Clinical Microbiology Reviews
Impact-Faktor IF - Analyse
· Trend · Ranking · Vorhersage
Impact-Faktor IF
2023-2024
50.129
Impact-Faktor IF Trend
Journal's Impact Ranking
Clinical Microbiology Reviews
Journal's Impact Ranking
| Category | Quartile | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|
| Medicine - Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health | -Q1 | -1/562 |
-99%
|
| Medicine - Microbiology (medical) | -Q1 | -1/118 |
-99%
|
| Medicine - Epidemiology | -Q1 | -1/108 |
-99%
|
| Medicine - Infectious Diseases | -Q1 | -3/295 |
-99%
|
| Immunology and Microbiology - General Immunology and Microbiology | -Q1 | -2/56 |
-97%
|
The Journal's Impact IF Ranking of Clinical Microbiology Reviews is
still under analysis. Stay
Tuned!
Clinical Microbiology Reviews Key Factor Analysis
One-click to visualize your research performance
One-click to visualize your research performance
One-click to visualize your research performance
One-click to visualize your research performance
Highly Cited Articles
Clinical Microbiology Reviews
High Impact Research Articles
Highly Cited Keywords
Clinical Microbiology Reviews
High Impact Research Keywords
Journal Research Scope
Clinical Microbiology Reviews
Research Scope
Research Scope
Clinical Microbiology Reviews
Research Scope
Verwandte Wissenschaftliche Zeitschrift (Related Journals)
Beliebte Akademische Zeitschriften
Clinical Microbiology Reviews Impact-Faktor IF
Der Impact-Faktor IF 2023-2024 von Clinical Microbiology Reviews beträgt 50.129 und wird erst 2024 aktualisiert.
Clinical Microbiology Reviews - Journal Impact IF
The 2023-2024 Journal Impact IF of Clinical Microbiology Reviews is 50.129, which is just updated in 2024.
The highest Impact-Faktor IF of Clinical Microbiology Reviews is 50.129.
The lowest Impact-Faktor IF of Clinical Microbiology Reviews is 16.0.
The total growth rate of Clinical Microbiology Reviews IF is 189.5%.
The annual growth rate of Clinical Microbiology Reviews IF is 18.9%.
Clinical Microbiology Reviews Journal's Impact IF 2024-2025 Prediction
Clinical Microbiology Reviews Journal's Impact IF Prediction System is now online. You can start share your valuable insights with the community.
Jährliches Publikationsvolumen (Annual Publication Volume)
Jährliche Zitieraufzeichnung (Annual Citation Record)
Internationaler Zusammenarbeitstrend
(International
Collaboration Trend)
Trend für zitierte Dokumente
(Cited Documents Trend)
Impact-Faktor IF Analyse
| Jahr | Impact-Faktor IF |
|---|---|
| Jahr | Impact-Faktor IF |
| 2021-2022 | 50.129 |
| 2020-2021 | 26.132 |
| 2019-2020 | 22.556 |
| 2018-2019 | 17.75 |
| 2017-2018 | 20.642 |
| 2016-2017 | 19.958 |
| 2015-2016 | 16.187 |
| 2014-2015 | 17.406 |
| 2013-2014 | 16.0 |
| 2012-2011 | 17.313 |
· The 2021-2022 Impact-Faktor IF of Clinical Microbiology Reviews is 50.129
Clinical Microbiology Reviews
Key Factor Analysis
· The 2020-2021 Impact-Faktor IF of Clinical Microbiology Reviews is 26.132
Clinical Microbiology Reviews
Key Factor Analysis
· The 2019-2020 Impact-Faktor IF of Clinical Microbiology Reviews is 22.556
Clinical Microbiology Reviews
Key Factor Analysis
· The 2018-2019 Impact-Faktor IF of Clinical Microbiology Reviews is 17.75
Clinical Microbiology Reviews
Key Factor Analysis
· The 2017-2018 Impact-Faktor IF of Clinical Microbiology Reviews is 20.642
Clinical Microbiology Reviews
Key Factor Analysis
· The 2016-2017 Impact-Faktor IF of Clinical Microbiology Reviews is 19.958
Clinical Microbiology Reviews
Key Factor Analysis
· The 2015-2016 Impact-Faktor IF of Clinical Microbiology Reviews is 16.187
Clinical Microbiology Reviews
Key Factor Analysis
· The 2014-2015 Impact-Faktor IF of Clinical Microbiology Reviews is 17.406
Clinical Microbiology Reviews
Key Factor Analysis
· The 2013-2014 Impact-Faktor IF of Clinical Microbiology Reviews is 16.0
Clinical Microbiology Reviews
Key Factor Analysis
· The 2012-2011 Impact-Faktor IF of Clinical Microbiology Reviews is 17.313
Clinical Microbiology Reviews
Key Factor Analysis
Datensatz für Veröffentlichungen / Zitate
| Jahr | Veröffentlichungen | Zitate |
|---|---|---|
| Jahr | Veröffentlichungen | Zitate |
| 1999 | 34 | 7799 |
| 2000 | 36 | 8258 |
| 2001 | 42 | 10650 |
| 2002 | 43 | 8154 |
| 2003 | 41 | 9435 |
| 2004 | 47 | 11851 |
| 2005 | 37 | 8909 |
| 2006 | 35 | 9257 |
| 2007 | 31 | 7142 |
| 2008 | 37 | 8103 |
| 2009 | 36 | 7391 |
| 2010 | 35 | 10711 |
| 2011 | 32 | 8890 |
| 2012 | 28 | 8915 |
| 2013 | 36 | 9134 |
| 2014 | 39 | 11625 |
| 2015 | 37 | 11484 |
| 2016 | 30 | 7542 |
| 2017 | 32 | 9433 |
| 2018 | 34 | 8462 |
| 2019 | 36 | 9498 |
| 2020 | 36 | 10963 |
| 2021 | 44 | 11658 |
· The Clinical Microbiology Reviews has published 34 reports and
received 7799 citations in 1999.
Clinical Microbiology Reviews
Key Factor Analysis
· The Clinical Microbiology Reviews has published 36 reports and
received 8258 citations in 2000.
Clinical Microbiology Reviews
Key Factor Analysis
· The Clinical Microbiology Reviews has published 42 reports and
received 10650 citations in 2001.
Clinical Microbiology Reviews
Key Factor Analysis
· The Clinical Microbiology Reviews has published 43 reports and
received 8154 citations in 2002.
Clinical Microbiology Reviews
Key Factor Analysis
· The Clinical Microbiology Reviews has published 41 reports and
received 9435 citations in 2003.
Clinical Microbiology Reviews
Key Factor Analysis
· The Clinical Microbiology Reviews has published 47 reports and
received 11851 citations in 2004.
Clinical Microbiology Reviews
Key Factor Analysis
· The Clinical Microbiology Reviews has published 37 reports and
received 8909 citations in 2005.
Clinical Microbiology Reviews
Key Factor Analysis
· The Clinical Microbiology Reviews has published 35 reports and
received 9257 citations in 2006.
Clinical Microbiology Reviews
Key Factor Analysis
· The Clinical Microbiology Reviews has published 31 reports and
received 7142 citations in 2007.
Clinical Microbiology Reviews
Key Factor Analysis
· The Clinical Microbiology Reviews has published 37 reports and
received 8103 citations in 2008.
Clinical Microbiology Reviews
Key Factor Analysis
· The Clinical Microbiology Reviews has published 36 reports and
received 7391 citations in 2009.
Clinical Microbiology Reviews
Key Factor Analysis
· The Clinical Microbiology Reviews has published 35 reports and
received 10711 citations in 2010.
Clinical Microbiology Reviews
Key Factor Analysis
· The Clinical Microbiology Reviews has published 32 reports and
received 8890 citations in 2011.
Clinical Microbiology Reviews
Key Factor Analysis
· The Clinical Microbiology Reviews has published 28 reports and
received 8915 citations in 2012.
Clinical Microbiology Reviews
Key Factor Analysis
· The Clinical Microbiology Reviews has published 36 reports and
received 9134 citations in 2013.
Clinical Microbiology Reviews
Key Factor Analysis
· The Clinical Microbiology Reviews has published 39 reports and
received 11625 citations in 2014.
Clinical Microbiology Reviews
Key Factor Analysis
· The Clinical Microbiology Reviews has published 37 reports and
received 11484 citations in 2015.
Clinical Microbiology Reviews
Key Factor Analysis
· The Clinical Microbiology Reviews has published 30 reports and
received 7542 citations in 2016.
Clinical Microbiology Reviews
Key Factor Analysis
· The Clinical Microbiology Reviews has published 32 reports and
received 9433 citations in 2017.
Clinical Microbiology Reviews
Key Factor Analysis
· The Clinical Microbiology Reviews has published 34 reports and
received 8462 citations in 2018.
Clinical Microbiology Reviews
Key Factor Analysis
· The Clinical Microbiology Reviews has published 36 reports and
received 9498 citations in 2019.
Clinical Microbiology Reviews
Key Factor Analysis
· The Clinical Microbiology Reviews has published 36 reports and
received 10963 citations in 2020.
Clinical Microbiology Reviews
Key Factor Analysis
· The Clinical Microbiology Reviews has published 44 reports and
received 11658 citations in 2021.
Clinical Microbiology Reviews
Key Factor Analysis
· The total publications of Clinical Microbiology Reviews is
838.
Clinical Microbiology Reviews
Key Factor Analysis
· The total citations of Clinical Microbiology Reviews is
215264.
Clinical Microbiology Reviews
Key Factor Analysis
Einführung
Clinical Microbiology Reviews® (CMR) accepts reviews that are of primary interest to clinical microbiologists, medical microbiologists and immunologists, public health workers, infectious disease clinicians, and others who are interested in the pathogenesis, laboratory diagnosis, epidemiology, and control of human and veterinary pathogens. The articles should present comprehensive, critical summaries of current knowledge in the field, in other words, authoritative narrative review articles. The content of the article should not be limited to a discussion of the author's work. Sufficient historical or other background material may be included for those readers who are not current with the latest advances in the particular field. If the material covered is controversial, the author should attempt to provide balanced coverage. Appropriate reviews would include those addressing pathogenic mechanisms, specific or groups of microbial pathogens, clinical and laboratory aspects of newly recognized or reemerging infectious diseases, recently developed antimicrobial agents and their application, and new diagnostic laboratory technology. Clinical Microbiology Reviews (CMR) is a peer-reviewed academic journal that publishes scholarly works of interest in the areas of clinical microbiology, immunology, medical microbiology, infectious diseases, veterinary microbiology, and microbial pathogenesis. It is a delayed open access journal, full content is accessible via PubMed Central and the journal's website after a 12-month embargo. In April 2015, the journal transitioned to a continuous online publication model for CMR (whereby articles are published as they become ready, before the issue in which they will appear has been finalized). There is still a quarterly print issue. According to the Journal Citation Reports, the journal has a 2014 impact factor of 17.406, ranking it 2nd out of 119 journals in the category Microbiology. CMR was established in January 1988. The founding editor was Josephine A. Morello (University of Chicago Medical Center). Editorial board structure changed in 1992 and Morello became editor-in-chief. Betty Ann Forbes (State University of New York) was appointed editor-in-chief in 1997. Irving Nachamkin (University of Pennsylvania) was appointed editor-in-chief in 2002 until 2012. Since 2012, Jo-Anne H. Young (University of Minnesota) has served as editor-in-chief. It is the ninth journal established and published by the American Society for Microbiology.
The ISSN of Clinical Microbiology Reviews is
0893-8512
.
An ISSN is an 8-digit
code used to identify newspapers, journals, magazines and
periodicals of all kinds and on all media–print and
electronic.
Clinical Microbiology Reviews
Key Factor Analysis
The ISSN (Online) of Clinical Microbiology Reviews is
1098-6618
.
An ISSN is an 8-digit
code used to identify newspapers, journals, magazines and
periodicals of all kinds and on all media–print and
electronic.
Clinical Microbiology Reviews
Key Factor Analysis
Clinical Microbiology Reviews is published by
American Society for Microbiology
.
Clinical Microbiology Reviews
Key Factor Analysis
Clinical Microbiology Reviews publishes reports
Quarterly
.
Clinical Microbiology Reviews
Key Factor Analysis
The Publication History of
Clinical Microbiology Reviews covers
1988 - Present
.
Clinical Microbiology Reviews
Key Factor Analysis
Clinical Microbiology Reviews
Key Factor Analysis
The language of Clinical Microbiology Reviews is
English
.
Clinical Microbiology Reviews
Key Factor Analysis
The publisher of Clinical Microbiology Reviews is
American Society for Microbiology
,
which locates in
United States
.
Clinical Microbiology Reviews
Key Factor Analysis
Was ist der Impact-Faktor?
Der Impact-Faktor (IF) wird häufig als Indikator für die Bedeutung eines Journals für sein Fachgebiet verwendet. Es wurde erstmals von Eugene Garfield, dem Gründer des Instituts für wissenschaftliche Information, vorgestellt. Obwohl IF von Institutionen und Klinikern weit verbreitet ist, haben die Menschen ein weit verbreitetes Missverständnis hinsichtlich der Methode zur Berechnung des IF der Zeitschrift, seiner Bedeutung und seiner Verwendung. Das IF einer Zeitschrift hängt nicht mit Faktoren wie der Qualität des Peer-Review-Prozesses und der Qualität des Inhalts der Zeitschrift zusammen, sondern ist ein Maß, das die durchschnittliche Anzahl von Zitaten zu Artikeln widerspiegelt, die in Zeitschriften, Büchern, Abschlussarbeiten, Projektberichten und Zeitungen veröffentlicht wurden , Konferenz- / Seminarberichte, im Internet veröffentlichte Dokumente, Notizen und andere genehmigte Dokumente.
Der Impact-Faktor wird üblicherweise verwendet, um die relative Bedeutung einer Zeitschrift in ihrem Bereich zu bewerten und die Häufigkeit zu messen, mit der der „durchschnittliche Artikel“ in einer Zeitschrift in einem bestimmten Zeitraum zitiert wurde. Eine Zeitschrift, die mehr Übersichtsartikel veröffentlicht, erhält die höchsten IFs. Zeitschriften mit höheren IFs wurden als wichtiger angesehen als Zeitschriften mit niedrigeren. Laut Eugene Garfield „spiegelt die Wirkung lediglich die Fähigkeit der Zeitschriften und Herausgeber wider, das beste verfügbare Papier anzuziehen.“ Eine Zeitschrift, die mehr Übersichtsartikel veröffentlicht, erhält maximale IFs.
