Journal of Ginseng Research
最新影响因子 - 实时趋势预测 & 排名分区分析








Journal of Ginseng Research

Journal of Ginseng Research 2019-2020 年的影响因子为5.487。

Journal of Ginseng Research Impact Factor
最高影响因子 IF

近十年Journal of Ginseng Research的最高影响因子为5.487。

最低影响因子 IF

近十年Journal of Ginseng Research的最低影响因子为1.265。

影响因子 总成长率
影响因子 总成长率

近十年Journal of Ginseng Research的影响因子总成长率为333.8%。

影响因子 平均成长率
影响因子 平均成长率

近十年Journal of Ginseng Research的影响因子平均成长率为37.1%。


子领域 分区 排名 百分比
Complementary and Alternative Medicine 1区 2/83

Complementary and Alternative Medicine 98%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (miscellaneous) 1区 3/35

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (miscellaneous) 92%

Biotechnology 1区 33/275

Biotechnology 88%


· 在Complementary and Alternative Medicine研究领域,Journal of Ginseng Research的分区数为1区。Journal of Ginseng Research在Complementary and Alternative Medicine研究类别的83种相关期刊中排名第2。在Complementary and Alternative Medicine领域,Journal of Ginseng Research的排名百分位约为98%。
· 在Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (miscellaneous)研究领域,Journal of Ginseng Research的分区数为1区。Journal of Ginseng Research在Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (miscellaneous)研究类别的35种相关期刊中排名第3。在Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (miscellaneous)领域,Journal of Ginseng Research的排名百分位约为92%。
· 在Biotechnology研究领域,Journal of Ginseng Research的分区数为1区。Journal of Ginseng Research在Biotechnology研究类别的275种相关期刊中排名第33。在Biotechnology领域,Journal of Ginseng Research的排名百分位约为88%。

Journal of Ginseng Research Impact Factor 2020-2021 Prediction

Journal of Ginseng Research Impact Factor Predition System

Journal of Ginseng Research Impact Factor Prediction System is now online. You can start share your valuable insights with the community.

Predict Check All Preditions






2019-2020 5.487
2018-2019 4.029
2017-2018 4.053
2016-2017 4.082
2015-2016 3.898
2014-2015 2.815
2013-2014 2.295
2012-2013 2.259
2011-2012 1.265

· Journal of Ginseng Research 2019-2020年的影响因子为5.487
· Journal of Ginseng Research 2018-2019年的影响因子为4.029
· Journal of Ginseng Research 2017-2018年的影响因子为4.053
· Journal of Ginseng Research 2016-2017年的影响因子为4.082
· Journal of Ginseng Research 2015-2016年的影响因子为3.898
· Journal of Ginseng Research 2014-2015年的影响因子为2.815
· Journal of Ginseng Research 2013-2014年的影响因子为2.295
· Journal of Ginseng Research 2012-2013年的影响因子为2.259
· Journal of Ginseng Research 2011-2012年的影响因子为1.265


出版数量 引用数量
出版数量 引用数量
1976 9 0
1977 5 0
1979 13 0
1980 19 0
1981 20 0
1982 21 0
1983 22 0
1984 18 0
1985 31 0
1986 26 0
1987 19 0
1988 21 2
1989 45 3
1990 97 7
1991 37 0
1992 40 3
1993 35 3
1994 31 5
1995 46 3
1996 58 6
1997 32 13
1998 53 8
1999 52 14
2000 42 28
2001 29 33
2002 35 36
2003 37 67
2004 37 54
2005 30 72
2006 34 72
2007 37 61
2008 57 201
2009 56 267
2010 49 433
2011 59 609
2012 54 842
2013 55 1019
2014 44 1067
2015 56 1404
2016 61 1492
2017 152 2055
2018 35 1860
2019 49 2559
2020 126 3655
2021 20 469

· Journal of Ginseng Research于1976年发表了9篇报告,并取得0篇引用文献。
· Journal of Ginseng Research于1977年发表了5篇报告,并取得0篇引用文献。
· Journal of Ginseng Research于1979年发表了13篇报告,并取得0篇引用文献。
· Journal of Ginseng Research于1980年发表了19篇报告,并取得0篇引用文献。
· Journal of Ginseng Research于1981年发表了20篇报告,并取得0篇引用文献。
· Journal of Ginseng Research于1982年发表了21篇报告,并取得0篇引用文献。
· Journal of Ginseng Research于1983年发表了22篇报告,并取得0篇引用文献。
· Journal of Ginseng Research于1984年发表了18篇报告,并取得0篇引用文献。
· Journal of Ginseng Research于1985年发表了31篇报告,并取得0篇引用文献。
· Journal of Ginseng Research于1986年发表了26篇报告,并取得0篇引用文献。
· Journal of Ginseng Research于1987年发表了19篇报告,并取得0篇引用文献。
· Journal of Ginseng Research于1988年发表了21篇报告,并取得2篇引用文献。
· Journal of Ginseng Research于1989年发表了45篇报告,并取得3篇引用文献。
· Journal of Ginseng Research于1990年发表了97篇报告,并取得7篇引用文献。
· Journal of Ginseng Research于1991年发表了37篇报告,并取得0篇引用文献。
· Journal of Ginseng Research于1992年发表了40篇报告,并取得3篇引用文献。
· Journal of Ginseng Research于1993年发表了35篇报告,并取得3篇引用文献。
· Journal of Ginseng Research于1994年发表了31篇报告,并取得5篇引用文献。
· Journal of Ginseng Research于1995年发表了46篇报告,并取得3篇引用文献。
· Journal of Ginseng Research于1996年发表了58篇报告,并取得6篇引用文献。
· Journal of Ginseng Research于1997年发表了32篇报告,并取得13篇引用文献。
· Journal of Ginseng Research于1998年发表了53篇报告,并取得8篇引用文献。
· Journal of Ginseng Research于1999年发表了52篇报告,并取得14篇引用文献。
· Journal of Ginseng Research于2000年发表了42篇报告,并取得28篇引用文献。
· Journal of Ginseng Research于2001年发表了29篇报告,并取得33篇引用文献。
· Journal of Ginseng Research于2002年发表了35篇报告,并取得36篇引用文献。
· Journal of Ginseng Research于2003年发表了37篇报告,并取得67篇引用文献。
· Journal of Ginseng Research于2004年发表了37篇报告,并取得54篇引用文献。
· Journal of Ginseng Research于2005年发表了30篇报告,并取得72篇引用文献。
· Journal of Ginseng Research于2006年发表了34篇报告,并取得72篇引用文献。
· Journal of Ginseng Research于2007年发表了37篇报告,并取得61篇引用文献。
· Journal of Ginseng Research于2008年发表了57篇报告,并取得201篇引用文献。
· Journal of Ginseng Research于2009年发表了56篇报告,并取得267篇引用文献。
· Journal of Ginseng Research于2010年发表了49篇报告,并取得433篇引用文献。
· Journal of Ginseng Research于2011年发表了59篇报告,并取得609篇引用文献。
· Journal of Ginseng Research于2012年发表了54篇报告,并取得842篇引用文献。
· Journal of Ginseng Research于2013年发表了55篇报告,并取得1019篇引用文献。
· Journal of Ginseng Research于2014年发表了44篇报告,并取得1067篇引用文献。
· Journal of Ginseng Research于2015年发表了56篇报告,并取得1404篇引用文献。
· Journal of Ginseng Research于2016年发表了61篇报告,并取得1492篇引用文献。
· Journal of Ginseng Research于2017年发表了152篇报告,并取得2055篇引用文献。
· Journal of Ginseng Research于2018年发表了35篇报告,并取得1860篇引用文献。
· Journal of Ginseng Research于2019年发表了49篇报告,并取得2559篇引用文献。
· Journal of Ginseng Research于2020年发表了126篇报告,并取得3655篇引用文献。
· Journal of Ginseng Research于2021年发表了20篇报告,并取得469篇引用文献。
· Journal of Ginseng Research的总出版物为1904。
· Journal of Ginseng Research的总引用为18422。

Journal of Ginseng Research
Journal of Ginseng Research | Academic Accelerator - About the Journal


Journal of Ginseng Research (JGR) is an official, open access journal of the Korean Society of Ginseng and is the only international journal publishing scholarly reports on ginseng research in the world. The journal is a bimonthly peer-reviewed publication featuring high-quality studies related to basic, pre-clinical, and clinical researches on ginseng to reflect recent progresses in ginseng research.JGR publishes papers, either experimental or theoretical, that advance our understanding of ginseng science, including plant sciences, biology, chemistry, pharmacology, toxicology, pharmacokinetics, veterinary medicine, biochemistry, manufacture, and clinical study of ginseng since 1976. It also includes the new paradigm of integrative research, covering alternative medicinal approaches. Article types considered for publication include review articles, original research articles, and brief reports.JGR helps researchers to understand mechanisms for traditional efficacy of ginseng and to put their clinical evidence together. It provides balanced information on basic science and clinical applications to researchers, manufacturers, practitioners, teachers, scholars, and medical doctors. None


Journal of Ginseng Research的ISSN是 1226-8453 ISSN是一个8位数的代码,用于识别各种报纸,期刊,杂志和期刊以及所有媒体 - 包括印刷版和电子版。

ISSN (Online)
ISSN (Online)

Journal of Ginseng Research的ISSN(Online)是 2093-4947 . ISSN是一个8位数的代码,用于识别各种报纸,期刊,杂志和期刊以及所有媒体 - 包括印刷版和电子版。

The Korean Society of Ginseng

Journal of Ginseng Research的出版社是 The Korean Society of Ginseng


Journal of Ginseng Research publishes reports Quarterly .

2010 - Present

Journal of Ginseng Research的出版年度包含 2010 - Present .


Journal of Ginseng Research开放存取(Open Access,简称OA)期刊。开放获取是国际学术界、出版界、图书情报界为了推动科研成果利用互联网自由传播而采取的行动。其目的是促进科学及人文信息的广泛交流,促进利用互联网进行科学交流与出版,提升科学研究的公共利用程度、保障科学信息的保存,提高科学研究的效率。通过新的数字技术和网络化通信, 只要正确引用作者和原始来源,任何人都可以及时、免费、不受任何限制地通过网络获取各类文献。


Journal of Ginseng Research is an Open Access (OA) Journal. Open Access stands for unrestricted access and unrestricted reuse. With Open Access, researchers can read and build on the findings of others without restriction. Open Access allows taxpayers to see the results of their investment. Please share or review the publication fee with the community.


The language of Journal of Ginseng Research is English .


The publisher of Journal of Ginseng Research is The Korean Society of Ginseng , which locates in Netherlands .

What is Impact Factor?

The impact factor (IF) or journal impact factor (JIF) of an academic journal is a scientometric index calculated by Clarivate that reflects the yearly average number of citations of articles published in the last two years in a given journal. It is frequently used as a proxy for the relative importance of a journal within its field; journals with higher impact factor values are often deemed to be more important, or carry more intrinsic prestige in their respective fields, than those with lower values.

Journal of Ginseng Research | Academic Accelerator - About the Impact Factor

Impact factor is commonly used to evaluate the relative importance of a journal within its field and to measure the frequency with which the “average article” in a journal has been cited in a particular time period. Journal which publishes more review articles will get highest IFs. Journals with higher IFs believed to be more important than those with lower ones. According to Eugene Garfield “impact simply reflects the ability of the journals and editors to attract the best paper available.” Journal which publishes more review articles will get maximum IFs. The Impact Factor of an academic journal is a scientometric Metric that reflects the yearly average number of citations that recent articles published in a given journal received. It is frequently used as a Metric for the relative importance of a journal within its field; journals with higher Impact Factor are often deemed to be more important than those with lower ones. The Journal of Ginseng Research Impact Factor IF measures the average number of citations received in a particular year (2020) by papers published in the Journal of Ginseng Research during the two preceding years (2018-2019). Note that 2020 Impact Factor are reported in 2021; they cannot be calculated until all of the 2020 publications have been processed by the indexing agency. New journals, which are indexed from their first published issue, will receive an impact factor after two years of indexing; in this case, the citations to the year prior to Volume 1, and the number of articles published in the year prior to Volume 1, are known zero values. Journals that are indexed starting with a volume other than the first volume will not get an impact factor until they have been indexed for three years. Occasionally, Journal Citation Reports assigns an impact factor to new journals with less than two years of indexing, based on partial citation data. The calculation always uses two complete and known years of item counts, but for new titles one of the known counts is zero. Annuals and other irregular publications sometimes publish no items in a particular year, affecting the count. The impact factor relates to a specific time period; it is possible to calculate it for any desired period. In addition to the 2-year Impact Factor, the 3-year Impact Factor, 4-year Impact Factor, 5-year Impact Factor, Real-Time Impact Factor can provide further insights and factors into the impact of Journal of Ginseng Research.


The impact factor was devised by Eugene Garfield, the founder of the Institute for Scientific Information (ISI). Impact factors are calculated yearly starting from 1975 for journals listed in the Journal Citation Reports (JCR). ISI was acquired by Thomson Scientific & Healthcare in 1992, and became known as Thomson ISI. In 2018, Thomson ISI was sold to Onex Corporation and Baring Private Equity Asia. They founded a new corporation, Clarivate, which is now the publisher of the JCR.


The impact factor is used to compare different journals within a certain field. The Web of Science indexes more than 11,500 science and social science journals. Journal impact factors are often used to evaluate the merit of individual articles and individual researchers. This use of impact factors was summarised by Hoeffel:

Impact Factor is not a perfect tool to measure the quality of articles but there is nothing better and it has the advantage of already being in existence and is, therefore, a good technique for scientific evaluation. Experience has shown that in each specialty the best journals are those in which it is most difficult to have an article accepted, and these are the journals that have a high impact factor. Most of these journals existed long before the impact factor was devised. The use of impact factor as a measure of quality is widespread because it fits well with the opinion we have in each field of the best journals in our specialty....In conclusion, prestigious journals publish papers of high level. Therefore, their impact factor is high, and not the contrary.

Eugene Garfield

In brief, Impact factors may be used by:
  • Authors to decide where to submit an article for publication.
  • Libraries to make collection development decisions
  • Academic departments to assess academic productivity
  • Academic departments to make decisions on promotion and tenure.
As impact factors are a journal-level metric, rather than an article- or individual-level metric, this use is controversial. Garfield agrees with Hoeffel,but warns about the "misuse in evaluating individuals" because there is "a wide variation [of citations] from article to article within a single journal". Other things to consider about Impact Factors:
  • Many journals do not have an impact factor.
  • The impact factor cannot assess the quality of individual articles. Even if citations were evenly distributed among articles, the impact factor would only measure the interests of other researchers in an article, not its importance and usefulness.
  • Only research articles, technical notes and reviews are “citable” items. Editorials, letters, news items and meeting abstracts are “non-citable items”.
  • Only a small percentage of articles are highly cited and they are found in a small subset of journals. This small proportion accounts for a large percentage of citations.
  • Controversial papers, such as those based on fraudulent data, may be highly cited, distorting the impact factor of a journal.
  • Citation bias may exist. For example, English language resources may be favoured. Authors may cite their own work.
Moreover, informed and careful use of these impact data is essential, and should be based on a thorough understanding of the methodology used to generate impact factors. There are controversial aspects of using impact factors:
  • It is not clear whether the number of times a paper is cited measures its actual quality.
  • Some databases that calculate impact factors fail to incorporate publications including textbooks, handbooks and reference books.
  • Certain disciplines have low numbers of journals and usage. Therefore, one should only compare journals or researchers within the same discipline.
  • Review articles normally are cited more often and therefore can skew results.
  • Self-citing may also skew results.
  • Some resources used to calculate impact factors have inadequate international coverage.
  • Editorial policies can artificially inflate an impact factor.
Impact factors have often been used in advancement and tenure decision-making. Many recognize that this is a coarse tool for such important decisions, and that a multitude of factors should be taken into account in these deliberations. When considering the use of the impact factor (IF), keep these aspects in mind:
  • IF analysis is limited to citations from the journals indexed by the Web of Science/Web of Knowledge. Currently, the Web of Science indexes only 8621 journals across the full breadth of the sciences, and just 3121 in the social sciences.
  • A high IF/citation rate says nothing about the quality -- or even, validity -- of the references being cited. Notorious or even retracted articles often attract a lot of attention, hence a high number of citations. The notority related to the first publication on "cold fusion" is one such example.
  • Journals that publish more "review articles" are often found near the top of the rankings. While not known for publishing new, creative findings, these individual articles tend to be heavily cited.
  • The IF measures the average number of citations to articles in the journal -- given this, a small number of highly-cited articles will skew the figure.
  • It takes several years for new journals to be added to the list of titles indexed by the Web of Science/Web of Knowledge, so these newer titles will be under-represented.
  • It's alleged that journal editors have learned to "game" the system, encouraging authors to cite their works previously published in the same journal.
Comparing Journals Across Disciplines? Not a good idea! Using Impact Factors within a given discipline should only be done with great care, as described above. Using impact factor data to compare journals across disciplines is even more problematic. Here are some of the reasons:
  • Disciplines where older literature is still referenced, such as Chemistry and Mathematics, offer challenges to the methodolgy since older citations (older than two years) are not used to calculate the impact factor for a given journal. (Five-year impact factor analysis, which can be calculated using the Journal Citation Index database, helps smooth out this problem only to some degree.)
  • Different disciplines have different practices regarding tendency to cite larger numbers of references. Higher overall citation rates will bump upward impact factor measurements.
  • Where it's common for large numbers of authors to collaborate on a single paper, such as in Physics, the tendency of authors to cite themselves (and in this case, more authors) will result in increased citation rates.

Pros and Cons of the Impact Factor


  • A vetted, established metric for measuring journal impact within a discipline.
  • Designed to eliminate bias based on journal size and frequency.
  • Individual articles makes an uneven contribution to overall Impact Factor.
  • Impact Factor does not account for certain things, things like context (postive or negative citaion) and intentionality (self-citation).
  • The metric is proprietary to and bound by the contents of the Thomson Reuters database.
  • Citations, on which the Impact Factor is based, count for less than 1% of an article's overall use.


Numerous critiques have been made regarding the use of impact factors. A 2007 study noted that the most fundamental flaw is that impact factors present the mean of data that are not normally distributed, and suggested that it would be more appropriate to present the median of these data. There is also a more general debate on the validity of the impact factor as a measure of journal importance and the effect of policies that editors may adopt to boost their impact factor (perhaps to the detriment of readers and writers). Other criticism focuses on the effect of the impact factor on behavior of scholars, editors and other stakeholders. Others have made more general criticisms, arguing that emphasis on impact factor results from negative influence of neoliberal policies on academia claiming that what is needed is not just replacement of the impact factor with more sophisticated metrics for science publications but also discussion on the social value of research assessment and the growing precariousness of scientific careers in higher education.
Experts stress that there are limitations in using impact factors to evaluate a scholar's work. There are many reasons cited for not relying on impact factor alone to evaluate the output of a particular individual. Among these are the following:

  • A single factor is not sufficient for evaluating an author's work.
  • Journal values are meaningless unless compared within the same discipline. Impact factors vary among disciplines.
  • The impact factor was originally devised to show the impact of a specific journal, not a specific scholar. The quality and impact of the author's work may extend beyond the impact of a particular journal.
According to Jim Testa, a researcher for ThomsonReuters Scientific, the most widespread misuse of the Impact Factor is to evaluate the work of an individual author (instead of a journal). "To say that because a researcher is publishing in a certain journal, he or she is more influential or deserves more credit is not necessarily true. There are many other variables to consider." (interview 6/26/2008 in Thomson Reuters blog entry)


影响因子(IF)经常用作表明期刊对其领域重要性的指标。它是由科学信息研究所的创始人Eugene Garfield首次提出的。尽管IF被机构和临床医生广泛使用,但是人们对于IF日记的计算方法,其意义以及如何利用它存在着广泛的误解。期刊的影响因子与同行评议过程的质量和期刊的内容质量等因素无关,而是一种反映对期刊,书籍,论文,项目报告,报纸上发表的文章的平均引用次数的度量,会议/研讨会论文集,在互联网上发布的文件,说明以及任何其他批准的文件。

Journal of Ginseng Research | Academic Accelerator - About the Impact Factor

影响因子通常用于评估期刊在其领域内的相对重要性,以及衡量期刊在特定时间段内引用“平均文章”的频率。发表更多评论文章的期刊将获得最高的IF。 IF较高的期刊被认为比IF较低的期刊更重要。根据尤金·加菲尔德(Eugene Garfield)的说法,“影响只是反映期刊和编辑吸引最佳论文的能力。”发表更多评论文章的期刊将获得最大的IF。