two years to complete, and you must have the psychological preparation for long-term submission.

After one month of wait, we received a straight reject email where a reviewer stated that our discoveries were not confirming some scientific statements available in the literature for that topic. , That statement did not make any sense: of course, as our article was new, it contained aspects that differ from the current literature.