Real Estate Economics
Factor de Impact - Analiză · Tendinţă · Clasament · Predicție


Nou

Factor de Impact

2020-2021

3.418

115.6%

Factor de Impact Trend

Researchain
One-click to visualize your research performance

Researchain
One-click to visualize your research performance

Researchain
One-click to visualize your research performance

Researchain
One-click to visualize your research performance

Highly Cited Articles

Real Estate Economics

High Impact Research Articles
Publication Title Author Listing
Publication Title Author Listing
·
· ·
· ·
· ·
·
· ·
·
· · ·
·
· ·
· · ·
·
· ·
· ·
· ·
·
· · ·
·
·
· ·
· ·

Highly Cited Keywords

Real Estate Economics

High Impact Research Keywords

Journal Research Scope

Research Scope

Related Journals

Popular Journals

Real Estate Economics

The 2020-2021 Factor de Impact of Real Estate Economics is 3.418, which is just updated in 2021.

Real Estate Economics Impact Factor
Highest IF
3.418
Highest Factor de Impact

The highest Factor de Impact of Real Estate Economics is 3.418.

Lowest IF
0.672
Lowest Factor de Impact

The lowest Factor de Impact of Real Estate Economics is 0.672.

Total Growth Rate
235.1%
IF Total Growth Rate

The total growth rate of Real Estate Economics IF is 235.1%.

Annual Growth Rate
23.5%
IF Annual Growth Rate

The annual growth rate of Real Estate Economics IF is 23.5%.

Factor de Impact Ranking

Subcategory Quartile Rank Percentile
Finance Q1 68/288

Finance 76%

Economics and Econometrics Q2 172/661

Economics and Econometrics 74%

Accounting Q2 44/155

Accounting 71%

Factor de Impact Ranking

· In the Finance research field, the Quartile of Real Estate Economics is Q1. Real Estate Economics has been ranked #68 over 288 related journals in the Finance research category. The ranking percentile of Real Estate Economics is around 76% in the field of Finance.
· In the Economics and Econometrics research field, the Quartile of Real Estate Economics is Q2. Real Estate Economics has been ranked #172 over 661 related journals in the Economics and Econometrics research category. The ranking percentile of Real Estate Economics is around 74% in the field of Economics and Econometrics.
· In the Accounting research field, the Quartile of Real Estate Economics is Q2. Real Estate Economics has been ranked #44 over 155 related journals in the Accounting research category. The ranking percentile of Real Estate Economics is around 71% in the field of Accounting.

Real Estate Economics Impact Factor 2021-2022 Prediction

Real Estate Economics Impact Factor Predition System

Real Estate Economics Impact Factor Prediction System is now online. You can start share your valuable insights with the community.

Predict Check All Preditions
Total Publications
1413
Total Citations
59575

Annual Publication Volume

Annual Citation Record

International Collaboration Trend

Cited Documents Trend

Factor de Impact History

Year Factor de Impact
Year Factor de Impact
2020-2021 3.418
2019-2020 1.585
2018-2019 1.764
2017-2018 1.103
2016-2017 0.758
2015-2016 0.869
2014-2015 0.672
2013-2014 1.203
2012-2013 1.02
2011-2012 1.02
Factor de Impact History

· The 2020-2021 Factor de Impact of Real Estate Economics is 3.418
· The 2019-2020 Factor de Impact of Real Estate Economics is 1.585
· The 2018-2019 Factor de Impact of Real Estate Economics is 1.764
· The 2017-2018 Factor de Impact of Real Estate Economics is 1.103
· The 2016-2017 Factor de Impact of Real Estate Economics is 0.758
· The 2015-2016 Factor de Impact of Real Estate Economics is 0.869
· The 2014-2015 Factor de Impact of Real Estate Economics is 0.672
· The 2013-2014 Factor de Impact of Real Estate Economics is 1.203
· The 2012-2013 Factor de Impact of Real Estate Economics is 1.02
· The 2011-2012 Factor de Impact of Real Estate Economics is 1.02

Publications Cites Dataset

Year Publications Citations
Year Publications Citations
1973 17 0
1974 12 2
1975 12 0
1976 18 1
1977 28 2
1978 27 18
1979 36 15
1980 25 27
1981 27 26
1982 21 45
1983 31 64
1984 30 86
1985 29 101
1986 37 135
1987 33 196
1988 29 247
1989 34 256
1990 29 331
1991 32 451
1992 28 571
1993 23 502
1994 30 446
1995 22 774
1996 30 871
1997 30 878
1998 28 993
1999 25 1020
2000 26 1095
2001 26 1096
2002 28 1142
2003 26 1424
2004 26 1461
2005 29 1804
2006 26 2101
2007 24 2316
2008 29 2331
2009 26 3193
2010 25 2844
2011 29 3145
2012 36 3649
2013 32 3499
2014 39 3704
2015 40 3306
2016 33 2877
2017 29 2589
2018 36 2249
2019 63 2368
2020 62 3090
Publications Cites Dataset

· The Real Estate Economics has published 17 reports and received 0 citations in 1973.
· The Real Estate Economics has published 12 reports and received 2 citations in 1974.
· The Real Estate Economics has published 12 reports and received 0 citations in 1975.
· The Real Estate Economics has published 18 reports and received 1 citations in 1976.
· The Real Estate Economics has published 28 reports and received 2 citations in 1977.
· The Real Estate Economics has published 27 reports and received 18 citations in 1978.
· The Real Estate Economics has published 36 reports and received 15 citations in 1979.
· The Real Estate Economics has published 25 reports and received 27 citations in 1980.
· The Real Estate Economics has published 27 reports and received 26 citations in 1981.
· The Real Estate Economics has published 21 reports and received 45 citations in 1982.
· The Real Estate Economics has published 31 reports and received 64 citations in 1983.
· The Real Estate Economics has published 30 reports and received 86 citations in 1984.
· The Real Estate Economics has published 29 reports and received 101 citations in 1985.
· The Real Estate Economics has published 37 reports and received 135 citations in 1986.
· The Real Estate Economics has published 33 reports and received 196 citations in 1987.
· The Real Estate Economics has published 29 reports and received 247 citations in 1988.
· The Real Estate Economics has published 34 reports and received 256 citations in 1989.
· The Real Estate Economics has published 29 reports and received 331 citations in 1990.
· The Real Estate Economics has published 32 reports and received 451 citations in 1991.
· The Real Estate Economics has published 28 reports and received 571 citations in 1992.
· The Real Estate Economics has published 23 reports and received 502 citations in 1993.
· The Real Estate Economics has published 30 reports and received 446 citations in 1994.
· The Real Estate Economics has published 22 reports and received 774 citations in 1995.
· The Real Estate Economics has published 30 reports and received 871 citations in 1996.
· The Real Estate Economics has published 30 reports and received 878 citations in 1997.
· The Real Estate Economics has published 28 reports and received 993 citations in 1998.
· The Real Estate Economics has published 25 reports and received 1020 citations in 1999.
· The Real Estate Economics has published 26 reports and received 1095 citations in 2000.
· The Real Estate Economics has published 26 reports and received 1096 citations in 2001.
· The Real Estate Economics has published 28 reports and received 1142 citations in 2002.
· The Real Estate Economics has published 26 reports and received 1424 citations in 2003.
· The Real Estate Economics has published 26 reports and received 1461 citations in 2004.
· The Real Estate Economics has published 29 reports and received 1804 citations in 2005.
· The Real Estate Economics has published 26 reports and received 2101 citations in 2006.
· The Real Estate Economics has published 24 reports and received 2316 citations in 2007.
· The Real Estate Economics has published 29 reports and received 2331 citations in 2008.
· The Real Estate Economics has published 26 reports and received 3193 citations in 2009.
· The Real Estate Economics has published 25 reports and received 2844 citations in 2010.
· The Real Estate Economics has published 29 reports and received 3145 citations in 2011.
· The Real Estate Economics has published 36 reports and received 3649 citations in 2012.
· The Real Estate Economics has published 32 reports and received 3499 citations in 2013.
· The Real Estate Economics has published 39 reports and received 3704 citations in 2014.
· The Real Estate Economics has published 40 reports and received 3306 citations in 2015.
· The Real Estate Economics has published 33 reports and received 2877 citations in 2016.
· The Real Estate Economics has published 29 reports and received 2589 citations in 2017.
· The Real Estate Economics has published 36 reports and received 2249 citations in 2018.
· The Real Estate Economics has published 63 reports and received 2368 citations in 2019.
· The Real Estate Economics has published 62 reports and received 3090 citations in 2020.
· The total publications of Real Estate Economics is 1413.
· The total citations of Real Estate Economics is 59575.

Real Estate Economics
Journal Profile
Real Estate Economics | Academic Accelerator - About the Journal

About

As the official journal of the American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association, Real Estate Economics is the premier journal on real estate topics. Since 1973, Real Estate Economics has been facilitating communication among academic researchers and industry professionals and improving the analysis of real estate decisions. Articles span a wide range of issues, from tax rules to brokers' commissions to corporate real estate including housing and urban economics, and the financial economics of real estate development and investment. None

ISSN
1080-8620
ISSN

The ISSN of Real Estate Economics is 1080-8620 . An ISSN is an 8-digit code used to identify newspapers, journals, magazines and periodicals of all kinds and on all media–print and electronic.

ISSN (Online)
1540-6229
ISSN (Online)

The ISSN (Online) of Real Estate Economics is 1540-6229 . An ISSN is an 8-digit code used to identify newspapers, journals, magazines and periodicals of all kinds and on all media–print and electronic.

Publisher
Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Publisher

Real Estate Economics is published by Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd .

Publication Frequency
Quarterly
Publication Frequency

Real Estate Economics publishes reports Quarterly .

Coverage
1973 - Present
Coverage

The Publication History of Real Estate Economics covers 1973 - Present .

Open Access
NO
Open Access

Publication Fee
Review
Publication Fee

Language
English
Language

The language of Real Estate Economics is English .

Country/Region
United Kingdom
Country/Region

The publisher of Real Estate Economics is Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd , which locates in United Kingdom .

What is Impact Factor?

The impact factor (IF) or journal impact factor (JIF) of an academic journal is a scientometric index calculated by Clarivate that reflects the yearly average number of citations of articles published in the last two years in a given journal. It is frequently used as a proxy for the relative importance of a journal within its field; journals with higher impact factor values are often deemed to be more important, or carry more intrinsic prestige in their respective fields, than those with lower values.

Real Estate Economics | Academic Accelerator - About the Impact Factor

Impact factor is commonly used to evaluate the relative importance of a journal within its field and to measure the frequency with which the “average article” in a journal has been cited in a particular time period. Journal which publishes more review articles will get highest IFs. Journals with higher IFs believed to be more important than those with lower ones. According to Eugene Garfield “impact simply reflects the ability of the journals and editors to attract the best paper available.” Journal which publishes more review articles will get maximum IFs. The Impact Factor of an academic journal is a scientometric Metric that reflects the yearly average number of citations that recent articles published in a given journal received. It is frequently used as a Metric for the relative importance of a journal within its field; journals with higher Impact Factor are often deemed to be more important than those with lower ones. The Real Estate Economics Impact Factor IF measures the average number of citations received in a particular year (2020) by papers published in the Real Estate Economics during the two preceding years (2018-2019). Note that 2020 Impact Factor are reported in 2021; they cannot be calculated until all of the 2020 publications have been processed by the indexing agency. New journals, which are indexed from their first published issue, will receive an impact factor after two years of indexing; in this case, the citations to the year prior to Volume 1, and the number of articles published in the year prior to Volume 1, are known zero values. Journals that are indexed starting with a volume other than the first volume will not get an impact factor until they have been indexed for three years. Occasionally, Journal Citation Reports assigns an impact factor to new journals with less than two years of indexing, based on partial citation data. The calculation always uses two complete and known years of item counts, but for new titles one of the known counts is zero. Annuals and other irregular publications sometimes publish no items in a particular year, affecting the count. The impact factor relates to a specific time period; it is possible to calculate it for any desired period. In addition to the 2-year Impact Factor, the 3-year Impact Factor, 4-year Impact Factor, 5-year Impact Factor, Real-Time Impact Factor can provide further insights and factors into the impact of Real Estate Economics.

History

The impact factor was devised by Eugene Garfield, the founder of the Institute for Scientific Information (ISI). Impact factors are calculated yearly starting from 1975 for journals listed in the Journal Citation Reports (JCR). ISI was acquired by Thomson Scientific & Healthcare in 1992, and became known as Thomson ISI. In 2018, Thomson ISI was sold to Onex Corporation and Baring Private Equity Asia. They founded a new corporation, Clarivate, which is now the publisher of the JCR.

Use

The impact factor is used to compare different journals within a certain field. The Web of Science indexes more than 11,500 science and social science journals. Journal impact factors are often used to evaluate the merit of individual articles and individual researchers. This use of impact factors was summarised by Hoeffel:

Impact Factor is not a perfect tool to measure the quality of articles but there is nothing better and it has the advantage of already being in existence and is, therefore, a good technique for scientific evaluation. Experience has shown that in each specialty the best journals are those in which it is most difficult to have an article accepted, and these are the journals that have a high impact factor. Most of these journals existed long before the impact factor was devised. The use of impact factor as a measure of quality is widespread because it fits well with the opinion we have in each field of the best journals in our specialty....In conclusion, prestigious journals publish papers of high level. Therefore, their impact factor is high, and not the contrary.

Eugene Garfield

In brief, Impact factors may be used by:
  • Authors to decide where to submit an article for publication.
  • Libraries to make collection development decisions
  • Academic departments to assess academic productivity
  • Academic departments to make decisions on promotion and tenure.
As impact factors are a journal-level metric, rather than an article- or individual-level metric, this use is controversial. Garfield agrees with Hoeffel,but warns about the "misuse in evaluating individuals" because there is "a wide variation [of citations] from article to article within a single journal". Other things to consider about Impact Factors:
  • Many journals do not have an impact factor.
  • The impact factor cannot assess the quality of individual articles. Even if citations were evenly distributed among articles, the impact factor would only measure the interests of other researchers in an article, not its importance and usefulness.
  • Only research articles, technical notes and reviews are “citable” items. Editorials, letters, news items and meeting abstracts are “non-citable items”.
  • Only a small percentage of articles are highly cited and they are found in a small subset of journals. This small proportion accounts for a large percentage of citations.
  • Controversial papers, such as those based on fraudulent data, may be highly cited, distorting the impact factor of a journal.
  • Citation bias may exist. For example, English language resources may be favoured. Authors may cite their own work.
Moreover, informed and careful use of these impact data is essential, and should be based on a thorough understanding of the methodology used to generate impact factors. There are controversial aspects of using impact factors:
  • It is not clear whether the number of times a paper is cited measures its actual quality.
  • Some databases that calculate impact factors fail to incorporate publications including textbooks, handbooks and reference books.
  • Certain disciplines have low numbers of journals and usage. Therefore, one should only compare journals or researchers within the same discipline.
  • Review articles normally are cited more often and therefore can skew results.
  • Self-citing may also skew results.
  • Some resources used to calculate impact factors have inadequate international coverage.
  • Editorial policies can artificially inflate an impact factor.
Impact factors have often been used in advancement and tenure decision-making. Many recognize that this is a coarse tool for such important decisions, and that a multitude of factors should be taken into account in these deliberations. When considering the use of the impact factor (IF), keep these aspects in mind:
  • IF analysis is limited to citations from the journals indexed by the Web of Science/Web of Knowledge. Currently, the Web of Science indexes only 8621 journals across the full breadth of the sciences, and just 3121 in the social sciences.
  • A high IF/citation rate says nothing about the quality -- or even, validity -- of the references being cited. Notorious or even retracted articles often attract a lot of attention, hence a high number of citations. The notority related to the first publication on "cold fusion" is one such example.
  • Journals that publish more "review articles" are often found near the top of the rankings. While not known for publishing new, creative findings, these individual articles tend to be heavily cited.
  • The IF measures the average number of citations to articles in the journal -- given this, a small number of highly-cited articles will skew the figure.
  • It takes several years for new journals to be added to the list of titles indexed by the Web of Science/Web of Knowledge, so these newer titles will be under-represented.
  • It's alleged that journal editors have learned to "game" the system, encouraging authors to cite their works previously published in the same journal.
Comparing Journals Across Disciplines? Not a good idea! Using Impact Factors within a given discipline should only be done with great care, as described above. Using impact factor data to compare journals across disciplines is even more problematic. Here are some of the reasons:
  • Disciplines where older literature is still referenced, such as Chemistry and Mathematics, offer challenges to the methodolgy since older citations (older than two years) are not used to calculate the impact factor for a given journal. (Five-year impact factor analysis, which can be calculated using the Journal Citation Index database, helps smooth out this problem only to some degree.)
  • Different disciplines have different practices regarding tendency to cite larger numbers of references. Higher overall citation rates will bump upward impact factor measurements.
  • Where it's common for large numbers of authors to collaborate on a single paper, such as in Physics, the tendency of authors to cite themselves (and in this case, more authors) will result in increased citation rates.

Pros and Cons of the Impact Factor

Pros:

  • A vetted, established metric for measuring journal impact within a discipline.
  • Designed to eliminate bias based on journal size and frequency.
Cons:
  • Individual articles makes an uneven contribution to overall Impact Factor.
  • Impact Factor does not account for certain things, things like context (postive or negative citaion) and intentionality (self-citation).
  • The metric is proprietary to and bound by the contents of the Thomson Reuters database.
  • Citations, on which the Impact Factor is based, count for less than 1% of an article's overall use.

Criticism

Numerous critiques have been made regarding the use of impact factors. A 2007 study noted that the most fundamental flaw is that impact factors present the mean of data that are not normally distributed, and suggested that it would be more appropriate to present the median of these data. There is also a more general debate on the validity of the impact factor as a measure of journal importance and the effect of policies that editors may adopt to boost their impact factor (perhaps to the detriment of readers and writers). Other criticism focuses on the effect of the impact factor on behavior of scholars, editors and other stakeholders. Others have made more general criticisms, arguing that emphasis on impact factor results from negative influence of neoliberal policies on academia claiming that what is needed is not just replacement of the impact factor with more sophisticated metrics for science publications but also discussion on the social value of research assessment and the growing precariousness of scientific careers in higher education.
Experts stress that there are limitations in using impact factors to evaluate a scholar's work. There are many reasons cited for not relying on impact factor alone to evaluate the output of a particular individual. Among these are the following:

  • A single factor is not sufficient for evaluating an author's work.
  • Journal values are meaningless unless compared within the same discipline. Impact factors vary among disciplines.
  • The impact factor was originally devised to show the impact of a specific journal, not a specific scholar. The quality and impact of the author's work may extend beyond the impact of a particular journal.
According to Jim Testa, a researcher for ThomsonReuters Scientific, the most widespread misuse of the Impact Factor is to evaluate the work of an individual author (instead of a journal). "To say that because a researcher is publishing in a certain journal, he or she is more influential or deserves more credit is not necessarily true. There are many other variables to consider." (interview 6/26/2008 in Thomson Reuters blog entry)