Pediatric Diabetes
最新影響指數 - 實時趨勢預測 & 期刊影響力排名





-8.8 %




Pediatric Diabetes

Pediatric Diabetes 2019-2020 年的影響指數為3.052。

Pediatric Diabetes Impact Factor
最高影響指數 IF

近十年Pediatric Diabetes的最高影響指數為4.267。

最低影響指數 IF

近十年Pediatric Diabetes的最低影響指數為2.077。

影響指數 累積成長率
影響指數 累積成長率

近十年Pediatric Diabetes的影響指數累積成長率為41.3%。

影響指數 平均成長率
影響指數 平均成長率

近十年Pediatric Diabetes的影響指數平均成長率為4.6%。


子領域 四分位數 排名 百分比
Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism Q2 69/217

Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 68%

Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health Q1 21/286

Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 92%

Internal Medicine Q1 30/128

Internal Medicine 76%


· 在Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism研究領域,Pediatric Diabetes的四分位數為Q2。Pediatric Diabetes在Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism研究類別的217種相關期刊中排名第69。在Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism研究領域,Pediatric Diabetes的排名百分位約為68%。
· 在Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health研究領域,Pediatric Diabetes的四分位數為Q1。Pediatric Diabetes在Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health研究類別的286種相關期刊中排名第21。在Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health研究領域,Pediatric Diabetes的排名百分位約為92%。
· 在Internal Medicine研究領域,Pediatric Diabetes的四分位數為Q1。Pediatric Diabetes在Internal Medicine研究類別的128種相關期刊中排名第30。在Internal Medicine研究領域,Pediatric Diabetes的排名百分位約為76%。

Pediatric Diabetes Impact Factor 2020-2021 Prediction

Pediatric Diabetes Impact Factor Predition System

Pediatric Diabetes Impact Factor Prediction System is now online. You can start share your valuable insights with the community.

Predict Check All Preditions






2019-2020 3.052
2018-2019 3.347
2017-2018 3.172
2016-2017 4.267
2015-2016 3.488
2014-2015 2.569
2013-2014 2.129
2012-2013 2.077
2011-2012 2.16

· Pediatric Diabetes 2019-2020年的影響指數為3.052
· Pediatric Diabetes 2018-2019年的影響指數為3.347
· Pediatric Diabetes 2017-2018年的影響指數為3.172
· Pediatric Diabetes 2016-2017年的影響指數為4.267
· Pediatric Diabetes 2015-2016年的影響指數為3.488
· Pediatric Diabetes 2014-2015年的影響指數為2.569
· Pediatric Diabetes 2013-2014年的影響指數為2.129
· Pediatric Diabetes 2012-2013年的影響指數為2.077
· Pediatric Diabetes 2011-2012年的影響指數為2.16


出版數量 引用數量
出版数量 引用数量
2000 30 0
2001 34 20
2002 33 48
2003 30 86
2004 49 160
2005 40 387
2006 67 601
2007 89 967
2008 107 1494
2009 139 2132
2010 70 2693
2011 109 2980
2012 120 3599
2013 87 4096
2014 115 4671
2015 89 4844
2016 108 4613
2017 131 4778
2018 237 4925
2019 125 4976
2020 226 6826
2021 1 308

· Pediatric Diabetes於2000年發表了30篇报告,並取得0篇文獻引用。
· Pediatric Diabetes於2001年發表了34篇报告,並取得20篇文獻引用。
· Pediatric Diabetes於2002年發表了33篇报告,並取得48篇文獻引用。
· Pediatric Diabetes於2003年發表了30篇报告,並取得86篇文獻引用。
· Pediatric Diabetes於2004年發表了49篇报告,並取得160篇文獻引用。
· Pediatric Diabetes於2005年發表了40篇报告,並取得387篇文獻引用。
· Pediatric Diabetes於2006年發表了67篇报告,並取得601篇文獻引用。
· Pediatric Diabetes於2007年發表了89篇报告,並取得967篇文獻引用。
· Pediatric Diabetes於2008年發表了107篇报告,並取得1494篇文獻引用。
· Pediatric Diabetes於2009年發表了139篇报告,並取得2132篇文獻引用。
· Pediatric Diabetes於2010年發表了70篇报告,並取得2693篇文獻引用。
· Pediatric Diabetes於2011年發表了109篇报告,並取得2980篇文獻引用。
· Pediatric Diabetes於2012年發表了120篇报告,並取得3599篇文獻引用。
· Pediatric Diabetes於2013年發表了87篇报告,並取得4096篇文獻引用。
· Pediatric Diabetes於2014年發表了115篇报告,並取得4671篇文獻引用。
· Pediatric Diabetes於2015年發表了89篇报告,並取得4844篇文獻引用。
· Pediatric Diabetes於2016年發表了108篇报告,並取得4613篇文獻引用。
· Pediatric Diabetes於2017年發表了131篇报告,並取得4778篇文獻引用。
· Pediatric Diabetes於2018年發表了237篇报告,並取得4925篇文獻引用。
· Pediatric Diabetes於2019年發表了125篇报告,並取得4976篇文獻引用。
· Pediatric Diabetes於2020年發表了226篇报告,並取得6826篇文獻引用。
· Pediatric Diabetes於2021年發表了1篇报告,並取得308篇文獻引用。
· Pediatric Diabetes的總出版物為2036。
· Pediatric Diabetes的總引用數為55204。

Pediatric Diabetes
Pediatric Diabetes | Academic Accelerator - About the Journal


Pediatric Diabetes is a bi-monthly journal devoted to disseminating new knowledge relating to the epidemiology, etiology, pathogenesis, management, complications and prevention of diabetes in childhood and adolescence. The aim of the journal is to become the leading vehicle for international dissemination of research and practice relating to diabetes in youth. Papers are considered for publication based on the rigor of scientific approach, novelty, and importance for understanding mechanisms involved in the epidemiology and etiology of this disease, especially its molecular, biochemical and physiological aspects. Work relating to the clinical presentation, course, management and outcome of diabetes, including its physical and emotional sequelae, is considered. In vitro studies using animal or human tissues, whole animal and clinical studies in humans are also considered. The journal reviews full-length papers, preliminary communications with important new information, clinical reports, and reviews of major topics. Invited editorials, commentaries, and perspectives are a regular feature. The editors, based in the USA, Europe, and Australasia, maintain regular communications to assure rapid turnaround time of submitted manuscripts. Pediatric Diabetes is an academic journal published by ISPAD. It published articles related to diabetes mellitus in children and adolescents.


Pediatric Diabetes的ISSN是 1399-543X ISSN是一個8位數的代碼,用於識別各種報紙,期刊,雜誌和期刊以及所有媒體 - 包括印刷版和電子版。

ISSN (Online)
ISSN (Online)

Pediatric Diabetes的ISSN(Online)是 1399-5448 . ISSN是一個8位數的代碼,用於識別各種報紙,期刊,雜誌和期刊以及所有媒體 - 包括印刷版和電子版。

Blackwell Munksgaard

Pediatric Diabetes的出版社是 Blackwell Munksgaard


Pediatric Diabetes publishes reports - .

2001 - Present

Pediatric Diabetes的出版年度包含 2001 - Present .


Pediatric Diabetes傳統訂閱 (non-OA) 期刊。出版商擁有其期刊中文章的版權。任何想要閱讀文章的人都應該由個人或機構支付費用來訪問這些文章。任何人想以任何方式使用這些文章都必須獲得出版商的許可。


There is no publication fee for submiting manuscript to Pediatric Diabetes. Pediatric Diabetes is Subscription-based (non-OA) Journal. Publishers own the rights to the articles in their journals. Anyone who wants to read the articles should pay by individual or institution to access the articles.


The language of Pediatric Diabetes is - .

United Kingdom

The publisher of Pediatric Diabetes is Blackwell Munksgaard , which locates in United Kingdom .

What is Impact Factor?

The impact factor (IF) or journal impact factor (JIF) of an academic journal is a scientometric index calculated by Clarivate that reflects the yearly average number of citations of articles published in the last two years in a given journal. It is frequently used as a proxy for the relative importance of a journal within its field; journals with higher impact factor values are often deemed to be more important, or carry more intrinsic prestige in their respective fields, than those with lower values.

Pediatric Diabetes | Academic Accelerator - About the Impact Factor

Impact factor is commonly used to evaluate the relative importance of a journal within its field and to measure the frequency with which the “average article” in a journal has been cited in a particular time period. Journal which publishes more review articles will get highest IFs. Journals with higher IFs believed to be more important than those with lower ones. According to Eugene Garfield “impact simply reflects the ability of the journals and editors to attract the best paper available.” Journal which publishes more review articles will get maximum IFs. The Impact Factor of an academic journal is a scientometric Metric that reflects the yearly average number of citations that recent articles published in a given journal received. It is frequently used as a Metric for the relative importance of a journal within its field; journals with higher Impact Factor are often deemed to be more important than those with lower ones. The Pediatric Diabetes Impact Factor IF measures the average number of citations received in a particular year (2020) by papers published in the Pediatric Diabetes during the two preceding years (2018-2019). Note that 2020 Impact Factor are reported in 2021; they cannot be calculated until all of the 2020 publications have been processed by the indexing agency. New journals, which are indexed from their first published issue, will receive an impact factor after two years of indexing; in this case, the citations to the year prior to Volume 1, and the number of articles published in the year prior to Volume 1, are known zero values. Journals that are indexed starting with a volume other than the first volume will not get an impact factor until they have been indexed for three years. Occasionally, Journal Citation Reports assigns an impact factor to new journals with less than two years of indexing, based on partial citation data. The calculation always uses two complete and known years of item counts, but for new titles one of the known counts is zero. Annuals and other irregular publications sometimes publish no items in a particular year, affecting the count. The impact factor relates to a specific time period; it is possible to calculate it for any desired period. In addition to the 2-year Impact Factor, the 3-year Impact Factor, 4-year Impact Factor, 5-year Impact Factor, Real-Time Impact Factor can provide further insights and factors into the impact of Pediatric Diabetes.


The impact factor was devised by Eugene Garfield, the founder of the Institute for Scientific Information (ISI). Impact factors are calculated yearly starting from 1975 for journals listed in the Journal Citation Reports (JCR). ISI was acquired by Thomson Scientific & Healthcare in 1992, and became known as Thomson ISI. In 2018, Thomson ISI was sold to Onex Corporation and Baring Private Equity Asia. They founded a new corporation, Clarivate, which is now the publisher of the JCR.


The impact factor is used to compare different journals within a certain field. The Web of Science indexes more than 11,500 science and social science journals. Journal impact factors are often used to evaluate the merit of individual articles and individual researchers. This use of impact factors was summarised by Hoeffel:

Impact Factor is not a perfect tool to measure the quality of articles but there is nothing better and it has the advantage of already being in existence and is, therefore, a good technique for scientific evaluation. Experience has shown that in each specialty the best journals are those in which it is most difficult to have an article accepted, and these are the journals that have a high impact factor. Most of these journals existed long before the impact factor was devised. The use of impact factor as a measure of quality is widespread because it fits well with the opinion we have in each field of the best journals in our specialty....In conclusion, prestigious journals publish papers of high level. Therefore, their impact factor is high, and not the contrary.

Eugene Garfield

In brief, Impact factors may be used by:
  • Authors to decide where to submit an article for publication.
  • Libraries to make collection development decisions
  • Academic departments to assess academic productivity
  • Academic departments to make decisions on promotion and tenure.
As impact factors are a journal-level metric, rather than an article- or individual-level metric, this use is controversial. Garfield agrees with Hoeffel,but warns about the "misuse in evaluating individuals" because there is "a wide variation [of citations] from article to article within a single journal". Other things to consider about Impact Factors:
  • Many journals do not have an impact factor.
  • The impact factor cannot assess the quality of individual articles. Even if citations were evenly distributed among articles, the impact factor would only measure the interests of other researchers in an article, not its importance and usefulness.
  • Only research articles, technical notes and reviews are “citable” items. Editorials, letters, news items and meeting abstracts are “non-citable items”.
  • Only a small percentage of articles are highly cited and they are found in a small subset of journals. This small proportion accounts for a large percentage of citations.
  • Controversial papers, such as those based on fraudulent data, may be highly cited, distorting the impact factor of a journal.
  • Citation bias may exist. For example, English language resources may be favoured. Authors may cite their own work.
Moreover, informed and careful use of these impact data is essential, and should be based on a thorough understanding of the methodology used to generate impact factors. There are controversial aspects of using impact factors:
  • It is not clear whether the number of times a paper is cited measures its actual quality.
  • Some databases that calculate impact factors fail to incorporate publications including textbooks, handbooks and reference books.
  • Certain disciplines have low numbers of journals and usage. Therefore, one should only compare journals or researchers within the same discipline.
  • Review articles normally are cited more often and therefore can skew results.
  • Self-citing may also skew results.
  • Some resources used to calculate impact factors have inadequate international coverage.
  • Editorial policies can artificially inflate an impact factor.
Impact factors have often been used in advancement and tenure decision-making. Many recognize that this is a coarse tool for such important decisions, and that a multitude of factors should be taken into account in these deliberations. When considering the use of the impact factor (IF), keep these aspects in mind:
  • IF analysis is limited to citations from the journals indexed by the Web of Science/Web of Knowledge. Currently, the Web of Science indexes only 8621 journals across the full breadth of the sciences, and just 3121 in the social sciences.
  • A high IF/citation rate says nothing about the quality -- or even, validity -- of the references being cited. Notorious or even retracted articles often attract a lot of attention, hence a high number of citations. The notority related to the first publication on "cold fusion" is one such example.
  • Journals that publish more "review articles" are often found near the top of the rankings. While not known for publishing new, creative findings, these individual articles tend to be heavily cited.
  • The IF measures the average number of citations to articles in the journal -- given this, a small number of highly-cited articles will skew the figure.
  • It takes several years for new journals to be added to the list of titles indexed by the Web of Science/Web of Knowledge, so these newer titles will be under-represented.
  • It's alleged that journal editors have learned to "game" the system, encouraging authors to cite their works previously published in the same journal.
Comparing Journals Across Disciplines? Not a good idea! Using Impact Factors within a given discipline should only be done with great care, as described above. Using impact factor data to compare journals across disciplines is even more problematic. Here are some of the reasons:
  • Disciplines where older literature is still referenced, such as Chemistry and Mathematics, offer challenges to the methodolgy since older citations (older than two years) are not used to calculate the impact factor for a given journal. (Five-year impact factor analysis, which can be calculated using the Journal Citation Index database, helps smooth out this problem only to some degree.)
  • Different disciplines have different practices regarding tendency to cite larger numbers of references. Higher overall citation rates will bump upward impact factor measurements.
  • Where it's common for large numbers of authors to collaborate on a single paper, such as in Physics, the tendency of authors to cite themselves (and in this case, more authors) will result in increased citation rates.

Pros and Cons of the Impact Factor


  • A vetted, established metric for measuring journal impact within a discipline.
  • Designed to eliminate bias based on journal size and frequency.
  • Individual articles makes an uneven contribution to overall Impact Factor.
  • Impact Factor does not account for certain things, things like context (postive or negative citaion) and intentionality (self-citation).
  • The metric is proprietary to and bound by the contents of the Thomson Reuters database.
  • Citations, on which the Impact Factor is based, count for less than 1% of an article's overall use.


Numerous critiques have been made regarding the use of impact factors. A 2007 study noted that the most fundamental flaw is that impact factors present the mean of data that are not normally distributed, and suggested that it would be more appropriate to present the median of these data. There is also a more general debate on the validity of the impact factor as a measure of journal importance and the effect of policies that editors may adopt to boost their impact factor (perhaps to the detriment of readers and writers). Other criticism focuses on the effect of the impact factor on behavior of scholars, editors and other stakeholders. Others have made more general criticisms, arguing that emphasis on impact factor results from negative influence of neoliberal policies on academia claiming that what is needed is not just replacement of the impact factor with more sophisticated metrics for science publications but also discussion on the social value of research assessment and the growing precariousness of scientific careers in higher education.
Experts stress that there are limitations in using impact factors to evaluate a scholar's work. There are many reasons cited for not relying on impact factor alone to evaluate the output of a particular individual. Among these are the following:

  • A single factor is not sufficient for evaluating an author's work.
  • Journal values are meaningless unless compared within the same discipline. Impact factors vary among disciplines.
  • The impact factor was originally devised to show the impact of a specific journal, not a specific scholar. The quality and impact of the author's work may extend beyond the impact of a particular journal.
According to Jim Testa, a researcher for ThomsonReuters Scientific, the most widespread misuse of the Impact Factor is to evaluate the work of an individual author (instead of a journal). "To say that because a researcher is publishing in a certain journal, he or she is more influential or deserves more credit is not necessarily true. There are many other variables to consider." (interview 6/26/2008 in Thomson Reuters blog entry)


影響指數(IF)經常用作表明期刊對其領域重要性的指標。它是由科學信息研究所的創始人Eugene Garfield首次提出的。儘管IF被機構和臨床醫生廣泛使用,但是人們對於IF日記的計算方法,其意義以及如何利用它存在著廣泛的誤解。期刊的影響指數與同行評議過程的質量和期刊的內容質量等因素無關,而是一種反映對期刊,書籍,論文,項目報告,報紙上發表的文章的平均引用次數的度量,會議/研討會論文集,在互聯網上發布的文件,說明以及任何其他批准的文件。

Pediatric Diabetes | Academic Accelerator - About the Impact Factor

影響指數通常用於評估期刊在其領域內的相對重要性,以及衡量期刊在特定時間段內引用“平均文章”的頻率。發表更多評論文章的期刊將獲得最高的IF。 IF較高的期刊被認為比IF較低的期刊更重要。根據尤金·加菲爾德(Eugene Garfield)的說法,“影響只是反映期刊和編輯吸引最佳論文的能力。”發表更多評論文章的期刊將獲得最大的IF。