Advanced Functional Materials

Profile - Forum · Metrics · Reviews

after 2 reviews in 4 month it was rejected,

One of the top journals in the material category, the sister journal of advanced materials, publishes full paper, which has very high requirements for material innovation, and the rejection rate is more than 80%. Since many authors tend to shorten the article and submit advanced materials, the quality of the manuscript is slightly inferior to advanced materials

This magazine is a very good magazine in the field of materials. The published articles and topic selection are all relatively important functional materials. There are both basic problem research and performance improvement exploration, which are generally more systematic and in-depth work. Therefore, the amount of information is relatively rich, which is of greater help to readers.

The journals with better materials, the sister journals of advanced materials, have the same reviewers. If the am is based on the manuscript, the editor is not prompted to submit afm. Just don't submit, the reviewers and editors are the same, and the result will be the same. The editor is very nice, and after rejecting it for the first time, it suggests that it can be resubmitted after correction. Resubmit after modification and accept within 1 week. The same reviewer has reviewed it three times, and I feel that the editor is very responsible and friendly. However, there are too many articles above, and many articles are equivalent to jpcc. It is a very cheap high-if magazine, worthy of bugs. The proof time is slow.

The speed is not very fast, or it may be that I am an example. I only gave my opinion for more than three months. After more than a month of revision, hehe, but the editor is really good. Generally speaking, the journal is very nice, and the if is also good, hehe