Last updated on

New England Journal of Medicine
Latest Impact Factor IF - Analysis · Trend · Prediction · Ranking


User Feedback

Journal Impact IF

2020-2021

91.245

22.2%

Journal Impact IF Trend

Researchain
One-click to visualize your research performance

Researchain
One-click to visualize your research performance

Researchain
One-click to visualize your research performance

Researchain
One-click to visualize your research performance

Popular Journals

Highly Cited Articles

New England Journal of Medicine

High Impact Research Articles
Publication Title Author Listing
Publication Title Author Listing
· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·
· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·
· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·
· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·
· ·
· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·
· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·
· · · · · · · · · · · · · ·
· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·
· ·
· · · · · ·
· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·
· · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·
· ·
· · · · ·
· · · · · · · · · · · · ·
· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·
· ·
· ·
·
· · · · · · · · · · ·
· ·
· · ·
· · · · · · · ·
· · · · ·
·
· · ·
· · ·
· · · ·
·
· · ·
· ·
·
· · · · ·

Highly Cited Keywords

New England Journal of Medicine

High Impact Research Keywords

Journal Impact IF Ranking

New England Journal of Medicine

Journal Impact IF Ranking
Subcategory Quartile Rank Percentile
Medicine (all) Q1 2/793

Medicine (all) 99%

Journal Impact IF Ranking

· In the Medicine (all) research field, the Quartile of New England Journal of Medicine is Q1. New England Journal of Medicine has been ranked #2 over 793 related journals in the Medicine (all) research category. The ranking percentile of New England Journal of Medicine is around 99% in the field of Medicine (all).

Related Journals

New England Journal of Medicine

Similar Journals

New England Journal of Medicine

The 2020-2021 Journal Impact IF of New England Journal of Medicine is 91.245, which is just updated in 2021.

New England Journal of Medicine Impact Factor
Highest IF
91.245
Highest Journal Impact IF

The highest Journal Impact IF of New England Journal of Medicine is 91.245.

Lowest IF
51.658
Lowest Journal Impact IF

The lowest Journal Impact IF of New England Journal of Medicine is 51.658.

Total Growth Rate
71.2%
IF Total Growth Rate

The total growth rate of New England Journal of Medicine IF is 71.2%.

Annual Growth Rate
7.1%
IF Annual Growth Rate

The annual growth rate of New England Journal of Medicine IF is 7.1%.

Journal Impact IF History

New England Journal of Medicine

Journal Impact IF Trend

Year Journal Impact IF
Year Journal Impact IF
2021-2022 Check our Real-Time Impact Factor and Impact Factor Prediction Results
2020-2021 91.245
2019-2020 74.699
2018-2019 70.67
2017-2018 79.26
2016-2017 72.406
2015-2016 59.558
2014-2015 55.873
2013-2014 54.42
2012-2013 51.658
2011-2012 53.298
Journal Impact IF History

· The 2020-2021 Journal Impact IF of New England Journal of Medicine is 91.245
· The 2019-2020 Journal Impact IF of New England Journal of Medicine is 74.699
· The 2018-2019 Journal Impact IF of New England Journal of Medicine is 70.67
· The 2017-2018 Journal Impact IF of New England Journal of Medicine is 79.26
· The 2016-2017 Journal Impact IF of New England Journal of Medicine is 72.406
· The 2015-2016 Journal Impact IF of New England Journal of Medicine is 59.558
· The 2014-2015 Journal Impact IF of New England Journal of Medicine is 55.873
· The 2013-2014 Journal Impact IF of New England Journal of Medicine is 54.42
· The 2012-2013 Journal Impact IF of New England Journal of Medicine is 51.658
· The 2011-2012 Journal Impact IF of New England Journal of Medicine is 53.298

New England Journal of Medicine

Journal Key Metrics
Journal Title New England Journal of Medicine
ISSN 0028-4793
ISSN (Online) 1533-4406
Publisher
Massachussetts Medical Society
Publication Frequency
Weekly
Coverage
1945 - Present
Open Access
NO
Language
English
Highest Impact Factor (2011 - 2021) 91.245
Lowest Impact Factor (2011 - 2021) 51.658
Total Impact Factor IF Growth Rate (2011 - 2021) 71.2%
Avarage Impact Factor IF Growth Rate (2011 - 2021) 7.1%
Annual Impact Factor IF Growth Rate (2020 - 2021) 22.2 %
Publication Fee
Homepage
Submit Manuscript
Wikipedia

New England Journal of Medicine

Impact Factor 2021-2022 Prediction
New England Journal of Medicine Impact Factor Predition System

New England Journal of Medicine Impact Factor Prediction System is now online. You can start share your valuable insights with the community.

Predict Check All Preditions

What is Impact Factor?

The impact factor (IF) or journal impact factor (JIF) of an academic journal is a scientometric index calculated by Clarivate that reflects the yearly average number of citations of articles published in the last two years in a given journal. It is frequently used as a proxy for the relative importance of a journal within its field; journals with higher impact factor values are often deemed to be more important, or carry more intrinsic prestige in their respective fields, than those with lower values.

New England Journal of Medicine | Academic Accelerator - About the Impact Factor

Impact factor is commonly used to evaluate the relative importance of a journal within its field and to measure the frequency with which the “average article” in a journal has been cited in a particular time period. Journal which publishes more review articles will get highest IFs. Journals with higher IFs believed to be more important than those with lower ones. According to Eugene Garfield “impact simply reflects the ability of the journals and editors to attract the best paper available.” Journal which publishes more review articles will get maximum IFs. The Impact Factor of an academic journal is a scientometric Metric that reflects the yearly average number of citations that recent articles published in a given journal received. It is frequently used as a Metric for the relative importance of a journal within its field; journals with higher Impact Factor are often deemed to be more important than those with lower ones. The New England Journal of Medicine Impact Factor IF measures the average number of citations received in a particular year (2020) by papers published in the New England Journal of Medicine during the two preceding years (2018-2019). Note that 2020 Impact Factor are reported in 2021; they cannot be calculated until all of the 2020 publications have been processed by the indexing agency. New journals, which are indexed from their first published issue, will receive an impact factor after two years of indexing; in this case, the citations to the year prior to Volume 1, and the number of articles published in the year prior to Volume 1, are known zero values. Journals that are indexed starting with a volume other than the first volume will not get an impact factor until they have been indexed for three years. Occasionally, Journal Citation Reports assigns an impact factor to new journals with less than two years of indexing, based on partial citation data. The calculation always uses two complete and known years of item counts, but for new titles one of the known counts is zero. Annuals and other irregular publications sometimes publish no items in a particular year, affecting the count. The impact factor relates to a specific time period; it is possible to calculate it for any desired period. In addition to the 2-year Impact Factor, the 3-year Impact Factor, 4-year Impact Factor, 5-year Impact Factor, Real-Time Impact Factor can provide further insights and factors into the impact of New England Journal of Medicine.

History

The impact factor was devised by Eugene Garfield, the founder of the Institute for Scientific Information (ISI). Impact factors are calculated yearly starting from 1975 for journals listed in the Journal Citation Reports (JCR). ISI was acquired by Thomson Scientific & Healthcare in 1992, and became known as Thomson ISI. In 2018, Thomson ISI was sold to Onex Corporation and Baring Private Equity Asia. They founded a new corporation, Clarivate, which is now the publisher of the JCR.

Use

The impact factor is used to compare different journals within a certain field. The Web of Science indexes more than 11,500 science and social science journals. Journal impact factors are often used to evaluate the merit of individual articles and individual researchers. This use of impact factors was summarised by Hoeffel:

Impact Factor is not a perfect tool to measure the quality of articles but there is nothing better and it has the advantage of already being in existence and is, therefore, a good technique for scientific evaluation. Experience has shown that in each specialty the best journals are those in which it is most difficult to have an article accepted, and these are the journals that have a high impact factor. Most of these journals existed long before the impact factor was devised. The use of impact factor as a measure of quality is widespread because it fits well with the opinion we have in each field of the best journals in our specialty....In conclusion, prestigious journals publish papers of high level. Therefore, their impact factor is high, and not the contrary.

Eugene Garfield

In brief, Impact factors may be used by:
  • Authors to decide where to submit an article for publication.
  • Libraries to make collection development decisions
  • Academic departments to assess academic productivity
  • Academic departments to make decisions on promotion and tenure.
As impact factors are a journal-level metric, rather than an article- or individual-level metric, this use is controversial. Garfield agrees with Hoeffel,but warns about the "misuse in evaluating individuals" because there is "a wide variation [of citations] from article to article within a single journal". Other things to consider about Impact Factors:
  • Many journals do not have an impact factor.
  • The impact factor cannot assess the quality of individual articles. Even if citations were evenly distributed among articles, the impact factor would only measure the interests of other researchers in an article, not its importance and usefulness.
  • Only research articles, technical notes and reviews are “citable” items. Editorials, letters, news items and meeting abstracts are “non-citable items”.
  • Only a small percentage of articles are highly cited and they are found in a small subset of journals. This small proportion accounts for a large percentage of citations.
  • Controversial papers, such as those based on fraudulent data, may be highly cited, distorting the impact factor of a journal.
  • Citation bias may exist. For example, English language resources may be favoured. Authors may cite their own work.
Moreover, informed and careful use of these impact data is essential, and should be based on a thorough understanding of the methodology used to generate impact factors. There are controversial aspects of using impact factors:
  • It is not clear whether the number of times a paper is cited measures its actual quality.
  • Some databases that calculate impact factors fail to incorporate publications including textbooks, handbooks and reference books.
  • Certain disciplines have low numbers of journals and usage. Therefore, one should only compare journals or researchers within the same discipline.
  • Review articles normally are cited more often and therefore can skew results.
  • Self-citing may also skew results.
  • Some resources used to calculate impact factors have inadequate international coverage.
  • Editorial policies can artificially inflate an impact factor.
Impact factors have often been used in advancement and tenure decision-making. Many recognize that this is a coarse tool for such important decisions, and that a multitude of factors should be taken into account in these deliberations. When considering the use of the impact factor (IF), keep these aspects in mind:
  • IF analysis is limited to citations from the journals indexed by the Web of Science/Web of Knowledge. Currently, the Web of Science indexes only 8621 journals across the full breadth of the sciences, and just 3121 in the social sciences.
  • A high IF/citation rate says nothing about the quality -- or even, validity -- of the references being cited. Notorious or even retracted articles often attract a lot of attention, hence a high number of citations. The notority related to the first publication on "cold fusion" is one such example.
  • Journals that publish more "review articles" are often found near the top of the rankings. While not known for publishing new, creative findings, these individual articles tend to be heavily cited.
  • The IF measures the average number of citations to articles in the journal -- given this, a small number of highly-cited articles will skew the figure.
  • It takes several years for new journals to be added to the list of titles indexed by the Web of Science/Web of Knowledge, so these newer titles will be under-represented.
  • It's alleged that journal editors have learned to "game" the system, encouraging authors to cite their works previously published in the same journal.
Comparing Journals Across Disciplines? Not a good idea! Using Impact Factors within a given discipline should only be done with great care, as described above. Using impact factor data to compare journals across disciplines is even more problematic. Here are some of the reasons:
  • Disciplines where older literature is still referenced, such as Chemistry and Mathematics, offer challenges to the methodolgy since older citations (older than two years) are not used to calculate the impact factor for a given journal. (Five-year impact factor analysis, which can be calculated using the Journal Citation Index database, helps smooth out this problem only to some degree.)
  • Different disciplines have different practices regarding tendency to cite larger numbers of references. Higher overall citation rates will bump upward impact factor measurements.
  • Where it's common for large numbers of authors to collaborate on a single paper, such as in Physics, the tendency of authors to cite themselves (and in this case, more authors) will result in increased citation rates.

Pros and Cons of the Impact Factor

Pros:

  • A vetted, established metric for measuring journal impact within a discipline.
  • Designed to eliminate bias based on journal size and frequency.
Cons:
  • Individual articles makes an uneven contribution to overall Impact Factor.
  • Impact Factor does not account for certain things, things like context (postive or negative citaion) and intentionality (self-citation).
  • The metric is proprietary to and bound by the contents of the Thomson Reuters database.
  • Citations, on which the Impact Factor is based, count for less than 1% of an article's overall use.

Criticism

Numerous critiques have been made regarding the use of impact factors. A 2007 study noted that the most fundamental flaw is that impact factors present the mean of data that are not normally distributed, and suggested that it would be more appropriate to present the median of these data. There is also a more general debate on the validity of the impact factor as a measure of journal importance and the effect of policies that editors may adopt to boost their impact factor (perhaps to the detriment of readers and writers). Other criticism focuses on the effect of the impact factor on behavior of scholars, editors and other stakeholders. Others have made more general criticisms, arguing that emphasis on impact factor results from negative influence of neoliberal policies on academia claiming that what is needed is not just replacement of the impact factor with more sophisticated metrics for science publications but also discussion on the social value of research assessment and the growing precariousness of scientific careers in higher education.
Experts stress that there are limitations in using impact factors to evaluate a scholar's work. There are many reasons cited for not relying on impact factor alone to evaluate the output of a particular individual. Among these are the following:

  • A single factor is not sufficient for evaluating an author's work.
  • Journal values are meaningless unless compared within the same discipline. Impact factors vary among disciplines.
  • The impact factor was originally devised to show the impact of a specific journal, not a specific scholar. The quality and impact of the author's work may extend beyond the impact of a particular journal.
According to Jim Testa, a researcher for ThomsonReuters Scientific, the most widespread misuse of the Impact Factor is to evaluate the work of an individual author (instead of a journal). "To say that because a researcher is publishing in a certain journal, he or she is more influential or deserves more credit is not necessarily true. There are many other variables to consider." (interview 6/26/2008 in Thomson Reuters blog entry)

New England Journal of Medicine
Journal Profile

About

The New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) is the world’s leading medical journal and website. Published continuously for over 200 years, NEJM delivers high-quality, peer-reviewed research and interactive clinical content to physicians, educators, and the global medical community. Our mission is to bring physicians the best research and information at the intersection of biomedical science and clinical practice and to present this information in understandable and clinically useful formats that inform health care delivery and improve patient outcomes. The New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) is a weekly medical journal published by the Massachusetts Medical Society. It is among the most prestigious peer-reviewed medical journals as well as the oldest continuously published one.

ISSN
0028-4793
ISSN

The ISSN of New England Journal of Medicine is 0028-4793 . An ISSN is an 8-digit code used to identify newspapers, journals, magazines and periodicals of all kinds and on all media–print and electronic.

ISSN (Online)
1533-4406
ISSN (Online)

The ISSN (Online) of New England Journal of Medicine is 1533-4406 . An ISSN is an 8-digit code used to identify newspapers, journals, magazines and periodicals of all kinds and on all media–print and electronic.

Publisher
Massachussetts Medical Society
Publisher

New England Journal of Medicine is published by Massachussetts Medical Society .

Publication Frequency
Weekly
Publication Frequency

New England Journal of Medicine publishes reports Weekly .

Coverage
1945 - Present
Coverage

The Publication History of New England Journal of Medicine covers 1945 - Present .

Open Access
NO
Open Access

Publication Fee
Publication Fee

Language
English
Language

The language of New England Journal of Medicine is English .

Country/Region
United States
Country/Region

The publisher of New England Journal of Medicine is Massachussetts Medical Society , which locates in United States .

International Collaboration Trend

New England Journal of Medicine

Cited Documents Trend

New England Journal of Medicine

Total Publications
100463
Total Citations
11644675

Annual Publication Volume

New England Journal of Medicine

Annual Citation Record

New England Journal of Medicine

Publications Cites Dataset

New England Journal of Medicine

Year Publications Citations
Year Publications Citations
1922 225 71
1923 246 85
1924 247 94
1925 264 167
1926 334 159
1927 343 184
1928 420 199
1929 412 253
1930 431 222
1931 431 305
1932 379 384
1933 401 414
1934 315 412
1935 280 507
1936 271 627
1937 230 609
1938 233 668
1939 214 800
1940 219 682
1941 231 782
1942 230 693
1943 174 620
1944 165 667
1945 163 662
1946 284 708
1947 288 1059
1948 312 1301
1949 331 1514
1950 245 1936
1951 304 2032
1952 331 2081
1953 340 2423
1954 353 2500
1955 359 2874
1956 445 3150
1957 457 3255
1958 449 4002
1959 455 4612
1960 482 5553
1961 572 5462
1962 564 6329
1963 608 6535
1964 624 7159
1965 585 8573
1966 598 9486
1967 573 10760
1968 971 11720
1969 1168 12565
1970 1332 14180
1971 1265 16806
1972 1281 19557
1973 1329 21839
1974 1375 25000
1975 1219 26855
1976 1313 31272
1977 1143 34029
1978 1095 38339
1979 1381 41174
1980 1529 45407
1981 1377 48349
1982 1376 52654
1983 1388 59273
1984 1385 64036
1985 1318 67538
1986 1270 70853
1987 1170 77756
1988 1176 82638
1989 1193 90238
1990 1269 94589
1991 1225 100621
1992 1411 105137
1993 1476 108958
1994 1438 113900
1995 1253 126996
1996 1278 138941
1997 1340 155620
1998 1295 174484
1999 1346 190044
2000 1365 213757
2001 1188 230364
2002 1469 247115
2003 1529 278453
2004 1579 303996
2005 1567 331712
2006 1587 368570
2007 1565 389840
2008 1465 418312
2009 1502 453788
2010 1350 471051
2011 1312 507255
2012 1231 540320
2013 1337 564620
2014 1251 572510
2015 1237 576633
2016 1273 557358
2017 1176 560359
2018 1146 465767
2019 1124 497157
2020 1384 680703
2021 59 49322
Publications Cites Dataset

· The New England Journal of Medicine has published 225 reports and received 71 citations in 1922.
· The New England Journal of Medicine has published 246 reports and received 85 citations in 1923.
· The New England Journal of Medicine has published 247 reports and received 94 citations in 1924.
· The New England Journal of Medicine has published 264 reports and received 167 citations in 1925.
· The New England Journal of Medicine has published 334 reports and received 159 citations in 1926.
· The New England Journal of Medicine has published 343 reports and received 184 citations in 1927.
· The New England Journal of Medicine has published 420 reports and received 199 citations in 1928.
· The New England Journal of Medicine has published 412 reports and received 253 citations in 1929.
· The New England Journal of Medicine has published 431 reports and received 222 citations in 1930.
· The New England Journal of Medicine has published 431 reports and received 305 citations in 1931.
· The New England Journal of Medicine has published 379 reports and received 384 citations in 1932.
· The New England Journal of Medicine has published 401 reports and received 414 citations in 1933.
· The New England Journal of Medicine has published 315 reports and received 412 citations in 1934.
· The New England Journal of Medicine has published 280 reports and received 507 citations in 1935.
· The New England Journal of Medicine has published 271 reports and received 627 citations in 1936.
· The New England Journal of Medicine has published 230 reports and received 609 citations in 1937.
· The New England Journal of Medicine has published 233 reports and received 668 citations in 1938.
· The New England Journal of Medicine has published 214 reports and received 800 citations in 1939.
· The New England Journal of Medicine has published 219 reports and received 682 citations in 1940.
· The New England Journal of Medicine has published 231 reports and received 782 citations in 1941.
· The New England Journal of Medicine has published 230 reports and received 693 citations in 1942.
· The New England Journal of Medicine has published 174 reports and received 620 citations in 1943.
· The New England Journal of Medicine has published 165 reports and received 667 citations in 1944.
· The New England Journal of Medicine has published 163 reports and received 662 citations in 1945.
· The New England Journal of Medicine has published 284 reports and received 708 citations in 1946.
· The New England Journal of Medicine has published 288 reports and received 1059 citations in 1947.
· The New England Journal of Medicine has published 312 reports and received 1301 citations in 1948.
· The New England Journal of Medicine has published 331 reports and received 1514 citations in 1949.
· The New England Journal of Medicine has published 245 reports and received 1936 citations in 1950.
· The New England Journal of Medicine has published 304 reports and received 2032 citations in 1951.
· The New England Journal of Medicine has published 331 reports and received 2081 citations in 1952.
· The New England Journal of Medicine has published 340 reports and received 2423 citations in 1953.
· The New England Journal of Medicine has published 353 reports and received 2500 citations in 1954.
· The New England Journal of Medicine has published 359 reports and received 2874 citations in 1955.
· The New England Journal of Medicine has published 445 reports and received 3150 citations in 1956.
· The New England Journal of Medicine has published 457 reports and received 3255 citations in 1957.
· The New England Journal of Medicine has published 449 reports and received 4002 citations in 1958.
· The New England Journal of Medicine has published 455 reports and received 4612 citations in 1959.
· The New England Journal of Medicine has published 482 reports and received 5553 citations in 1960.
· The New England Journal of Medicine has published 572 reports and received 5462 citations in 1961.
· The New England Journal of Medicine has published 564 reports and received 6329 citations in 1962.
· The New England Journal of Medicine has published 608 reports and received 6535 citations in 1963.
· The New England Journal of Medicine has published 624 reports and received 7159 citations in 1964.
· The New England Journal of Medicine has published 585 reports and received 8573 citations in 1965.
· The New England Journal of Medicine has published 598 reports and received 9486 citations in 1966.
· The New England Journal of Medicine has published 573 reports and received 10760 citations in 1967.
· The New England Journal of Medicine has published 971 reports and received 11720 citations in 1968.
· The New England Journal of Medicine has published 1168 reports and received 12565 citations in 1969.
· The New England Journal of Medicine has published 1332 reports and received 14180 citations in 1970.
· The New England Journal of Medicine has published 1265 reports and received 16806 citations in 1971.
· The New England Journal of Medicine has published 1281 reports and received 19557 citations in 1972.
· The New England Journal of Medicine has published 1329 reports and received 21839 citations in 1973.
· The New England Journal of Medicine has published 1375 reports and received 25000 citations in 1974.
· The New England Journal of Medicine has published 1219 reports and received 26855 citations in 1975.
· The New England Journal of Medicine has published 1313 reports and received 31272 citations in 1976.
· The New England Journal of Medicine has published 1143 reports and received 34029 citations in 1977.
· The New England Journal of Medicine has published 1095 reports and received 38339 citations in 1978.
· The New England Journal of Medicine has published 1381 reports and received 41174 citations in 1979.
· The New England Journal of Medicine has published 1529 reports and received 45407 citations in 1980.
· The New England Journal of Medicine has published 1377 reports and received 48349 citations in 1981.
· The New England Journal of Medicine has published 1376 reports and received 52654 citations in 1982.
· The New England Journal of Medicine has published 1388 reports and received 59273 citations in 1983.
· The New England Journal of Medicine has published 1385 reports and received 64036 citations in 1984.
· The New England Journal of Medicine has published 1318 reports and received 67538 citations in 1985.
· The New England Journal of Medicine has published 1270 reports and received 70853 citations in 1986.
· The New England Journal of Medicine has published 1170 reports and received 77756 citations in 1987.
· The New England Journal of Medicine has published 1176 reports and received 82638 citations in 1988.
· The New England Journal of Medicine has published 1193 reports and received 90238 citations in 1989.
· The New England Journal of Medicine has published 1269 reports and received 94589 citations in 1990.
· The New England Journal of Medicine has published 1225 reports and received 100621 citations in 1991.
· The New England Journal of Medicine has published 1411 reports and received 105137 citations in 1992.
· The New England Journal of Medicine has published 1476 reports and received 108958 citations in 1993.
· The New England Journal of Medicine has published 1438 reports and received 113900 citations in 1994.
· The New England Journal of Medicine has published 1253 reports and received 126996 citations in 1995.
· The New England Journal of Medicine has published 1278 reports and received 138941 citations in 1996.
· The New England Journal of Medicine has published 1340 reports and received 155620 citations in 1997.
· The New England Journal of Medicine has published 1295 reports and received 174484 citations in 1998.
· The New England Journal of Medicine has published 1346 reports and received 190044 citations in 1999.
· The New England Journal of Medicine has published 1365 reports and received 213757 citations in 2000.
· The New England Journal of Medicine has published 1188 reports and received 230364 citations in 2001.
· The New England Journal of Medicine has published 1469 reports and received 247115 citations in 2002.
· The New England Journal of Medicine has published 1529 reports and received 278453 citations in 2003.
· The New England Journal of Medicine has published 1579 reports and received 303996 citations in 2004.
· The New England Journal of Medicine has published 1567 reports and received 331712 citations in 2005.
· The New England Journal of Medicine has published 1587 reports and received 368570 citations in 2006.
· The New England Journal of Medicine has published 1565 reports and received 389840 citations in 2007.
· The New England Journal of Medicine has published 1465 reports and received 418312 citations in 2008.
· The New England Journal of Medicine has published 1502 reports and received 453788 citations in 2009.
· The New England Journal of Medicine has published 1350 reports and received 471051 citations in 2010.
· The New England Journal of Medicine has published 1312 reports and received 507255 citations in 2011.
· The New England Journal of Medicine has published 1231 reports and received 540320 citations in 2012.
· The New England Journal of Medicine has published 1337 reports and received 564620 citations in 2013.
· The New England Journal of Medicine has published 1251 reports and received 572510 citations in 2014.
· The New England Journal of Medicine has published 1237 reports and received 576633 citations in 2015.
· The New England Journal of Medicine has published 1273 reports and received 557358 citations in 2016.
· The New England Journal of Medicine has published 1176 reports and received 560359 citations in 2017.
· The New England Journal of Medicine has published 1146 reports and received 465767 citations in 2018.
· The New England Journal of Medicine has published 1124 reports and received 497157 citations in 2019.
· The New England Journal of Medicine has published 1384 reports and received 680703 citations in 2020.
· The New England Journal of Medicine has published 59 reports and received 49322 citations in 2021.
· The total publications of New England Journal of Medicine is 100463.
· The total citations of New England Journal of Medicine is 11644675.

Share Your Impact Factor Information with Community

Do you know the Latest Impact Factor of New England Journal of Medicine? Share with the community!

Impact Factor

What is the Latest Impact Factor?

Data Source

Where do you get the information?



Impact Factor Data Source
Impact Factor Data Source
91.245 Baidu

Thanks for sharing your information with us!