Last updated on

Medicine
Latest Impact Factor IF - Analysis · Trend · Prediction · Ranking


User Feedback

Journal Impact IF

2021-2022

-

- %

Journal Impact IF Trend

Researchain
One-click to visualize your research performance

Researchain
One-click to visualize your research performance

Researchain
One-click to visualize your research performance

Researchain
One-click to visualize your research performance

Popular Journals

Highly Cited Articles

Medicine

High Impact Research Articles
Publication Title Author Listing
Publication Title Author Listing
· · · · · ·
· · · · · ·
· · · · ·
· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·
· · · · · ·
· · ·
· · · · · · · · · · · · ·
· · · · · · · · ·
· · · · · ·
· · · · · · ·
· ·
· · ·
· · · · · · ·
· · · · ·
· · · · · · · · ·
· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·
· · · · · ·
· · ·
· · · · ·
· · · · · · ·
· ·
· · ·
· · · · ·
· · · · · · ·
· · · · · · ·
· · · · · · · ·
· · · · ·
· ·
· · · · · · · ·
· · ·
· ·
· · · · · · · · · ·
· · · · · ·
·
· · · · · ·
· · · ·
· ·
· · · · ·
· · · ·
· · ·
· · · · · · ·
· · ·
·
· · · · · · ·
· · · ·
· · · · · · · · · · · ·
· · · · ·
· · · · ·

Highly Cited Keywords

Medicine

High Impact Research Keywords

Journal Impact IF Ranking

Medicine

Journal Impact IF Ranking
Subcategory Quartile Rank Percentile
Medicine (all) Q4 748/793

Medicine (all) 5%

Journal Impact IF Ranking

· In the Medicine (all) research field, the Quartile of Medicine is Q4. Medicine has been ranked #748 over 793 related journals in the Medicine (all) research category. The ranking percentile of Medicine is around 5% in the field of Medicine (all).

Related Journals

Medicine

Similar Journals

Medicine

The 2021-2022 Journal Impact IF of Medicine is still under calculation. Stay tuned!

Medicine Impact Factor
Highest IF
-
Highest Journal Impact IF

The Journal Impact IF of Medicine is still under calculation. Stay Tuned!

Lowest IF
-
Lowest Journal Impact IF

The Journal Impact IF of Medicine is still under calculation. Stay Tuned!

Total Growth Rate
-
IF Total Growth Rate

The total growth rate of Medicine IF is still under calculation. Stay Tuned!

Annual Growth Rate
-
IF Annual Growth Rate

The annual growth rate of Medicine IF is still under calculation. Stay Tuned!

Journal Impact IF History

Medicine

Journal Impact IF Trend

Year Journal Impact IF
Year Journal Impact IF
2022-2023 Check our Real-Time Impact Factor and Impact Factor Prediction Results
2020-2021 -
2019-2020 -
2018-2019 -
2017-2018 -
2016-2017 -
2015-2016 -
2014-2015 -
2013-2014 -
2012-2013 -
2011-2012 -
Journal Impact IF History

The Journal Impact IF 2020-2021 of Medicine is still under analysis. Stay Tuned!
The Journal Impact IF 2019-2020 of Medicine is still under analysis. Stay Tuned!
The Journal Impact IF 2018-2019 of Medicine is still under analysis. Stay Tuned!
The Journal Impact IF 2017-2018 of Medicine is still under analysis. Stay Tuned!
The Journal Impact IF 2016-2017 of Medicine is still under analysis. Stay Tuned!
The Journal Impact IF 2015-2016 of Medicine is still under analysis. Stay Tuned!
The Journal Impact IF 2014-2015 of Medicine is still under analysis. Stay Tuned!
The Journal Impact IF 2013-2014 of Medicine is still under analysis. Stay Tuned!
The Journal Impact IF 2012-2013 of Medicine is still under analysis. Stay Tuned!
The Journal Impact IF 2011-2012 of Medicine is still under analysis. Stay Tuned!

Medicine

Journal Key Metrics
Journal Title Medicine
ISSN 0304-5412
ISSN (Online) 1578-8822
Publisher
Elsevier Doyma
Publication Frequency
0.0
Coverage
2007 - Present
Open Access
NO
Language
0.0
Highest Impact Factor (2011 - 2022) -
Lowest Impact Factor (2011 - 2022) -
Total Impact Factor IF Growth Rate (2011 - 2022) Under calculation
Avarage Impact Factor IF Growth Rate (2011 - 2022) Under calculation
Annual Impact Factor IF Growth Rate (2021 - 2022) Umder calculation
Publication Fees
Homepage
Submit Manuscript

Medicine

Impact Factor 2022-2023 Prediction
Medicine Impact Factor Predition System

Medicine Impact Factor Prediction System is now online. You can start share your valuable insights with the community.

Predict Check All Preditions

What is Impact Factor?

The impact factor (IF) or journal impact factor (JIF) of an academic journal is a scientometric index calculated by Clarivate that reflects the yearly average number of citations of articles published in the last two years in a given journal. It is frequently used as a proxy for the relative importance of a journal within its field; journals with higher impact factor values are often deemed to be more important, or carry more intrinsic prestige in their respective fields, than those with lower values.

Medicine | Academic Accelerator - About the Impact Factor

Impact factor is commonly used to evaluate the relative importance of a journal within its field and to measure the frequency with which the “average article” in a journal has been cited in a particular time period. Journal which publishes more review articles will get highest IFs. Journals with higher IFs believed to be more important than those with lower ones. According to Eugene Garfield “impact simply reflects the ability of the journals and editors to attract the best paper available.” Journal which publishes more review articles will get maximum IFs. The Impact Factor of an academic journal is a scientometric Metric that reflects the yearly average number of citations that recent articles published in a given journal received. It is frequently used as a Metric for the relative importance of a journal within its field; journals with higher Impact Factor are often deemed to be more important than those with lower ones. The Medicine Impact Factor IF measures the average number of citations received in a particular year (2021) by papers published in the Medicine during the two preceding years (2019-2020). Note that 2021 Impact Factor are reported in 2022; they cannot be calculated until all of the 2021 publications have been processed by the indexing agency. New journals, which are indexed from their first published issue, will receive an impact factor after two years of indexing; in this case, the citations to the year prior to Volume 1, and the number of articles published in the year prior to Volume 1, are known zero values. Journals that are indexed starting with a volume other than the first volume will not get an impact factor until they have been indexed for three years. Occasionally, Journal Citation Reports assigns an impact factor to new journals with less than two years of indexing, based on partial citation data. The calculation always uses two complete and known years of item counts, but for new titles one of the known counts is zero. Annuals and other irregular publications sometimes publish no items in a particular year, affecting the count. The impact factor relates to a specific time period; it is possible to calculate it for any desired period. In addition to the 2-year Impact Factor, the 3-year Impact Factor, 4-year Impact Factor, 5-year Impact Factor, Real-Time Impact Factor can provide further insights and factors into the impact of Medicine.

History

The impact factor was devised by Eugene Garfield, the founder of the Institute for Scientific Information (ISI). Impact factors are calculated yearly starting from 1975 for journals listed in the Journal Citation Reports (JCR). ISI was acquired by Thomson Scientific & Healthcare in 1992, and became known as Thomson ISI. In 2018, Thomson ISI was sold to Onex Corporation and Baring Private Equity Asia. They founded a new corporation, Clarivate, which is now the publisher of the JCR.

Use

The impact factor is used to compare different journals within a certain field. The Web of Science indexes more than 11,500 science and social science journals. Journal impact factors are often used to evaluate the merit of individual articles and individual researchers. This use of impact factors was summarised by Hoeffel:

Impact Factor is not a perfect tool to measure the quality of articles but there is nothing better and it has the advantage of already being in existence and is, therefore, a good technique for scientific evaluation. Experience has shown that in each specialty the best journals are those in which it is most difficult to have an article accepted, and these are the journals that have a high impact factor. Most of these journals existed long before the impact factor was devised. The use of impact factor as a measure of quality is widespread because it fits well with the opinion we have in each field of the best journals in our specialty....In conclusion, prestigious journals publish papers of high level. Therefore, their impact factor is high, and not the contrary.

Eugene Garfield

In brief, Impact factors may be used by:
  • Authors to decide where to submit an article for publication.
  • Libraries to make collection development decisions
  • Academic departments to assess academic productivity
  • Academic departments to make decisions on promotion and tenure.
As impact factors are a journal-level metric, rather than an article- or individual-level metric, this use is controversial. Garfield agrees with Hoeffel,but warns about the "misuse in evaluating individuals" because there is "a wide variation [of citations] from article to article within a single journal". Other things to consider about Impact Factors:
  • Many journals do not have an impact factor.
  • The impact factor cannot assess the quality of individual articles. Even if citations were evenly distributed among articles, the impact factor would only measure the interests of other researchers in an article, not its importance and usefulness.
  • Only research articles, technical notes and reviews are “citable” items. Editorials, letters, news items and meeting abstracts are “non-citable items”.
  • Only a small percentage of articles are highly cited and they are found in a small subset of journals. This small proportion accounts for a large percentage of citations.
  • Controversial papers, such as those based on fraudulent data, may be highly cited, distorting the impact factor of a journal.
  • Citation bias may exist. For example, English language resources may be favoured. Authors may cite their own work.
Moreover, informed and careful use of these impact data is essential, and should be based on a thorough understanding of the methodology used to generate impact factors. There are controversial aspects of using impact factors:
  • It is not clear whether the number of times a paper is cited measures its actual quality.
  • Some databases that calculate impact factors fail to incorporate publications including textbooks, handbooks and reference books.
  • Certain disciplines have low numbers of journals and usage. Therefore, one should only compare journals or researchers within the same discipline.
  • Review articles normally are cited more often and therefore can skew results.
  • Self-citing may also skew results.
  • Some resources used to calculate impact factors have inadequate international coverage.
  • Editorial policies can artificially inflate an impact factor.
Impact factors have often been used in advancement and tenure decision-making. Many recognize that this is a coarse tool for such important decisions, and that a multitude of factors should be taken into account in these deliberations. When considering the use of the impact factor (IF), keep these aspects in mind:
  • IF analysis is limited to citations from the journals indexed by the Web of Science/Web of Knowledge. Currently, the Web of Science indexes only 8621 journals across the full breadth of the sciences, and just 3121 in the social sciences.
  • A high IF/citation rate says nothing about the quality -- or even, validity -- of the references being cited. Notorious or even retracted articles often attract a lot of attention, hence a high number of citations. The notority related to the first publication on "cold fusion" is one such example.
  • Journals that publish more "review articles" are often found near the top of the rankings. While not known for publishing new, creative findings, these individual articles tend to be heavily cited.
  • The IF measures the average number of citations to articles in the journal -- given this, a small number of highly-cited articles will skew the figure.
  • It takes several years for new journals to be added to the list of titles indexed by the Web of Science/Web of Knowledge, so these newer titles will be under-represented.
  • It's alleged that journal editors have learned to "game" the system, encouraging authors to cite their works previously published in the same journal.
Comparing Journals Across Disciplines? Not a good idea! Using Impact Factors within a given discipline should only be done with great care, as described above. Using impact factor data to compare journals across disciplines is even more problematic. Here are some of the reasons:
  • Disciplines where older literature is still referenced, such as Chemistry and Mathematics, offer challenges to the methodolgy since older citations (older than two years) are not used to calculate the impact factor for a given journal. (Five-year impact factor analysis, which can be calculated using the Journal Citation Index database, helps smooth out this problem only to some degree.)
  • Different disciplines have different practices regarding tendency to cite larger numbers of references. Higher overall citation rates will bump upward impact factor measurements.
  • Where it's common for large numbers of authors to collaborate on a single paper, such as in Physics, the tendency of authors to cite themselves (and in this case, more authors) will result in increased citation rates.

Pros and Cons of the Impact Factor

Pros:

  • A vetted, established metric for measuring journal impact within a discipline.
  • Designed to eliminate bias based on journal size and frequency.
Cons:
  • Individual articles makes an uneven contribution to overall Impact Factor.
  • Impact Factor does not account for certain things, things like context (postive or negative citaion) and intentionality (self-citation).
  • The metric is proprietary to and bound by the contents of the Thomson Reuters database.
  • Citations, on which the Impact Factor is based, count for less than 1% of an article's overall use.

Criticism

Numerous critiques have been made regarding the use of impact factors. A 2007 study noted that the most fundamental flaw is that impact factors present the mean of data that are not normally distributed, and suggested that it would be more appropriate to present the median of these data. There is also a more general debate on the validity of the impact factor as a measure of journal importance and the effect of policies that editors may adopt to boost their impact factor (perhaps to the detriment of readers and writers). Other criticism focuses on the effect of the impact factor on behavior of scholars, editors and other stakeholders. Others have made more general criticisms, arguing that emphasis on impact factor results from negative influence of neoliberal policies on academia claiming that what is needed is not just replacement of the impact factor with more sophisticated metrics for science publications but also discussion on the social value of research assessment and the growing precariousness of scientific careers in higher education.
Experts stress that there are limitations in using impact factors to evaluate a scholar's work. There are many reasons cited for not relying on impact factor alone to evaluate the output of a particular individual. Among these are the following:

  • A single factor is not sufficient for evaluating an author's work.
  • Journal values are meaningless unless compared within the same discipline. Impact factors vary among disciplines.
  • The impact factor was originally devised to show the impact of a specific journal, not a specific scholar. The quality and impact of the author's work may extend beyond the impact of a particular journal.
According to Jim Testa, a researcher for ThomsonReuters Scientific, the most widespread misuse of the Impact Factor is to evaluate the work of an individual author (instead of a journal). "To say that because a researcher is publishing in a certain journal, he or she is more influential or deserves more credit is not necessarily true. There are many other variables to consider." (interview 6/26/2008 in Thomson Reuters blog entry)

Medicine
Journal Profile

About

Created in 1975, Medicine - Programa de Formación Médica Continuada Acreditado is a complete continuing education programme in healthcare that offers not only the most established and reliable theoretical bases and concepts in medicine, but also guidelines for patient care, systematization of clinical procedures and precise guidelines for the management of diagnostic resources and therapies in clinical practice. Medicine is a bi-monthly journal in paper and on-line format, whose programme spans 4 years and is composed of 92 units that cover all areas of medicine, structured by systems, devices or specialties. Its aim is to offer a continuing education programme with a critical analysis of the medical information with regard to aetiopathogenesis, clinical basis, diagnosis and treatment of high prevalence diseases in the field of internal medicine and its subspecialties. Medicine - Programa de Formación Médica Continuada Acreditado offers updated reviews of the different aspects in its area of interest. It presents articles on clinical, diagnostic and/or therapeutic clinical pathways or guidelines. It publishes clinical cases of special relevance for clinical practice, and introduces clinical and radiological findings and other images of special interest to enhance the diagnostic capability of its readers. It publishes videos on practical aspects, with diagnostic and/or therapeutic procedures. All the articles of this journal are commissioned to professionals of recognized prestige with extensive clinical and teaching experience. The Editorial Committee has drawn up specific guidelines for each section in order to commission each article. Every article received is subjected to anonymous peer review by two professionals with experience in the contents of the work, chosen by the editor of the Journal. Medicine is a peer-reviewed medical journal published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. It was established in 1922. Of general medical journals still in publication since 1959, Medicine had the highest number of citations per paper between 1959 and 2009. The journal covers all aspects of clinical medicine and the editor-in-chief is David B. Hellmann.

ISSN
0304-5412
ISSN

The ISSN of Medicine is 0304-5412 . An ISSN is an 8-digit code used to identify newspapers, journals, magazines and periodicals of all kinds and on all media–print and electronic.

ISSN (Online)
1578-8822
ISSN (Online)

The ISSN (Online) of Medicine is 1578-8822 . An ISSN is an 8-digit code used to identify newspapers, journals, magazines and periodicals of all kinds and on all media–print and electronic.

Publisher
Elsevier Doyma
Publisher

Medicine is published by Elsevier Doyma .

Publication Frequency
0.0
Publication Frequency

Medicine publishes reports 0.0 .

Coverage
2007 - Present
Coverage

The Publication History of Medicine covers 2007 - Present .

Open Access
NO
Open Access

Publication Fees
Publication Fees

Language
0.0
Language

The language of Medicine is 0.0 .

Country/Region
Spain
Country/Region

The publisher of Medicine is Elsevier Doyma , which locates in Spain .

International Collaboration Trend

Medicine

Cited Documents Trend

Medicine

Total Publications
32174
Total Citations
458758

Annual Publication Volume

Medicine

Annual Citation Record

Medicine

Publications Cites Dataset

Medicine

Year Publications Citations
Year Publications Citations
1922 5 0
1923 4 6
1924 6 3
1925 18 14
1926 7 13
1927 7 30
1928 8 40
1929 7 42
1930 6 40
1931 5 57
1932 6 80
1933 6 64
1934 4 61
1935 7 92
1936 6 102
1937 7 103
1938 8 137
1939 6 129
1940 7 134
1941 11 144
1942 12 162
1943 12 135
1944 11 105
1945 10 151
1946 9 183
1947 9 205
1948 10 227
1949 9 283
1950 10 374
1951 10 375
1952 10 394
1953 6 464
1954 8 453
1955 11 606
1956 11 591
1957 8 598
1958 10 747
1959 15 755
1960 7 881
1961 11 771
1962 10 887
1963 16 896
1964 56 957
1965 17 1163
1966 39 1267
1967 29 1340
1968 18 1461
1969 17 1373
1970 20 1475
1971 19 1717
1972 24 1766
1973 40 1889
1974 23 2010
1975 23 2078
1976 26 2269
1977 31 2582
1978 32 2722
1979 28 3091
1980 30 3138
1981 31 3439
1982 32 3676
1983 29 3793
1984 28 3899
1985 34 4348
1986 32 4207
1987 27 4294
1988 29 4494
1989 29 4695
1990 33 4400
1991 33 4456
1992 35 4737
1993 33 4566
1994 34 4727
1995 33 4780
1996 29 5088
1997 34 5294
1998 30 5588
1999 262 5668
2000 390 6699
2001 390 7054
2002 404 7291
2003 357 7543
2004 316 8384
2005 340 8631
2006 361 10061
2007 386 10241
2008 389 11207
2009 370 12839
2010 396 11992
2011 332 12525
2012 335 12615
2013 314 13216
2014 589 13578
2015 2302 14029
2016 3571 18229
2017 3925 26070
2018 4674 26148
2019 4790 35338
2020 5376 51206
2021 202 3881
Publications Cites Dataset

· The Medicine has published 5 reports and received 0 citations in 1922.
· The Medicine has published 4 reports and received 6 citations in 1923.
· The Medicine has published 6 reports and received 3 citations in 1924.
· The Medicine has published 18 reports and received 14 citations in 1925.
· The Medicine has published 7 reports and received 13 citations in 1926.
· The Medicine has published 7 reports and received 30 citations in 1927.
· The Medicine has published 8 reports and received 40 citations in 1928.
· The Medicine has published 7 reports and received 42 citations in 1929.
· The Medicine has published 6 reports and received 40 citations in 1930.
· The Medicine has published 5 reports and received 57 citations in 1931.
· The Medicine has published 6 reports and received 80 citations in 1932.
· The Medicine has published 6 reports and received 64 citations in 1933.
· The Medicine has published 4 reports and received 61 citations in 1934.
· The Medicine has published 7 reports and received 92 citations in 1935.
· The Medicine has published 6 reports and received 102 citations in 1936.
· The Medicine has published 7 reports and received 103 citations in 1937.
· The Medicine has published 8 reports and received 137 citations in 1938.
· The Medicine has published 6 reports and received 129 citations in 1939.
· The Medicine has published 7 reports and received 134 citations in 1940.
· The Medicine has published 11 reports and received 144 citations in 1941.
· The Medicine has published 12 reports and received 162 citations in 1942.
· The Medicine has published 12 reports and received 135 citations in 1943.
· The Medicine has published 11 reports and received 105 citations in 1944.
· The Medicine has published 10 reports and received 151 citations in 1945.
· The Medicine has published 9 reports and received 183 citations in 1946.
· The Medicine has published 9 reports and received 205 citations in 1947.
· The Medicine has published 10 reports and received 227 citations in 1948.
· The Medicine has published 9 reports and received 283 citations in 1949.
· The Medicine has published 10 reports and received 374 citations in 1950.
· The Medicine has published 10 reports and received 375 citations in 1951.
· The Medicine has published 10 reports and received 394 citations in 1952.
· The Medicine has published 6 reports and received 464 citations in 1953.
· The Medicine has published 8 reports and received 453 citations in 1954.
· The Medicine has published 11 reports and received 606 citations in 1955.
· The Medicine has published 11 reports and received 591 citations in 1956.
· The Medicine has published 8 reports and received 598 citations in 1957.
· The Medicine has published 10 reports and received 747 citations in 1958.
· The Medicine has published 15 reports and received 755 citations in 1959.
· The Medicine has published 7 reports and received 881 citations in 1960.
· The Medicine has published 11 reports and received 771 citations in 1961.
· The Medicine has published 10 reports and received 887 citations in 1962.
· The Medicine has published 16 reports and received 896 citations in 1963.
· The Medicine has published 56 reports and received 957 citations in 1964.
· The Medicine has published 17 reports and received 1163 citations in 1965.
· The Medicine has published 39 reports and received 1267 citations in 1966.
· The Medicine has published 29 reports and received 1340 citations in 1967.
· The Medicine has published 18 reports and received 1461 citations in 1968.
· The Medicine has published 17 reports and received 1373 citations in 1969.
· The Medicine has published 20 reports and received 1475 citations in 1970.
· The Medicine has published 19 reports and received 1717 citations in 1971.
· The Medicine has published 24 reports and received 1766 citations in 1972.
· The Medicine has published 40 reports and received 1889 citations in 1973.
· The Medicine has published 23 reports and received 2010 citations in 1974.
· The Medicine has published 23 reports and received 2078 citations in 1975.
· The Medicine has published 26 reports and received 2269 citations in 1976.
· The Medicine has published 31 reports and received 2582 citations in 1977.
· The Medicine has published 32 reports and received 2722 citations in 1978.
· The Medicine has published 28 reports and received 3091 citations in 1979.
· The Medicine has published 30 reports and received 3138 citations in 1980.
· The Medicine has published 31 reports and received 3439 citations in 1981.
· The Medicine has published 32 reports and received 3676 citations in 1982.
· The Medicine has published 29 reports and received 3793 citations in 1983.
· The Medicine has published 28 reports and received 3899 citations in 1984.
· The Medicine has published 34 reports and received 4348 citations in 1985.
· The Medicine has published 32 reports and received 4207 citations in 1986.
· The Medicine has published 27 reports and received 4294 citations in 1987.
· The Medicine has published 29 reports and received 4494 citations in 1988.
· The Medicine has published 29 reports and received 4695 citations in 1989.
· The Medicine has published 33 reports and received 4400 citations in 1990.
· The Medicine has published 33 reports and received 4456 citations in 1991.
· The Medicine has published 35 reports and received 4737 citations in 1992.
· The Medicine has published 33 reports and received 4566 citations in 1993.
· The Medicine has published 34 reports and received 4727 citations in 1994.
· The Medicine has published 33 reports and received 4780 citations in 1995.
· The Medicine has published 29 reports and received 5088 citations in 1996.
· The Medicine has published 34 reports and received 5294 citations in 1997.
· The Medicine has published 30 reports and received 5588 citations in 1998.
· The Medicine has published 262 reports and received 5668 citations in 1999.
· The Medicine has published 390 reports and received 6699 citations in 2000.
· The Medicine has published 390 reports and received 7054 citations in 2001.
· The Medicine has published 404 reports and received 7291 citations in 2002.
· The Medicine has published 357 reports and received 7543 citations in 2003.
· The Medicine has published 316 reports and received 8384 citations in 2004.
· The Medicine has published 340 reports and received 8631 citations in 2005.
· The Medicine has published 361 reports and received 10061 citations in 2006.
· The Medicine has published 386 reports and received 10241 citations in 2007.
· The Medicine has published 389 reports and received 11207 citations in 2008.
· The Medicine has published 370 reports and received 12839 citations in 2009.
· The Medicine has published 396 reports and received 11992 citations in 2010.
· The Medicine has published 332 reports and received 12525 citations in 2011.
· The Medicine has published 335 reports and received 12615 citations in 2012.
· The Medicine has published 314 reports and received 13216 citations in 2013.
· The Medicine has published 589 reports and received 13578 citations in 2014.
· The Medicine has published 2302 reports and received 14029 citations in 2015.
· The Medicine has published 3571 reports and received 18229 citations in 2016.
· The Medicine has published 3925 reports and received 26070 citations in 2017.
· The Medicine has published 4674 reports and received 26148 citations in 2018.
· The Medicine has published 4790 reports and received 35338 citations in 2019.
· The Medicine has published 5376 reports and received 51206 citations in 2020.
· The Medicine has published 202 reports and received 3881 citations in 2021.
· The total publications of Medicine is 32174.
· The total citations of Medicine is 458758.

Share Your Impact Factor Information with Community

Do you know the Latest Impact Factor of Medicine? Share with the community!

Impact Factor

What is the Latest Impact Factor?

Data Source

Where do you get the information?



Impact Factor Data Source
Impact Factor Data Source
1.889 Wikipedia

Thanks for sharing your information with us!

Medicine - DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000016839
Glucocorticoid treatment of suspected organizing pneumonia after H7N9 infection

Huijiao Liu · Jianwei Li · Miaolian Chen · Jiahao Su ·

Medicine
PDF

Medicine - DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000014802
Concomitant occurrence of primary renal non-Hodgkin lymphoma and a colon cancer

Ji Li · Yabin Zou · Bin Wang · Xiangwei Meng · Xun Sun ·

Medicine
PDF

Medicine - DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000017402
Acupotomy for patients with trigger finger

Yan Jia · Zuyun Qiu · Xiaojie Sun · Yifeng Shen · Qiaoyin Zhou · Shiliang Li ·

Medicine
PDF

The Chronic Disease Management (CDM) items program was introduced to the Medicare Benefits Schedule (MBS) to encourage a more structured approach to managing patients with chronic conditions.

Increasing use of general practice management and team care arrangements over time in New South Wales, Australia. [10.1071/PY18113]


Results Out of 127 patients supported with ECMO, 56 (44%) required CRRT (40 early and 16 late CRRT).

Outcomes of Patients with Cardiogenic Shock Requiring Early vs Late Renal Replacement Therapy during Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) Support [10.1016/J.CARDFAIL.2019.07.454]


Improved understanding of how metabolism in the TME modulates cancer development and evasion of tumour-suppressive mechanisms may provide clues for novel anticancer therapeutics directed to metabolic targets.

Metabolic crosstalk in the breast cancer microenvironment. [10.1016/j.ejca.2019.09.002]


Peptides have acquired increasing interest as promising therapeutics, particularly as anti-cancer alternatives during the recent years.

The Potential Use of Anticancer Peptides (ACPs) in the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. [10.2174/1568009619666191111141032]


Conclusion: The pretreatment NLR is a prognostic biomarker for patients with mCRC who receive TAS-102 treatment.

Pretreatment Neutrophil–to–Lymphocyte Ratio Predicts Survival After TAS-102 Treatment of Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer [10.21873/anticanres.13602]


Our findings show that progesterone treatment exerts beneficial effects on neurons, oligodendroglial cells and neuroinflammatory responses via PR.

Cerebroprotection by progesterone following ischemic stroke: Multiple effects and role of the neural progesterone receptors [10.1016/j.jsbmb.2018.07.014]

Scientific Writng Keywords