International Journal of Eating Disorders
ปัจจัยกระทบ - การวิเคราะห์ · แนวโน้ม · การจัดอันดับ · คาดการณ์


ใหม่

ปัจจัยกระทบ

2019-2020

3.668

4.1%

ปัจจัยกระทบ Trend

Related Journals

Popular Journals

International Journal of Eating Disorders

The 2019-2020 ปัจจัยกระทบ of International Journal of Eating Disorders is 3.668, which is just updated in 2020.

International Journal of Eating Disorders Impact Factor
Highest IF
4.068
Highest ปัจจัยกระทบ

The highest ปัจจัยกระทบ of International Journal of Eating Disorders is 4.068.

Lowest IF
2.877
Lowest ปัจจัยกระทบ

The lowest ปัจจัยกระทบ of International Journal of Eating Disorders is 2.877.

Total Growth Rate
24.5%
IF Total Growth Rate

The total growth rate of International Journal of Eating Disorders IF is 24.5%.

Annual Growth Rate
2.7%
IF Annual Growth Rate

The annual growth rate of International Journal of Eating Disorders IF is 2.7%.

ปัจจัยกระทบ Ranking

Subcategory Quartile Rank Percentile
Psychiatry and Mental Health Q1 57/506

Psychiatry and Mental Health 88%

ปัจจัยกระทบ Ranking

· In the Psychiatry and Mental Health research field, the Quartile of International Journal of Eating Disorders is Q1. International Journal of Eating Disorders has been ranked #57 over 506 related journals in the Psychiatry and Mental Health research category. The ranking percentile of International Journal of Eating Disorders is around 88% in the field of Psychiatry and Mental Health.

International Journal of Eating Disorders Impact Factor 2020-2021 Prediction

International Journal of Eating Disorders Impact Factor Predition System

International Journal of Eating Disorders Impact Factor Prediction System is now online. You can start share your valuable insights with the community.

Predict Check All Preditions
Total Publications
4544
Total Citations
310541

Annual Publication Volume

Annual Citation Record

International Collaboration Trend

Cited Documents Trend

ปัจจัยกระทบ History

Year ปัจจัยกระทบ
Year ปัจจัยกระทบ
2019-2020 3.668
2018-2019 3.523
2017-2018 3.897
2016-2017 3.567
2015-2016 4.068
2014-2015 3.126
2013-2014 3.033
2012-2013 2.877
2011-2012 2.947
ปัจจัยกระทบ History

· The 2019-2020 ปัจจัยกระทบ of International Journal of Eating Disorders is 3.668
· The 2018-2019 ปัจจัยกระทบ of International Journal of Eating Disorders is 3.523
· The 2017-2018 ปัจจัยกระทบ of International Journal of Eating Disorders is 3.897
· The 2016-2017 ปัจจัยกระทบ of International Journal of Eating Disorders is 3.567
· The 2015-2016 ปัจจัยกระทบ of International Journal of Eating Disorders is 4.068
· The 2014-2015 ปัจจัยกระทบ of International Journal of Eating Disorders is 3.126
· The 2013-2014 ปัจจัยกระทบ of International Journal of Eating Disorders is 3.033
· The 2012-2013 ปัจจัยกระทบ of International Journal of Eating Disorders is 2.877
· The 2011-2012 ปัจจัยกระทบ of International Journal of Eating Disorders is 2.947

Publications Cites Dataset

Year Publications Citations
Year Publications Citations
1974 0 1
1976 0 1
1977 0 1
1982 24 38
1983 50 127
1984 28 248
1985 45 495
1986 95 599
1987 90 742
1988 106 897
1989 75 1159
1990 78 1304
1991 73 1534
1992 103 1683
1993 109 2291
1994 82 2263
1995 99 2957
1996 101 2779
1997 102 2765
1998 108 3367
1999 109 4186
2000 122 5287
2001 127 6731
2002 109 7341
2003 114 7490
2004 118 10218
2005 156 10041
2006 129 11067
2007 145 13768
2008 113 13753
2009 171 14462
2010 74 13998
2011 94 16474
2012 143 17415
2013 137 18464
2014 140 18519
2015 168 18764
2016 158 15282
2017 195 14779
2018 186 12053
2019 174 13923
2020 282 20049
2021 5 1226
Publications Cites Dataset

· The International Journal of Eating Disorders has published 0 reports and received 1 citations in 1974.
· The International Journal of Eating Disorders has published 0 reports and received 1 citations in 1976.
· The International Journal of Eating Disorders has published 0 reports and received 1 citations in 1977.
· The International Journal of Eating Disorders has published 24 reports and received 38 citations in 1982.
· The International Journal of Eating Disorders has published 50 reports and received 127 citations in 1983.
· The International Journal of Eating Disorders has published 28 reports and received 248 citations in 1984.
· The International Journal of Eating Disorders has published 45 reports and received 495 citations in 1985.
· The International Journal of Eating Disorders has published 95 reports and received 599 citations in 1986.
· The International Journal of Eating Disorders has published 90 reports and received 742 citations in 1987.
· The International Journal of Eating Disorders has published 106 reports and received 897 citations in 1988.
· The International Journal of Eating Disorders has published 75 reports and received 1159 citations in 1989.
· The International Journal of Eating Disorders has published 78 reports and received 1304 citations in 1990.
· The International Journal of Eating Disorders has published 73 reports and received 1534 citations in 1991.
· The International Journal of Eating Disorders has published 103 reports and received 1683 citations in 1992.
· The International Journal of Eating Disorders has published 109 reports and received 2291 citations in 1993.
· The International Journal of Eating Disorders has published 82 reports and received 2263 citations in 1994.
· The International Journal of Eating Disorders has published 99 reports and received 2957 citations in 1995.
· The International Journal of Eating Disorders has published 101 reports and received 2779 citations in 1996.
· The International Journal of Eating Disorders has published 102 reports and received 2765 citations in 1997.
· The International Journal of Eating Disorders has published 108 reports and received 3367 citations in 1998.
· The International Journal of Eating Disorders has published 109 reports and received 4186 citations in 1999.
· The International Journal of Eating Disorders has published 122 reports and received 5287 citations in 2000.
· The International Journal of Eating Disorders has published 127 reports and received 6731 citations in 2001.
· The International Journal of Eating Disorders has published 109 reports and received 7341 citations in 2002.
· The International Journal of Eating Disorders has published 114 reports and received 7490 citations in 2003.
· The International Journal of Eating Disorders has published 118 reports and received 10218 citations in 2004.
· The International Journal of Eating Disorders has published 156 reports and received 10041 citations in 2005.
· The International Journal of Eating Disorders has published 129 reports and received 11067 citations in 2006.
· The International Journal of Eating Disorders has published 145 reports and received 13768 citations in 2007.
· The International Journal of Eating Disorders has published 113 reports and received 13753 citations in 2008.
· The International Journal of Eating Disorders has published 171 reports and received 14462 citations in 2009.
· The International Journal of Eating Disorders has published 74 reports and received 13998 citations in 2010.
· The International Journal of Eating Disorders has published 94 reports and received 16474 citations in 2011.
· The International Journal of Eating Disorders has published 143 reports and received 17415 citations in 2012.
· The International Journal of Eating Disorders has published 137 reports and received 18464 citations in 2013.
· The International Journal of Eating Disorders has published 140 reports and received 18519 citations in 2014.
· The International Journal of Eating Disorders has published 168 reports and received 18764 citations in 2015.
· The International Journal of Eating Disorders has published 158 reports and received 15282 citations in 2016.
· The International Journal of Eating Disorders has published 195 reports and received 14779 citations in 2017.
· The International Journal of Eating Disorders has published 186 reports and received 12053 citations in 2018.
· The International Journal of Eating Disorders has published 174 reports and received 13923 citations in 2019.
· The International Journal of Eating Disorders has published 282 reports and received 20049 citations in 2020.
· The International Journal of Eating Disorders has published 5 reports and received 1226 citations in 2021.
· The total publications of International Journal of Eating Disorders is 4544.
· The total citations of International Journal of Eating Disorders is 310541.

International Journal of Eating Disorders
Journal Profile
International Journal of Eating Disorders | Academic Accelerator - About the Journal

About

Articles featured in the journal describe state-of-the-art scientific research on theory, methodology, etiology, clinical practice, and policy related to eating disorders, as well as contributions that facilitate scholarly critique and discussion of science and practice in the field. Theoretical and empirical work on obesity or healthy eating falls within the journal’s scope inasmuch as it facilitates the advancement of efforts to describe and understand, prevent, or treat eating disorders. IJED welcomes submissions from all regions of the world and representing all levels of inquiry (including basic science, clinical trials, implementation research, and dissemination studies), and across a full range of scientific methods, disciplines, and approaches. None

ISSN
0276-3478
ISSN

The ISSN of International Journal of Eating Disorders is 0276-3478 . An ISSN is an 8-digit code used to identify newspapers, journals, magazines and periodicals of all kinds and on all media–print and electronic.

ISSN (Online)
1098-108X
ISSN (Online)

The ISSN (Online) of International Journal of Eating Disorders is 1098-108X . An ISSN is an 8-digit code used to identify newspapers, journals, magazines and periodicals of all kinds and on all media–print and electronic.

Publisher
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
Publisher

International Journal of Eating Disorders is published by John Wiley and Sons Inc. .

Publication Frequency
Monthly
Publication Frequency

International Journal of Eating Disorders publishes reports Monthly .

Coverage
1981 - Present
Coverage

The Publication History of International Journal of Eating Disorders covers 1981 - Present .

Open Access
NO
Open Access

International Journal of Eating Disorders is Subscription-based (non-OA) Journal. Publishers own the rights to the articles in their journals. Anyone who wants to read the articles should pay by individual or institution to access the articles. Anyone who wants to use the articles in any way must obtain permission from the publishers.

Publication Fee
Review
Publication Fee

There is no publication fee for submiting manuscript to International Journal of Eating Disorders. International Journal of Eating Disorders is Subscription-based (non-OA) Journal. Publishers own the rights to the articles in their journals. Anyone who wants to read the articles should pay by individual or institution to access the articles.

Language
English
Language

The language of International Journal of Eating Disorders is English .

Country/Region
United States
Country/Region

The publisher of International Journal of Eating Disorders is John Wiley and Sons Inc. , which locates in United States .

What is Impact Factor?

The impact factor (IF) or journal impact factor (JIF) of an academic journal is a scientometric index calculated by Clarivate that reflects the yearly average number of citations of articles published in the last two years in a given journal. It is frequently used as a proxy for the relative importance of a journal within its field; journals with higher impact factor values are often deemed to be more important, or carry more intrinsic prestige in their respective fields, than those with lower values.

International Journal of Eating Disorders | Academic Accelerator - About the Impact Factor

Impact factor is commonly used to evaluate the relative importance of a journal within its field and to measure the frequency with which the “average article” in a journal has been cited in a particular time period. Journal which publishes more review articles will get highest IFs. Journals with higher IFs believed to be more important than those with lower ones. According to Eugene Garfield “impact simply reflects the ability of the journals and editors to attract the best paper available.” Journal which publishes more review articles will get maximum IFs. The Impact Factor of an academic journal is a scientometric Metric that reflects the yearly average number of citations that recent articles published in a given journal received. It is frequently used as a Metric for the relative importance of a journal within its field; journals with higher Impact Factor are often deemed to be more important than those with lower ones. The International Journal of Eating Disorders Impact Factor IF measures the average number of citations received in a particular year (2020) by papers published in the International Journal of Eating Disorders during the two preceding years (2018-2019). Note that 2020 Impact Factor are reported in 2021; they cannot be calculated until all of the 2020 publications have been processed by the indexing agency. New journals, which are indexed from their first published issue, will receive an impact factor after two years of indexing; in this case, the citations to the year prior to Volume 1, and the number of articles published in the year prior to Volume 1, are known zero values. Journals that are indexed starting with a volume other than the first volume will not get an impact factor until they have been indexed for three years. Occasionally, Journal Citation Reports assigns an impact factor to new journals with less than two years of indexing, based on partial citation data. The calculation always uses two complete and known years of item counts, but for new titles one of the known counts is zero. Annuals and other irregular publications sometimes publish no items in a particular year, affecting the count. The impact factor relates to a specific time period; it is possible to calculate it for any desired period. In addition to the 2-year Impact Factor, the 3-year Impact Factor, 4-year Impact Factor, 5-year Impact Factor, Real-Time Impact Factor can provide further insights and factors into the impact of International Journal of Eating Disorders.

History

The impact factor was devised by Eugene Garfield, the founder of the Institute for Scientific Information (ISI). Impact factors are calculated yearly starting from 1975 for journals listed in the Journal Citation Reports (JCR). ISI was acquired by Thomson Scientific & Healthcare in 1992, and became known as Thomson ISI. In 2018, Thomson ISI was sold to Onex Corporation and Baring Private Equity Asia. They founded a new corporation, Clarivate, which is now the publisher of the JCR.

Use

The impact factor is used to compare different journals within a certain field. The Web of Science indexes more than 11,500 science and social science journals. Journal impact factors are often used to evaluate the merit of individual articles and individual researchers. This use of impact factors was summarised by Hoeffel:

Impact Factor is not a perfect tool to measure the quality of articles but there is nothing better and it has the advantage of already being in existence and is, therefore, a good technique for scientific evaluation. Experience has shown that in each specialty the best journals are those in which it is most difficult to have an article accepted, and these are the journals that have a high impact factor. Most of these journals existed long before the impact factor was devised. The use of impact factor as a measure of quality is widespread because it fits well with the opinion we have in each field of the best journals in our specialty....In conclusion, prestigious journals publish papers of high level. Therefore, their impact factor is high, and not the contrary.

Eugene Garfield

In brief, Impact factors may be used by:
  • Authors to decide where to submit an article for publication.
  • Libraries to make collection development decisions
  • Academic departments to assess academic productivity
  • Academic departments to make decisions on promotion and tenure.
As impact factors are a journal-level metric, rather than an article- or individual-level metric, this use is controversial. Garfield agrees with Hoeffel,but warns about the "misuse in evaluating individuals" because there is "a wide variation [of citations] from article to article within a single journal". Other things to consider about Impact Factors:
  • Many journals do not have an impact factor.
  • The impact factor cannot assess the quality of individual articles. Even if citations were evenly distributed among articles, the impact factor would only measure the interests of other researchers in an article, not its importance and usefulness.
  • Only research articles, technical notes and reviews are “citable” items. Editorials, letters, news items and meeting abstracts are “non-citable items”.
  • Only a small percentage of articles are highly cited and they are found in a small subset of journals. This small proportion accounts for a large percentage of citations.
  • Controversial papers, such as those based on fraudulent data, may be highly cited, distorting the impact factor of a journal.
  • Citation bias may exist. For example, English language resources may be favoured. Authors may cite their own work.
Moreover, informed and careful use of these impact data is essential, and should be based on a thorough understanding of the methodology used to generate impact factors. There are controversial aspects of using impact factors:
  • It is not clear whether the number of times a paper is cited measures its actual quality.
  • Some databases that calculate impact factors fail to incorporate publications including textbooks, handbooks and reference books.
  • Certain disciplines have low numbers of journals and usage. Therefore, one should only compare journals or researchers within the same discipline.
  • Review articles normally are cited more often and therefore can skew results.
  • Self-citing may also skew results.
  • Some resources used to calculate impact factors have inadequate international coverage.
  • Editorial policies can artificially inflate an impact factor.
Impact factors have often been used in advancement and tenure decision-making. Many recognize that this is a coarse tool for such important decisions, and that a multitude of factors should be taken into account in these deliberations. When considering the use of the impact factor (IF), keep these aspects in mind:
  • IF analysis is limited to citations from the journals indexed by the Web of Science/Web of Knowledge. Currently, the Web of Science indexes only 8621 journals across the full breadth of the sciences, and just 3121 in the social sciences.
  • A high IF/citation rate says nothing about the quality -- or even, validity -- of the references being cited. Notorious or even retracted articles often attract a lot of attention, hence a high number of citations. The notority related to the first publication on "cold fusion" is one such example.
  • Journals that publish more "review articles" are often found near the top of the rankings. While not known for publishing new, creative findings, these individual articles tend to be heavily cited.
  • The IF measures the average number of citations to articles in the journal -- given this, a small number of highly-cited articles will skew the figure.
  • It takes several years for new journals to be added to the list of titles indexed by the Web of Science/Web of Knowledge, so these newer titles will be under-represented.
  • It's alleged that journal editors have learned to "game" the system, encouraging authors to cite their works previously published in the same journal.
Comparing Journals Across Disciplines? Not a good idea! Using Impact Factors within a given discipline should only be done with great care, as described above. Using impact factor data to compare journals across disciplines is even more problematic. Here are some of the reasons:
  • Disciplines where older literature is still referenced, such as Chemistry and Mathematics, offer challenges to the methodolgy since older citations (older than two years) are not used to calculate the impact factor for a given journal. (Five-year impact factor analysis, which can be calculated using the Journal Citation Index database, helps smooth out this problem only to some degree.)
  • Different disciplines have different practices regarding tendency to cite larger numbers of references. Higher overall citation rates will bump upward impact factor measurements.
  • Where it's common for large numbers of authors to collaborate on a single paper, such as in Physics, the tendency of authors to cite themselves (and in this case, more authors) will result in increased citation rates.

Pros and Cons of the Impact Factor

Pros:

  • A vetted, established metric for measuring journal impact within a discipline.
  • Designed to eliminate bias based on journal size and frequency.
Cons:
  • Individual articles makes an uneven contribution to overall Impact Factor.
  • Impact Factor does not account for certain things, things like context (postive or negative citaion) and intentionality (self-citation).
  • The metric is proprietary to and bound by the contents of the Thomson Reuters database.
  • Citations, on which the Impact Factor is based, count for less than 1% of an article's overall use.

Criticism

Numerous critiques have been made regarding the use of impact factors. A 2007 study noted that the most fundamental flaw is that impact factors present the mean of data that are not normally distributed, and suggested that it would be more appropriate to present the median of these data. There is also a more general debate on the validity of the impact factor as a measure of journal importance and the effect of policies that editors may adopt to boost their impact factor (perhaps to the detriment of readers and writers). Other criticism focuses on the effect of the impact factor on behavior of scholars, editors and other stakeholders. Others have made more general criticisms, arguing that emphasis on impact factor results from negative influence of neoliberal policies on academia claiming that what is needed is not just replacement of the impact factor with more sophisticated metrics for science publications but also discussion on the social value of research assessment and the growing precariousness of scientific careers in higher education.
Experts stress that there are limitations in using impact factors to evaluate a scholar's work. There are many reasons cited for not relying on impact factor alone to evaluate the output of a particular individual. Among these are the following:

  • A single factor is not sufficient for evaluating an author's work.
  • Journal values are meaningless unless compared within the same discipline. Impact factors vary among disciplines.
  • The impact factor was originally devised to show the impact of a specific journal, not a specific scholar. The quality and impact of the author's work may extend beyond the impact of a particular journal.
According to Jim Testa, a researcher for ThomsonReuters Scientific, the most widespread misuse of the Impact Factor is to evaluate the work of an individual author (instead of a journal). "To say that because a researcher is publishing in a certain journal, he or she is more influential or deserves more credit is not necessarily true. There are many other variables to consider." (interview 6/26/2008 in Thomson Reuters blog entry)