Last updated on

Tumori
Latest Impact Factor IF - Analysis · Trend · Prediction · Ranking


User Feedback

Journal Impact IF

2020-2021

2.098

22.9%

Journal Impact IF Trend

Researchain
One-click to visualize your research performance

Researchain
One-click to visualize your research performance

Researchain
One-click to visualize your research performance

Researchain
One-click to visualize your research performance

Popular Journals

Highly Cited Articles

Tumori

High Impact Research Articles
Publication Title Author Listing
Publication Title Author Listing
· · · ·
· · · · · · · · · ·
· · · · · · · · · · ·
· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·
· · · · ·
·
· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·
· · · · · · · ·

Highly Cited Keywords

Tumori

High Impact Research Keywords

Journal Research Scope

Tumori

Research Scope

Research Scope

Tumori

Research Scope

Journal Impact IF Ranking

Tumori

Journal Impact IF Ranking
Subcategory Quartile Rank Percentile
Oncology Q3 223/340

Oncology 34%

Cancer Research Q4 162/207

Cancer Research 21%

Journal Impact IF Ranking

· In the Oncology research field, the Quartile of Tumori is Q3. Tumori has been ranked #223 over 340 related journals in the Oncology research category. The ranking percentile of Tumori is around 34% in the field of Oncology.
· In the Cancer Research research field, the Quartile of Tumori is Q4. Tumori has been ranked #162 over 207 related journals in the Cancer Research research category. The ranking percentile of Tumori is around 21% in the field of Cancer Research.

Related Journals

Tumori

Similar Journals

Tumori

The 2020-2021 Journal Impact IF of Tumori is 2.098, which is just updated in 2021.

Tumori Impact Factor
Highest IF
2.098
Highest Journal Impact IF

The highest Journal Impact IF of Tumori is 2.098.

Lowest IF
0.606
Lowest Journal Impact IF

The lowest Journal Impact IF of Tumori is 0.606.

Total Growth Rate
246.2%
IF Total Growth Rate

The total growth rate of Tumori IF is 246.2%.

Annual Growth Rate
24.6%
IF Annual Growth Rate

The annual growth rate of Tumori IF is 24.6%.

Journal Impact IF History

Tumori

Journal Impact IF Trend

Year Journal Impact IF
Year Journal Impact IF
2021-2022 Check our Real-Time Impact Factor and Impact Factor Prediction Results
2020-2021 2.098
2019-2020 1.707
2018-2019 1.234
2017-2018 1.304
2016-2017 1.233
2015-2016 1.071
2014-2015 1.269
2013-2014 1.09
2012-2013 0.922
2011-2012 0.606
Journal Impact IF History

· The 2020-2021 Journal Impact IF of Tumori is 2.098
· The 2019-2020 Journal Impact IF of Tumori is 1.707
· The 2018-2019 Journal Impact IF of Tumori is 1.234
· The 2017-2018 Journal Impact IF of Tumori is 1.304
· The 2016-2017 Journal Impact IF of Tumori is 1.233
· The 2015-2016 Journal Impact IF of Tumori is 1.071
· The 2014-2015 Journal Impact IF of Tumori is 1.269
· The 2013-2014 Journal Impact IF of Tumori is 1.09
· The 2012-2013 Journal Impact IF of Tumori is 0.922
· The 2011-2012 Journal Impact IF of Tumori is 0.606

Tumori

Journal Key Metrics
Journal Title Tumori
ISSN 0300-8916
ISSN (Online) 2038-2529
Publisher
Wichtig Publishing Srl
Publication Frequency
Bimonthly
Coverage
1946 - Present
Open Access
NO
Language
Italian
Highest Impact Factor (2011 - 2021) 2.098
Lowest Impact Factor (2011 - 2021) 0.606
Total Impact Factor IF Growth Rate (2011 - 2021) 246.2%
Avarage Impact Factor IF Growth Rate (2011 - 2021) 24.6%
Annual Impact Factor IF Growth Rate (2020 - 2021) 22.9 %
Publication Fee
Homepage
Submit Manuscript

Tumori

Impact Factor 2021-2022 Prediction
Tumori Impact Factor Predition System

Tumori Impact Factor Prediction System is now online. You can start share your valuable insights with the community.

Predict Check All Preditions

What is Impact Factor?

The impact factor (IF) or journal impact factor (JIF) of an academic journal is a scientometric index calculated by Clarivate that reflects the yearly average number of citations of articles published in the last two years in a given journal. It is frequently used as a proxy for the relative importance of a journal within its field; journals with higher impact factor values are often deemed to be more important, or carry more intrinsic prestige in their respective fields, than those with lower values.

Tumori | Academic Accelerator - About the Impact Factor

Impact factor is commonly used to evaluate the relative importance of a journal within its field and to measure the frequency with which the “average article” in a journal has been cited in a particular time period. Journal which publishes more review articles will get highest IFs. Journals with higher IFs believed to be more important than those with lower ones. According to Eugene Garfield “impact simply reflects the ability of the journals and editors to attract the best paper available.” Journal which publishes more review articles will get maximum IFs. The Impact Factor of an academic journal is a scientometric Metric that reflects the yearly average number of citations that recent articles published in a given journal received. It is frequently used as a Metric for the relative importance of a journal within its field; journals with higher Impact Factor are often deemed to be more important than those with lower ones. The Tumori Impact Factor IF measures the average number of citations received in a particular year (2020) by papers published in the Tumori during the two preceding years (2018-2019). Note that 2020 Impact Factor are reported in 2021; they cannot be calculated until all of the 2020 publications have been processed by the indexing agency. New journals, which are indexed from their first published issue, will receive an impact factor after two years of indexing; in this case, the citations to the year prior to Volume 1, and the number of articles published in the year prior to Volume 1, are known zero values. Journals that are indexed starting with a volume other than the first volume will not get an impact factor until they have been indexed for three years. Occasionally, Journal Citation Reports assigns an impact factor to new journals with less than two years of indexing, based on partial citation data. The calculation always uses two complete and known years of item counts, but for new titles one of the known counts is zero. Annuals and other irregular publications sometimes publish no items in a particular year, affecting the count. The impact factor relates to a specific time period; it is possible to calculate it for any desired period. In addition to the 2-year Impact Factor, the 3-year Impact Factor, 4-year Impact Factor, 5-year Impact Factor, Real-Time Impact Factor can provide further insights and factors into the impact of Tumori.

History

The impact factor was devised by Eugene Garfield, the founder of the Institute for Scientific Information (ISI). Impact factors are calculated yearly starting from 1975 for journals listed in the Journal Citation Reports (JCR). ISI was acquired by Thomson Scientific & Healthcare in 1992, and became known as Thomson ISI. In 2018, Thomson ISI was sold to Onex Corporation and Baring Private Equity Asia. They founded a new corporation, Clarivate, which is now the publisher of the JCR.

Use

The impact factor is used to compare different journals within a certain field. The Web of Science indexes more than 11,500 science and social science journals. Journal impact factors are often used to evaluate the merit of individual articles and individual researchers. This use of impact factors was summarised by Hoeffel:

Impact Factor is not a perfect tool to measure the quality of articles but there is nothing better and it has the advantage of already being in existence and is, therefore, a good technique for scientific evaluation. Experience has shown that in each specialty the best journals are those in which it is most difficult to have an article accepted, and these are the journals that have a high impact factor. Most of these journals existed long before the impact factor was devised. The use of impact factor as a measure of quality is widespread because it fits well with the opinion we have in each field of the best journals in our specialty....In conclusion, prestigious journals publish papers of high level. Therefore, their impact factor is high, and not the contrary.

Eugene Garfield

In brief, Impact factors may be used by:
  • Authors to decide where to submit an article for publication.
  • Libraries to make collection development decisions
  • Academic departments to assess academic productivity
  • Academic departments to make decisions on promotion and tenure.
As impact factors are a journal-level metric, rather than an article- or individual-level metric, this use is controversial. Garfield agrees with Hoeffel,but warns about the "misuse in evaluating individuals" because there is "a wide variation [of citations] from article to article within a single journal". Other things to consider about Impact Factors:
  • Many journals do not have an impact factor.
  • The impact factor cannot assess the quality of individual articles. Even if citations were evenly distributed among articles, the impact factor would only measure the interests of other researchers in an article, not its importance and usefulness.
  • Only research articles, technical notes and reviews are “citable” items. Editorials, letters, news items and meeting abstracts are “non-citable items”.
  • Only a small percentage of articles are highly cited and they are found in a small subset of journals. This small proportion accounts for a large percentage of citations.
  • Controversial papers, such as those based on fraudulent data, may be highly cited, distorting the impact factor of a journal.
  • Citation bias may exist. For example, English language resources may be favoured. Authors may cite their own work.
Moreover, informed and careful use of these impact data is essential, and should be based on a thorough understanding of the methodology used to generate impact factors. There are controversial aspects of using impact factors:
  • It is not clear whether the number of times a paper is cited measures its actual quality.
  • Some databases that calculate impact factors fail to incorporate publications including textbooks, handbooks and reference books.
  • Certain disciplines have low numbers of journals and usage. Therefore, one should only compare journals or researchers within the same discipline.
  • Review articles normally are cited more often and therefore can skew results.
  • Self-citing may also skew results.
  • Some resources used to calculate impact factors have inadequate international coverage.
  • Editorial policies can artificially inflate an impact factor.
Impact factors have often been used in advancement and tenure decision-making. Many recognize that this is a coarse tool for such important decisions, and that a multitude of factors should be taken into account in these deliberations. When considering the use of the impact factor (IF), keep these aspects in mind:
  • IF analysis is limited to citations from the journals indexed by the Web of Science/Web of Knowledge. Currently, the Web of Science indexes only 8621 journals across the full breadth of the sciences, and just 3121 in the social sciences.
  • A high IF/citation rate says nothing about the quality -- or even, validity -- of the references being cited. Notorious or even retracted articles often attract a lot of attention, hence a high number of citations. The notority related to the first publication on "cold fusion" is one such example.
  • Journals that publish more "review articles" are often found near the top of the rankings. While not known for publishing new, creative findings, these individual articles tend to be heavily cited.
  • The IF measures the average number of citations to articles in the journal -- given this, a small number of highly-cited articles will skew the figure.
  • It takes several years for new journals to be added to the list of titles indexed by the Web of Science/Web of Knowledge, so these newer titles will be under-represented.
  • It's alleged that journal editors have learned to "game" the system, encouraging authors to cite their works previously published in the same journal.
Comparing Journals Across Disciplines? Not a good idea! Using Impact Factors within a given discipline should only be done with great care, as described above. Using impact factor data to compare journals across disciplines is even more problematic. Here are some of the reasons:
  • Disciplines where older literature is still referenced, such as Chemistry and Mathematics, offer challenges to the methodolgy since older citations (older than two years) are not used to calculate the impact factor for a given journal. (Five-year impact factor analysis, which can be calculated using the Journal Citation Index database, helps smooth out this problem only to some degree.)
  • Different disciplines have different practices regarding tendency to cite larger numbers of references. Higher overall citation rates will bump upward impact factor measurements.
  • Where it's common for large numbers of authors to collaborate on a single paper, such as in Physics, the tendency of authors to cite themselves (and in this case, more authors) will result in increased citation rates.

Pros and Cons of the Impact Factor

Pros:

  • A vetted, established metric for measuring journal impact within a discipline.
  • Designed to eliminate bias based on journal size and frequency.
Cons:
  • Individual articles makes an uneven contribution to overall Impact Factor.
  • Impact Factor does not account for certain things, things like context (postive or negative citaion) and intentionality (self-citation).
  • The metric is proprietary to and bound by the contents of the Thomson Reuters database.
  • Citations, on which the Impact Factor is based, count for less than 1% of an article's overall use.

Criticism

Numerous critiques have been made regarding the use of impact factors. A 2007 study noted that the most fundamental flaw is that impact factors present the mean of data that are not normally distributed, and suggested that it would be more appropriate to present the median of these data. There is also a more general debate on the validity of the impact factor as a measure of journal importance and the effect of policies that editors may adopt to boost their impact factor (perhaps to the detriment of readers and writers). Other criticism focuses on the effect of the impact factor on behavior of scholars, editors and other stakeholders. Others have made more general criticisms, arguing that emphasis on impact factor results from negative influence of neoliberal policies on academia claiming that what is needed is not just replacement of the impact factor with more sophisticated metrics for science publications but also discussion on the social value of research assessment and the growing precariousness of scientific careers in higher education.
Experts stress that there are limitations in using impact factors to evaluate a scholar's work. There are many reasons cited for not relying on impact factor alone to evaluate the output of a particular individual. Among these are the following:

  • A single factor is not sufficient for evaluating an author's work.
  • Journal values are meaningless unless compared within the same discipline. Impact factors vary among disciplines.
  • The impact factor was originally devised to show the impact of a specific journal, not a specific scholar. The quality and impact of the author's work may extend beyond the impact of a particular journal.
According to Jim Testa, a researcher for ThomsonReuters Scientific, the most widespread misuse of the Impact Factor is to evaluate the work of an individual author (instead of a journal). "To say that because a researcher is publishing in a certain journal, he or she is more influential or deserves more credit is not necessarily true. There are many other variables to consider." (interview 6/26/2008 in Thomson Reuters blog entry)

Tumori
Journal Profile

About

Tumori Journal is a peer reviewed journal covering all aspects of cancer science and clinical practice with a strong focus on prevention, translational medicine and clinically relevant reports. We invite the publication of randomized trials and reports on large, consecutive patient series that investigate the real impact of new techniques, drugs and devices in day-to-day clinical practice. State-of-the-art reviews that summarize and critically analyze the clinical, economic, and social consequences of cancer are also welcome. None

ISSN
0300-8916
ISSN

The ISSN of Tumori is 0300-8916 . An ISSN is an 8-digit code used to identify newspapers, journals, magazines and periodicals of all kinds and on all media–print and electronic.

ISSN (Online)
2038-2529
ISSN (Online)

The ISSN (Online) of Tumori is 2038-2529 . An ISSN is an 8-digit code used to identify newspapers, journals, magazines and periodicals of all kinds and on all media–print and electronic.

Publisher
Wichtig Publishing Srl
Publisher

Tumori is published by Wichtig Publishing Srl .

Publication Frequency
Bimonthly
Publication Frequency

Tumori publishes reports Bimonthly .

Coverage
1946 - Present
Coverage

The Publication History of Tumori covers 1946 - Present .

Open Access
NO
Open Access

Publication Fee
Publication Fee

Language
Italian
Language

The language of Tumori is Italian .

Country/Region
Italy
Country/Region

The publisher of Tumori is Wichtig Publishing Srl , which locates in Italy .

International Collaboration Trend

Tumori

Cited Documents Trend

Tumori

Total Publications
11314
Total Citations
60437

Annual Publication Volume

Tumori

Annual Citation Record

Tumori

Publications Cites Dataset

Tumori

Year Publications Citations
Year Publications Citations
1922 1 0
1927 1 0
1930 1 0
1932 1 0
1946 10 0
1947 40 1
1948 29 10
1949 30 22
1950 52 27
1951 42 3
1952 45 52
1953 51 33
1954 64 57
1955 65 70
1956 70 70
1957 52 78
1958 46 50
1959 64 67
1960 37 48
1961 36 50
1962 44 48
1963 37 38
1964 39 63
1965 39 41
1966 44 53
1967 52 87
1968 57 103
1969 56 114
1970 46 78
1971 41 86
1972 126 103
1973 56 94
1974 74 98
1975 93 148
1976 98 109
1977 66 112
1978 74 150
1979 90 212
1980 87 231
1981 100 269
1982 91 355
1983 100 330
1984 103 467
1985 98 393
1986 107 446
1987 112 481
1988 124 468
1989 140 639
1990 129 635
1991 114 635
1992 106 625
1993 99 634
1994 91 596
1995 136 648
1996 141 667
1997 199 783
1998 166 951
1999 183 1066
2000 319 1114
2001 398 1370
2002 409 1346
2003 382 1643
2004 338 1825
2005 303 2020
2006 381 2232
2007 386 2141
2008 422 2120
2009 382 2257
2010 393 2328
2011 373 2566
2012 369 2934
2013 375 3013
2014 354 3166
2015 376 2997
2016 332 2786
2017 272 2508
2018 160 1897
2019 95 2012
2020 197 2283
2021 3 185
Publications Cites Dataset

· The Tumori has published 1 reports and received 0 citations in 1922.
· The Tumori has published 1 reports and received 0 citations in 1927.
· The Tumori has published 1 reports and received 0 citations in 1930.
· The Tumori has published 1 reports and received 0 citations in 1932.
· The Tumori has published 10 reports and received 0 citations in 1946.
· The Tumori has published 40 reports and received 1 citations in 1947.
· The Tumori has published 29 reports and received 10 citations in 1948.
· The Tumori has published 30 reports and received 22 citations in 1949.
· The Tumori has published 52 reports and received 27 citations in 1950.
· The Tumori has published 42 reports and received 3 citations in 1951.
· The Tumori has published 45 reports and received 52 citations in 1952.
· The Tumori has published 51 reports and received 33 citations in 1953.
· The Tumori has published 64 reports and received 57 citations in 1954.
· The Tumori has published 65 reports and received 70 citations in 1955.
· The Tumori has published 70 reports and received 70 citations in 1956.
· The Tumori has published 52 reports and received 78 citations in 1957.
· The Tumori has published 46 reports and received 50 citations in 1958.
· The Tumori has published 64 reports and received 67 citations in 1959.
· The Tumori has published 37 reports and received 48 citations in 1960.
· The Tumori has published 36 reports and received 50 citations in 1961.
· The Tumori has published 44 reports and received 48 citations in 1962.
· The Tumori has published 37 reports and received 38 citations in 1963.
· The Tumori has published 39 reports and received 63 citations in 1964.
· The Tumori has published 39 reports and received 41 citations in 1965.
· The Tumori has published 44 reports and received 53 citations in 1966.
· The Tumori has published 52 reports and received 87 citations in 1967.
· The Tumori has published 57 reports and received 103 citations in 1968.
· The Tumori has published 56 reports and received 114 citations in 1969.
· The Tumori has published 46 reports and received 78 citations in 1970.
· The Tumori has published 41 reports and received 86 citations in 1971.
· The Tumori has published 126 reports and received 103 citations in 1972.
· The Tumori has published 56 reports and received 94 citations in 1973.
· The Tumori has published 74 reports and received 98 citations in 1974.
· The Tumori has published 93 reports and received 148 citations in 1975.
· The Tumori has published 98 reports and received 109 citations in 1976.
· The Tumori has published 66 reports and received 112 citations in 1977.
· The Tumori has published 74 reports and received 150 citations in 1978.
· The Tumori has published 90 reports and received 212 citations in 1979.
· The Tumori has published 87 reports and received 231 citations in 1980.
· The Tumori has published 100 reports and received 269 citations in 1981.
· The Tumori has published 91 reports and received 355 citations in 1982.
· The Tumori has published 100 reports and received 330 citations in 1983.
· The Tumori has published 103 reports and received 467 citations in 1984.
· The Tumori has published 98 reports and received 393 citations in 1985.
· The Tumori has published 107 reports and received 446 citations in 1986.
· The Tumori has published 112 reports and received 481 citations in 1987.
· The Tumori has published 124 reports and received 468 citations in 1988.
· The Tumori has published 140 reports and received 639 citations in 1989.
· The Tumori has published 129 reports and received 635 citations in 1990.
· The Tumori has published 114 reports and received 635 citations in 1991.
· The Tumori has published 106 reports and received 625 citations in 1992.
· The Tumori has published 99 reports and received 634 citations in 1993.
· The Tumori has published 91 reports and received 596 citations in 1994.
· The Tumori has published 136 reports and received 648 citations in 1995.
· The Tumori has published 141 reports and received 667 citations in 1996.
· The Tumori has published 199 reports and received 783 citations in 1997.
· The Tumori has published 166 reports and received 951 citations in 1998.
· The Tumori has published 183 reports and received 1066 citations in 1999.
· The Tumori has published 319 reports and received 1114 citations in 2000.
· The Tumori has published 398 reports and received 1370 citations in 2001.
· The Tumori has published 409 reports and received 1346 citations in 2002.
· The Tumori has published 382 reports and received 1643 citations in 2003.
· The Tumori has published 338 reports and received 1825 citations in 2004.
· The Tumori has published 303 reports and received 2020 citations in 2005.
· The Tumori has published 381 reports and received 2232 citations in 2006.
· The Tumori has published 386 reports and received 2141 citations in 2007.
· The Tumori has published 422 reports and received 2120 citations in 2008.
· The Tumori has published 382 reports and received 2257 citations in 2009.
· The Tumori has published 393 reports and received 2328 citations in 2010.
· The Tumori has published 373 reports and received 2566 citations in 2011.
· The Tumori has published 369 reports and received 2934 citations in 2012.
· The Tumori has published 375 reports and received 3013 citations in 2013.
· The Tumori has published 354 reports and received 3166 citations in 2014.
· The Tumori has published 376 reports and received 2997 citations in 2015.
· The Tumori has published 332 reports and received 2786 citations in 2016.
· The Tumori has published 272 reports and received 2508 citations in 2017.
· The Tumori has published 160 reports and received 1897 citations in 2018.
· The Tumori has published 95 reports and received 2012 citations in 2019.
· The Tumori has published 197 reports and received 2283 citations in 2020.
· The Tumori has published 3 reports and received 185 citations in 2021.
· The total publications of Tumori is 11314.
· The total citations of Tumori is 60437.

Share Your Impact Factor Information with Community

Do you know the Latest Impact Factor of Tumori? Share with the community!

Impact Factor

What is the Latest Impact Factor?

Data Source

Where do you get the information?



Impact Factor Data Source
Impact Factor Data Source
2.098 Letpub

Thanks for sharing your information with us!