Journal of Musculoskeletal Neuronal Interactions
Journal Impact IF - Analysis · Trend · Prediction · Ranking


New

Journal Impact IF

2019-2020

1.66

6.3%

Journal Impact IF Trend

Related Journals

Popular Journals

Journal of Musculoskeletal Neuronal Interactions

The 2019-2020 Journal Impact IF of Journal of Musculoskeletal Neuronal Interactions is 1.66, which is just updated in 2020.

Journal of Musculoskeletal Neuronal Interactions Impact Factor
Highest IF
2.453
Highest Journal Impact IF

The highest Journal Impact IF of Journal of Musculoskeletal Neuronal Interactions is 2.453.

Lowest IF
1.489
Lowest Journal Impact IF

The lowest Journal Impact IF of Journal of Musculoskeletal Neuronal Interactions is 1.489.

Total Growth Rate
-17.0%
IF Total Growth Rate

The total growth rate of Journal of Musculoskeletal Neuronal Interactions IF is -17.0%.

Annual Growth Rate
-1.9%
IF Annual Growth Rate

The annual growth rate of Journal of Musculoskeletal Neuronal Interactions IF is -1.9%.

Journal Impact IF Ranking

Subcategory Quartile Rank Percentile
Physiology Q4 133/172

Physiology 22%

Orthopedics and Sports Medicine Q2 113/261

Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 56%

Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism Q3 146/217

Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 32%

Journal Impact IF Ranking

· In the Physiology research field, the Quartile of Journal of Musculoskeletal Neuronal Interactions is Q4. Journal of Musculoskeletal Neuronal Interactions has been ranked #133 over 172 related journals in the Physiology research category. The ranking percentile of Journal of Musculoskeletal Neuronal Interactions is around 22% in the field of Physiology.
· In the Orthopedics and Sports Medicine research field, the Quartile of Journal of Musculoskeletal Neuronal Interactions is Q2. Journal of Musculoskeletal Neuronal Interactions has been ranked #113 over 261 related journals in the Orthopedics and Sports Medicine research category. The ranking percentile of Journal of Musculoskeletal Neuronal Interactions is around 56% in the field of Orthopedics and Sports Medicine.
· In the Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism research field, the Quartile of Journal of Musculoskeletal Neuronal Interactions is Q3. Journal of Musculoskeletal Neuronal Interactions has been ranked #146 over 217 related journals in the Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism research category. The ranking percentile of Journal of Musculoskeletal Neuronal Interactions is around 32% in the field of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism.

Journal of Musculoskeletal Neuronal Interactions Impact Factor 2020-2021 Prediction

Journal of Musculoskeletal Neuronal Interactions Impact Factor Predition System

Journal of Musculoskeletal Neuronal Interactions Impact Factor Prediction System is now online. You can start share your valuable insights with the community.

Predict Check All Preditions
Total Publications
1159
Total Citations
30131

Annual Publication Volume

Annual Citation Record

International Collaboration Trend

Cited Documents Trend

Journal Impact IF History

Year Journal Impact IF
Year Journal Impact IF
2019-2020 1.66
2018-2019 1.562
2017-2018 1.651
2016-2017 1.489
2015-2016 1.638
2014-2015 1.744
2013-2014 2.4
2012-2013 2.453
2011-2012 2.0
Journal Impact IF History

· The 2019-2020 Journal Impact IF of Journal of Musculoskeletal Neuronal Interactions is 1.66
· The 2018-2019 Journal Impact IF of Journal of Musculoskeletal Neuronal Interactions is 1.562
· The 2017-2018 Journal Impact IF of Journal of Musculoskeletal Neuronal Interactions is 1.651
· The 2016-2017 Journal Impact IF of Journal of Musculoskeletal Neuronal Interactions is 1.489
· The 2015-2016 Journal Impact IF of Journal of Musculoskeletal Neuronal Interactions is 1.638
· The 2014-2015 Journal Impact IF of Journal of Musculoskeletal Neuronal Interactions is 1.744
· The 2013-2014 Journal Impact IF of Journal of Musculoskeletal Neuronal Interactions is 2.4
· The 2012-2013 Journal Impact IF of Journal of Musculoskeletal Neuronal Interactions is 2.453
· The 2011-2012 Journal Impact IF of Journal of Musculoskeletal Neuronal Interactions is 2.0

Publications Cites Dataset

Year Publications Citations
Year Publications Citations
1999 0 2
2000 27 8
2001 41 49
2002 77 77
2003 71 155
2004 77 193
2005 57 329
2006 65 746
2007 69 897
2008 78 1246
2009 34 1449
2010 40 1777
2011 40 2093
2012 32 2322
2013 57 2385
2014 55 2476
2015 46 2739
2016 45 2254
2017 49 2219
2018 61 1903
2019 67 2004
2020 71 2607
2021 0 201
Publications Cites Dataset

· The Journal of Musculoskeletal Neuronal Interactions has published 0 reports and received 2 citations in 1999.
· The Journal of Musculoskeletal Neuronal Interactions has published 27 reports and received 8 citations in 2000.
· The Journal of Musculoskeletal Neuronal Interactions has published 41 reports and received 49 citations in 2001.
· The Journal of Musculoskeletal Neuronal Interactions has published 77 reports and received 77 citations in 2002.
· The Journal of Musculoskeletal Neuronal Interactions has published 71 reports and received 155 citations in 2003.
· The Journal of Musculoskeletal Neuronal Interactions has published 77 reports and received 193 citations in 2004.
· The Journal of Musculoskeletal Neuronal Interactions has published 57 reports and received 329 citations in 2005.
· The Journal of Musculoskeletal Neuronal Interactions has published 65 reports and received 746 citations in 2006.
· The Journal of Musculoskeletal Neuronal Interactions has published 69 reports and received 897 citations in 2007.
· The Journal of Musculoskeletal Neuronal Interactions has published 78 reports and received 1246 citations in 2008.
· The Journal of Musculoskeletal Neuronal Interactions has published 34 reports and received 1449 citations in 2009.
· The Journal of Musculoskeletal Neuronal Interactions has published 40 reports and received 1777 citations in 2010.
· The Journal of Musculoskeletal Neuronal Interactions has published 40 reports and received 2093 citations in 2011.
· The Journal of Musculoskeletal Neuronal Interactions has published 32 reports and received 2322 citations in 2012.
· The Journal of Musculoskeletal Neuronal Interactions has published 57 reports and received 2385 citations in 2013.
· The Journal of Musculoskeletal Neuronal Interactions has published 55 reports and received 2476 citations in 2014.
· The Journal of Musculoskeletal Neuronal Interactions has published 46 reports and received 2739 citations in 2015.
· The Journal of Musculoskeletal Neuronal Interactions has published 45 reports and received 2254 citations in 2016.
· The Journal of Musculoskeletal Neuronal Interactions has published 49 reports and received 2219 citations in 2017.
· The Journal of Musculoskeletal Neuronal Interactions has published 61 reports and received 1903 citations in 2018.
· The Journal of Musculoskeletal Neuronal Interactions has published 67 reports and received 2004 citations in 2019.
· The Journal of Musculoskeletal Neuronal Interactions has published 71 reports and received 2607 citations in 2020.
· The Journal of Musculoskeletal Neuronal Interactions has published 0 reports and received 201 citations in 2021.
· The total publications of Journal of Musculoskeletal Neuronal Interactions is 1159.
· The total citations of Journal of Musculoskeletal Neuronal Interactions is 30131.

What is Impact Factor?

The impact factor (IF) or journal impact factor (JIF) of an academic journal is a scientometric index calculated by Clarivate that reflects the yearly average number of citations of articles published in the last two years in a given journal. It is frequently used as a proxy for the relative importance of a journal within its field; journals with higher impact factor values are often deemed to be more important, or carry more intrinsic prestige in their respective fields, than those with lower values.

Journal of Musculoskeletal Neuronal Interactions | Academic Accelerator - About the Impact Factor

Impact factor is commonly used to evaluate the relative importance of a journal within its field and to measure the frequency with which the “average article” in a journal has been cited in a particular time period. Journal which publishes more review articles will get highest IFs. Journals with higher IFs believed to be more important than those with lower ones. According to Eugene Garfield “impact simply reflects the ability of the journals and editors to attract the best paper available.” Journal which publishes more review articles will get maximum IFs. The Impact Factor of an academic journal is a scientometric Metric that reflects the yearly average number of citations that recent articles published in a given journal received. It is frequently used as a Metric for the relative importance of a journal within its field; journals with higher Impact Factor are often deemed to be more important than those with lower ones. The Journal of Musculoskeletal Neuronal Interactions Impact Factor IF measures the average number of citations received in a particular year (2020) by papers published in the Journal of Musculoskeletal Neuronal Interactions during the two preceding years (2018-2019). Note that 2020 Impact Factor are reported in 2021; they cannot be calculated until all of the 2020 publications have been processed by the indexing agency. New journals, which are indexed from their first published issue, will receive an impact factor after two years of indexing; in this case, the citations to the year prior to Volume 1, and the number of articles published in the year prior to Volume 1, are known zero values. Journals that are indexed starting with a volume other than the first volume will not get an impact factor until they have been indexed for three years. Occasionally, Journal Citation Reports assigns an impact factor to new journals with less than two years of indexing, based on partial citation data. The calculation always uses two complete and known years of item counts, but for new titles one of the known counts is zero. Annuals and other irregular publications sometimes publish no items in a particular year, affecting the count. The impact factor relates to a specific time period; it is possible to calculate it for any desired period. In addition to the 2-year Impact Factor, the 3-year Impact Factor, 4-year Impact Factor, 5-year Impact Factor, Real-Time Impact Factor can provide further insights and factors into the impact of Journal of Musculoskeletal Neuronal Interactions.

History

The impact factor was devised by Eugene Garfield, the founder of the Institute for Scientific Information (ISI). Impact factors are calculated yearly starting from 1975 for journals listed in the Journal Citation Reports (JCR). ISI was acquired by Thomson Scientific & Healthcare in 1992, and became known as Thomson ISI. In 2018, Thomson ISI was sold to Onex Corporation and Baring Private Equity Asia. They founded a new corporation, Clarivate, which is now the publisher of the JCR.

Use

The impact factor is used to compare different journals within a certain field. The Web of Science indexes more than 11,500 science and social science journals. Journal impact factors are often used to evaluate the merit of individual articles and individual researchers. This use of impact factors was summarised by Hoeffel:

Impact Factor is not a perfect tool to measure the quality of articles but there is nothing better and it has the advantage of already being in existence and is, therefore, a good technique for scientific evaluation. Experience has shown that in each specialty the best journals are those in which it is most difficult to have an article accepted, and these are the journals that have a high impact factor. Most of these journals existed long before the impact factor was devised. The use of impact factor as a measure of quality is widespread because it fits well with the opinion we have in each field of the best journals in our specialty....In conclusion, prestigious journals publish papers of high level. Therefore, their impact factor is high, and not the contrary.

Eugene Garfield

In brief, Impact factors may be used by:
  • Authors to decide where to submit an article for publication.
  • Libraries to make collection development decisions
  • Academic departments to assess academic productivity
  • Academic departments to make decisions on promotion and tenure.
As impact factors are a journal-level metric, rather than an article- or individual-level metric, this use is controversial. Garfield agrees with Hoeffel,but warns about the "misuse in evaluating individuals" because there is "a wide variation [of citations] from article to article within a single journal". Other things to consider about Impact Factors:
  • Many journals do not have an impact factor.
  • The impact factor cannot assess the quality of individual articles. Even if citations were evenly distributed among articles, the impact factor would only measure the interests of other researchers in an article, not its importance and usefulness.
  • Only research articles, technical notes and reviews are “citable” items. Editorials, letters, news items and meeting abstracts are “non-citable items”.
  • Only a small percentage of articles are highly cited and they are found in a small subset of journals. This small proportion accounts for a large percentage of citations.
  • Controversial papers, such as those based on fraudulent data, may be highly cited, distorting the impact factor of a journal.
  • Citation bias may exist. For example, English language resources may be favoured. Authors may cite their own work.
Moreover, informed and careful use of these impact data is essential, and should be based on a thorough understanding of the methodology used to generate impact factors. There are controversial aspects of using impact factors:
  • It is not clear whether the number of times a paper is cited measures its actual quality.
  • Some databases that calculate impact factors fail to incorporate publications including textbooks, handbooks and reference books.
  • Certain disciplines have low numbers of journals and usage. Therefore, one should only compare journals or researchers within the same discipline.
  • Review articles normally are cited more often and therefore can skew results.
  • Self-citing may also skew results.
  • Some resources used to calculate impact factors have inadequate international coverage.
  • Editorial policies can artificially inflate an impact factor.
Impact factors have often been used in advancement and tenure decision-making. Many recognize that this is a coarse tool for such important decisions, and that a multitude of factors should be taken into account in these deliberations. When considering the use of the impact factor (IF), keep these aspects in mind:
  • IF analysis is limited to citations from the journals indexed by the Web of Science/Web of Knowledge. Currently, the Web of Science indexes only 8621 journals across the full breadth of the sciences, and just 3121 in the social sciences.
  • A high IF/citation rate says nothing about the quality -- or even, validity -- of the references being cited. Notorious or even retracted articles often attract a lot of attention, hence a high number of citations. The notority related to the first publication on "cold fusion" is one such example.
  • Journals that publish more "review articles" are often found near the top of the rankings. While not known for publishing new, creative findings, these individual articles tend to be heavily cited.
  • The IF measures the average number of citations to articles in the journal -- given this, a small number of highly-cited articles will skew the figure.
  • It takes several years for new journals to be added to the list of titles indexed by the Web of Science/Web of Knowledge, so these newer titles will be under-represented.
  • It's alleged that journal editors have learned to "game" the system, encouraging authors to cite their works previously published in the same journal.
Comparing Journals Across Disciplines? Not a good idea! Using Impact Factors within a given discipline should only be done with great care, as described above. Using impact factor data to compare journals across disciplines is even more problematic. Here are some of the reasons:
  • Disciplines where older literature is still referenced, such as Chemistry and Mathematics, offer challenges to the methodolgy since older citations (older than two years) are not used to calculate the impact factor for a given journal. (Five-year impact factor analysis, which can be calculated using the Journal Citation Index database, helps smooth out this problem only to some degree.)
  • Different disciplines have different practices regarding tendency to cite larger numbers of references. Higher overall citation rates will bump upward impact factor measurements.
  • Where it's common for large numbers of authors to collaborate on a single paper, such as in Physics, the tendency of authors to cite themselves (and in this case, more authors) will result in increased citation rates.

Pros and Cons of the Impact Factor

Pros:

  • A vetted, established metric for measuring journal impact within a discipline.
  • Designed to eliminate bias based on journal size and frequency.
Cons:
  • Individual articles makes an uneven contribution to overall Impact Factor.
  • Impact Factor does not account for certain things, things like context (postive or negative citaion) and intentionality (self-citation).
  • The metric is proprietary to and bound by the contents of the Thomson Reuters database.
  • Citations, on which the Impact Factor is based, count for less than 1% of an article's overall use.

Criticism

Numerous critiques have been made regarding the use of impact factors. A 2007 study noted that the most fundamental flaw is that impact factors present the mean of data that are not normally distributed, and suggested that it would be more appropriate to present the median of these data. There is also a more general debate on the validity of the impact factor as a measure of journal importance and the effect of policies that editors may adopt to boost their impact factor (perhaps to the detriment of readers and writers). Other criticism focuses on the effect of the impact factor on behavior of scholars, editors and other stakeholders. Others have made more general criticisms, arguing that emphasis on impact factor results from negative influence of neoliberal policies on academia claiming that what is needed is not just replacement of the impact factor with more sophisticated metrics for science publications but also discussion on the social value of research assessment and the growing precariousness of scientific careers in higher education.
Experts stress that there are limitations in using impact factors to evaluate a scholar's work. There are many reasons cited for not relying on impact factor alone to evaluate the output of a particular individual. Among these are the following:

  • A single factor is not sufficient for evaluating an author's work.
  • Journal values are meaningless unless compared within the same discipline. Impact factors vary among disciplines.
  • The impact factor was originally devised to show the impact of a specific journal, not a specific scholar. The quality and impact of the author's work may extend beyond the impact of a particular journal.
According to Jim Testa, a researcher for ThomsonReuters Scientific, the most widespread misuse of the Impact Factor is to evaluate the work of an individual author (instead of a journal). "To say that because a researcher is publishing in a certain journal, he or she is more influential or deserves more credit is not necessarily true. There are many other variables to consider." (interview 6/26/2008 in Thomson Reuters blog entry)

Journal of Musculoskeletal Neuronal Interactions
Journal Profile

About

The Journal of Musculoskeletal and Neuronal Interactions (JMNI) is a peer reviewed Journal providing a forum for papers pertaining to research areas of emphasis listed below, but not limited to:Interactions Between the Musculoskeletal (The Muscle, Ligament, Tendon, Cartilage, Bone unit) and nervous systems at the organ, tissue, cellular and molecular levelsInnervation, function and adaptation of the musculoskeletal system in normal and pathological statesCharacterization of the mechanisms of actions of hormones, cytokines, growth factors, neurotransmitters, pharmaceuticals, nutrition, physical activity and environmental factors on the musculoskeletal system at the organ, tissue, cellular and molecular levelRole of angiogenesis in local physiological events in the musculoskeletal systemPrimary and metastatic cancers of the musculoskeletal systemPreclinical and Clinical studies of the pathophysiology, prevention and treatment of Osteoporosis, Osteoarthritis and Metabolic Musculoskeletal DiseasesPre-clinical models and therapies of experimental musculoskeletal system strength loss from osteoporosis, osteoarthritis and metabolic musculoskeletal diseasesPre-clinical models of musculoskeletal system interactions and experimental therapies, including pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventionsApproaches to mitigate musculoskeletal and neuronal decline with aging and disease statesClinical and interventional studiesExercise studies and effects on the musculoskeletal systemRole of soft tissue (e.g. muscle, tendons, ligaments, synovium etc.)Specific technologies for evaluation of the musculoskeletal and nervous systems (e.g. muscle, tendon, ligament, cartilage, bone and nervous tissues) properties. None

Highly Cited Keywords

ISSN
1108-7161
ISSN

The ISSN of Journal of Musculoskeletal Neuronal Interactions is 1108-7161 . An ISSN is an 8-digit code used to identify newspapers, journals, magazines and periodicals of all kinds and on all media–print and electronic.

ISSN (Online)
-
ISSN (Online)

The ISSN (Online) of Journal of Musculoskeletal Neuronal Interactions is - . An ISSN is an 8-digit code used to identify newspapers, journals, magazines and periodicals of all kinds and on all media–print and electronic.

Publisher
International Society of Musculoskeletal and Neuronal Interactions
Publisher

Journal of Musculoskeletal Neuronal Interactions is published by International Society of Musculoskeletal and Neuronal Interactions .

Publication Frequency
Three times a year
Publication Frequency

Journal of Musculoskeletal Neuronal Interactions publishes reports Three times a year .

Coverage
2002 - Present
Coverage

The Publication History of Journal of Musculoskeletal Neuronal Interactions covers 2002 - Present .

Open Access
NO
Open Access

Journal of Musculoskeletal Neuronal Interactions is Subscription-based (non-OA) Journal. Publishers own the rights to the articles in their journals. Anyone who wants to read the articles should pay by individual or institution to access the articles. Anyone who wants to use the articles in any way must obtain permission from the publishers.

Publication Fee
Publication Fee

There is no publication fee for submiting manuscript to Journal of Musculoskeletal Neuronal Interactions. Journal of Musculoskeletal Neuronal Interactions is Subscription-based (non-OA) Journal. Publishers own the rights to the articles in their journals. Anyone who wants to read the articles should pay by individual or institution to access the articles.

Language
English
Language

The language of Journal of Musculoskeletal Neuronal Interactions is English .

Country/Region
Greece
Country/Region

The publisher of Journal of Musculoskeletal Neuronal Interactions is International Society of Musculoskeletal and Neuronal Interactions , which locates in Greece .

Journal Research Scope

Research Scope

Selected Articles

Full Title Authors
Full Title Authors
Performance control in one consecutive motor task sequence – Approaching central neuronal motor behaviour preceding isometric contraction onsets and relaxation offsets at lower distinct torques Tobias Vogt · Kouki Kato · N. Flüthmann · O. Bloch · H. Nakata · Kazuyuki Kanosue · Kazuyuki Kanosue
Calf muscle density in independently associated with physical function in overweight and obese older adults David Scott · Catherine Shore-Lorenti · Lachlan McMillan · Jakub Mesinovic · Ross A. Clark · Alan Hayes · Kerrie M. Sanders · Gustavo Duque · Peter R. Ebeling · Peter R. Ebeling
Leptin-deficiency eradicates the positive effect of traumatic brain injury on bone healing: histological analyses in a combined trauma mouse model Ricarda Seemann · F Graef · A. Garbe · J Keller · F Huang · Georg N. Duda · Katharina Schmidt-Bleek · Klaus-Dieter Schaser · Serafeim Tsitsilonis · Serafeim Tsitsilonis
Physiological and pathological osteocytic osteolysis Tsourdi E · Jähn K · Rauner M · Busse B · Lynda F. Bonewald · Lynda F. Bonewald
Moderate tibia axial loading promotes discordant response of bone composition parameters and mechanical properties in a hindlimb unloading rat model Pengfei Yang · Ling-Wei Huang · Xiao-Tong Nie · Yue Yang · Zhe Wang · Li Ren · Huiyun Xu · Peng Shang · Peng Shang
Prolonging disuse in aged mice amplifies cortical but not trabecular bones response to mechanical loading R. de Souza · Behzad Javaheri · R.S. Collinson · Chantal Chenu · Sandra J. Shefelbine · Peter D. Lee · Andrew A. Pitsillides · Andrew A. Pitsillides
Intertester and intratester reliability of a movement control test battery for patients with knee osteoarthritis and controls P.T. Kaukinen · J.P. Arokoski · E.O. Huber · Hannu Luomajoki · Hannu Luomajoki
Alterations to maternal cortical and trabecular bone in multiparous middle-aged mice Alex Gu · Alex Gu · R. Sellamuthu · Evan R. Himes · P.J. Childress · L.M. Pelus · C.M. Orschell · M. A. Kacena · M. A. Kacena
Baseline mineralizing surface determines the magnitude of the bisphosphonate effect on cortical bone mineralization in postmenopausal osteoporotic patients Barbara Misof Misof · Stéphane Blouin · S. Lueger · E.P. Paschalis · Robert R. Recker · R. Phipps · Klaus Klaushofer · Paul Roschger · Paul Roschger
Feasibility and acceptability of using jumping mechanography to detect early components of sarcopenia in community-dwelling older women Avan Aihie Sayer · Avan Aihie Sayer
Relationship between muscle performance and DXA-derived bone parameters in community-dwelling older adults H Singh · Kim D · M G Bemben · Debra A. Bemben · Debra A. Bemben
Relationship of body anthropometric measures with skeletal muscle mass and strength in a reference cohort of young Finnish women S.L. Qazi · T Rikkonen · H Kröger · Risto Honkanen · M. Isanejad · O Airaksinen · J Sirola · J Sirola
Muscular response to the first three months of deflazacort treatment in boys with Duchenne muscular dystrophy Line Jensen · Stine Juhl Petersson · Niels Ove Illum · H C Laugaard-Jacobsen · Thomas Helweg Thelle · Louise Helskov Jørgensen · Henrik Daa Schrøder · Henrik Daa Schrøder
Mechanical basis of bone strength: influence of bone material, bone structure and muscle action Nicolas H. Hart · Sophia Nimphius · Timo Rantalainen · Alex Ireland · Aris Siafarikas · Aris Siafarikas · Robert U. Newton · Robert U. Newton
Prevalence of sarcopenia in a population of nursing home residents according to their frailty status: results of the SENIOR cohort Fanny Buckinx · Jean-Yves Reginster · Théo Brunois · Céline Lenaerts · Charlotte Beaudart · Jean-Louis Croisier · Jean Petermans · Olivier Bruyère · Olivier Bruyère
Experience with jumping mechanography in children with cerebral palsy Ibrahim Duran · Kyriakos Martakis · Christina Stark · E. Alberg · C. Bossier · Oliver Semler · Eckhard Schoenau · Eckhard Schoenau
T2-relaxation time increases in lumbar intervertebral disks after 21d head-down tilt bed-rest Timmo Koy · Bergita Ganse · Jörn Rittweger · Regina Pohle-Fröhlich · Petra Frings-Meuthen · Bernd Johannes · Dieter Felsenberg · P. Eysel · Martin Bansmann · Daniel L. Belavy · Daniel L. Belavy
In vivo dynamic compression has less detrimental effect than static compression on newly formed bone of a rat caudal vertebra Benoit A · T. Mustafy · Irène Londono · Guy Grimard · Carl-Eric Aubin · Isabelle Villemure · Isabelle Villemure
Acute corticospinal and spinal modulation after whole body vibration Anne Krause · Albert Gollhofer · Kathrin Freyler · Jablonka L · Ramona Ritzmann · Ramona Ritzmann
Bone health measured using quantitative ultrasonography in adult males with muscular dystrophy Christopher I. Morse · Jonathon E. Smith · A Denny · J Tweedale · Nd Searle · Keith Winwood · Gladys Onambele-Pearson · Gladys Onambele-Pearson
Reference data for jumping mechanography in Canadian children, adolescents and young adults Gabel L · Macdonald Hm · Nettlefold L · Race D · Heather A. McKay · Heather A. McKay
Effect of sex on torque, recovery, EMG, and MMG responses to fatigue Ethan C. Hill · Terry J. Housh · Cory M. Smith · Kristen C. Cochrane · Nathaniel D.M. Jenkins · Joel T. Cramer · Glen O. Johnson · Glen O. Johnson
The molecular basis of bone mechanotransduction Yavropoulou Mp · Yovos Jg · Yovos Jg
A rare complication after minimally invasive posterior cervical laminoforaminotomy Wu Z · Wu H · Wang H · Wu C · Xu W · Zhang L · Fan H · Cai J · Ma J · Ma J
Improvement in muscle performance after one-year cessation of low-magnitude high-frequency vibration in community elderly Wing-Hoi Cheung · Li Cy · Zhu Ty · Kwok Leung · Kwok Leung
Centrifugation as a countermeasure during bed rest and dry immersion: What has been learned? Gilles Clément · William H. Paloski · Jörn Rittweger · Dag Linnarsson · Marie-Pierre Bareille · Edwin Mulder · Floris L. Wuyts · Jochen Zange · Jochen Zange
The effect of female sex hormone supplementation on tendon in pre and postmenopausal women: A systematic review Charlotte Ganderton · A. Semciw · Jill Cook · Tania Pizzari · Tania Pizzari
TRPV1, ASICs and P2X2/3 expressed in bone cells simultaneously regulate bone metabolic markers in ovariectomized mice Kanaya K · Iba K · Dohke T · Okazaki S · Yamashita T · Yamashita T
Gorham-Stout disease of the pelvis: Seven years follow up with complete radiological evaluation Tolis K · Triantafyllopoulos Ik · Tournis S · Papaioannou Na · Papaioannou Na
What is new in neuro-musculoskeletal interactions? From brains to babies Alex Ireland · Alex Ireland
Effects of short term water immersion on peripheral reflex excitability in hemiplegic and healthy individuals: A preliminary study Neil J. Cronin · A.M. Valtonen · Benjamin Waller · Tapani Pöyhönen · Janne Avela · Janne Avela
Whole body vibration training improves vibration perception threshold in healthy young adults: A randomized clinical trial pilot study M.A. Hernandez-Mocholi · F.J. Dominguez-Muñoz · H. Corzo · S.C.S. Silva · J.C. Adsuar · N. Gusi · N. Gusi
Osteocytic connexin 43 is not required for the increase in bone mass induced by intermittent PTH administration in male mice Rafael Pacheco-Costa · Hannah M. Davis · Emily G. Atkinson · Eduardo Katchburian · Lilian I. Plotkin · Rejane Daniele Reginato · Rejane Daniele Reginato
Safety and efficacy of denosumab in children with osteogenesis imperfect--a first prospective trial Heike Hoyer-Kuhn · J. Franklin · G. Allo · M. Kron · C. Netzer · P. Eysel · B. Hero · Eckhard Schoenau · Oliver Semler · Oliver Semler
The negative effect of sitting time on bone is mediated by lean mass in pubertal children Teresa Binkley · Bonny Specker · Bonny Specker
Sodium selenate treatment mitigates reduction of bone volume following traumatic brain injury in rats Rhys D. Brady · Brian L. Grills · Tania Romano · John D. Wark · Terence J. O’Brien · Sandy R. Shultz · Stuart J. McDonald · Stuart J. McDonald
Functional in vitro tension measurements of fascial tissue - a novel modified superfusion approach Robert Schleip · Werner Klingler · Scott C. Wearing · Naylor I · Zuegel M · Kerstin Hoppe · Kerstin Hoppe
A comparison of peripheral imaging technologies for bone and muscle quantification: a technical review of image acquisition Andy Kin On Wong · Andy Kin On Wong
Effects of whole body vibration exercises on bone mineral density of women with postmenopausal osteoporosis without medications: novel findings and literature review C.F. Dionello · D. Sá-Caputo · H.V.F.S. Pereira · C.R. Sousa-Gonçalves · A.I. Maiworm · D.S. Morel · E. Moreira-Marconi · L.L. Paineiras-Domingos · D. Bemben · M. Bernardo-Filho · M. Bernardo-Filho
Pediatric data for dual X-ray absorptiometric measures of normal lumbar bone mineral density in children under 5 years of age using the lunar prodigy densitometer Manousaki D · Frank Rauch · Chabot G · Dubois J · Fiscaletti M · Alos N · Alos N
Longitudinal bone, muscle and adipose tissue changes in physically active subjects - sex differences during adolescence and maturity Adam G. Culvenor · Heide Boeth · Gerd Diederichs · W. Wirth · Georg N. Duda · F. Eckstein · F. Eckstein
Early vibration assisted physiotherapy in toddlers with cerebral palsy - a randomized controlled pilot trial Christina Stark · Peter Herkenrath · H. Hollmann · S. Waltz · I. Becker · L. Hoebing · Oliver Semler · Heike Hoyer-Kuhn · Ibrahim Duran · B. Hero · Mijna Hadders-Algra · Eckhard Schoenau · Eckhard Schoenau
Preventive effects of kilohertz frequency electrical stimulation on sepsis-induced muscle atrophy Masayuki Tanaka · Kohei Tanaka · Tategaki J · Hidemi Fujino · Hidemi Fujino
Achilles tendon material properties are greater in the jump leg of jumping athletes Amy J. Bayliss · Alyssa M. Weatherholt · Crandall Tt · Farmer Dl · McConnell Jc · Kay M. Crossley · Stuart J. Warden · Stuart J. Warden
Atypical femoral fracture in a beta-thalassemia major patient with previous bisphosphonate use: case report and a review of the literature Lampropoulou-Adamidou K · Tournis S · Triantafyllopoulos Ik · Triantafyllopoulos Ik
Effects of collagen hydrolysate on the tibialis anterior muscle and femur in senescence-accelerated mouse prone 6 Okiura T · Oishi Y · Takemura A · Akihiko Ishihara · Akihiko Ishihara
Severe muscle trauma triggers heightened and prolonged local musculoskeletal inflammation and impairs adjacent tibia fracture healing Hurtgen Bj · Ward Cl · Garg K · Pollot Be · Goldman Sm · Todd O. McKinley · Joseph C. Wenke · Benjamin T. Corona · Benjamin T. Corona
Vibratory sense deficits in patients with symptomatic femoroacetabular impingement Gary Jordan Farkas · Najia Shakoor · Gregory L. Cvetanovich · Louis Fogg · Orías Aa · Shane J. Nho · Shane J. Nho
Osteogenesis imperfecta due to a possible new COL1A2 mutation; the importance of phenotyping and diagnostic challenges Papamerkouriou Ym · Doulgeraki A · Gyftodimou Y · Athanasopoulou H · Tsiridis E · Anastasopoulos J · Anastasopoulos J
Patella bone density is lower in knee osteoarthritis patients experiencing moderate-to-severe pain at rest W.D. Burnett · Saija A. Kontulainen · Christine E. McLennan · D. Hazel · Carl T. Talmo · David J. Hunter · David R. Wilson · James D. Johnston · James D. Johnston
Needle tract seeding after core biopsy in a knee tumor; should biopsy tract be excised? Papanastassiou Id · Gerochristou Ma · Zafeiris Cp · Patoulias I · Ntallas D · Isaakidis D · Papageorgiou G · Papageorgiou G
Effects of whole-body vibration applied to lower extremity muscles during decline bench press exercise García-Gutiérrez Mt · Hazell Tj · Marín Pj · Marín Pj
Forearm muscle quality as a better indicator of physical performance than handgrip strength in older male ground golf players aged 70 to 89 Abe T · Robert S. Thiebaud · Loenneke Jp · Loenneke Jp
Effects of oncostatin M on cell proliferation and osteogenic differentiation in C3H10T1/2 Zou F · Xu Jc · Wu Gh · Zhou Ll · Wa Qd · Peng Jq · Zou Xn · Zou Xn
Functional status of the articularis genus muscle in individuals with knee osteoarthritis A Saito · K Okada · I Saito · K Kinoshita · A Seto · Y Takahashi · K Shibata · H Sato · M Wakasa · M Wakasa
Alterations in gene expression precede sarcopenia and osteopenia in botulinum toxin immobilized mice Vegger Jb · Annemarie Brüel · Dahlgaard Af · Jesper Skovhus Thomsen · Jesper Skovhus Thomsen
Genetic and tissue level muscle-bone interactions during unloading and reambulation Stefan Judex · Weidong Zhang · Leah Rae Donahue · Engin Ozcivici · Engin Ozcivici
Lower insulin sensitivity is related to lower relative muscle cross-sectional area, lower muscle density and lower handgrip force in young and middle aged non-diabetic men Tineke Gysel · Cajsa Tonoli · Sofie Pardaens · Dirk Cambier · Jean-Marc Kaufman · Hans-Georg Zmierczak · Stefan Goemaere · Bruno Lapauw · Patrick Calders · Patrick Calders
Four weeks of high- versus low-load resistance training to failure on the rate of torque development, electromechanical delay, and contractile twitch properties Nathaniel D.M. Jenkins · Nathaniel D.M. Jenkins · Terry J. Housh · Samuel L. Buckner · Haley C. Bergstrom · Cory M. Smith · Kristen C. Cochrane · Ethan C. Hill · Amelia A. Miramonti · Glen O. Johnson · Joel T. Cramer · Joel T. Cramer
Effects of fatiguing constant versus alternating intensityintermittent isometric muscle actions on maximal torqueand neuromuscular responses Cory M. Smith · Terry J. Housh · Ethan C. Hill · Kristen C. Cochrane · Nathaniel D.M. Jenkins · Glen O. Johnson · Glen O. Johnson
Differences of bone mineral mass, volumetric bone mineral density, geometrical and structural parameters and derived strength of the tibia between premenopausal and postmenopausal women of different age groups: a peripheral Quantitative Computed Tomography (pQCT) study Stathopoulos Kd · Zoubos Ab · Papaioannou Na · Mastrokalos D · Galanos A · Papagelopoulos Pj · Skarantavos G · Skarantavos G
Repeatability of knee impulsive loading measurements with skin-mounted accelerometers and lower limb surface electromyographic recordings during gait in knee osteoarthritic and asymptomatic individuals Tarja Lyytinen · Timo Bragge · Marko Hakkarainen · Tuomas Liikavainio · Pasi A. Karjalainen · Jari Arokoski · Jari Arokoski

Calf muscle density in independently associated with physical function in overweight and obese older adults
Journal of Musculoskeletal Neuronal Interactions | 2018
David Scott · Catherine Shore-Lorenti · Lachlan McMillan · Jakub Mesinovic · Ross A. Clark · Alan Hayes · Kerrie M. Sanders · Gustavo Duque · Peter R. Ebeling · Peter R. Ebeling
Leptin-deficiency eradicates the positive effect of traumatic brain injury on bone healing: histological analyses in a combined trauma mouse model
Journal of Musculoskeletal Neuronal Interactions | 2018
Ricarda Seemann · F Graef · A. Garbe · J Keller · F Huang · Georg N. Duda · Katharina Schmidt-Bleek · Klaus-Dieter Schaser · Serafeim Tsitsilonis · Serafeim Tsitsilonis
Physiological and pathological osteocytic osteolysis
Journal of Musculoskeletal Neuronal Interactions | 2018
Tsourdi E · Jähn K · Rauner M · Busse B · Lynda F. Bonewald · Lynda F. Bonewald