Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry
最新影響指數 - 實時趨勢預測 & 期刊影響力排名


最新

影響指數

2019-2020

1.647

21.1%

影響指數趨勢分析

相關推薦期刊

熱門瀏覽期刊

Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry

Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry 2019-2020 年的影響指數為1.647。

Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry Impact Factor
最高影響指數
1.705
最高影響指數 IF

近十年Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry的最高影響指數為1.705。

最低影響指數
1.025
最低影響指數 IF

近十年Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry的最低影響指數為1.025。

影響指數 累積成長率
42.2%
影響指數 累積成長率

近十年Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry的影響指數累積成長率為42.2%。

影響指數 平均成長率
4.7%
影響指數 平均成長率

近十年Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry的影響指數平均成長率為4.7%。

期刊影響力排名

子領域 四分位數 排名 百分比
Psychiatry and Mental Health Q2 211/506

Psychiatry and Mental Health 58%

Clinical Psychology Q2 90/275

Clinical Psychology 67%

Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health Q2 90/286

Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 68%

期刊影響力排名

· 在Psychiatry and Mental Health研究領域,Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry的四分位數為Q2。Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry在Psychiatry and Mental Health研究類別的506種相關期刊中排名第211。在Psychiatry and Mental Health研究領域,Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry的排名百分位約為58%。
· 在Clinical Psychology研究領域,Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry的四分位數為Q2。Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry在Clinical Psychology研究類別的275種相關期刊中排名第90。在Clinical Psychology研究領域,Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry的排名百分位約為67%。
· 在Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health研究領域,Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry的四分位數為Q2。Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry在Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health研究類別的286種相關期刊中排名第90。在Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health研究領域,Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry的排名百分位約為68%。

Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry Impact Factor 2020-2021 Prediction

Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry Impact Factor Predition System

Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry Impact Factor Prediction System is now online. You can start share your valuable insights with the community.

Predict Check All Preditions
期刊出版物總量
1414
期刊累積被引用數
26504

出版物數量年度趨勢

期刊被引用量年度趨勢

國際合作趨勢

文獻被引用趨勢

影響指數歷年數據分析

影響指數
影響指數
2019-2020 1.647
2018-2019 1.36
2017-2018 1.705
2016-2017 1.145
2015-2016 1.192
2014-2015 1.025
2013-2014 1.578
2012-2013 1.457
2011-2012 1.158
影響指數歷年數據分析

· Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry 2019-2020年的影響指數為1.647
· Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry 2018-2019年的影響指數為1.36
· Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry 2017-2018年的影響指數為1.705
· Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry 2016-2017年的影響指數為1.145
· Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry 2015-2016年的影響指數為1.192
· Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry 2014-2015年的影響指數為1.025
· Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry 2013-2014年的影響指數為1.578
· Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry 2012-2013年的影響指數為1.457
· Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry 2011-2012年的影響指數為1.158

出版物引用數趨勢分析

出版數量 引用數量
出版数量 引用数量
1970 1 0
1996 53 22
1997 45 50
1998 48 78
1999 46 115
2000 57 137
2001 49 187
2002 52 251
2003 41 374
2004 50 384
2005 60 533
2006 55 595
2007 80 714
2008 68 951
2009 74 1130
2010 64 1333
2011 46 1541
2012 49 1833
2013 46 1952
2014 46 2152
2015 51 2168
2016 52 1827
2017 49 1960
2018 43 1466
2019 69 1838
2020 119 2775
2021 1 138
出版物引用數趨勢分析

· Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry於1970年發表了1篇报告,並取得0篇文獻引用。
· Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry於1996年發表了53篇报告,並取得22篇文獻引用。
· Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry於1997年發表了45篇报告,並取得50篇文獻引用。
· Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry於1998年發表了48篇报告,並取得78篇文獻引用。
· Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry於1999年發表了46篇报告,並取得115篇文獻引用。
· Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry於2000年發表了57篇报告,並取得137篇文獻引用。
· Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry於2001年發表了49篇报告,並取得187篇文獻引用。
· Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry於2002年發表了52篇报告,並取得251篇文獻引用。
· Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry於2003年發表了41篇报告,並取得374篇文獻引用。
· Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry於2004年發表了50篇报告,並取得384篇文獻引用。
· Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry於2005年發表了60篇报告,並取得533篇文獻引用。
· Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry於2006年發表了55篇报告,並取得595篇文獻引用。
· Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry於2007年發表了80篇报告,並取得714篇文獻引用。
· Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry於2008年發表了68篇报告,並取得951篇文獻引用。
· Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry於2009年發表了74篇报告,並取得1130篇文獻引用。
· Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry於2010年發表了64篇报告,並取得1333篇文獻引用。
· Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry於2011年發表了46篇报告,並取得1541篇文獻引用。
· Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry於2012年發表了49篇报告,並取得1833篇文獻引用。
· Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry於2013年發表了46篇报告,並取得1952篇文獻引用。
· Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry於2014年發表了46篇报告,並取得2152篇文獻引用。
· Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry於2015年發表了51篇报告,並取得2168篇文獻引用。
· Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry於2016年發表了52篇报告,並取得1827篇文獻引用。
· Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry於2017年發表了49篇报告,並取得1960篇文獻引用。
· Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry於2018年發表了43篇报告,並取得1466篇文獻引用。
· Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry於2019年發表了69篇报告,並取得1838篇文獻引用。
· Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry於2020年發表了119篇报告,並取得2775篇文獻引用。
· Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry於2021年發表了1篇报告,並取得138篇文獻引用。
· Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry的總出版物為1414。
· Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry的總引用數為26504。

Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry
基本資訊
Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry | Academic Accelerator - About the Journal

介绍

Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry brings together clinically oriented, peer reviewed work of the highest distinction from an international and multidisciplinary perspective, offering comprehensive coverage of clinical and treatment issues across the range of treatment modalities.Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry is interested in advancing theory, practice and clinical research in the realm of child and adolescent psychology and psychiatry and related disciplines.The journal directs its attention to matters of clinical practice, including related topics such as the ethics of treatment and the integration of research into practice.Multidisciplinary in approach, the journal includes work by, and is of interest to, child psychologists, psychiatrists and psychotherapists, nurses, social workers and all other professionals in the fields of child and adolescent psychology and psychiatry. Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry is a quarterly peer-reviewed academic journal that covers the field of child psychology and psychiatry. The editors-in-chief are Anna Brazier (University Hospital of Wales) and Michael Tarren-Sweeney (University of Canterbury). It was established in 1996 and is currently published by SAGE Publications.

ISSN
1359-1045
ISSN

Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry的ISSN是 1359-1045 ISSN是一個8位數的代碼,用於識別各種報紙,期刊,雜誌和期刊以及所有媒體 - 包括印刷版和電子版。

ISSN (Online)
-
ISSN (Online)

Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry的ISSN(Online)是 - . ISSN是一個8位數的代碼,用於識別各種報紙,期刊,雜誌和期刊以及所有媒體 - 包括印刷版和電子版。

出版社
SAGE Publications Ltd
出版社

Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry的出版社是 SAGE Publications Ltd

出版頻率
Quarterly
出版頻率

Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry publishes reports Quarterly .

出版年度
1996 - Present
出版年度

Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry的出版年度包含 1996 - Present .

開放取用
NO
開放取用

Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry傳統訂閱 (non-OA) 期刊。出版商擁有其期刊中文章的版權。任何想要閱讀文章的人都應該由個人或機構支付費用來訪問這些文章。任何人想以任何方式使用這些文章都必須獲得出版商的許可。

出版费
Review
出版費

There is no publication fee for submiting manuscript to Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry. Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry is Subscription-based (non-OA) Journal. Publishers own the rights to the articles in their journals. Anyone who wants to read the articles should pay by individual or institution to access the articles.

語言
English
語言

The language of Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry is English .

國家/地區
United States
國家/地區

The publisher of Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry is SAGE Publications Ltd , which locates in United States .

What is Impact Factor?

The impact factor (IF) or journal impact factor (JIF) of an academic journal is a scientometric index calculated by Clarivate that reflects the yearly average number of citations of articles published in the last two years in a given journal. It is frequently used as a proxy for the relative importance of a journal within its field; journals with higher impact factor values are often deemed to be more important, or carry more intrinsic prestige in their respective fields, than those with lower values.

Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry | Academic Accelerator - About the Impact Factor

Impact factor is commonly used to evaluate the relative importance of a journal within its field and to measure the frequency with which the “average article” in a journal has been cited in a particular time period. Journal which publishes more review articles will get highest IFs. Journals with higher IFs believed to be more important than those with lower ones. According to Eugene Garfield “impact simply reflects the ability of the journals and editors to attract the best paper available.” Journal which publishes more review articles will get maximum IFs. The Impact Factor of an academic journal is a scientometric Metric that reflects the yearly average number of citations that recent articles published in a given journal received. It is frequently used as a Metric for the relative importance of a journal within its field; journals with higher Impact Factor are often deemed to be more important than those with lower ones. The Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry Impact Factor IF measures the average number of citations received in a particular year (2020) by papers published in the Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry during the two preceding years (2018-2019). Note that 2020 Impact Factor are reported in 2021; they cannot be calculated until all of the 2020 publications have been processed by the indexing agency. New journals, which are indexed from their first published issue, will receive an impact factor after two years of indexing; in this case, the citations to the year prior to Volume 1, and the number of articles published in the year prior to Volume 1, are known zero values. Journals that are indexed starting with a volume other than the first volume will not get an impact factor until they have been indexed for three years. Occasionally, Journal Citation Reports assigns an impact factor to new journals with less than two years of indexing, based on partial citation data. The calculation always uses two complete and known years of item counts, but for new titles one of the known counts is zero. Annuals and other irregular publications sometimes publish no items in a particular year, affecting the count. The impact factor relates to a specific time period; it is possible to calculate it for any desired period. In addition to the 2-year Impact Factor, the 3-year Impact Factor, 4-year Impact Factor, 5-year Impact Factor, Real-Time Impact Factor can provide further insights and factors into the impact of Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry.

History

The impact factor was devised by Eugene Garfield, the founder of the Institute for Scientific Information (ISI). Impact factors are calculated yearly starting from 1975 for journals listed in the Journal Citation Reports (JCR). ISI was acquired by Thomson Scientific & Healthcare in 1992, and became known as Thomson ISI. In 2018, Thomson ISI was sold to Onex Corporation and Baring Private Equity Asia. They founded a new corporation, Clarivate, which is now the publisher of the JCR.

Use

The impact factor is used to compare different journals within a certain field. The Web of Science indexes more than 11,500 science and social science journals. Journal impact factors are often used to evaluate the merit of individual articles and individual researchers. This use of impact factors was summarised by Hoeffel:

Impact Factor is not a perfect tool to measure the quality of articles but there is nothing better and it has the advantage of already being in existence and is, therefore, a good technique for scientific evaluation. Experience has shown that in each specialty the best journals are those in which it is most difficult to have an article accepted, and these are the journals that have a high impact factor. Most of these journals existed long before the impact factor was devised. The use of impact factor as a measure of quality is widespread because it fits well with the opinion we have in each field of the best journals in our specialty....In conclusion, prestigious journals publish papers of high level. Therefore, their impact factor is high, and not the contrary.

Eugene Garfield

In brief, Impact factors may be used by:
  • Authors to decide where to submit an article for publication.
  • Libraries to make collection development decisions
  • Academic departments to assess academic productivity
  • Academic departments to make decisions on promotion and tenure.
As impact factors are a journal-level metric, rather than an article- or individual-level metric, this use is controversial. Garfield agrees with Hoeffel,but warns about the "misuse in evaluating individuals" because there is "a wide variation [of citations] from article to article within a single journal". Other things to consider about Impact Factors:
  • Many journals do not have an impact factor.
  • The impact factor cannot assess the quality of individual articles. Even if citations were evenly distributed among articles, the impact factor would only measure the interests of other researchers in an article, not its importance and usefulness.
  • Only research articles, technical notes and reviews are “citable” items. Editorials, letters, news items and meeting abstracts are “non-citable items”.
  • Only a small percentage of articles are highly cited and they are found in a small subset of journals. This small proportion accounts for a large percentage of citations.
  • Controversial papers, such as those based on fraudulent data, may be highly cited, distorting the impact factor of a journal.
  • Citation bias may exist. For example, English language resources may be favoured. Authors may cite their own work.
Moreover, informed and careful use of these impact data is essential, and should be based on a thorough understanding of the methodology used to generate impact factors. There are controversial aspects of using impact factors:
  • It is not clear whether the number of times a paper is cited measures its actual quality.
  • Some databases that calculate impact factors fail to incorporate publications including textbooks, handbooks and reference books.
  • Certain disciplines have low numbers of journals and usage. Therefore, one should only compare journals or researchers within the same discipline.
  • Review articles normally are cited more often and therefore can skew results.
  • Self-citing may also skew results.
  • Some resources used to calculate impact factors have inadequate international coverage.
  • Editorial policies can artificially inflate an impact factor.
Impact factors have often been used in advancement and tenure decision-making. Many recognize that this is a coarse tool for such important decisions, and that a multitude of factors should be taken into account in these deliberations. When considering the use of the impact factor (IF), keep these aspects in mind:
  • IF analysis is limited to citations from the journals indexed by the Web of Science/Web of Knowledge. Currently, the Web of Science indexes only 8621 journals across the full breadth of the sciences, and just 3121 in the social sciences.
  • A high IF/citation rate says nothing about the quality -- or even, validity -- of the references being cited. Notorious or even retracted articles often attract a lot of attention, hence a high number of citations. The notority related to the first publication on "cold fusion" is one such example.
  • Journals that publish more "review articles" are often found near the top of the rankings. While not known for publishing new, creative findings, these individual articles tend to be heavily cited.
  • The IF measures the average number of citations to articles in the journal -- given this, a small number of highly-cited articles will skew the figure.
  • It takes several years for new journals to be added to the list of titles indexed by the Web of Science/Web of Knowledge, so these newer titles will be under-represented.
  • It's alleged that journal editors have learned to "game" the system, encouraging authors to cite their works previously published in the same journal.
Comparing Journals Across Disciplines? Not a good idea! Using Impact Factors within a given discipline should only be done with great care, as described above. Using impact factor data to compare journals across disciplines is even more problematic. Here are some of the reasons:
  • Disciplines where older literature is still referenced, such as Chemistry and Mathematics, offer challenges to the methodolgy since older citations (older than two years) are not used to calculate the impact factor for a given journal. (Five-year impact factor analysis, which can be calculated using the Journal Citation Index database, helps smooth out this problem only to some degree.)
  • Different disciplines have different practices regarding tendency to cite larger numbers of references. Higher overall citation rates will bump upward impact factor measurements.
  • Where it's common for large numbers of authors to collaborate on a single paper, such as in Physics, the tendency of authors to cite themselves (and in this case, more authors) will result in increased citation rates.

Pros and Cons of the Impact Factor

Pros:

  • A vetted, established metric for measuring journal impact within a discipline.
  • Designed to eliminate bias based on journal size and frequency.
Cons:
  • Individual articles makes an uneven contribution to overall Impact Factor.
  • Impact Factor does not account for certain things, things like context (postive or negative citaion) and intentionality (self-citation).
  • The metric is proprietary to and bound by the contents of the Thomson Reuters database.
  • Citations, on which the Impact Factor is based, count for less than 1% of an article's overall use.

Criticism

Numerous critiques have been made regarding the use of impact factors. A 2007 study noted that the most fundamental flaw is that impact factors present the mean of data that are not normally distributed, and suggested that it would be more appropriate to present the median of these data. There is also a more general debate on the validity of the impact factor as a measure of journal importance and the effect of policies that editors may adopt to boost their impact factor (perhaps to the detriment of readers and writers). Other criticism focuses on the effect of the impact factor on behavior of scholars, editors and other stakeholders. Others have made more general criticisms, arguing that emphasis on impact factor results from negative influence of neoliberal policies on academia claiming that what is needed is not just replacement of the impact factor with more sophisticated metrics for science publications but also discussion on the social value of research assessment and the growing precariousness of scientific careers in higher education.
Experts stress that there are limitations in using impact factors to evaluate a scholar's work. There are many reasons cited for not relying on impact factor alone to evaluate the output of a particular individual. Among these are the following:

  • A single factor is not sufficient for evaluating an author's work.
  • Journal values are meaningless unless compared within the same discipline. Impact factors vary among disciplines.
  • The impact factor was originally devised to show the impact of a specific journal, not a specific scholar. The quality and impact of the author's work may extend beyond the impact of a particular journal.
According to Jim Testa, a researcher for ThomsonReuters Scientific, the most widespread misuse of the Impact Factor is to evaluate the work of an individual author (instead of a journal). "To say that because a researcher is publishing in a certain journal, he or she is more influential or deserves more credit is not necessarily true. There are many other variables to consider." (interview 6/26/2008 in Thomson Reuters blog entry)

什麼是影響指數?

影響指數(IF)經常用作表明期刊對其領域重要性的指標。它是由科學信息研究所的創始人Eugene Garfield首次提出的。儘管IF被機構和臨床醫生廣泛使用,但是人們對於IF日記的計算方法,其意義以及如何利用它存在著廣泛的誤解。期刊的影響指數與同行評議過程的質量和期刊的內容質量等因素無關,而是一種反映對期刊,書籍,論文,項目報告,報紙上發表的文章的平均引用次數的度量,會議/研討會論文集,在互聯網上發布的文件,說明以及任何其他批准的文件。

Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry | Academic Accelerator - About the Impact Factor

影響指數通常用於評估期刊在其領域內的相對重要性,以及衡量期刊在特定時間段內引用“平均文章”的頻率。發表更多評論文章的期刊將獲得最高的IF。 IF較高的期刊被認為比IF較低的期刊更重要。根據尤金·加菲爾德(Eugene Garfield)的說法,“影響只是反映期刊和編輯吸引最佳論文的能力。”發表更多評論文章的期刊將獲得最大的IF。