Seminars in Perinatology
Journal Impact IF - Analysis · Trend · Prediction · Ranking


New

Journal Impact IF

2019-2020

3.231

12.1%

Journal Impact IF Trend

Related Journals

Popular Journals

Seminars in Perinatology

The 2019-2020 Journal Impact IF of Seminars in Perinatology is 3.231, which is just updated in 2020.

Seminars in Perinatology Impact Factor
Highest IF
3.231
Highest Journal Impact IF

The highest Journal Impact IF of Seminars in Perinatology is 3.231.

Lowest IF
2.131
Lowest Journal Impact IF

The lowest Journal Impact IF of Seminars in Perinatology is 2.131.

Total Growth Rate
8.1%
IF Total Growth Rate

The total growth rate of Seminars in Perinatology IF is 8.1%.

Annual Growth Rate
0.9%
IF Annual Growth Rate

The annual growth rate of Seminars in Perinatology IF is 0.9%.

Journal Impact IF Ranking

Subcategory Quartile Rank Percentile
Obstetrics and Gynecology Q1 25/171

Obstetrics and Gynecology 85%

Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health Q1 29/286

Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 90%

Journal Impact IF Ranking

· In the Obstetrics and Gynecology research field, the Quartile of Seminars in Perinatology is Q1. Seminars in Perinatology has been ranked #25 over 171 related journals in the Obstetrics and Gynecology research category. The ranking percentile of Seminars in Perinatology is around 85% in the field of Obstetrics and Gynecology.
· In the Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health research field, the Quartile of Seminars in Perinatology is Q1. Seminars in Perinatology has been ranked #29 over 286 related journals in the Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health research category. The ranking percentile of Seminars in Perinatology is around 90% in the field of Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health.

Seminars in Perinatology Impact Factor 2020-2021 Prediction

Seminars in Perinatology Impact Factor Predition System

Seminars in Perinatology Impact Factor Prediction System is now online. You can start share your valuable insights with the community.

Predict Check All Preditions
Total Publications
2331
Total Citations
88826

Annual Publication Volume

Annual Citation Record

International Collaboration Trend

Cited Documents Trend

Journal Impact IF History

Year Journal Impact IF
Year Journal Impact IF
2019-2020 3.231
2018-2019 2.883
2017-2018 2.885
2016-2017 3.185
2015-2016 2.131
2014-2015 2.682
2013-2014 2.42
2012-2013 2.814
2011-2012 2.99
Journal Impact IF History

· The 2019-2020 Journal Impact IF of Seminars in Perinatology is 3.231
· The 2018-2019 Journal Impact IF of Seminars in Perinatology is 2.883
· The 2017-2018 Journal Impact IF of Seminars in Perinatology is 2.885
· The 2016-2017 Journal Impact IF of Seminars in Perinatology is 3.185
· The 2015-2016 Journal Impact IF of Seminars in Perinatology is 2.131
· The 2014-2015 Journal Impact IF of Seminars in Perinatology is 2.682
· The 2013-2014 Journal Impact IF of Seminars in Perinatology is 2.42
· The 2012-2013 Journal Impact IF of Seminars in Perinatology is 2.814
· The 2011-2012 Journal Impact IF of Seminars in Perinatology is 2.99

Publications Cites Dataset

Year Publications Citations
Year Publications Citations
1977 38 0
1978 33 9
1979 32 34
1980 33 96
1981 43 168
1982 36 196
1983 36 280
1984 28 304
1985 24 356
1986 34 359
1987 44 350
1988 37 420
1989 51 438
1990 57 482
1991 75 583
1992 43 572
1993 42 605
1994 46 684
1995 53 635
1996 58 766
1997 50 718
1998 46 1010
1999 52 994
2000 54 1297
2001 49 1613
2002 57 1602
2003 52 1862
2004 50 2069
2005 57 2261
2006 52 2378
2007 50 2902
2008 70 3387
2009 53 3795
2010 57 3926
2011 57 4601
2012 72 5013
2013 69 5287
2014 74 5447
2015 82 5283
2016 74 5043
2017 76 5666
2018 62 4383
2019 75 4821
2020 82 5712
2021 16 419
Publications Cites Dataset

· The Seminars in Perinatology has published 38 reports and received 0 citations in 1977.
· The Seminars in Perinatology has published 33 reports and received 9 citations in 1978.
· The Seminars in Perinatology has published 32 reports and received 34 citations in 1979.
· The Seminars in Perinatology has published 33 reports and received 96 citations in 1980.
· The Seminars in Perinatology has published 43 reports and received 168 citations in 1981.
· The Seminars in Perinatology has published 36 reports and received 196 citations in 1982.
· The Seminars in Perinatology has published 36 reports and received 280 citations in 1983.
· The Seminars in Perinatology has published 28 reports and received 304 citations in 1984.
· The Seminars in Perinatology has published 24 reports and received 356 citations in 1985.
· The Seminars in Perinatology has published 34 reports and received 359 citations in 1986.
· The Seminars in Perinatology has published 44 reports and received 350 citations in 1987.
· The Seminars in Perinatology has published 37 reports and received 420 citations in 1988.
· The Seminars in Perinatology has published 51 reports and received 438 citations in 1989.
· The Seminars in Perinatology has published 57 reports and received 482 citations in 1990.
· The Seminars in Perinatology has published 75 reports and received 583 citations in 1991.
· The Seminars in Perinatology has published 43 reports and received 572 citations in 1992.
· The Seminars in Perinatology has published 42 reports and received 605 citations in 1993.
· The Seminars in Perinatology has published 46 reports and received 684 citations in 1994.
· The Seminars in Perinatology has published 53 reports and received 635 citations in 1995.
· The Seminars in Perinatology has published 58 reports and received 766 citations in 1996.
· The Seminars in Perinatology has published 50 reports and received 718 citations in 1997.
· The Seminars in Perinatology has published 46 reports and received 1010 citations in 1998.
· The Seminars in Perinatology has published 52 reports and received 994 citations in 1999.
· The Seminars in Perinatology has published 54 reports and received 1297 citations in 2000.
· The Seminars in Perinatology has published 49 reports and received 1613 citations in 2001.
· The Seminars in Perinatology has published 57 reports and received 1602 citations in 2002.
· The Seminars in Perinatology has published 52 reports and received 1862 citations in 2003.
· The Seminars in Perinatology has published 50 reports and received 2069 citations in 2004.
· The Seminars in Perinatology has published 57 reports and received 2261 citations in 2005.
· The Seminars in Perinatology has published 52 reports and received 2378 citations in 2006.
· The Seminars in Perinatology has published 50 reports and received 2902 citations in 2007.
· The Seminars in Perinatology has published 70 reports and received 3387 citations in 2008.
· The Seminars in Perinatology has published 53 reports and received 3795 citations in 2009.
· The Seminars in Perinatology has published 57 reports and received 3926 citations in 2010.
· The Seminars in Perinatology has published 57 reports and received 4601 citations in 2011.
· The Seminars in Perinatology has published 72 reports and received 5013 citations in 2012.
· The Seminars in Perinatology has published 69 reports and received 5287 citations in 2013.
· The Seminars in Perinatology has published 74 reports and received 5447 citations in 2014.
· The Seminars in Perinatology has published 82 reports and received 5283 citations in 2015.
· The Seminars in Perinatology has published 74 reports and received 5043 citations in 2016.
· The Seminars in Perinatology has published 76 reports and received 5666 citations in 2017.
· The Seminars in Perinatology has published 62 reports and received 4383 citations in 2018.
· The Seminars in Perinatology has published 75 reports and received 4821 citations in 2019.
· The Seminars in Perinatology has published 82 reports and received 5712 citations in 2020.
· The Seminars in Perinatology has published 16 reports and received 419 citations in 2021.
· The total publications of Seminars in Perinatology is 2331.
· The total citations of Seminars in Perinatology is 88826.

What is Impact Factor?

The impact factor (IF) or journal impact factor (JIF) of an academic journal is a scientometric index calculated by Clarivate that reflects the yearly average number of citations of articles published in the last two years in a given journal. It is frequently used as a proxy for the relative importance of a journal within its field; journals with higher impact factor values are often deemed to be more important, or carry more intrinsic prestige in their respective fields, than those with lower values.

Seminars in Perinatology | Academic Accelerator - About the Impact Factor

Impact factor is commonly used to evaluate the relative importance of a journal within its field and to measure the frequency with which the “average article” in a journal has been cited in a particular time period. Journal which publishes more review articles will get highest IFs. Journals with higher IFs believed to be more important than those with lower ones. According to Eugene Garfield “impact simply reflects the ability of the journals and editors to attract the best paper available.” Journal which publishes more review articles will get maximum IFs. The Impact Factor of an academic journal is a scientometric Metric that reflects the yearly average number of citations that recent articles published in a given journal received. It is frequently used as a Metric for the relative importance of a journal within its field; journals with higher Impact Factor are often deemed to be more important than those with lower ones. The Seminars in Perinatology Impact Factor IF measures the average number of citations received in a particular year (2020) by papers published in the Seminars in Perinatology during the two preceding years (2018-2019). Note that 2020 Impact Factor are reported in 2021; they cannot be calculated until all of the 2020 publications have been processed by the indexing agency. New journals, which are indexed from their first published issue, will receive an impact factor after two years of indexing; in this case, the citations to the year prior to Volume 1, and the number of articles published in the year prior to Volume 1, are known zero values. Journals that are indexed starting with a volume other than the first volume will not get an impact factor until they have been indexed for three years. Occasionally, Journal Citation Reports assigns an impact factor to new journals with less than two years of indexing, based on partial citation data. The calculation always uses two complete and known years of item counts, but for new titles one of the known counts is zero. Annuals and other irregular publications sometimes publish no items in a particular year, affecting the count. The impact factor relates to a specific time period; it is possible to calculate it for any desired period. In addition to the 2-year Impact Factor, the 3-year Impact Factor, 4-year Impact Factor, 5-year Impact Factor, Real-Time Impact Factor can provide further insights and factors into the impact of Seminars in Perinatology.

History

The impact factor was devised by Eugene Garfield, the founder of the Institute for Scientific Information (ISI). Impact factors are calculated yearly starting from 1975 for journals listed in the Journal Citation Reports (JCR). ISI was acquired by Thomson Scientific & Healthcare in 1992, and became known as Thomson ISI. In 2018, Thomson ISI was sold to Onex Corporation and Baring Private Equity Asia. They founded a new corporation, Clarivate, which is now the publisher of the JCR.

Use

The impact factor is used to compare different journals within a certain field. The Web of Science indexes more than 11,500 science and social science journals. Journal impact factors are often used to evaluate the merit of individual articles and individual researchers. This use of impact factors was summarised by Hoeffel:

Impact Factor is not a perfect tool to measure the quality of articles but there is nothing better and it has the advantage of already being in existence and is, therefore, a good technique for scientific evaluation. Experience has shown that in each specialty the best journals are those in which it is most difficult to have an article accepted, and these are the journals that have a high impact factor. Most of these journals existed long before the impact factor was devised. The use of impact factor as a measure of quality is widespread because it fits well with the opinion we have in each field of the best journals in our specialty....In conclusion, prestigious journals publish papers of high level. Therefore, their impact factor is high, and not the contrary.

Eugene Garfield

In brief, Impact factors may be used by:
  • Authors to decide where to submit an article for publication.
  • Libraries to make collection development decisions
  • Academic departments to assess academic productivity
  • Academic departments to make decisions on promotion and tenure.
As impact factors are a journal-level metric, rather than an article- or individual-level metric, this use is controversial. Garfield agrees with Hoeffel,but warns about the "misuse in evaluating individuals" because there is "a wide variation [of citations] from article to article within a single journal". Other things to consider about Impact Factors:
  • Many journals do not have an impact factor.
  • The impact factor cannot assess the quality of individual articles. Even if citations were evenly distributed among articles, the impact factor would only measure the interests of other researchers in an article, not its importance and usefulness.
  • Only research articles, technical notes and reviews are “citable” items. Editorials, letters, news items and meeting abstracts are “non-citable items”.
  • Only a small percentage of articles are highly cited and they are found in a small subset of journals. This small proportion accounts for a large percentage of citations.
  • Controversial papers, such as those based on fraudulent data, may be highly cited, distorting the impact factor of a journal.
  • Citation bias may exist. For example, English language resources may be favoured. Authors may cite their own work.
Moreover, informed and careful use of these impact data is essential, and should be based on a thorough understanding of the methodology used to generate impact factors. There are controversial aspects of using impact factors:
  • It is not clear whether the number of times a paper is cited measures its actual quality.
  • Some databases that calculate impact factors fail to incorporate publications including textbooks, handbooks and reference books.
  • Certain disciplines have low numbers of journals and usage. Therefore, one should only compare journals or researchers within the same discipline.
  • Review articles normally are cited more often and therefore can skew results.
  • Self-citing may also skew results.
  • Some resources used to calculate impact factors have inadequate international coverage.
  • Editorial policies can artificially inflate an impact factor.
Impact factors have often been used in advancement and tenure decision-making. Many recognize that this is a coarse tool for such important decisions, and that a multitude of factors should be taken into account in these deliberations. When considering the use of the impact factor (IF), keep these aspects in mind:
  • IF analysis is limited to citations from the journals indexed by the Web of Science/Web of Knowledge. Currently, the Web of Science indexes only 8621 journals across the full breadth of the sciences, and just 3121 in the social sciences.
  • A high IF/citation rate says nothing about the quality -- or even, validity -- of the references being cited. Notorious or even retracted articles often attract a lot of attention, hence a high number of citations. The notority related to the first publication on "cold fusion" is one such example.
  • Journals that publish more "review articles" are often found near the top of the rankings. While not known for publishing new, creative findings, these individual articles tend to be heavily cited.
  • The IF measures the average number of citations to articles in the journal -- given this, a small number of highly-cited articles will skew the figure.
  • It takes several years for new journals to be added to the list of titles indexed by the Web of Science/Web of Knowledge, so these newer titles will be under-represented.
  • It's alleged that journal editors have learned to "game" the system, encouraging authors to cite their works previously published in the same journal.
Comparing Journals Across Disciplines? Not a good idea! Using Impact Factors within a given discipline should only be done with great care, as described above. Using impact factor data to compare journals across disciplines is even more problematic. Here are some of the reasons:
  • Disciplines where older literature is still referenced, such as Chemistry and Mathematics, offer challenges to the methodolgy since older citations (older than two years) are not used to calculate the impact factor for a given journal. (Five-year impact factor analysis, which can be calculated using the Journal Citation Index database, helps smooth out this problem only to some degree.)
  • Different disciplines have different practices regarding tendency to cite larger numbers of references. Higher overall citation rates will bump upward impact factor measurements.
  • Where it's common for large numbers of authors to collaborate on a single paper, such as in Physics, the tendency of authors to cite themselves (and in this case, more authors) will result in increased citation rates.

Pros and Cons of the Impact Factor

Pros:

  • A vetted, established metric for measuring journal impact within a discipline.
  • Designed to eliminate bias based on journal size and frequency.
Cons:
  • Individual articles makes an uneven contribution to overall Impact Factor.
  • Impact Factor does not account for certain things, things like context (postive or negative citaion) and intentionality (self-citation).
  • The metric is proprietary to and bound by the contents of the Thomson Reuters database.
  • Citations, on which the Impact Factor is based, count for less than 1% of an article's overall use.

Criticism

Numerous critiques have been made regarding the use of impact factors. A 2007 study noted that the most fundamental flaw is that impact factors present the mean of data that are not normally distributed, and suggested that it would be more appropriate to present the median of these data. There is also a more general debate on the validity of the impact factor as a measure of journal importance and the effect of policies that editors may adopt to boost their impact factor (perhaps to the detriment of readers and writers). Other criticism focuses on the effect of the impact factor on behavior of scholars, editors and other stakeholders. Others have made more general criticisms, arguing that emphasis on impact factor results from negative influence of neoliberal policies on academia claiming that what is needed is not just replacement of the impact factor with more sophisticated metrics for science publications but also discussion on the social value of research assessment and the growing precariousness of scientific careers in higher education.
Experts stress that there are limitations in using impact factors to evaluate a scholar's work. There are many reasons cited for not relying on impact factor alone to evaluate the output of a particular individual. Among these are the following:

  • A single factor is not sufficient for evaluating an author's work.
  • Journal values are meaningless unless compared within the same discipline. Impact factors vary among disciplines.
  • The impact factor was originally devised to show the impact of a specific journal, not a specific scholar. The quality and impact of the author's work may extend beyond the impact of a particular journal.
According to Jim Testa, a researcher for ThomsonReuters Scientific, the most widespread misuse of the Impact Factor is to evaluate the work of an individual author (instead of a journal). "To say that because a researcher is publishing in a certain journal, he or she is more influential or deserves more credit is not necessarily true. There are many other variables to consider." (interview 6/26/2008 in Thomson Reuters blog entry)

Seminars in Perinatology
Journal Profile

About

The purpose of each issue of Seminars in Perinatology is to provide authoritative and comprehensive reviews of a single topic of interest to professionals who care for the mother, the fetus, and the newborn. The journal's readership includes perinatologists, obstetricians, pediatricians, epidemiologists, students in these fields, and others. Each issue offers a comprehensive review of an individual topic, with emphasis on new developments that will have a direct impact on their practice. None

Highly Cited Keywords

ISSN
0146-0005
ISSN

The ISSN of Seminars in Perinatology is 0146-0005 . An ISSN is an 8-digit code used to identify newspapers, journals, magazines and periodicals of all kinds and on all media–print and electronic.

ISSN (Online)
1558-075X
ISSN (Online)

The ISSN (Online) of Seminars in Perinatology is 1558-075X . An ISSN is an 8-digit code used to identify newspapers, journals, magazines and periodicals of all kinds and on all media–print and electronic.

Publisher
W.B. Saunders Ltd
Publisher

Seminars in Perinatology is published by W.B. Saunders Ltd .

Publication Frequency
Quarterly
Publication Frequency

Seminars in Perinatology publishes reports Quarterly .

Coverage
1977 - Present
Coverage

The Publication History of Seminars in Perinatology covers 1977 - Present .

Open Access
NO
Open Access

Seminars in Perinatology is Subscription-based (non-OA) Journal. Publishers own the rights to the articles in their journals. Anyone who wants to read the articles should pay by individual or institution to access the articles. Anyone who wants to use the articles in any way must obtain permission from the publishers.

Publication Fee
Publication Fee

There is no publication fee for submiting manuscript to Seminars in Perinatology. Seminars in Perinatology is Subscription-based (non-OA) Journal. Publishers own the rights to the articles in their journals. Anyone who wants to read the articles should pay by individual or institution to access the articles.

Language
English
Language

The language of Seminars in Perinatology is English .

Country/Region
United Kingdom
Country/Region

The publisher of Seminars in Perinatology is W.B. Saunders Ltd , which locates in United Kingdom .

Selected Articles

Full Title Authors
Full Title Authors
CRISPR/Cas9 gene-editing: Research technologies, clinical applications and ethical considerations Fani Memi · Aglaia Ntokou · Irinna Papangeli · Irinna Papangeli
What are the required components of pre- and post-test counseling? Britton D. Rink · Britton D. Rink · Jeffrey A. Kuller · Jeffrey A. Kuller · Jeffrey A. Kuller
Therapy services and specialized devices for conjoined twins: Unique challenges with conjoined twins and the importance of physical and occupational therapy Katherine Cugini · Frank B. McCormick · Cheryl Mitchell · Erin Psencik · Stephanie Sarduy · Isabela Masuoka · Rose Toruno · Jonathan Davies · Jonathan Davies
Optimizing use of existing prenatal genetic tests: Screening and diagnostic testing for aneuploidy Katie Stoll · Mary E. Norton · Mary E. Norton
Congenital cytomegalovirus infection Karen B. Fowler · Suresh B. Boppana · Suresh B. Boppana
Neonatal nonpolio enterovirus and parechovirus infections Nada Harik · Roberta L. DeBiasi · Roberta L. DeBiasi
Ethical and end of life considerations for neonates requiring ECMO support Roxanne Kirsch · David Munson · David Munson
An overview of medical ECMO for neonates Kathryn Fletcher · Kathryn Fletcher · Rachel Chapman · Rachel Chapman · Sarah Keene · Sarah Keene
Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in infants with congenital diaphragmatic hernia Theresa R. Grover · Natalie E. Rintoul · Holly L. Hedrick · Holly L. Hedrick
Anticoagulation in neonatal ECMO Aditi Kamdar · Natalie E. Rintoul · Leslie Raffini · Leslie Raffini
Education for ECMO providers: Using education science to bridge the gap between clinical and educational expertise Lindsay Johnston · Lindsay Johnston · Susan B. Williams · Anne Ades · Anne Ades · Anne Ades
Current trends in neonatal ECMO Burhan Mahmood · Debra Newton · Eugenia K. Pallotto · Eugenia K. Pallotto · Eugenia K. Pallotto
Multidisciplinary obstetric critical care delivery: The concept of thevirtualintensive care unit Michael P. Leovic · Hailey N. Robbins · Roman S. Starikov · Michael R. Foley · Michael R. Foley
Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in congenital heart disease Kiona Y. Allen · Catherine K. Allan · Lillian Su · Mary E. McBride · Mary E. McBride
Special equipment considerations for neonatal ECMO James T. Connelly · Thane A. Blinman · Thane A. Blinman · Thane A. Blinman
Trauma in pregnancy Christopher Kevin Huls · Corey Detlefs · Corey Detlefs
Adverse outcomes of pregnancy-associated Zika virus infection William J. Britt · William J. Britt
Managing congenital heart disease in the obstetric patient Heidi M. Connolly · Heidi M. Connolly
Neonatal herpes simplex virus infections Swetha Pinninti · David W. Kimberlin · David W. Kimberlin
Update on the management of hepatitis B and C infections in the neonatal period Claudia Espinosa · Ravi Jhaveri · Ravi Jhaveri
Association between prophylactic indomethacin and death or bronchopulmonary dysplasia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies Erik A. Jensen · Elizabeth E. Foglia · Barbara Schmidt · Barbara Schmidt
Transcriptional profiling of the ductus arteriosus: Comparison of rodent microarrays and human RNA sequencing Michael T. Yarboro · Matthew D. Durbin · Jennifer L. Herington · Jennifer L. Herington · Elaine L. Shelton · Elaine L. Shelton · Tao Zhang · Cris G. Ebby · Jason Z. Stoller · Ronald I. Clyman · Jeff Reese · Jeff Reese
Comparative physiology of the ductus arteriosus among vertebrates Edward M. Dzialowski · Edward M. Dzialowski
Novel drug targets for ductus arteriosus manipulation: Looking beyond prostaglandins Elaine L. Shelton · Elaine L. Shelton · Gautam K. Singh · Colin G. Nichols · Colin G. Nichols
Patent ductus arteriosus, its treatments, and the risks of pulmonary morbidity Ronald I. Clyman · Ronald I. Clyman
Towards a greater understanding of the ductus arteriosus Jeff Reese · Jeff Reese
Changing patterns of patent ductus arteriosus surgical ligation in the United States Jeff Reese · Theresa A Scott · Stephen W. Patrick · Stephen W. Patrick · Stephen W. Patrick
Evidence-based use of acetaminophen for hemodynamically significant ductus arteriosus in preterm infants B. Jasani · D.E. Weisz · D.E. Weisz · Patrick J. McNamara · Patrick J. McNamara
Catheter-based closure of the patent ductus arteriosus in lower weight infants Leeann R. Pavlek · Jonathan L. Slaughter · Jonathan L. Slaughter · Darren P. Berman · Darren P. Berman · Carl H. Backes · Carl H. Backes · Carl H. Backes
How should costs and cost-effectiveness be considered in prenatal genetic testing? Teresa N. Sparks · Aaron B. Caughey · Aaron B. Caughey
Neuromonitoring in the neonatal ECMO patient Nan Lin · John Flibotte · Daniel J. Licht · Daniel J. Licht
Prenatal genetic carrier screening in the genomic age Anthony R. Gregg · Janice G. Edwards · Janice G. Edwards
An Update on Pulmonary and Neurodevelopmental Outcomes of Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia Jeanie L.Y. Cheong · Lex W. Doyle · Lex W. Doyle
Treatment of heritable diseases using CRISPR: hopes, fears, and reality Natalie Kofler · Katherine L. Kraschel · Katherine L. Kraschel
The surgical principles of conjoined twin separation Sara C. Fallon · Oluyinka O. Olutoye · Oluyinka O. Olutoye
Nanotherapies for Micropreemies: Stem Cells and the Secretome in Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia Flore Lesage · Flore Lesage · Flore Lesage · Bernard Thébaud · Bernard Thébaud
Genomics, microbiomics, proteomics, and metabolomics in bronchopulmonary dysplasia Charitharth Vivek Lal · Vineet Bhandari · Namasivayam Ambalavanan · Namasivayam Ambalavanan
Surfactant, steroids and non-invasive ventilation in the prevention of BPD Vikramaditya Dumpa · Vineet Bhandari · Vineet Bhandari
Recent Advances in Antenatal Factors Predisposing to Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia Elizabeth Taglauer · Steven H. Abman · Roberta L. Keller · Roberta L. Keller
Prenatal and postnatal radiologic evaluation of conjoined twins Amy R. Mehollin-Ray · Amy R. Mehollin-Ray
In search of: Suggesting a course of action for the scientific community to research potential impacts of heritable gene editing on the maternal carrier Robyn Gravelle · Robyn Gravelle
An Update on the Diagnosis and Management of Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia (BPD)-Associated Pulmonary Hypertension Sara K. Berkelhamer · Karen K. Mestan · Robin H. Steinhorn · Robin H. Steinhorn
CRISPR Diagnostics: Underappreciated Uses in Perinatology Adam Pan · Katherine L. Kraschel · Katherine L. Kraschel
Conjoined twins: Pre-birth management, changes to NRP, and transport Elizabeth C. Sager · Alana Thomas · Nathan C. Sundgren · Nathan C. Sundgren
Introduction: Unique Challenges in the Care of Conjoined Twins Jennifer Arnold · Alexandra Luton · Jonathan Davies · Jonathan Davies
Family support and media considerations with conjoined twins Colleen Hanratty · Hester De Jong · Veronika Javor · Lindsey Fox · Jenn Jacome · Caley Johns · Kirstin Springmeyer · Jonathan Davies · Jonathan Davies
Role of simulation in preparation for the care of conjoined twins-prenatal preparation to separation Shweta Parmekar · Leisa McMullen · Courtney Washington · Jennifer L. Arnold · Jennifer L. Arnold
Recent advances in the pathogenesis of BPD Rory E. Morty · Rory E. Morty · Rory E. Morty
Nutritional considerations in the care of conjoined twins Erynn M. Bergner · Laura Gollins · L. Adriana Massieu · Nancy M. Hurst · Amy B. Hair · Amy B. Hair
Laboratory considerations for prenatal genetic testing Karen Wou · Wendy K. Chung · Ronald J. Wapner · Ronald J. Wapner
Pharmaceutical considerations with conjoined twins Emily A. Rodman · Jennifer L. Placencia · Jennifer L. Placencia
An Ethically-Justifiable, Practical Approach to Decision-Making Surrounding Conjoined-Twin Separation Alana Thomas · Karen E. Johnson · Frank X. Placencia · Frank X. Placencia
An update on the post-NICU discharge management of bronchopulmonary dysplasia Anita Bhandari · Howard B. Panitch · Howard B. Panitch
Modulators of Inflammation in Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia Rashmin C. Savani · Rashmin C. Savani
CRISPR in Personalized Medicine: Industry Perspectives in Gene Editing Andrew Hong · Andrew Hong
Introducing new and emerging genetic tests into prenatal care Neeta L. Vora · Ronald J. Wapner · Ronald J. Wapner
Industry perspectives on prenatal genetic testing Amy Swanson · James D Goldberg · James D Goldberg
What are the goals of prenatal genetic testing Stephanie Dukhovny · Mary E. Norton · Mary E. Norton
Compassionate Use of Gene Therapies in Pediatrics: An Ethical Analysis Carolyn P. Neuhaus · Rachel L. Zacharias · Rachel L. Zacharias
Predicting preterm birth: Cervical length and fetal fibronectin Moeun Son · Emily S. Miller · Emily S. Miller
Primary palliative care in neonatal intensive care Krishelle L. Marc-Aurele · Nancy K. English · Nancy K. English
Preterm prelabor rupture of the membranes: A disease of the fetal membranes Ramkumar Menon · Lauren Richardson · Lauren Richardson
Moving toward a shared process: The impact of parent experiences on perinatal palliative care Susan L. Hasegawa · Jessica T. Fry · Jessica T. Fry
The role of palliative care in critical congenital heart disease Mjaye L. Mazwi · Natalia Henner · Roxanne Kirsch · Roxanne Kirsch
Neonatologist training in communication and palliative care Natalia Henner · Renee D. Boss · Renee D. Boss
Palliative care approaches to neonates with chronic respiratory failure Nicolas Porta · Nicolas Porta
Neonatal pain management Brian S. Carter · Brian S. Carter · Jessica Brunkhorst · Jessica Brunkhorst
Challenges in neurologic prognostication after neonatal brain injury Niranjana Natarajan · Andrea C. Pardo · Andrea C. Pardo
The intersection of fetal palliative care and fetal surgery: Addressing mortality and quality of life David Munson · David Munson · David Munson
Pathogenesis of NEC: Impact of an altered intestinal microbiome Josef Neu · Mohan Pammi · Mohan Pammi
Computer modeling tools to understand the causes of preterm birth Andrea R. Westervelt · Kristin M. Myers · Kristin M. Myers
Epidemiology of racial/ethnic disparities in severe maternal morbidity and mortality Sarah J. Holdt Somer · Rachel G. Sinkey · Allison Bryant · Allison Bryant
Cardiac arrest in pregnancy Jacqueline Kikuchi · Shad Deering · Shad Deering
The pathophysiology of human premature cervical remodeling resulting in spontaneous preterm birth: Where are we now? Joy Vink · Mirella Mourad · Mirella Mourad
Racial disparity in infant mortality Nana Matoba · James W. Collins · James W. Collins
Maternity care access, quality, and outcomes: A systems-level perspective on research, clinical, and policy needs Katy B. Kozhimannil · Rachel R. Hardeman · Carrie Henning-Smith · Carrie Henning-Smith
Pathophysiology of preterm labor with intact membranes Asha N. Talati · David N. Hackney · Sam Mesiano · Sam Mesiano
Genetics, hormonal influences, and preterm birth Kara Rood · Catalin S. Buhimschi · Catalin S. Buhimschi
Introduction: Update on neonatal extracorporeal membrane oxygenation Lindsay Johnston · Natalie E. Rintoul · Anne Ades · Anne Ades
Cytokines and growth factors in the developing intestine and during necrotizing enterocolitis Krishnan MohanKumar · Kopperuncholan Namachivayam · Thao T.B. Ho · Benjamin A. Torres · Robin K. Ohls · Robin K. Ohls
Tocolysis: Present and future treatment options Joshua D. Younger · Elena Reitman · George Gallos · George Gallos
Perinatal legislative policies and health outcomes Scott A. Lorch · Scott A. Lorch
New techniques in evaluation of the cervix Helen Feltovich · Lindsey C. Carlson · Lindsey C. Carlson
Long-term childhood outcomes after interventions for prevention and management of preterm birth Sarah R. Murray · Sarah J. Stock · Jane E. Norman · Jane E. Norman
Introduction: Current preterm birth prevention strategies, Part 2 Joy Vink · Cynthia Gyamfi-Bannerman · Cynthia Gyamfi-Bannerman
Catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome and pregnancy Robert M. Silver · Robert M. Silver
Understanding pregnancy outcomes using epidemiology and health services research Scott A. Lorch · Scott A. Lorch
Epidemiology of maternal morbidity and mortality Adi Hirshberg · Sindhu Srinivas · Sindhu Srinivas
The utility of bedside simulation for training in critical care obstetrics Jean-Ju Sheen · Colleen Lee · Dena Goffman · Dena Goffman
Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) during pregnancy and postpartum Luis D. Pacheco · George R. Saade · Gary D.V. Hankins · Gary D.V. Hankins
The diagnosis and management of morbidly adherent placenta Michael A. Belfort · Alireza A. Shamshirsaz · Karin A. Fox · Karin A. Fox
Novel thoughts on preterm birth research proceedings of the 13th annual preterm birth international collaborative (PREBIC) meeting Cynthia Gyamfi-Bannerman · Ramkumar Menon · Elizabeth A. Bonney · Siobhan M. Dolan · Mark R. Johnson · Ronald F. Lamont · Ronald F. Lamont · Sam Mesiano · Amy P. Murtha · Leslie Myatt · Indira U. Mysorekar · Scott M. Williams · Nanbert Zhong · Hanns Helmer · Hanns Helmer
The prevalence of selected major birth defects in the United States Russell S. Kirby · Russell S. Kirby
Prevention of preterm birth: Novel interventions for the cervix Bouchra Koullali · Andrea R. Westervelt · Kristin M. Myers · Michael House · Michael House
Current options for mechanical prevention of preterm birth Rupsa C. Boelig · Vincenzo Berghella · Vincenzo Berghella
Epidemiology of preterm birth Stephanie Purisch · Cynthia Gyamfi-Bannerman · Cynthia Gyamfi-Bannerman
17-alpha hydroxyprogesterone caproate for preterm birth prevention: Where have we been, how did we get here, and where are we going? Tracy A. Manuck · Tracy A. Manuck
Racial and ethnic differences in preterm birth: A complex, multifactorial problem Tracy A. Manuck · Tracy A. Manuck
Maintaining and repeating tocolysis: A reflection on evidence Isabelle Dehaene · Lina Bergman · Paula Turtiainen · Alexandra Ridout · Ben Willem J. Mol · Elsa Lorthe · Elsa Lorthe
Pathogenesis of NEC: Role of the innate and adaptive immune response Timothy L. Denning · Amina M. Bhatia · Andrea F. Kane · Ravi Mangal Patel · Patricia W. Denning · Patricia W. Denning
Human milk is the feeding strategy to prevent necrotizing enterocolitis Diana Maffei · Richard J. Schanler · Richard J. Schanler
Strategies to reduce disparities in maternal morbidity and mortality: Patient and provider education Joses Jain · Leslie Moroz · Leslie Moroz
Update on the surgical approach for reconstruction of the male genitalia Rodrigo L.P. Romao · Joao L. Pippi Salle · Joao L. Pippi Salle
Should we believe in transfusion-associated enterocolitis? Applying a GRADE to the literature Susanne Hay · Susanne Hay · Susanne Hay · John A.F. Zupancic · John A.F. Zupancic · John A.F. Zupancic · Dustin D. Flannery · Haresh Kirpalani · Haresh Kirpalani · Dmitry Dukhovny · Dmitry Dukhovny
Global disparities in maternal morbidity and mortality Maria Small · Terrence K. Allen · Haywood L. Brown · Haywood L. Brown
State-based perinatal quality collaboratives: Pursuing improvements in perinatal health outcomes for all mothers and newborns Munish Gupta · Edward F. Donovan · Zsakeba Henderson · Zsakeba Henderson
Racial and ethnic differences in contraception use and obstetric outcomes: A review Andrea V. Jackson · Lin-Fan Wang · Jessica E. Morse · Jessica E. Morse
Racial and ethnic disparities in U.S. breastfeeding and implications for maternal and child health outcomes Adetola Louis-Jacques · Tara F. Deubel · Melina Taylor · Alison M. Stuebe · Alison M. Stuebe
Ethnic and racial disparities in hypertension management among women Theresa M. Beckie · Theresa M. Beckie
Maternal early warning systems—Towards reducing preventable maternal mortality and severe maternal morbidity through improved clinical surveillance and responsiveness Lisa C. Zuckerwise · Heather S. Lipkind · Heather S. Lipkind
Racial and ethnic disparities in obstetric anesthesia Elizabeth M. S. Lange · Suman Rao · Paloma Toledo · Paloma Toledo
Central line-associated bloodstream infections in the NICU: Successes and controversies in the quest for zero Renée E. Mobley · Matthew J. Bizzarro · Matthew J. Bizzarro
Implementation of a multicenter shoulder dystocia injury prevention program Linda Szymanski · Christine Arnold · Arthur J. Vaught · Susan LaMantia · Theresa Harris · Andrew J. Satin · Andrew J. Satin
Genetic approach to ambiguous genitalia and disorders of sex development: What clinicians need to know Svetlana A. Yatsenko · Selma F. Witchel · Selma F. Witchel
Systematic approaches to adverse events in obstetrics, Part I: Event identification and classification Christian M. Pettker · Christian M. Pettker
Systematic approaches to adverse events in obstetrics, Part II: Event analysis and response Christian M. Pettker · Christian M. Pettker
Using quality improvement to increase human milk use for preterm infants Margaret Parker · Aloka L. Patel · Aloka L. Patel
Tools and methods for quality improvement and patient safety in perinatal care Amy T. Nathan · Heather C. Kaplan · Heather C. Kaplan
Restoring normal anatomy in female patients with atypical genitalia Laurence S. Baskin · Laurence S. Baskin
Pragmatic approach to intersex, including genital ambiguity, in the newborn Kanthi Bangalore Krishna · Christopher P. Houk · Peter A. Lee · Peter A. Lee
Fluidity models in ancient Greece and current practices of sex assignment Chen Mj · Bonnie McCann-Crosby · Sheila K. Gunn · Paraskevi Georgiadis · Frank X. Placencia · David E. Mann · Marni E. Axelrad · Lefkothea P. Karaviti · Laurence B. McCullough · Laurence B. McCullough
Legal, ethical, and human rights considerations for physicians treating children with atypical or ambiguous genitalia Julie A. Greenberg · Julie A. Greenberg
Strategies to reduce disparities in maternal morbidity and mortality: The role of obesity and metabolic disease Christina P. Teefey · Celeste P. Durnwald · Celeste P. Durnwald
Gender identity outcomes in children with disorders/differences of sex development: Predictive factors Dana M. Bakula · Alexandria J. Mullins · Christina M. Sharkey · Cortney Wolfe-Christensen · Larry L. Mullins · Amy Wisniewski · Amy Wisniewski
In Vitro fertilization and adverse obstetric and perinatal outcomes Chantae S. Sullivan-Pyke · S. Senapati · Monica Mainigi · Kurt T. Barnhart · Kurt T. Barnhart
Surgical necrotizing enterocolitis Jamie R. Robinson · Eric J. Rellinger · L. Dupree Hatch · Joern Hendrik Weitkamp · K. Elizabeth Speck · Melissa E. Danko · Martin L. Blakely · Martin L. Blakely
Exploring the social determinants of racial/ethnic disparities in prenatal care utilization and maternal outcome Alexis Gadson · Eloho Akpovi · Pooja Mehta · Pooja Mehta
Necrotizing: A historical perspective Michael S. Caplan · Avroy A. Fanaroff · Avroy A. Fanaroff
Improving hospital quality to reduce disparities in severe maternal morbidity and mortality Elizabeth A. Howell · Jennifer Zeitlin · Jennifer Zeitlin · Jennifer Zeitlin
A critical question for NEC researchers: Can we create a consensus definition of NEC that facilitates research progress? Phillip V. Gordon · Jonathan R. Swanson · B C MacQueen · Robert D. Christensen · Robert D. Christensen
Current preterm birth prevention strategies Joy Vink · Cynthia Gyamfi-Bannerman · Cynthia Gyamfi-Bannerman
Impact of probiotics on necrotizing enterocolitis Mark A. Underwood · Mark A. Underwood
Birth outcome racial disparities: A result of intersecting social and environmental factors Heather H. Burris · Michele R. Hacker · Michele R. Hacker · Michele R. Hacker
Maternal microbiomes in preterm birth: Recent progress and analytical pipelines Lindsay A. Parnell · Catherine M. Briggs · Indira U. Mysorekar · Indira U. Mysorekar
Genetic alterations in necrotizing enterocolitis Alain Cuna · Venkatesh Sampath · Venkatesh Sampath
Cardiac surgery for children with trisomies 13 and 18: Where are we now? Annie Janvier · Barbara Farlow · Keith J. Barrington · Keith J. Barrington
Pharmacologic interventions for the prevention and treatment of retinopathy of prematurity Kay D. Beharry · Kay D. Beharry · Gloria B. Valencia · Douglas R. Lazzaro · Douglas R. Lazzaro · Jacob V. Aranda · Jacob V. Aranda · Jacob V. Aranda
Ethical challenges in the new world of maternal–fetal surgery Ryan M. Antiel · Ryan M. Antiel
Ethics and professional responsibility: Essential dimensions of planned home birth Laurence B. McCullough · Amos Grunebaum · Birgit Arabin · Robert L. Brent · Robert L. Brent · Malcolm Levene · Frank A. Chervenak · Frank A. Chervenak
Pediatric obstetrical ethics: Medical decision-making by, with, and for pregnant early adolescents Mark R. Mercurio · Mark R. Mercurio
Severe systolic hypertension and the search for safer motherhood James N. Martin · James N. Martin
Reducing the risk of venous thromboembolism in pregnancy—The safe motherhood initiative thromboembolism bundle Jennifer M. Walsh · Fergal D. Malone · Fergal D. Malone
Ethical issues in neonatal research involving human subjects Alan R. Fleischman · Alan R. Fleischman · Alan R. Fleischman
Stem cell–based therapies for the newborn lung and brain: Possibilities and challenges S. Alex Mitsialis · S. Alex Mitsialis · Stella Kourembanas · Stella Kourembanas · Stella Kourembanas
Teaching and assessing ethics in the newborn ICU Christy L. Cummings · Christy L. Cummings
Responding to refusal of recommended cesarean section: Promoting good parenting Janet Malek · Janet Malek
What we have learned about intrapartum fetal monitoring trials in the MFMU Network Steven L. Bloom · Michael A. Belfort · George R. Saade · George R. Saade
What we have learned about best practices for recruitment and retention in multicenter pregnancy studies Ashley Salazar · Susan Tolivaisa · D. Allard · Tammy Sinclair Bishop · Sabine Bousleiman · Kelly S. Clark · Wendy Dalton · Stacy L. Harris · Kathy Hale · Kim Hill · Francee Johnson · Gail Mallett · Lisa Moseley · F. Ortiz · Cynthia Willson · Elizabeth Thom · Elizabeth Thom
Maternal mortality in New York—Looking back, looking forward Cynthia Chazotte · Mary E. D’Alton · Mary E. D’Alton
The safe motherhood initiative: The development and implementation of standardized obstetric care bundles in New York Anna Burgansky · Donna Montalto · Norain A. Siddiqui · Norain A. Siddiqui
Early neurodevelopmental outcomes of extremely preterm infants Elizabeth E. Rogers · Susan R. Hintz · Susan R. Hintz
What we have learned about treating mild gestational diabetes mellitus Madeline Murguia Rice · Mark B. Landon · Mark B. Landon
What we have learned about antenatal corticosteroid regimens Ronald J. Wapner · Cynthia Gyamfi-Bannerman · Elizabeth Thom · Elizabeth Thom
Obstetrical venous thromboembolism: Epidemiology and strategies for prophylaxis Alexander M. Friedman · Cande V. Ananth · Cande V. Ananth
Obstetric hemorrhage: A global review Dena Goffman · Lisa Nathan · Cynthia Chazotte · Cynthia Chazotte
Expanded carrier screening: A review of early implementation and literature Gabriel A. Lazarin · Imran S. Haque · Imran S. Haque
Ultrasound screening: Status of markers and efficacy of screening for structural abnormalities Rashmi Rao · Lawrence D. Platt · Lawrence D. Platt
Changing indications for invasive testing in an era of improved screening Mary E. Norton · Britton D. Rink · Britton D. Rink
Care bundles for management of obstetrical hemorrhage Adiel Fleischer · Natalie Meirowitz · Natalie Meirowitz
Current recommendations: Screening for Mendelian disorders Nancy C. Rose · Nancy C. Rose · Myra J. Wick · Myra J. Wick
Screening for fetal aneuploidy Britton D. Rink · Mary E. Norton · Mary E. Norton
Neonatal abstinence syndrome: Pharmacologic strategies for the mother and infant Walter K. Kraft · Megan W. Stover · Jonathan M. Davis · Jonathan M. Davis · Jonathan M. Davis
What is prenatal screening and why to do it Lorene A. Temming · George A. Macones · George A. Macones
Development of prenatal screening--A historical overview Howard Cuckle · Ron Maymon · Ron Maymon
Maternal mortality and serious morbidity in New York: Recognizing the burden of the problem Cande V. Ananth · Mary E. D’Alton · Mary E. D’Alton
Challenges and lessons learned in Neonatal Drug Therapies Jacob V. Aranda · Jacob V. Aranda
Management of severe hypertension in pregnancy Leslie Moroz · Lynn L. Simpson · Burton Rochelson · Burton Rochelson
What we learned about the role of antenatal magnesium sulfate for the prevention of cerebral palsy Dwight J. Rouse · Deborah Hirtz · Deborah Hirtz
What we have learned about the role of 17-alpha-hydroxyprogesterone caproate in the prevention of preterm birth Steve N. Caritis · Maisa Feghali · William A. Grobman · Dwight J. Rouse · Dwight J. Rouse
Drugs for neuroprotection after birth asphyxia: Pharmacologic adjuncts to hypothermia Frank van Bel · Floris Groenendaal · Floris Groenendaal
Moral philosophy in perinatalology: A collaborative model for perinatal ethics Frank A. Chervenak · Laurence B. McCullough · Laurence B. McCullough
What we have learned about scheduling elective repeat cesarean delivery at term Alan Tita · Alan Tita
Pharmacologic strategies in neonatal pulmonary hypertension other than nitric oxide Satyan Lakshminrusimha · Bobby Mathew · Corinne L. Leach · Corinne L. Leach
Prevention and management of bronchopulmonary dysplasia: Lessons learned from the neonatal research network Kathleen A. Kennedy · C. Michael Cotten · Kristi L. Watterberg · Waldemar A. Carlo · Waldemar A. Carlo
Simulation and debriefing in neonatology 2016: Mission incomplete Louis P. Halamek · Louis P. Halamek
Language and hearing outcomes of preterm infants Betty R. Vohr · Betty R. Vohr
Simulation training for primary caregivers in the neonatal intensive care unit Jennifer Arnold · Maria Carmen G. Diaz · Maria Carmen G. Diaz
The role of early developmental intervention to influence neurobehavioral outcomes of children born preterm Alicia J. Spittle · Alicia J. Spittle · Karli Treyvaud · Karli Treyvaud
Executive function in children born preterm: Risk factors and implications for outcome H. Gerry Taylor · Caron A. C. Clark · Caron A. C. Clark
Advanced neuroimaging and its role in predicting neurodevelopmental outcomes in very preterm infants Nehal A. Parikh · Nehal A. Parikh · Nehal A. Parikh
Outcomes in childhood following therapeutic hypothermia for neonatal hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) Girija Natarajan · Athina Pappas · Seetha Shankaran · Seetha Shankaran
Neonatology faculty development using simulation Heather French · Roberta L. Hales · Roberta L. Hales · Roberta L. Hales
In their own words: Life at adulthood after very premature birth Saroj Saigal · Saroj Saigal
Simulation for neonatal extracorporeal membrane oxygenation teams Lindsay Johnston · Gary Oldenburg · Gary Oldenburg
Introduction: Simulation in neonatology Lindsay Johnston · Stephanie N. Sudikoff · Stephanie N. Sudikoff
Functional, quality of life, and neurodevelopmental outcomes after congenital cardiac surgery Megan L. Ringle · Gil Wernovsky · Gil Wernovsky
Defining outcomes for high-risk infants: Problems and possibilities Susan R. Hintz · Susan R. Hintz
Pre- and post-test genetic counseling for chromosomal and Mendelian disorders Jill Fonda Allen · Katie Stoll · Barbara A. Bernhardt · Barbara A. Bernhardt
Update on simulation for the Neonatal Resuscitation Program Anne Ades · Henry C. Lee · Henry C. Lee
Measuring and communicating meaningful outcomes in neonatology: A family perspective Annie Janvier · Barbara Farlow · Jason Baardsnes · Rebecca Pearce · Keith J. Barrington · Keith J. Barrington
Hemodynamic instability in the critically ill neonate: An approach to cardiovascular support based on disease pathophysiology Regan E. Giesinger · Patrick J. McNamara · Patrick J. McNamara
Perinatal management: What has been learned through the network? Sanjay Chawla · Elizabeth E. Foglia · Vishal S. Kapadia · Myra H. Wyckoff · Myra H. Wyckoff
The Neonatal Research Network: History since 2003, future directions and challenges Rosemary D. Higgins · Seetha Shankaran · Seetha Shankaran
Methodological issues in the design and analyses of neonatal research studies: Experience of the NICHD Neonatal Research Network Abhik Das · Jon E. Tyson · Claudia Pedroza · Barbara Schmidt · Marie G. Gantz · Dennis Wallace · William E. Truog · Rosemary D. Higgins · Rosemary D. Higgins
Hypothermia for neonatal hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy: NICHD Neonatal Research Network contribution to the field Seetha Shankaran · Girija Natarajan · Lina F. Chalak · Athina Pappas · Scott A. McDonald · Abbot R. Laptook · Abbot R. Laptook
What we have learned about the design of randomized trials in pregnancy Elizabeth Thom · Madeline Murguia Rice · George R. Saade · Uma M. Reddy · Uma M. Reddy
Improving publication rates in a collaborative clinical trials research network Stephanie Wilson Archer · Waldemar A. Carlo · William E. Truog · David K. Stevenson · Krisa P. Van Meurs · Pablo J. Sánchez · Abhik Das · Uday Devaskar · Leif D. Nelin · Carolyn M. Petrie Huitema · Margaret M. Crawford · Rosemary D. Higgins · Rosemary D. Higgins
Recent controversies on comparative effectiveness research investigations: Challenges, opportunities, and pitfalls Haresh Kirpalani · Haresh Kirpalani · William E. Truog · Carl T. D’Angio · Carl T. D’Angio · Michael Cotten · Michael Cotten
Inhaled nitric oxide therapy for pulmonary disorders of the term and preterm infant Gregory M. Sokol · Girija G. Konduri · Krisa P. Van Meurs · Krisa P. Van Meurs
Simulation in neonatal transport medicine Douglas M. Campbell · Douglas M. Campbell · Rita Dadiz · Rita Dadiz
The problems of moderate preterm infants Andrea Trembath · Allison H. Payne · Tarah T. Colaizy · Edward F. Bell · Michele C. Walsh · Michele C. Walsh
Neonatal outreach simulation Bobbi J. Byrne · Deepak Manhas · Deepak Manhas
Cost-effective and low-technology options for simulation and training in neonatology Christie J. Bruno · Kristen M. Glass · Kristen M. Glass
Procedural training and assessment of competency utilizing simulation Taylor Sawyer · Megan M. Gray · Megan M. Gray
What we have learned about quality measures for intrapartum obstetrical care Jennifer L. Bailit · William A. Grobman · William A. Grobman
What We Have Learned About Trial of Labor After Cesarean Delivery from the Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Cesarean Registry Mark B. Landon · William A. Grobman · William A. Grobman
Venous thromboembolism bundle: Risk assessment and prophylaxis for obstetric patients Alexander M. Friedman · Mary E. D’Alton · Mary E. D’Alton

What are the required components of pre- and post-test counseling?
Seminars in Perinatology | 2018
Britton D. Rink · Britton D. Rink · Jeffrey A. Kuller · Jeffrey A. Kuller · Jeffrey A. Kuller
Therapy services and specialized devices for conjoined twins: Unique challenges with conjoined twins and the importance of physical and occupational therapy
Seminars in Perinatology | 2018
Katherine Cugini · Frank B. McCormick · Cheryl Mitchell · Erin Psencik · Stephanie Sarduy · Isabela Masuoka · Rose Toruno · Jonathan Davies · Jonathan Davies
Congenital cytomegalovirus infection
Seminars in Perinatology | 2018
Karen B. Fowler · Suresh B. Boppana · Suresh B. Boppana